原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。使用 Google 登录即可撰写评价。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Reader

作者:cyninzf版本 0.1.0i★ 1i在云端运行
注册名称io.nablaz/reader

安装方法

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Read NablaZ's open record: agent actions under permission, cited onchain. Evidence, not a verdict.

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在云端运行
  • 传输方式: Streamable HTTP
  • 分类: 加密货币与区块链

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

通过 4/4 项检查 · 你的提问会经过开发者的服务器(read.nablaz.io)

第一步:你用哪个 AI?

选择你用的应用,步骤会显示在下方。

可连接 Claude · 约 2 分钟

不需要密钥,不用安装程序 · 在 claude.ai 或桌面应用设置一次,即可在聊天中使用 · 免费账户可添加 1 个

  1. 打开 Claude 的 Connectors 页面

    CustomizeConnectors

    CustomizeConnectors1+ Add2https://…3Add4
  2. 点击“+ Add” → “Add custom connector”,填写这 2 项

    把这里的内容复制到 Claude 中同名的输入框,然后点击 Continue

    Name · 名称Reader
    Remote MCP server URL · 地址https://read.nablaz.io/mcp

    Authentication 保持 Claude 检测到的设置,然后点击 Add

  3. 在聊天中开启

    +ConnectorsReader

  4. 试一试

    用 Reader 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看

    ✓ 如果 Claude 说正在使用 Reader,或回答中出现 Reader 的工具名称,就表示连接成功

菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Anthropic 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同

仅企业版 ChatGPT 可连接

适用于网页版 ChatGPT Business、Enterprise 或 Edu,需由工作区管理员或所有者添加 · 使用 Free、Plus 或 Pro:你的 ChatGPT 方案暂时无法自行连接 MCP

  1. 在网页版 ChatGPT 打开添加 MCP 的页面

    Plugins+Add custom MCP server

    ChatGPTPlugins1+2https://…3Create4
  2. 填写名称和地址

    输入名称,在 Connection 下粘贴地址,勾选风险提示,然后点击 Create as a plugin

    Name · 名称Reader
    Connection · 地址https://read.nablaz.io/mcp
  3. 在聊天中选择 Reader

    开启新聊天,输入前先从插件列表中选择 Reader

  4. 试一试

    用 Reader 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看

    ✓ 如果 ChatGPT 说正在使用 Reader,或回答中出现 Reader 的工具名称,就表示连接成功

菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 OpenAI 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同

可连接 Claude Code · 约 2 分钟

不需要密钥,不用安装程序

  1. 打开终端

    Mac:按 Command+空格,输入 Terminal · Windows:打开 PowerShell

  2. 粘贴这条命令并按 Enter

    claude mcp add --transport http reader https://read.nablaz.io/mcp
  3. 在 Claude Code 中输入 /mcp

    应能看到 Reader 在列表中并显示已连接

  4. 试一试

    用 Reader 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看

    ✓ 如果 Claude Code 说正在使用 Reader,或回答中出现 Reader 的工具名称,就表示连接成功

菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Anthropic 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同

可连接 Cursor · 约 2 分钟

不需要密钥,不用安装程序

  1. 点击这个按钮打开 Cursor

    在 Cursor 中打开

    Cursor 会请你确认安装,点击 Install

  2. 在 Cursor 中以 Agent 模式打开 AI 聊天

  3. 试一试

    用 Reader 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看

    ✓ 如果 Cursor 说正在使用 Reader,或回答中出现 Reader 的工具名称,就表示连接成功

菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Cursor 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同

可连接 VS Code · 约 2 分钟

不需要密钥,不用安装程序

  1. 点击这个按钮打开 VS Code

    在 VS Code 中打开

    VS Code 会请你确认安装,点击 Install

  2. 在 VS Code 中以 Agent 模式打开 AI 聊天

  3. 试一试

    用 Reader 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看

    ✓ 如果 VS Code 说正在使用 Reader,或回答中出现 Reader 的工具名称,就表示连接成功

菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 VS Code 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同

其他支持 MCP 的应用(如 Windsurf、Zed、Gemini CLI)添加方式各不相同,请在应用列表中查看

查看所有支持 MCP 的应用 →

通过网页连接的应用使用的地址

地址https://read.nablaz.io/mcp

JSON 设置在下方“开发者专用”中

卡住了?问问正在用 Reader 的人💬 讨论 →
开发者专用:终端命令和 JSON 设置

通过网页连接

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http reader https://read.nablaz.io/mcp

Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reader": {
      "url": "https://read.nablaz.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

VS Code (mcp.json)

{
  "servers": {
    "reader": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://read.nablaz.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

一览

每周下载量i
不在 npm/PyPI 上
已验证域名
✓ nablaz.io
许可证i
未注明许可证
连接方式
在云端运行
传输方式
streamable-http
最新版本i
0.1.0
发布到注册中心i
2026年11月6日
代码最后更新i
2026年11月10日
作者
cyninzf
注册状态
活跃

哪些应用可以使用它

依据这个服务器的连接方式和各应用自己的文档,检查于 2026年11月10日。

通过互联网连接,适用于

ClaudeChatGPTGooseLM StudioMsty StudioCherry StudioCursorVS Code + GitHub CopilotVisual StudioWindsurf (Devin Desktop)ZedKiroClineContinueJetBrains AI AssistantClaude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCodenodecodeWarpLibreChatOpen WebUIRaycast

全部应用及其优缺点 →

它能做什么

工具名称和描述与服务器在 2026年11月7日 报告的完全一致。这些内容由作者撰写,不是我们写的;我们以纯文本形式显示。

  • read_subject

    Returns every fact the reader has indexed about an address on one chain, as GET /read/:chainId/:address JSON: each fact names its source, carries a permission label of shape (a) to (e), and cites the block, transaction and log index with a command that returns the same log from a

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月11日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过域名 nablaz.io 验证(注册中心会核实域名所有权)

  • ✓ 通过

    仍在维护

    代码最后更新于前天

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • ✓ 通过

    端点有响应

    在 122 毫秒内响应(HTTP 200)

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    无需登录

  • ✓ 通过

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    已读取 1 个工具描述,未发现针对 AI 的隐藏指令

讨论

提问、分享技巧或报告无法使用。按“有帮助”数量排序。

还没有帖子,欢迎第一个提问或分享。

此处内容由用户撰写,不代表 PopNx 团队。

使用 Google 登录后发帖

用户评价

还没有评价

用 Google 登录后写评价

与“加密货币与区块链”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 1643 个服务器的 83%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 1643 个服务器的 93% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 1643 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Reader 安全吗?

它在 4 项适用的基础检查中通过了 4 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于前天,最新版本(0.1.0)于5天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,因此也能用于支持远程 MCP 的应用,例如 ChatGPT Business 及以上方案。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Solana MCP by Vybe, Oracle3 prediction-market arbitrage checks, Polymarket Paper Trader

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Solana MCP by Vybe

Solana MCP developer toolkit: wallets, trades, markets, PnL, transfers, onchain, swaps & API tools.

作者:vybenetwork广泛使用★ 2599 整个仓库的星标6个月前更新

在云端运行

Oracle3 prediction-market arbitrage checks

Kalshi and Polymarket data, venue fees, no-arbitrage checks and paper execution for AI agents.

作者:YichengYang-Ethan正在增长↓ 35/周★ 56842天前更新

在你的电脑上运行

Polymarket Paper Trader

Polymarket paper trading for AI agents: $10k paper money, real order books, official fees.

作者:agent-next正在增长↓ 226/周★ 50426天前更新

在你的电脑上运行

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

nablaz-sdk

An open-source reader for agent payment permissions. It rebuilds, from public chain data, what an address was allowed to spend, what it spent, and under which terms, and keeps every fact next to the command that reproduces it. It reads the NablaZ record and grantee vaults, Coinbase spend permissions, MetaMask delegations and Agent Credit Lines.

It holds no keys, needs no account or API key, and runs anywhere you have an RPC endpoint.

What it reads

Arbitrum One and Base are both enabled. The NablaZ contracts are live on Arbitrum One only, so on Base the reader indexes the third-party sources alone.

Third-party sources, on both chains:

  • Coinbase SpendPermissionManager: SpendPermissionApproved, SpendPermissionUsed, SpendPermissionRevoked.
  • MetaMask DelegationManager (delegation framework v1.3.0): RedeemedDelegation, with every caveat decoded. For each redemption the reader reads the transaction receipt and keeps the ERC-20 Transfers sent by the delegator. A redemption alone is not a payment; only such a Transfer is.
  • Agent Credit Lines (Borrowed, Repaid, Defaulted) at a configured lender. No lender is known on either chain today, so no lender is registered. The decoder ships with tests, and a read with nothing indexed says "nothing indexed" with its block range.
  • ERC-8004: NewFeedback from the "Reputation Registry" (who rated which agentId, and where; never the feedback's value, decimals, tags, endpoint or URIs), and the agentWallet and owner histories from the Identity Registry's MetadataSet and ERC-721 Transfer. Addresses from src/generated/erc8004.json (vendor commit pinned there).

NablaZ sources, where deployed:

  • RecordEntry from NablaRecord, every field.
  • AccountCreated from NablaAccountFactoryPermanent and AccountRegistryV6, to discover accounts.
  • ERC-1967 Upgraded on every discovered account proxy.
  • USDC AuthorizationUsed and Transfer where the authorizer or sender is a grantee vault. Vaults are discovered from logs alone: the PAY_AUTHORIZED entry names the vault, and the funding Transfer in the same transaction confirms it.

What it writes

TableOne row per
record_entriesRecordEntry, raw
obligation_pairsOBLIGATION_OPENED / REPAY / OBLIGATION_CLOSED entry, grouped by obligationRef
vault_paymentssettlement: a vault's AuthorizationUsed paired with its Transfer, and the grant and envelope it drew against
implementation_historyUpgraded log or IMPLEMENTATION_CHANGED entry, per account
counterpartiesdistinct (subject, counterparty) pair, with first evidence and counts
accounts, grants, vaults, vault_fundingsdiscovery and pairing state the tables above are built from
factory_accountsaccount created on the permanent factory, with the owner from the factory's own event
external_permissionsspend permission or redeemed delegation, with its shape, label and decoded terms
external_paymentsSpendPermissionUsed, or an ERC-20 Transfer from the delegator in a redemption's transaction
external_redemptionsRedeemedDelegation, whether or not it moved value
credit_line_eventsBorrowed / Repaid / Defaulted at a configured lender
feedbacksERC-8004 NewFeedback: agentId, rater, feedback index; no value, tags or URIs
agent_walletsERC-8004 MetadataSet for the agentWallet key: agentId and wallet (null when cleared)
agent_ownersERC-8004 identity Transfer (ERC-721): agentId and new owner

Rows hold facts and counts. The reader states facts and passes no judgement on any subject.

In vault_payments, the party that submitted the settlement transaction (tx.from) is recorded as submitter. It is never treated as the counterparty; the counterparty is the Transfer recipient.

A settlement writes no NablaRecord entry. A payment's record is two parts, paired by the reader: the PAY_AUTHORIZED entry the account wrote when it reserved funds into the grantee vault (the reservation, in record_entries), and USDC's own AuthorizationUsed and Transfer events (the settlement, one vault_payments row). A citation of a payment cites both: the PAY_AUTHORIZED log (block, transaction hash, log index) and the USDC settlement transaction and its block.

Citation rule

The logs are the ground truth; this reader is a convenience over them. Every row carries the chain id, block number, transaction hash and log index of its evidence, plus a cast logs command and the equivalent raw eth_getLogs request that return that log from any RPC. A row you cannot reproduce from its command is a bug.

One field is a state read, not a log: the envelope expiry in vault_payments. It is labelled "state read — needs archive RPC". The reader calls envelopeOf(account, granteeKey, token) on the account's mandate at block N−1 and at the settlement block N, and stores both calls as cast call --block commands. If the two reads agree, the value is stored. If they differ, the envelope changed within block N, and the field is stored as "not determinable" with both reads cited. On 2026-10-23, the same historical eth_call at 50,000 blocks below head answered 6 of 10 times through https://arb1.arbitrum.io/rpc, and the other 4 returned "historical state … is not available", so a public endpoint cannot be relied on for this field. Everything else rebuilds from logs on any RPC.

Read

GET /read/:chainId/:address returns every indexed fact about an address. No key is needed: the endpoint is a read over public logs.

{ "subject": "0x…", "chainId": 8453, "asOfBlock": "53160200",

"facts": [ { "source": "metamask:delegation_payment", "label": "(b) exact execution, once", "shape": "b", "terms": { "payer": "0x…", "payee": "0x…", "token": "0x…", "amount": "…" }, "cite": { "chainId": 8453, "block": "…", "tx": "0x…", "logIndex": 0 }, "reproduce": "cast receipt 0x… --rpc-url \"$BASE_RPC_URL\" --json | jq …" } ], "selfDealing": null, "exposure": null, "cShare": { "chainId": 8453, "asOfBlock": "53160200", "byToken": { "0x…": { "count": { "c": 0, "total": 1 }, "value": { "c": "0", "total": "…" } } } }, "notes": [ "no Agent Credit Lines lender registered on this chain", "SpendPermissionManager permissions and spends for this address: nothing indexed (blocks 53160000..53160200)" ] }

  • facts: one per record entry, vault payment, spend permission, delegation, payment, redemption and credit-line event. Each names its source and carries a permission label, the block, transaction and log index, and the one-line command that returns the same log from any RPC.
  • selfDealing (NablaZ accounts only): distinct counterparties paid, share of value paid to accounts under the same controller, share paid to counterparties with no record, and the sentence "A payee controlled by the same person under another key cannot be detected from chain data."
  • exposure (NablaZ accounts only): per grant and token, the least remaining allowance across windows plus the vault balance, with the limit that outstanding authorizations are not observable onchain.
  • cShare: per token, the count and value of this read's payment facts labelled (c), over all of them; never summed across tokens.
  • notes: every source that returned nothing ("nothing indexed (blocks X..Y)", or "indexed up to X; source starts at Y" while the indexer is below the source's start), and every fact that is not determinable, stated as text.

Every permission label has one of five shapes:

ShapeLabelWhere it comes from
(a)allowance, per period / total / per call / per execution / streamedCoinbase spend permissions; MetaMask amount enforcers; NablaZ CAM V4 windows ("within mandate by construction" for a canonical NablaZ account)
(b)exact execution, once / N times / count unboundedMetaMask exact-call enforcers; the count from LimitedCallsEnforcer or a single-use enforcer
(c)not determinablean enforcer in no vendor list, terms that do not decode, a non-canonical NablaZ account
(d)no limit on amount or calla delegation whose caveats only restrict the call or the redeemer
(e)third-party attestation, writer namedAgent Credit Lines; record entries another writer placed; ERC-8004 feedback, the rater named

The MetaMask enforcer table is generated from the vendor's Deployments.md at a pinned commit (scripts/gen-enforcers.ts, src/generated/enforcers.json). A test fails when the vendor's main branch lists an enforcer the table lacks.

One-liners are the ground truth. The reader is a convenience over the logs. Each reproduce field is a cast command you can run yourself with an RPC URL in $ARB_ONE_RPC_URL or $BASE_RPC_URL.

Feedback grounding

When the subject has been the agentWallet or the owner of an ERC-8004 agentId, every NewFeedback about that agentId becomes an erc8004:feedback_grounding fact (R-D2B-2). A feedback is grounded when an ERC-20 Transfer from the rater to the identity's payment address settled before it (by block, then by log index within a block), whatever the token or route (R-S191-11). The payment address is resolved at the transfer's block, never later: getAgentWallet there, else ownerOf there, and the fact says which binding applied (R-S191-16). A transfer made before the identity existed does not ground ("identity did not exist at the payment block"). The wallet at the feedback block is reported beside the grounding ("wallet at feedback: " or "wallet at feedback: cleared") and is never the test (R-S191-12).

Plain transfers are not indexed. At read time the reader calls eth_getLogs with topic0 = Transfer and topic1 = the rater, any token address, from the Identity Registry's start block (or the instance's start) to the feedback block, and states that range in the fact. Candidates are the addresses in the identity's agentWallet history (MetadataSet) and owner history (ERC-721 Transfer), each confirmed at the transfer's block. A settlement from the rater's own grantee vault is a payment from the rater (R-S191-17). Native-token transfers are not read ("native-token transfers not read", R-S191-18). A transfer that is one of the reader's payment facts keeps its permission label; any other is labelled (c) with reason "direct transfer, no permission object". The fact also says whether the rater is the subject, and whether the two share a controller when both are NablaZ accounts. It carries no value, decimals, tags or URIs, and the feedback file is not fetched ("feedbackURI not read").

test/fork/afg.fork.test.ts runs this grounding on the 816 grounded feedback entries in Agentic Finance Graph's Base fixture (CC BY 4.0, see NOTICE) and writes the comparison to docs/reader/afg-agreement-2026-10-20.csv. docs/reader/retroactive-binding-2026-10.md describes the remaining disagreements.

Hosted read

https://read.nablaz.io runs the reader and the MCP server below as one instance, on both home chains (chain IDs 42161 and 8453), with every source indexed from its deployment block. It is keyless and reads only. It has two doors:

  • GET https://read.nablaz.io/read/:chainId/:address: the JSON a local GET /read returns.
  • POST https://read.nablaz.io/mcp: the MCP server's Streamable HTTP transport, with its one tool, read_subject. For an MCP client that takes a URL: { "type": "http", "url": "https://read.nablaz.io/mcp" }.

Both doors are rate-limited per client IP; a request over the limit gets 429 with a plain-text body. Beside them, GET /live (the process is up) answers with a status code and a short text, and GET /ready (the index has caught up) answers HTTP 200 with an empty body when ready, and 503 with {"ready":false} when not; nothing else is s

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读