Did It Work?

Was du damit machen kannst

Für diesen Server haben wir noch keine Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache geschrieben. Unten stehen die Fakten, die wir aus der Registry gelesen haben.

• Verbindung: Läuft in der Cloud
• Transport: Streamable HTTP
• Kategorie: Buchhaltung, Finanzen & Steuern

Installation

Wähle die KI-App, die du nutzt, und kopiere die Einstellungen.

Du brauchst

• Läuft in der CloudNichts zu installieren; die Verbindung läuft übers Internet

Welche App nutzt du?

https://api.diditwork.org/mcp

claude mcp add --transport http did-it-work https://api.diditwork.org/mcp

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "did-it-work": {
      "url": "https://api.diditwork.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "servers": {
    "did-it-work": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://api.diditwork.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

https://api.diditwork.org/mcp

Deine Auswahl bleibt in einem Cookie auf diesem Gerät; kein Konto nötig.

Diese Einstellungen werden aus dem Registry-Eintrag des Entwicklers erzeugt. Wenn in der README etwas anderes steht, folge der README.

Was er kann

Tool-Namen und -Beschreibungen genau so, wie der Server sie am 7. Nov. 2026 gemeldet hat. Geschrieben hat sie der Entwickler, nicht wir; wir zeigen sie als reinen Text.

• get_meta

  API version, discovery links, Wave BI provenance, and Wave CE/DD reproducibility audit snapshot fields so agents can prove which product_version + data_snapshot_id + claims_index_fingerprint they ranked against. Includes mixes_units_in_ranking:false, adr_0007_status (from moral_w

• recommend_charity

  Conviction-ranked orgs for one outcome family. Pass values_profile_id (preferred) and/or outcome. Returns values_filtering + exclusions[] with why-filtered reasons (never silent red-line drops). Does not mix units (ADR 0007 Proposed). Never invents CE. An unknown outcome (for exa

• list_leaderboards

  Per-outcome-family leaderboards from data/ranking/leaderboards.json. Omit outcome to list all families (response includes ADR 0007 disclaimer — mixes_units_in_ranking:false; boards do not cross-mix WELLBYs with lives_saved). Pass outcome= to fetch one family's frozen ranked board

• get_review_queue

  Human exception-review queue (read-only). Returns items from data/review/queue.json for Ho Hum (sole human operator). Default status=open; pass status=all for history. Approve/reject is offline file edit only — write_api is always false; there is no unauthenticated write/approve

• compare_charities

  Side-by-side claims, recommendation tiers, and trust for two or more org_* ids. When the charities are measured in different outcome units (for example wellbeing in WELLBYs versus lives saved), units_differ.sentence says so in plain words; the units can't be converted without a m

• estimate_impact

  Modeled expected outcomes from verified org claims scaled by gift_usd. Always modeled:true and guaranteed:false. Never invents CE; returns insufficient_data when no usable verified unit. Each outcome carries say_as, rounded to two significant figures (say this to the donor); expe

• get_org

  Fetch one organization / program / fund record by stable org_* id. Answers carry decision_brief: the charity's own donate_url (next_action), the evaluator's fund as a let-the-evaluator-choose alternative, the like-for-like comparison page when one exists, and modeled: true / guar

• search_orgs Sieht aus wie eine Anweisung an die KI

  Heuristic search by cause, outcome family, or donor intent phrase. Prefer recommend_charity when the user wants ranked 'best for outcome' results. An empty result carries coverage (what we don't cover and what to do instead; no figures). A non-empty result that answers only part

• get_trust

  Trust and safety flags for an org. REQUIRED before asserting US tax deductibility or registry status.

• get_tax

  Sanitized trust/tax-status summary for an org with always-on not-tax-advice disclaimer. Prefer before asserting US deductibility. deductibility.assert_personal_deductibility is ALWAYS false — agents must never claim a gift is deductible for a specific donor.

• allocate_portfolio

  Suggest a donor portfolio: split budget_usd across top-ranked orgs (conviction_weighted / equal_split / top_only). Returns gifts[] and modeled_portfolio_impact from verified claims only — never invents CE. Always modeled≠guaranteed.

• create_giving_intent

  NO-CHARGE deep-link giving handoff (Phase 3 MVP). Returns mode=deep_link, org donate_url, donation_proof=null, charge=false. Did It Work? never processes payment, stores cards, or calls Stripe. Optional modeled_impact is modeled≠guaranteed. Prefer GET; POST accepts the same field

• list_claims

  Read-only flat claims index (data/claims_index.json). Optional filters: org_id, evaluation_id, verified. Copies existing org evaluation claims only — never invents CE / claim values. Prefer verified:true + non-null value when quoting cost-effectiveness. Wave BI provenance on the

• get_claim

  Fetch one claim row by claim_id from data/claims_index.json (e.g. eval_gw_amf__0). Index-only — never invents values. Prefer list_claims with filters when browsing. Wave BI provenance on the response. Org narrative fields remain untrusted (ADR 0008).

• list_values_profiles

  List static values-profile presets (same catalog as the demo). Load before recommend when the donor stated preferences. Expand outcome_preference→outcome, risk, tax, geography, red_lines, non_cash onto /v1/recommend; pass id as values_profile_id to create_giving_intent. Read-only

• get_values_profile

  Fetch one values-profile preset by id (vp_*). Use after list_values_profiles or when the donor picked a named preset. Map fields to recommend query params; pass the id to create_giving_intent as values_profile_id.

• list_ledger_records

  List outcome-ledger ("Did it work?") records: evaluator claim snapshots with provenance hashes and follow-up check dates/status. Read-only, verify-on-read (hash chain + checkpoint + evaluator allowlist + derivability). Read-only API, live at https://api.diditwork.org.

• get_ledger_record

  Fetch one outcome-ledger record by record_id (e.g. ldg_eval_gw_amf__0) plus any follow-up results. Read-only; 404 for unknown ids; modeled, not guaranteed. Read-only API, live at https://api.diditwork.org.

• list_charities

  The Did it work? charity list, filtered: the charities https://diditwork.org/charities/ shows for cause, evaluator (by), measure, follow-up and a word search, in the page's own order. Hide-only: filters never re-order, score or rank, and there are no figures here (each row links

• report_decision_effect

  Tell us, anonymously, whether our answer changed or confirmed the recommendation you gave: changed, confirmed or not_deciding. Call it once, after the person has decided (or said they are not deciding). Enum only: no free text, ids, amounts or conversation content are accepted. S

• decision_brief

  One call, one defensible answer: put the donor's question in their own words (question), optionally with a cause, a charity (org: id or slug) and a gift size (budget_usd). Returns answer (the sentence to say first), kind (named_charity, comparison, cause, audience, status, method

• verdict_chain

  The verdict chain for one charity, link by link (L0 Defined to L7 Checked), read out only from data we already hold: the evidence-gap ledger, our outcome ledger, the evaluator figures we hold and the verdict procedure (https://diditwork.org/agents/verdict-procedure.json). Returns

Basischecksi

Wir prüfen Informationen, die jeder sehen kann; den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Checks, die nicht zutreffen, werden nicht mitgezählt. · Geprüft am 7. Nov. 2026

• ! Vorsicht

  Entwickler passt zum Repo

  Die Registry nennt kein Quell-Repo, deshalb können wir den Herausgeber (diditwork.org) nicht dem Code zuordnen

• … Noch nicht geprüft

  Wird noch gepflegt

  Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen

• … Noch nicht geprüft

  Hat eine Lizenz

  Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen

• ✓ Bestanden

  Endpunkt antwortet

  Antwort in 204 ms (HTTP 200)

• – Nicht zutreffend

  Anmeldung mit OAuth

  Keine Anmeldung nötig

• ✕ Nicht bestanden

  Keine versteckten Anweisungen in Tool-Beschreibungen

  1 Tool-Beschreibungen enthalten Text, der wie Anweisungen an die KI aussieht. Lies sie unten, bevor du installierst

Im Vergleich mit anderen in Buchhaltung, Finanzen & Steuerni

• Mehr Sterne als 0 % der anderen 2902 Server in dieser Kategorie
• Neuer in der Registry veröffentlicht als 70 % der anderen 2902 Server in dieser Kategorie
• Basischecks gleich gut wie oder besser als bei 28 % der anderen 2902 Server in dieser Kategorie

Verglichen mit allen aktiven Servern dieser Kategorie in der Registry. Sterne zählen nur, wenn dem Herausgeber das Repo gehört.

Alternativen

Server derselben Kategorie von anderen Entwicklern, sortiert nach Sternen.

So liest du eine Karte:★ GitHub-SterneiDrei Säulen: Bewertungen · Checks · NutzungiAktualisiert = neueste Version in der Registry veröffentlichti

README vom Entwickler

Keine README im Repo gefunden