Ortexo

Installation

Wähle die KI-App, die du nutzt, und kopiere die Einstellungen.

2/3 Prüfungen bestanden · Was du fragst, läuft über den Server des Anbieters (mcp.ortexo.com) · ✓ Befehle geprüft am 13. Nov. 2026

claude mcp add --transport http --scope user ortexo https://mcp.ortexo.com/mcp

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ortexo": {
      "url": "https://mcp.ortexo.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "servers": {
    "ortexo": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.ortexo.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Welche Apps ihn nutzen können

Basierend darauf, wie sich dieser Server verbindet, und auf der eigenen Doku jeder App, geprüft am 10. Nov. 2026.

Verbinden sich über das Internet in

ClaudeChatGPTGooseLM StudioMsty StudioCherry StudioCursorVS Code + GitHub CopilotVisual StudioWindsurf (Devin Desktop)ZedKiroClineContinueJetBrains AI AssistantClaude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCodenodecodeWarpLibreChatOpen WebUIRaycast

Alle Apps, mit Vor- und Nachteilen →

Was er kann

Tool-Namen und -Beschreibungen genau so, wie der Server sie am 8. Nov. 2026 gemeldet hat. Geschrieben hat sie der Entwickler, nicht wir; wir zeigen sie als reinen Text.

• search_semantic

  Meaning-based (vector) search over the Ortexo database of Romanian law — codes, laws, the Fiscal Code (tax and VAT/TVA), accounting norms (OMFP) and, when requested, case law. Returns the current, in-force text with a citation for each result, one result per article. Best when th

• search_lexical

  EXACT keyword / phrase search over the Ortexo Romanian legal database (codes, laws, Fiscal Code, OMFP accounting norms, and case law). Matches precise wording, ranked by how many of your words a passage holds and searched in full inside the principal codes — use it ONLY when you

• lookup_article

  Fetch the exact, in-force text of one specific article by number from a named Romanian law or code (e.g. article 291 of 'codul fiscal', article 5 of 'codul penal'). Use this when you need a precise article verbatim, with its citation. Amendment history is returned separately unde

• lookup_articles

  Fetch SEVERAL specific articles in ONE call — use this instead of many lookup_article calls when an answer cites multiple provisions (common in law: 15–20). Pass a list of {law, article, paragraph?, point?}. Returns each article's exact in-force text with its citation.

• lookup_decision

  Fetch the FULL text and a formal citation of one Romanian court decision by its number (e.g. "170/2019"). Turns a jurisprudence search hit — which carries only a bare number — into a citable decision: 'Instituție, Tip nr. N/AAAA din DATA'. Pass `court` and/or `year` to disambigua

• lookup_article_historical

  OPT-IN: fetch an article from an OLD / REPEALED Romanian law (e.g. the former Cod fiscal, Legea 571/2003, for a dispute over a pre-2016 transaction). Unlike lookup_article, this is NOT restricted to in-force acts, so it can return abrogated text (tagged [ABROGATED]). Use ONLY whe

• lookup_article_at_date

  POINT-IN-TIME: fetch an article AS IT STOOD on a specific date, not the current version. Resolves the consolidated snapshot of `law` in force on `date` (format YYYY-MM-DD) and returns that article's text, tagged with the actual version date. USE THIS whenever the question is abou

• get_related

  CONNECTIONS: the depth-1 neighbourhood of an article — what it REFERS TO and what legislation INVOKES it (cross-references), what AMENDED it, and which court DECISIONS interpret it. Each decision is tagged with the version of the article the court cited (a still-good-law signal)

• get_related_batch

  Batch form of get_related — the connections of SEVERAL articles in one call (max 8). Use when mapping a whole legal institution rather than a single provision. Pass a list of {law, article}.

• check_status

  STILL-GOOD-LAW CHECK — is this article still in force, when was it last amended, what amended it, and how many of the decisions interpreting it cite a version older than that amendment. Short and cheap ON PURPOSE: run it before citing an article, every time. A decision reasoning

• search_amending_acts

  WHICH ACT DID THE AMENDING. An act whose only purpose is to amend another one is hidden from search on purpose (its text is already folded into the consolidated version), so 'care ordin a modificat anexa 6?' or 'ce lege a completat Legea 95/2006 în 2024?' found nothing. Give `law

• compare_article

  What CHANGED in an article between two dates — returns only the delta, not both full versions. Use for 'what changed in the VAT rules between 2023 and 2025' or to check whether a provision a case relied on has since been rewritten. Dates are YYYY-MM-DD; the reply reports the ACTU

• find_act

  DOES THIS ACT EXIST, and what are its official details — number, issuing body, publication date, Monitorul Oficial number, the date it entered into force, how many articles it has, whether it is still in force. Searches the CATALOG of acts, not their text: use it for 'was Legea 1

• describe_corpus

  What Ortexo actually contains: how many acts by category, which jurisprudence sources and the date range each covers, how far back point-in-time snapshots go for the major codes, and when the corpus was last updated. Worth calling once per session before planning a research path:

• verify_citations

  CHECK A DRAFT BEFORE IT GOES OUT. Paste any text that cites Romanian law — your own draft, a client's contract, an opinion someone else wrote — and every article reference in it, down to the alineat, letter or point, is checked against the corpus. Each reference comes back as one

• get_act_structure

  WHAT IS IN THIS ACT — its table of contents: books, titles, chapters and sections, each with the range of articles it holds. Use this when you need an article but do NOT know its number: guessing an article number is how a citation gets fabricated. Pass `part` with a division's n

• scan_act_for_terms

  EVERY article of ONE act containing a literal term — exhaustive, not ranked. Use this for 'which articles of this law mention X', 'find everything in this act about Y', or to establish that a term does NOT appear in an act. search_semantic and search_lexical cannot answer this: t

• search_eu_law

  Search EU legislation — regulations, directives, decisions — held in Ortexo (32,400 acts, each in its applicable version) in their ROMANIAN versions. Write the query in Romanian: the search is semantic plus full-text, and the full-text half matches Romanian words only, so an Engl

• lookup_eu_article

  Fetch one article of one EU act by CELEX and article number, with its full text including paragraphs and points. Given a base CELEX it follows the act's family to the CONSOLIDATED version in force and says so — the base text is history and usually not the law that applies today.

• search_eu_jurisprudence

  Search European case law: CJEU and General Court rulings, Advocate General opinions, AND European Court of Human Rights judgments and decisions (74,894 of them, 5,041 against Romania). One row per case; with court='toate' the two courts are interleaved. LANGUAGES: write `query` i

• lookup_eu_decision

  Fetch the FULL text of one CJEU or ECHR decision. Use it after search_eu_jurisprudence finds a ruling you want to quote — the search returns only the matching passage, this returns the judgment. Accepts whatever identifier you are holding: a CJEU case number (C-131/12, T-604/18 —

• get_eu_related

  CONNECTIONS of one EU act, in both directions: what amended, repealed or replaced it, and what IT amended or rests on, plus the CJEU judgments that interpret it. Direction matters — 'what changed this regulation' and 'what did this regulation change' are opposite questions and th

• eu_cited_in_romania

  WHICH ROMANIAN ACTS AND COURT DECISIONS CITE THIS EU ACT — the bridge between the two corpora. Use it to see how a regulation or directive has actually landed in Romanian law and practice: which statutes reference it, and which Romanian courts (including the ÎCCJ and the Constitu

• lookup_eu_article_at_date

  POINT-IN-TIME for EU law: what an article of a regulation or directive SAID on a given date, not what it says today. The EU twin of lookup_article_at_date. Consolidated versions are collapsed by text, so an article consolidated thirty times with two actual wordings reports two ve

• lookup_eu_articles

  Fetch SEVERAL EU articles in ONE call — the EU twin of lookup_articles. An answer on EU law rests on as many provisions as one on Romanian law, so use this instead of repeated lookup_eu_article calls. Pass a list of {celex, article}; each comes back with its own text and citation

• get_eu_act_structure

  WHAT IS IN THIS EU ACT — its table of contents: the titles, chapters and sections, each with the range of articles it holds. The EU twin of get_act_structure. Use it when you need an article of a long act but do not know its number — guessing an article number is how a citation g

• eu_check_status

  STILL-GOOD-LAW CHECK for EU law — the EU twin of check_status. Answers at BOTH levels, because either alone misleads: whether the ACT is in force, expired or repealed (and by what), and whether the ARTICLE's own text has been rewritten and when. An act can be repealed while the a

• compare_eu_article

  WHAT CHANGED in an EU article between two dates — the delta, not both full texts. The EU twin of compare_article. Use it to check whether a provision a judgment relied on has since been rewritten, or what a reform actually altered. Says plainly when NOTHING changed, which is the

• lookup_eu_article_historical

  OPT-IN: read an article of a REPEALED or superseded EU act — the EU twin of lookup_article_historical. Every other EU tool resolves forward to the version in force, which is right for ordinary questions and wrong for a dispute about a transaction under the old regime. The other t

• eu_transposition

  Given an EU DIRECTIVE's CELEX, return the Romanian act or acts that transpose it, with the Monitorul Oficial number and date, from the EU's own implementing-measures register. A directive does not apply directly in Romania — it applies through the transposing act, so citing the d

• get_act_case_law

  The Romanian court decisions linked to ONE act, as a paged list: the High Court's binding decisions (RIL, HP) first, then the newest, each with its court, kind, number, date, recorded outcome and the articles it cites. Use it for 'what case law is there on this act', which includ

• get_act_case_law_map

  WHERE the case law of an act is: each article with the number of decisions linked to it, and how many of them are RIL/HP, by division, the numbers of the app's table of contents. Use it to see which articles carry much case law, which carry binding practice and which none, before

• connection_guide

  How to connect Ortexo to an AI assistant and how to sign back in, step by step for Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT and other assistants: the server address, the page where each one is connected and the exact commands. Needs no sign-in, reads no data and costs nothing. The server add

Basischecksi

Wir prüfen Informationen, die jeder sehen kann; den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Checks, die nicht zutreffen, werden nicht mitgezählt. · Geprüft am 13. Nov. 2026

• ! Vorsicht

  Entwickler passt zum Repo

  Die Registry nennt kein Quell-Repo, deshalb können wir den Herausgeber (ortexo.com) nicht dem Code zuordnen

• … Noch nicht geprüft

  Wird noch gepflegt

  Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen

• … Noch nicht geprüft

  Hat eine Lizenz

  Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen

• ✓ Bestanden

  Endpunkt antwortet

  Antwort in 795 ms (HTTP 200)

• – Nicht zutreffend

  Anmeldung mit OAuth

  Keine Anmeldung nötig

• ✓ Bestanden

  Keine versteckten Anweisungen in Tool-Beschreibungen

  Wir haben 33 Tool-Beschreibungen gelesen und keine versteckten Anweisungen an die KI gefunden

Nutzerbewertungen

Noch keine Bewertungen

Mit Google anmelden, um zu bewerten

Im Vergleich mit anderen in Recht & Behördendateni

• Mehr Sterne als 0 % der anderen 1828 Server in dieser Kategorie
• Neuer in der Registry veröffentlicht als 44 % der anderen 1828 Server in dieser Kategorie
• Basischecks gleich gut wie oder besser als bei 45 % der anderen 1828 Server in dieser Kategorie

Verglichen mit allen aktiven Servern dieser Kategorie in der Registry. Sterne zählen nur, wenn dem Herausgeber das Repo gehört.

Andere in derselben Kategorie

Server derselben Kategorie von anderen Entwicklern, sortiert nach Sternen.

So liest du eine Karte:↓ Downloads pro Wochei★ GitHub-SterneiDrei Säulen: Bewertungen · Checks · NutzungiAktualisiert = neueste Version in der Registry veröffentlichti

Korean Law MCP

Korean law: statutes, precedents, ordinances, treaties and citation verification (법제처 API).

von chrisryugj·Weit verbreitet·★ 2867·Aktualisiert vor 10 Tagen

Läuft in der Cloud

Verbinden

Global law

The law of nearly every country on earth, any date: read it, see what changed it, check citations.

von lexifina·Wachsend·★ 1949·Aktualisiert vor 3 Tagen

Läuft in der Cloud✓ lexifina.com

Verbinden

Tw Legal Rag

Taiwan law MCP server: 22M court judgments, statutes, agency rulings, with citation checks

von aa0101181514·Wachsend·★ 346·Aktualisiert gestern

Läuft in der Cloud

Verbinden

README vom Entwickler

Keine README im Repo gefunden