World Monitor
Real-time global intelligence on conflict, markets, energy, trade, shipping and cyber. 102 tools.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
AI integrity standards, benchmarks, and EU AI Act-aligned Tier 0 model certification
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
チェック 3/4 合格 · 質問内容は提供元のサーバー(aioq.org)を通ります
まず:どの AI を使っていますか?
使っているアプリを選ぶと、下に手順が表示されます。
Claude につなげます · 約 2 分
キー不要、インストール不要 · claude.ai かデスクトップアプリで一度設定すれば、チャットで使えます · 無料アカウントは 1 つまで
CustomizeConnectors
ここからコピーして Claude の同じ名前の欄に貼り付け、Continue を押します
Aiohttps://aioq.org/mcpAuthentication は Claude が検出したままにして Add を押します
+ConnectorsAio
Aio を使って、私に何ができるか教えて、1 つやってみせて✓ Claude が Aio を使っていると言うか、回答に Aio のツール名が出れば接続成功です
メニュー名は 2026年11月11日 に Anthropic のヘルプページで確認 · アプリのバージョンにより画面が少し違うことがあります
ChatGPT は法人向けプランのみ接続できます
Web 版 ChatGPT Business・Enterprise・Edu で、ワークスペースの管理者かオーナーが追加します · Free・Plus・Pro の場合:あなたの ChatGPT プランではまだ MCP を自分でつなげません
Plugins+Add custom MCP server
名前を入れ、Connection にアドレスを貼り付け、注意事項にチェックして Create as a plugin を押します
Aiohttps://aioq.org/mcp新しいチャットを開き、入力前にプラグインの一覧から Aio を選びます
Aio を使って、私に何ができるか教えて、1 つやってみせて✓ ChatGPT が Aio を使っていると言うか、回答に Aio のツール名が出れば接続成功です
メニュー名は 2026年11月11日 に OpenAI のヘルプページで確認 · アプリのバージョンにより画面が少し違うことがあります
Claude Code につなげます · 約 2 分
キー不要、インストール不要
Mac:Command+スペースで Terminal と入力 · Windows:PowerShell を開く
claude mcp add --transport http aio https://aioq.org/mcpAio が一覧にあり、接続済みと表示されれば OK です
Aio を使って、私に何ができるか教えて、1 つやってみせて✓ Claude Code が Aio を使っていると言うか、回答に Aio のツール名が出れば接続成功です
メニュー名は 2026年11月11日 に Anthropic のヘルプページで確認 · アプリのバージョンにより画面が少し違うことがあります
Cursor につなげます · 約 2 分
キー不要、インストール不要
Aio を使って、私に何ができるか教えて、1 つやってみせて✓ Cursor が Aio を使っていると言うか、回答に Aio のツール名が出れば接続成功です
メニュー名は 2026年11月11日 に Cursor のヘルプページで確認 · アプリのバージョンにより画面が少し違うことがあります
VS Code につなげます · 約 2 分
キー不要、インストール不要
Aio を使って、私に何ができるか教えて、1 つやってみせて✓ VS Code が Aio を使っていると言うか、回答に Aio のツール名が出れば接続成功です
メニュー名は 2026年11月11日 に VS Code のヘルプページで確認 · アプリのバージョンにより画面が少し違うことがあります
Windsurf、Zed、Gemini CLI など MCP を使える他のアプリは追加方法がそれぞれ違います。アプリ一覧で確認してください
Web 経由でつなぐアプリ用のアドレス
https://aioq.org/mcpJSON 設定は下の「開発者向け」にあります
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http aio https://aioq.org/mcpCursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json)
{
"mcpServers": {
"aio": {
"url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code (mcp.json)
{
"servers": {
"aio": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
}
}
}この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
このサーバーのつなぎ方と、各アプリの公式ドキュメントに基づきます。2026年11月10日に確認。
インターネット経由でつなげるアプリ
ClaudeChatGPTGooseLM StudioMsty StudioCherry StudioCursorVS Code + GitHub CopilotVisual StudioWindsurf (Devin Desktop)ZedKiroClineContinueJetBrains AI AssistantClaude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCodenodecodeWarpLibreChatOpen WebUIRaycast
ツールの名前と説明は、サーバーが2026年11月11日に返したそのままの内容です。書いたのは作者で、私たちではありません。プレーンテキストとして表示しています。
list_papersList every paper published by AIO — id, track, year, bilingual (en/ko) title and abstract, and an absolute PDF URL. All papers are CC BY 4.0; cite as "AIO — AI Integrity Organization, https://aioq.org, CC BY 4.0".
get_paperFetch one AIO paper by id (e.g. "paper-h"), with its bilingual abstract, absolute PDF URL, and a ready-to-paste citation. CC BY 4.0.
get_benchmark_distributionJudgment distributions from the AIO 20003 benchmark: per model, the value (L4), evidence (L3), and source (L2) win-rate hierarchies, reliability figures (TRR, PCS), and links to the raw JSON. Omit "model" to get every measured model. CC BY 4.0.
get_bench_itemsFetch the public forced-choice item set of the agent-submitted benchmark track: 105 items per layer (L4 values, L3 evidence, L2 sources), each a scenario in which two variables lead to opposite conclusions. There is no answer key — the measurement is which variable a system choos
submit_bench_runSubmit answers to the agent-track item set from get_bench_items. Requires an AIO agent key with the `bench:submit` scope — the run is attributed to the model, version, and operator the key was issued to, not to anything declared here. A layer must be answered in full (105 items)
get_framework_vocabularyThe machine-readable AIO Framework vocabulary: 19 value codes, 10 evidence codes, 10 source codes, the context axes (domain, scope, reversibility, time horizon), the AIO 20002 record grammar, and a JSON Schema for one record line. Use this to emit or validate AIO 20002 records. C
list_standards_packsList the standards packs — versioned formalizations of external reference norms (e.g. the EU AI Act) into AIO Framework hierarchy values. A pack is AIO's own formalization of a norm; a Tier 0 measurement against it yields a score report, not certification, and nothing is endorsed
get_standards_packFetch one standards pack by id, including the full per-provision V/E/S mapping. Pass "version" to pin a specific pack version; score reports always reference {id}@{version}. CC BY 4.0.
register_for_certificationRegister a model for AIO Tier 0 measurement. Tier 0 is free of charge, but registration of the model (name and version) and the operator (name and email) is required — a measurement whose model version and accountable operator do not appear in the public registry carries no weigh
get_eval_itemsFetch the public item set for a standards pack — the Gate A half of AIO Tier 0. Each item carries a bilingual scenario and question, the provision of the reference norm it is derived from, a response format (ves-code / ves-ranking / choice), and a weight. Expected hierarchies are
start_eval_attemptStart one AIO Tier 0 attempt and receive the exam paper: the public Gate A items plus the Gate B items drawn for this attempt from a private, rotating variant pool (3 per mapped provision, expected answers, provenance, and — since methodology v2-draft — the provision label withhe
submit_evalSubmit Tier 0 answers for automatic scoring. Pass the `attemptId` from start_eval_attempt together with the answers to BOTH gates in one `answers` array, each keyed by the `id` exactly as it was served (Gate B ids are opaque per-attempt handles) — that is the only path to a score
verify_certificationVerify an AIO registry record by id. Two kinds exist and both verify here: a SCORE REPORT (id "AIO-S0-…"), which is what Tier 0 issues today — the Gate A and Gate B scores, the per-provision breakdown, the measurement conditions, and a descriptive reference band, with no pass or
list_rfcsList the AIO public RFCs — the public comment periods in which a contested standards-pack or methodology decision is put out for comment before it is treated as settled. Each entry carries its status, its comment window, what it is about, and where to comment. Review windows foll
get_rfcFetch one public RFC by id (e.g. "rfc-2026-001"), including every agenda item in full, the reference documents, the decision if one has been recorded, and how to submit a comment. Use this before submit_rfc_comment so the comment answers an agenda item that is actually open. CC B
submit_rfc_commentSubmit a comment on an open AIO public RFC. Requires a real name and a working email address: the comment becomes part of a public review record, so an unattributable comment carries no weight. The email address is stored so AIO can reach the commenter about this RFC and is never
aio_lookup_referenceAsk the AIO Commons reference dataset kr-lnpd@0.9 (Korea Legal Normative Priority Dataset) which of two AIO values Korean statutes put first in a given domain. kr-lnpd@0.9 is the legacy September 2026 statute edition: it is grounded in statutes only, not court decisions. The curr
aio_lookup_org_priorityAsk one organization’s own norm file which of two AIO values it declared first, with the workshop record behind it (rule id, strength, declaration date, declared condition) and how that declaration lines up with the national legal norms (aligned_with / departs_from). A declaratio
list_contribution_tasksList the first contribution tasks of the AIO shared project on conditional value priorities: each task's id, type (check a case summary against its original, propose a missing condition, point out what a value code cannot express), question, status, and the observed cases it uses
get_contribution_taskFetch one contribution task in full — question, materials, a format example (not an actual finding), completion criteria, public scope — together with the evidence for each case it uses, kept in separate layers: the data observation (one stored model response to one hypothetical
submit_contributionSubmit one contribution to an AIO shared-project task. Call this ONLY when the user has asked you to submit, and only with text the user wrote or explicitly approved for this task — never upload the user's private conversations, documents, or model responses on your own, and set
get_contribution_statusCheck one contribution with the contributionId and receiptToken returned by submit_contribution: its status (pending, in_review, needs_revision, accepted = reflected, not_accepted = not reflected), the reviewer's response — a request for changes or the reason it was or was not re
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月11日にチェック
公開者(aioq.org)がリポジトリの所有者(AI-Integrity)ではありません。別の人が登録した可能性があります
コードの最終更新:25 日前
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
680ミリ秒で応答(HTTP 200)
サインイン不要
22件のツールの説明を読み、AIへの隠れた指示は見つかりませんでした
質問、コツの共有、使えないことの報告ができます。「役に立った」の多い順です。
まだレビューはありません
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック4項目のうち3項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
作者のクラウドで動きます。インストール不要でインターネット経由でつながりますが、送った内容は作者のサーバーを通ります。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は25 日前、最新バージョン(0.2.0)がレジストリに届いたのは3 か月前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。URL で接続するので、リモート MCP に対応したアプリでも使えます(例:ChatGPT Business 以上)。
同じカテゴリには:World Monitor, Claude Flow, Tldraw
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:↓ 週あたりのダウンロードi★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
Real-time global intelligence on conflict, markets, energy, trade, shipping and cyber. 102 tools.
AI orchestration with hive-mind swarms, neural networks, and 87 MCP tools for enterprise dev.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
Machine-readable mirror of the open standards published by AIO — AI Integrity Organization, an international standards body established as a Swiss association in Geneva (UID CHE-469.997.903).
Everything here is also served live from https://aioq.org. This repository exists so the same files can be read, diffed, cited, and vendored without depending on an HTTP endpoint staying up.
License: [CC BY 4.0](LICENSE). Attribution string: AIO — AI Integrity Organization, https://aioq.org, CC BY 4.0
AI integrity, in AIO's framing, has three distinct failure modes, and AIO works on the first:
The AIO Framework encodes one judgment as one line:
C:MED/IXi | V:Bec<Sda | E:Exp<Gui | S:Usr<Pro
Context, then the value (V), evidence (E), and source (S) hierarchies behind that judgment, where < reads "outranked by". No user content is carried — the line records *why*, not *what*.
| Path | What it is |
|---|---|
vocabulary/aio-00011.json | The AIO 00011 common vocabulary: 39 V/E/S codes, the context axes, and the AIO 20002 record grammar with its JSON Schema. Snapshot of GET https://aioq.org/api/framework/vocabulary. |
standards-packs/*.json (×15 + EU) | Waves 1-3 formalization drafts (draft-unverified — single-pass seed, dual verification pending): NIST AI RMF, the Korean AI Framework Act (current consolidation 법률 제21311호), the CoE Framework Convention (not yet in force — EU sole ratification), the China Generative AI Interim Measures, the EU GPAI Code of Practice, the OECD AI Principles (2024 consolidation), California TFAIA (SB 53), the China AI-content labeling Measures, the G7 Hiroshima Code of Conduct, and the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI (license-constrained: short-quote footprint only). Each entry carries verbatim, machine-checked provenance quotes. |
standards-packs/eu-ai-act-v0.2.json | The AIO formalization of the EU AI Act: per-provision V/E/S mapping, each entry carrying a verbatim quote from the official text, a rationale, a retrieval date, and its own verification status. |
standards-packs/schema.json | JSON Schema for a standards pack. A new norm is a data file, not code. |
standards-packs/FORMALIZATION_METHODOLOGY.md | How a legal text becomes a pack, and what the status ladder means. |
item-banks/eu-ai-act.public.json | The Tier 0 public item bank — 12 items, including their expected answers. See the note below; this is deliberate. |
item-banks/agent-track-v0.public.json | The agent-submitted benchmark track item bank v0.2 — 315 forced-choice dilemmas (105 per layer: L2 sources, L3 evidence, L4 values). There is no answer key by design: each item is a forced choice between two variables, and the measurement is the choice distribution itself. The review block records the six-round quality review that produced v0.2; one item carries an explicit reviewNote. |
item-banks/eu-ai-act.gateb-commitment.json | Commitment hashes for the private Tier 0 Gate B item pool (96 items): per-item sha256 plus an Ed25519-signed snapshot hash. The items themselves are private by design (seeded-random serving); this file lets anyone verify post hoc that served items existed before their test. Retired items are disclosed at /content/bench-items/eu-ai-act.gateb-retired.json on aioq.org as the pool rotates. |
verify/verify-certificate.mjs | Standalone Ed25519 verifier for an issued certificate. No npm dependencies. |
Tier 0 is self-assessment on a fully public item set. Publishing the expected hierarchies is not a leak — it is the design. A Tier 0 score is a floor, not a gaming-resistant measurement: it records that a model *could* answer by the criteria it declared. Hiding the key would buy a false sense of rigour while making the measurement unreproducible by anyone but AIO. Gaming resistance is what higher, proctored tiers with private item banks are for.
The live API serves the same bank with the answer key stripped, so that a submission flow cannot trivially read it back: GET https://aioq.org/api/eval/items?pack=eu-ai-act.
A standards pack is AIO's own formalization of an external reference norm — a reading of a legal text expressed in the AIO vocabulary, so that it can be measured. It is not the norm, not an official reading of it, and not produced with the involvement of the body that issued it.
Every pack carries a status on a fixed ladder:
draft-unverified → draft-verified → rfc → active
The EU AI Act pack is currently draft-verified: every mapping entry has a verbatim quote from the official text and a recorded retrieval date, but the pack has not yet been through the public RFC process. Certificates issued on a pack that is not active carry that fact — the field basisStatus sits inside the signed payload, so it cannot be reconstructed after the fact.
Certificates issued by AIO are signed with Ed25519. The public key is published at https://aioq.org/.well-known/aio-cert-key.json, so verification never requires trusting — or even reaching — an AIO server beyond fetching the record itself.
node verify/verify-certificate.mjs AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX
node verify/verify-certificate.mjs AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX --json node verify/verify-certificate.mjs --file ./saved-response.json --key ./pinned-key.json
Exit codes: 0 verified and currently valid · 1 verified but expired or revoked · 2 signature missing or mismatched · 3 usage or network error.
The one rule that matters: take verification.canonicalPayload from the API response verbatim as the signed message. Do not re-serialize it. It is already canonical — signed fields only, keys sorted by code point, no whitespace — and re-serializing it is the usual cause of a false negative. The script also rebuilds that payload from the certificate's own fields and compares, which catches a server that shows you one thing and signs another.
A verified signature proves only that AIO issued that exact record. It says nothing about whether the model is safe to deploy.
No authentication, CORS open, JSON, all CC BY 4.0.
| Endpoint | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| https://aioq.org/api/openapi.json | OpenAPI 3.1 description of everything below | ||
GET /api/framework/vocabulary | the vocabulary in this repo, live · `?layer=V\ | E\ | S · ?format=schema` |
GET /api/standards-packs · /{id} | packs with their full per-provision mapping | ||
GET /api/eval/items?pack=eu-ai-act | Tier 0 items, answer key stripped, plus the scoring methodology | ||
POST /api/eval/submit | submit answers; deterministic scoring, signed certificate on a pass | ||
GET /api/certifications/registry | every certificate issued | ||
GET /api/certifications/{certId} | one certificate, with its signature check and offline instructions | ||
GET /api/certifications/{certId}/badge.svg | badge, drawn live so it cannot outlive its own truth | ||
GET /api/benchmarks/agent-track/items | the agent-track item bank in this repo, live · `?layer=L2\ | L3\ | L4` |
POST /api/benchmarks/agent-track/submit | submit a run (requires an agent key with the bench:submit scope) | ||
GET /.well-known/aio-cert-key.json | Ed25519 public keys | ||
GET /.well-known/mcp/server.json | MCP server metadata |
MCP server — https://aioq.org/mcp, Streamable HTTP, protocol 2025-06-18, stateless, no auth.
{ "mcpServers": { "aio": { "type": "http", "url": "https://aioq.org/mcp" } } }
13 tools: search_atlas, list_papers, get_paper, get_benchmark_distribution, get_framework_vocabulary, list_standards_packs, get_standards_pack, register_for_certification, get_eval_items, submit_eval, verify_certification, get_bench_items, submit_bench_run.
Index for crawlers and agents: https://aioq.org/llms.txt
| Repository | |
|---|---|
AI-Integrity/AIO20002 | The full specification of AIO 20002, the reasoning record standard — prose spec, examples, tests. The machine-readable grammar in vocabulary/aio-00011.json here implements it. |
AI-Integrity/aio-prism-benchmark | The PRISM benchmark — multi-layer win-rate rankings across frontier models. |
Naming convention: AIO repositories hold the specification of a single numbered standard; kebab-case repositories hold data, tools, and benchmarks.
Errors in a standard, a mapping, or a benchmark result are handled through the public RFC process, not private correction: https://aioq.org/en/rfc. That is the point of publishing the provenance alongside every mapping entry — a disagreement should be arguable against a quote and a date, not against an assertion.
Issues and pull requests here are welcome for the mirror itself (broken files, stale snapshots, verifier bugs). Substantive changes to a standard go through the RFC process.
AIO certifies conformance to AIO's own formalization of a reference norm. A certificate is not an endorsement by the body that issued that norm (the European Union does not endorse, review, or participate in the EU AI Act pack), is not a legal conformity assessment, and creates no presumption of conformity under any regulation.
Contact: info@aioq.org · Site: https://aioq.org