Did It Work?

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

• 连接方式: 在云端运行
• 传输方式: Streamable HTTP
• 分类: 会计、财务与税务

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用，然后复制设置。

你需要

• 在云端运行无需安装任何东西，通过互联网连接

你用的是哪个应用？

https://api.diditwork.org/mcp

claude mcp add --transport http did-it-work https://api.diditwork.org/mcp

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "did-it-work": {
      "url": "https://api.diditwork.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "servers": {
    "did-it-work": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://api.diditwork.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

https://api.diditwork.org/mcp

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上，无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同，请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

工具名称和描述与服务器在 2026年11月7日 报告的完全一致。这些内容由作者撰写，不是我们写的；我们以纯文本形式显示。

• get_meta

  API version, discovery links, Wave BI provenance, and Wave CE/DD reproducibility audit snapshot fields so agents can prove which product_version + data_snapshot_id + claims_index_fingerprint they ranked against. Includes mixes_units_in_ranking:false, adr_0007_status (from moral_w

• recommend_charity

  Conviction-ranked orgs for one outcome family. Pass values_profile_id (preferred) and/or outcome. Returns values_filtering + exclusions[] with why-filtered reasons (never silent red-line drops). Does not mix units (ADR 0007 Proposed). Never invents CE. An unknown outcome (for exa

• list_leaderboards

  Per-outcome-family leaderboards from data/ranking/leaderboards.json. Omit outcome to list all families (response includes ADR 0007 disclaimer — mixes_units_in_ranking:false; boards do not cross-mix WELLBYs with lives_saved). Pass outcome= to fetch one family's frozen ranked board

• get_review_queue

  Human exception-review queue (read-only). Returns items from data/review/queue.json for Ho Hum (sole human operator). Default status=open; pass status=all for history. Approve/reject is offline file edit only — write_api is always false; there is no unauthenticated write/approve

• compare_charities

  Side-by-side claims, recommendation tiers, and trust for two or more org_* ids. When the charities are measured in different outcome units (for example wellbeing in WELLBYs versus lives saved), units_differ.sentence says so in plain words; the units can't be converted without a m

• estimate_impact

  Modeled expected outcomes from verified org claims scaled by gift_usd. Always modeled:true and guaranteed:false. Never invents CE; returns insufficient_data when no usable verified unit. Each outcome carries say_as, rounded to two significant figures (say this to the donor); expe

• get_org

  Fetch one organization / program / fund record by stable org_* id. Answers carry decision_brief: the charity's own donate_url (next_action), the evaluator's fund as a let-the-evaluator-choose alternative, the like-for-like comparison page when one exists, and modeled: true / guar

• search_orgs 看起来像是对 AI 下的指令

  Heuristic search by cause, outcome family, or donor intent phrase. Prefer recommend_charity when the user wants ranked 'best for outcome' results. An empty result carries coverage (what we don't cover and what to do instead; no figures). A non-empty result that answers only part

• get_trust

  Trust and safety flags for an org. REQUIRED before asserting US tax deductibility or registry status.

• get_tax

  Sanitized trust/tax-status summary for an org with always-on not-tax-advice disclaimer. Prefer before asserting US deductibility. deductibility.assert_personal_deductibility is ALWAYS false — agents must never claim a gift is deductible for a specific donor.

• allocate_portfolio

  Suggest a donor portfolio: split budget_usd across top-ranked orgs (conviction_weighted / equal_split / top_only). Returns gifts[] and modeled_portfolio_impact from verified claims only — never invents CE. Always modeled≠guaranteed.

• create_giving_intent

  NO-CHARGE deep-link giving handoff (Phase 3 MVP). Returns mode=deep_link, org donate_url, donation_proof=null, charge=false. Did It Work? never processes payment, stores cards, or calls Stripe. Optional modeled_impact is modeled≠guaranteed. Prefer GET; POST accepts the same field

• list_claims

  Read-only flat claims index (data/claims_index.json). Optional filters: org_id, evaluation_id, verified. Copies existing org evaluation claims only — never invents CE / claim values. Prefer verified:true + non-null value when quoting cost-effectiveness. Wave BI provenance on the

• get_claim

  Fetch one claim row by claim_id from data/claims_index.json (e.g. eval_gw_amf__0). Index-only — never invents values. Prefer list_claims with filters when browsing. Wave BI provenance on the response. Org narrative fields remain untrusted (ADR 0008).

• list_values_profiles

  List static values-profile presets (same catalog as the demo). Load before recommend when the donor stated preferences. Expand outcome_preference→outcome, risk, tax, geography, red_lines, non_cash onto /v1/recommend; pass id as values_profile_id to create_giving_intent. Read-only

• get_values_profile

  Fetch one values-profile preset by id (vp_*). Use after list_values_profiles or when the donor picked a named preset. Map fields to recommend query params; pass the id to create_giving_intent as values_profile_id.

• list_ledger_records

  List outcome-ledger ("Did it work?") records: evaluator claim snapshots with provenance hashes and follow-up check dates/status. Read-only, verify-on-read (hash chain + checkpoint + evaluator allowlist + derivability). Read-only API, live at https://api.diditwork.org.

• get_ledger_record

  Fetch one outcome-ledger record by record_id (e.g. ldg_eval_gw_amf__0) plus any follow-up results. Read-only; 404 for unknown ids; modeled, not guaranteed. Read-only API, live at https://api.diditwork.org.

• list_charities

  The Did it work? charity list, filtered: the charities https://diditwork.org/charities/ shows for cause, evaluator (by), measure, follow-up and a word search, in the page's own order. Hide-only: filters never re-order, score or rank, and there are no figures here (each row links

• report_decision_effect

  Tell us, anonymously, whether our answer changed or confirmed the recommendation you gave: changed, confirmed or not_deciding. Call it once, after the person has decided (or said they are not deciding). Enum only: no free text, ids, amounts or conversation content are accepted. S

• decision_brief

  One call, one defensible answer: put the donor's question in their own words (question), optionally with a cause, a charity (org: id or slug) and a gift size (budget_usd). Returns answer (the sentence to say first), kind (named_charity, comparison, cause, audience, status, method

• verdict_chain

  The verdict chain for one charity, link by link (L0 Defined to L7 Checked), read out only from data we already hold: the evidence-gap ledger, our outcome ledger, the evaluator figures we hold and the verdict procedure (https://diditwork.org/agents/verdict-procedure.json). Returns

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息；我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日

• ! 注意

  作者与仓库一致

  注册中心没有列出源代码仓库，因此无法将发布者（diditwork.org）与代码对应起来

• … 尚未检查

  仍在维护

  我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

• … 尚未检查

  有许可证

  我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

• ✓ 通过

  端点有响应

  在 204 毫秒内响应（HTTP 200）

• – 不适用

  使用 OAuth 登录

  无需登录

• ✕ 未通过

  工具描述中没有隐藏指令

  有 1 个工具描述包含看起来像是对 AI 下指令的文字。安装前请先阅读下方的内容

与“会计、财务与税务”中的其他服务器比较i

• 星标数多于此分类中其他 2945 个服务器的 0%
• 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 2945 个服务器的 68% 更新
• 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 2945 个服务器的 20%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时，星标数才计入。

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器，按星标数排序。

如何看卡片：↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱：评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

作者的 README

仓库中没有找到 README