原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

SQL Benchmarks Lab

作者:rctruta版本 0.1.2i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.rctruta/sqlbenchdag

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Query pre-computed SQL engine benchmarks. Runs standalone, no server setup required.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 数据库与数据集

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 需要你自己填写: SB_RESULTS_DIR, SB_API_BASE

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sqlbenchdag": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sqlbenchdag"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SB_RESULTS_DIR": "your-value",
        "SB_API_BASE": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add sqlbenchdag --env SB_RESULTS_DIR=your-value --env SB_API_BASE=your-value -- uvx sqlbenchdag

运行前请先填写空着的值。

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sqlbenchdag": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sqlbenchdag"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SB_RESULTS_DIR": "your-value",
        "SB_API_BASE": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "sqlbenchdag": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sqlbenchdag"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SB_RESULTS_DIR": "your-value",
        "SB_API_BASE": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

需要你填写的值

  • SB_RESULTS_DIR env
    Directory of experiment result capsules. The package ships the SQL suites, taxonomy and templates but NOT capsules, which are run output — so on a fresh install the catalog tools work and list_result…
  • SB_API_BASE env
    Optional. Base URL of a running SQL Benchmarks REST API. Leave unset and the read tools mount the API in-process — no server needed. Set it only when the API runs elsewhere, or to use submit_experime…

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 rctruta 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“数据库与数据集”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 953 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 953 个服务器的 24% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 953 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

SQL Benchmarks Lab 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.2)于3个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Supabase, MongoDB MCP Server, Elasticsearch MCP Server

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Supabase

作者:supabase

MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform

电脑或云端★ 2,993Apache-2.0今天更新
安装

MongoDB MCP Server

作者:mongodb-js

MongoDB Model Context Protocol Server

在你的电脑上运行★ 1,157Apache-2.0前天更新
安装

MCP server for interacting with Elasticsearch

在你的电脑上运行★ 315Apache-2.014个月前更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

SQL Benchmarking Laboratory

A deterministic, orchestrated harness for verifying database performance at scale.

Developed by Ramona C. Truta


The Mission: "Ground Truth" as Code

This platform is a specialized laboratory for testing SQL performance hypotheses. It transforms query tuning from intuition into a reproducible science.

The core of the system is a Deterministic Orchestration Harness that guarantees that if the logic or the environment changes, the benchmark result changes. If they do not, the result is addressable and cached.

Scope: the focus to date is synthetic and canonical (TPC-H) data, which is the right instrument for *mechanism* experiments — where controlled, reproducible data isolates the variable under test. Real-data support exists but is experimental; see the FAQ for the synthetic-vs-real rationale, the container model, and the roadmap (AI-security testbed, real-data trust chain).


Key Features & Innovations

1. Context-Aware Semantic Hashing (The Experiment ID)

The Heart of the system is the Experiment ID, an 8-character hash that governs the entire lifecycle. This hash is a SHA-256 fingerprint generated from:

  • The Config: Every dimension in your YAML (rows, skew, parameters).
  • The SQL Logic: The actual content of the benchmarked scripts.
  • The Code: All measurement-relevant Python — orchestration (assets/), engine clients (resources/), and data generators (plugins/).

Semantic Normalization: The hashing engine distinguishes between a logic change and a formatting change.

  • SQL: Comments, whitespace, and case are normalized before hashing.
  • Python: Orchestration scripts are parsed into an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) to strip docstrings and formatting variations, ensuring the Experiment ID only changes when execution logic changes.
2. Multi-Layer Cold-Cache Isolation

To ensure IO-bound performance is not masked by memory buffers, engine-level buffers are cleared before every query:

  • Postgres: Mandatory Docker Container Restarts clear shared buffers.
  • Versioned DuckDB (duckdb_1_5, duckdb_2_0): every query runs in a fresh worker process, so DuckDB's buffer pool starts empty.

OS page cache: not evicted. Engines call thrash_os_cache, which dirties an anonymous memory region (half of available RAM, capped at 4 GB). On macOS this was measured to leave a cached 1 GB file fully resident, so measurements should be read as warm at the OS level. DuckDB clients take a required cold argument, and cold=True raises until a verified eviction step exists.

3. Agentic AI Integration

The platform is built for the future of Autonomous Engineering. The Experiment ID allows AI agents to treat the laboratory as a Deterministic Performance API.

  • See AGENTS.md for the full Agentic Benchmarking Protocol.
4. Declarative Matrix Orchestration

Benchmarks are defined as N-dimensional matrices in YAML. The platform expands these into a Cartesian product of Independent Dagster Partitions. This allows for parallel dispatch and granular retries.


Usage & Technical Setup

Prerequisites
  • [uv](https://astral.sh/uv): the project's Python environment & dependency manager (fast, modern). setup.sh uses it, and it can install Python 3.11 for you.
  • Python 3.11+: core runtime (uv provisions it if missing).
  • Docker: for the containerized engines (Postgres, TypeDB), which the harness manages itself — *not* required for the DuckDB-only quickstart.
Installation & Setup

From PyPI — the lab is installable, which gives you the tooling and the sqlbench CLI:

pip install sqlbenchdag

From source — clone the repo to also get the published capsules (sql_benchmarks/experiments/results/) and the full harness. The laboratory includes a comprehensive setup script that manages virtual environments, dependencies, and directory initialization.

# 1. Automate Setup

chmod +x setup.sh && ./setup.sh

2. Activate Laboratory

source venv/bin/activate

The Execution Workflow (CLI)

While the system is powered by Dagster, the primary interface is the CLI for automated workflows.

# QUICKSTART: DuckDB only, no Docker required — runs in seconds

./run.sh sql_benchmarks/experiments/queue/quickstart.yaml --auto

FULL BENCHMARK: Run all queued experiments (requires Docker for Postgres)

./run.sh queue --auto

SINGLE EXPERIMENT: Pass a specific config path

./run.sh sql_benchmarks/experiments/queue/quack_execution_modes.yaml --auto

To write your own experiment, start from the annotated template and see the catalog of published runs in [docs/experiments.md](docs/experiments.md).


Project Structure

Managed with a strict separation between Harness and Scenario:

/sql_benchmarks

├── /assets # THE HARNESS: Dagster factories & pipeline logic ├── /resources # THE INFRASTRUCTURE: DB drivers & Docker management ├── /scripts/sql # THE SCENARIOS: Raw SQL partitioned by scenario ├── /plugins # THE DATA: Declarative generators & scenario providers ├── /utils # THE BRAIN: AST-hashing, common logic, & system primitives └── /experiments # THE LABORATORY ├── active.yaml # LOCAL runtime staging — the coordinator overwrites │ # this on every run (gitignored; not shared state) ├── /queue # Staging area for new experiment configs ├── /archive # Library of previously defined experiment templates ├── /configs # Registry of immutable, hash-addressed experiment capsules └── /results # Data capsules: fragments, CSVs, and Dashboards


Published Experiments — the Quack investigation

The first published study with this lab: an independent measurement of DuckDB's Quack client-server protocol (beta, v1.5.3). Each row links the runnable config to its committed, verifiable capsule. Full numbers, scaling exponents, and verification steps in docs/published_capsules.md.

ActQuestionConfigCapsuleFinding
IWhat does the protocol cost?quack_execution_modes.yamlb8e2bfafAttach-mode overhead grows with scan size (2.6× → 9.5× at 10M rows); pushdown stays flat at ~2×.
IIWhy is pushdown ~2× and not 1×?quack_residual_threads.yaml25b0e134The residual tracks reduced server-side parallelism (~2–4 of 8 threads), not transport.
IIIDoes it generalize to joins?tpch_quack_validation.yamlb198363eOn canonical TPC-H Q3, pushdown holds (~1.9×); attach mode cannot run the join at all (DNF).
IVDoes it beat the incumbent?quack_vs_postgres.yaml902d1277DuckDB-over-Quack (pushdown) beats PostgreSQL by up to 13.2×, and the gap widens with scale.

*Act 0 (b82b4eae) is the exploratory scout that started it — see docs/published_capsules.md.*

The lab also ships scenario suites for other studies — selectivity/, null_logic/, null_sentinel/, recursion/, sort_spill/, tpch/, and more under sql_benchmarks/scripts/sql/ — each runnable across the engine matrix.


Naming & Provenance

The lab works at two layers, named two different ways. Keeping them distinct is the difference between a number you can trace and a number you have to trust.

LayerWhat it isNamed byExample
Capsuleone experiment's complete resultsits Experiment ID — an 8-char SHA-256 of the *question* (config + SQL + measurement code), assigned by the machine48c92f31
Releasea signed set of capsules backing a publicationa human name: `sqlbenchdag- -v - `sqlbenchdag-quack-v1-20260614

A release *contains* capsules; a capsule is one experiment. The machine names capsules (hashes you can't forge); the author names releases (words that mean something). sqlbenchdag is the lab's maker's mark — sql + bench + dag (Dagster, the orchestration that distinguishes this lab from a bare query timer). It is carried on every release this lab produces.

Two hashes, two jobs (a capsule contains both — they are not the same thing):

  • the Experiment ID (8 chars) is an *address* — it *names* the capsule, and the same question always produces the same address;
  • the integrity seal (64 chars, in integrity.seal) is a *checksum* — it *verifies* the capsule's contents are untouched. You file by the address; the seal is the tamper-evident lid.

Reproducibility is pinned to the release. Because the Experiment ID hashes the measurement code, it is stable only at a fixed code revision — which is exactly what the signed release tag freezes. To reproduce a published capsule, check out its release tag and re-run its config; the same question yields the same ID, or the comparison is refused by construction.

Provenance roadmap: a per-capsule generator stamp (sqlbenchdag@ )

will record the exact build that produced each capsule. It writes through the

finalization code, which lives inside the Experiment-ID hash, so it ships with

a future release rather than re-numbering capsules already published.

See docs/published_capsules.md for the full trust chain (reproducibility, integrity, timestamp, authorship) and how to verify each. Reproducibility and integrity are automatic on every run; timestamp and signature are optional steps you add only when publishing — the producer workflow is docs/PUBLISHING.md.


License

Copyright 2025-2026 Ramona C. Truta. Licensed under the Apache License 2.0.

Built with Dagster, Polars, Docker, DuckDB, and Postgres.

问 PopNx