Leanforge MCP
概览
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Lean 4 theorem prover MCP: automated proof search, mathlib integration, job management
PopNx MCP 的三大支柱
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
- 用户评价i暂无评价评价功能将在后续阶段与账户功能一起开放
- 我们的基础检查i1 项中通过 1 项依据公开信息检查;尚未扫描代码
- 使用情况i非常新★ –
它能帮你做什么
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
- 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
- 传输方式: stdio
- 分类: 搜索与 AI 记忆
安装
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
安装之前
- 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
- 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
- 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
链接指向作者自己的文件;我们不托管也不重新打包它。打开文件后,Claude Desktop 会进行安装。
在终端中运行这条命令
浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它能做什么
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
基础检查i
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月10日
- ✓ 通过
作者与仓库一致
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 sandraschi 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
- … 尚未检查
仍在维护
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
- … 尚未检查
有许可证
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
- – 不适用
端点有响应
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
- – 不适用
使用 OAuth 登录
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
- … 尚未检查
工具描述中没有隐藏指令
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与“搜索与 AI 记忆”中的其他服务器比较i
- 星标数多于此分类中其他 5823 个服务器的 0%
- 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 5823 个服务器的 64% 更新
- 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 5823 个服务器的 100%
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
常见问题
Leanforge MCP 安全吗?
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
它需要哪些密钥或代码?
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
它还在维护吗?
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.1)于22天前进入注册中心。
哪些应用可以使用它?
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 MCPB。
有什么可以替代它?
同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
替代选择
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Codebase Memory
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Exa
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
作者的 README
打开 README
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
leanforge-mcp
MCP server for AI-driven formal proof search in Lean 4. Submit a theorem with sorry; get back a machine-verified proof. Implements Agent A from AlphaProof Nexus (DeepMind, May 2026).
Stack: Python 3.12+ . FastMCP 3.4+ . FastAPI . React/Vite . Tailwind . Zustand . Biome . Lean 4 / Mathlib
Table of Contents
- What it does
- Quick Install
- What You Can Do
- Tools
- Requirements
- Documentation
- Status
- License
What it does
Feed it a Lean 4 theorem with a sorry placeholder. It runs N parallel agents in a loop: the LLM proposes a proof edit, the Lean compiler judges it, errors feed back to the LLM. First agent to produce a sorry-free compile wins.
-- Input
theorem sum_formula (n : ℕ) : 2 * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), i = n * (n + 1) := by sorry
-- Output (machine-verified) theorem sum_formula (n : ℕ) : 2 * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), i = n * (n + 1) := by induction n with | zero => simp | succ n ih => rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]; ring_nf; linarith
The compiler is the only oracle -- if it compiles without sorry, the proof is correct.
Quick Install
git clone https://github.com/sandraschi/leanforge-mcp
cd leanforge-mcp uv sync Copy-Item config.example.toml config.toml
Then add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "leanforge": { "command": "uv", "args": ["--directory", "C:\\path\\to\\leanforge-mcp", "run", "python", "-m", "leanforge_mcp"], "env": { "DEEPSEEK_API_KEY": "...", "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "..." } } } }
See INSTALL.md for the Lean + Mathlib workspace setup (~4GB, one-time -- already provisioned and verified on Goliath as of 2026-07-09).
What You Can Do
"Prove that the sum of the first n natural numbers is n*(n+1)/2"
"Submit this MiniF2F problem and check back in 10 minutes"
"Show me all the proof attempts for job abc-123 -- why is it stuck?"
"Run validate_lean on this tactic proof to see if it compiles"
Tools
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
submit_theorem | Submit a theorem statement → job ID (async) |
submit_lean_file | Submit a full .lean file with sorry placeholders |
get_proof_status | Poll job status; returns proof when complete |
list_attempts | Inspect the attempt trajectory per agent/turn |
list_jobs | List all jobs with status summary |
validate_lean | Raw Lean 4 compile -- no job tracking |
verify_proof | Re-check a proven file with verified kernels (con-leche, con-ron) -- needs workspace on Lean >= 4.35.0, see docs/VERIFIED_KERNELS.md |
cancel_job | Cancel a running job |
leanforge_shutdown | Gracefully shut down the server (cancels live jobs, exits) |
get_mathlib_search | Natural language search over Mathlib theorems |
Requirements
- Python 3.11+
- Lean 4 via elan (
winget install leanprover.elan) - Mathlib workspace with cached oleans (~4GB, one-time setup -- see INSTALL.md)
- Ollama with
deepseek-prover-v2:7bfor tier-1 (local, free) - DeepSeek or Anthropic API key for tier-2/3 (optional)
Ports & configuration
| Piece | Value |
|---|---|
| MCP server | stdio (uv run python -m leanforge_mcp) |
| Web backend (FastAPI) | http://127.0.0.1:10867 |
| Web frontend (Vite) | http://127.0.0.1:10868 |
| Config file | config.toml (copy from config.example.toml; gitignored) |
| Environment | DEEPSEEK_API_KEY (tier 2), ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (tier 3) — see .env.example; keys stay in server env, never in the browser |
Documentation
| Doc | Contents |
|---|---|
| INSTALL.md | Prerequisites, Lean workspace setup, Claude Desktop config |
| docs/ONBOARDING.md | First-timer setup: costs, pitfalls, sanity check |
| docs/CONFIGURATION.md | All config options and environment variables |
| docs/TOOLS.md | Full tool reference with parameters and examples |
| docs/ARCHITECTURE.md | Proof loop, tier escalation, job lifecycle, SQLite schema |
| docs/LEAN.md | Lean 4 language reference, tactic guide, bibliography, link collection |
| docs/VERIFIED_KERNELS.md | Why verify_proof exists, what con-leche/con-ron are, workspace upgrade path |
| docs/LEAN_PRIMER.md | Quick Lean 4 intro for engineers (short version) |
| docs/ALPHAPROOF_NEXUS.md | The technique: AlphaProof Nexus paper explained |
| docs/COVERAGE_GAP.md | Why DeepMind got MSM coverage and a startup wouldn't |
| docs/BENCHMARK_RESULTS.md | MiniF2F, PutnamBench, Erdős results |
| docs/DEVELOPMENT.md | Contributing, dev setup, test commands |
| docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md | Common errors and fixes |
| llms-full.txt | Full LLM context: tools, endpoints, config, ports |
Roadmap
| Phase | What | Status |
|---|---|---|
| A | Core loop: LLM proposes, Lean judges, error feeds back | Done |
| B | Correctness hardening, edge case handling, timeout tuning | Done (2026-07-09) -- tamper guard closed against default-arg truncation and a decoy-duplicate attack, cross-process job ownership/cancellation fixed, stateless-prompting mitigations added. 56/56 tests passing on real hardware. See docs/ASSESSMENT_2026-06-24.md |
| C | Performance and safety: REPL worker pool (compile-time is the real bottleneck), LLM timeout/retry, token/cost accounting (hard gate before any batch run) | In progress -- see TODO.md |
| D | Multi-agent parallel scheduling (Agent B from paper) -- run N loops in parallel, first to finish wins | Planned |
| E | Self-critique step -- LLM reviews its own proof before compile, catches obvious errors early | Planned |
| F | Webapp proof explorer -- interactive tree view of attempted proof paths, live tactic streaming | Planned |
| G | Premise selection -- before generating tactics, search Mathlib for relevant lemmas | Planned |
| H | Cumulative context windowing -- smart summarization of long error chains instead of blind concatenation | Planned |
| I | Benchmark dashboard -- webapp page tracking MiniF2F, PutnamBench, Erdős results per model/config | Stretch |
| J | Human-in-the-loop -- when the agent is stuck, pause and surface the current state for a human hint | Stretch |
| K | Proof caching -- deduplicate sub-proofs so repeated lemmas compile instantly | Stretch |
What each phase enables
A + B let you submit a theorem and get a proof back on the other end. It works, it's useful, but it's single-threaded, pays a full compile per turn, and has no spend controls -- Phase C closes those gaps.
D changes the game: N parallel agents means wall-clock time drops from "however long one LLM takes" to "however long the fastest of N LLMs takes." For hard theorems where the LLM wanders into dead ends, this is the difference between 5 minutes and 30 seconds.
E prevents the LLM from wasting compiles on obviously wrong tactics. Cheap to add (one extra LLM call per attempt) and the paper shows it improves solve rate by ~15 percentage points on Agent A alone.
F is the user-facing payoff: instead of staring at "status: running" and polling, you watch the LLM try tactics in real time, see which paths it abandoned, and understand why it eventually succeeded or failed.
G addresses the most common failure mode: the LLM writes a correct tactic for a lemma that doesn't exist in the current context. Premise selection (a small retrieval step before tactic generation) cuts this dramatically.
H is invisible but critical: as the LLM accumulates 10+ failed attempts, the error context grows past the model's window. Smart summarization keeps relevant signal without drowning the LLM in noise.
Full gap analysis: docs/ASSESSMENT_2026-06-24.md
License
MIT