GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
Beschreibung vom Entwickler (englisches Original)
Passive AppSec scanners as eight parameterless MCP tools; the audited repository is data.
Diese drei werden nie zu einer Punktzahl zusammengefasst: Meinungen, Messungen und Beliebtheit sind verschiedene Dinge.
Für diesen Server haben wir noch keine Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache geschrieben. Unten stehen die Fakten, die wir aus der Registry gelesen haben.
Wähle die KI-App, die du nutzt, und kopiere die Einstellungen.
APPSEC_LANGSDu brauchst
Welche App nutzt du?
Wähle oben deine App. Wir merken sie uns, damit der Button beim nächsten Mal „In … installieren“ anzeigt.
Öffne Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config und füge dies in claude_desktop_config.json ein
{
"mcpServers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Führe das in deinem Terminal aus
claude mcp add appsec-toolbox --env APPSEC_LANGS=your-value -- docker run -i --rm -e APPSEC_LANGS ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0Trag die leeren Werte ein, bevor du ihn startest.
In .cursor/mcp.json in deinem Projekt oder in ~/.cursor/mcp.json einfügen
{
"mcpServers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Dein Browser fragt, ob er die App öffnen darf, dann zeigt die App die Einstellungen und bittet dich um Bestätigung. Schlüsselwerte bleiben leer, damit du sie selbst einträgst.
In .vscode/mcp.json in deinem Projekt einfügen
{
"servers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Dein Browser fragt, ob er die App öffnen darf, dann zeigt die App die Einstellungen und bittet dich um Bestätigung. Schlüsselwerte bleiben leer, damit du sie selbst einträgst.
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer, und ChatGPT kann sich nur mit Servern im Internet verbinden. Wähle eine andere App.
Deine Auswahl bleibt in einem Cookie auf diesem Gerät; kein Konto nötig.
APPSEC_LANGS envDiese Einstellungen werden aus dem Registry-Eintrag des Entwicklers erzeugt. Wenn in der README etwas anderes steht, folge der README.
Läuft auf deinem Computer; die Tool-Liste erscheint nach der Installation in deiner KI-App.
Wir prüfen Informationen, die jeder sehen kann; den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Checks, die nicht zutreffen, werden nicht mitgezählt. · Geprüft am 8. Nov. 2026
Der Registry-Name wurde mit dem GitHub-Konto ai-ronin-systems bestätigt, dem das Repo gehört
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer; es gibt keinen Endpunkt im Internet
Läuft auf deinem Computer und nutzt stattdessen lokale Einstellungen
Läuft auf deinem Computer; Tool-Listen können wir nur von Endpunkten im Internet lesen
Verglichen mit allen aktiven Servern dieser Kategorie in der Registry. Sterne zählen nur, wenn dem Herausgeber das Repo gehört.
Er hat 1 von 1 zutreffenden Basischecks bestanden. Den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Bevor du einen Schlüssel oder Token hinzufügst, sieh nach, welche Zugriffe der Server verlangt, und nutze einen Schlüssel, der nur die Berechtigungen hat, die du brauchst.
Die Registry nennt keinen erforderlichen Schlüssel, manche Server bitten dich aber bei der ersten Nutzung, dich anzumelden.
Er läuft auf deinem Computer. Deine KI-App startet ihn bei Bedarf, und die Daten laufen nicht über die Server des Entwicklers (außer der Server ruft selbst einen Onlinedienst auf).
Das GitHub-Repo wurde zuletzt – geändert, und die neueste Version (0.3.0) kam vor 13 Tagen in die Registry.
Apps, die MCP unterstützen, etwa Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor und VS Code. Außerdem brauchst du Docker auf deinem Computer.
In derselben Kategorie: GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
Server derselben Kategorie von anderen Entwicklern, sortiert nach Sternen.
So liest du eine Karte:★ GitHub-SterneiDrei Säulen: Bewertungen · Checks · NutzungiAktualisiert = neueste Version in der Registry veröffentlichti
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
Cloudflare MCP servers
Unverändert aus dem Repo des Entwicklers übernommen. PopNx MCP hat den Inhalt weder geprüft noch empfiehlt es ihn. HTML, Bilder und Skripte wurden entfernt. Links führen von dieser Website weg.
Let an AI agent audit code you do not trust, without giving it a shell, a path to choose, or the repository's code to run.
Ten pinned security scanners behind eight parameterless MCP tools, in one hardened container. The audited repository is treated as the attacker. The agent only ever collects evidence.
*Recorded from examples/agent_demo.py against examples/vulnerable-sample. Waiting time is shortened; the real scan time is in the last line.*
security.sast, security.secrets, security.dependencies, and so on.Each claim links to the code or test that proves it.
| Problem | Approach | Proof | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A prompt-injected agent with a shell can do anything. | The agent's whole surface is eight parameterless tasks, governed by Makefile MCP. Maintenance targets exist but are refused. | .makefile-mcp.yaml, the demo | |||
Scanning untrusted code usually runs it: setup.py, postinstall, Gradle plugins, Go toolchain downloads, scanner plug-ins. | Strictly passive analysis: no build, install, or dependency resolution; Go runs with GOPROXY=off and GOTOOLCHAIN=local. An adversarial review found that a planted .checkov.yaml could make Checkov import the repository's Python; that path is closed and regression-tested. | examples/hostile-sample, tests/image.sh | |||
A hostile repository can silence its own findings with .semgrepignore, .gitleaksignore, # nosec, # nosemgrep... | Every scanner runs on toolbox-owned configuration. Inline suppressions are disabled where the scanner allows it, and every marker found is inventoried for the reviewer either way. | settings table, output/suppressions.json | |||
| Evidence is only worth something if it is tied to what was scanned. | The manifest fingerprints the tree exactly like `find . -type f -print0 \ | LC_ALL=C sort -z \ | xargs -0 sha256sum \ | sha256sum, including file names that are not UTF-8 or that sha256sum` escapes, and records each report's digest, tool versions, and data sources. | scripts/write-manifest.py, tests/unit/test_manifest.py |
| One malformed file should not let the target stop the audit. | Input a scanner cannot read because of the target (an unloadable Go package, a corrupt lockfile) becomes a recorded coverage limit: not a failed bundle, and not a fake clean result. | scripts/run-language-profiles.py, scripts/run-osv.sh | |||
| Results should be reproducible, and a compromised scanner should have nowhere to send the code. | Offline mode: fetch rule and advisory data once, then scan under --network none. The manifest records the data's age and digest. | Offline mode | |||
| A security tool is a supply-chain target. | Every downloaded binary is checked against its published SHA-256 per architecture; the base image is pinned by digest; Actions are pinned by commit; release jobs that run project code hold no write token; images carry signed build provenance. | Dockerfile, release.yml |
Verification in layers. Unit tests cover the scripts. A smoke test drives the Makefile through Makefile MCP with fake scanners whose stubs fail if any hardening flag is missing. The image test runs the real scanners against a known-vulnerable sample, a hostile sample that tries every attack above, and offline mode, under the documented resource limits. Independent adversarial reviews attacked the image; every confirmed finding was fixed with a regression test, and what remains is written down in the threat model.
IMAGE=ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0
docker pull "$IMAGE" gh attestation verify "oci://$IMAGE" --owner ai-ronin-systems
Offline mode, the resource limits, and the target-settings hardening are on main and ship in the next release. To use them now: docker build -t appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev . and IMAGE=appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev.
Run it as an MCP stdio server against one repository:
docker run --rm -i \
--read-only --cap-drop=ALL --security-opt=no-new-privileges:true \ --tmpfs /tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g --memory=6g --pids-limit=512 \ --user "$(id -u):$(id -g)" \ -v "$PWD/my-project:/runner/target:ro" \ -v "$PWD/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw" \ "$IMAGE"
Register the same command as a stdio server in any MCP client:
{
"mcpServers": { "appsec-toolbox": { "command": "docker", "args": ["run", "--rm", "-i", "--read-only", "--cap-drop=ALL", "--security-opt=no-new-privileges:true", "--tmpfs", "/tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g", "--memory=6g", "--pids-limit=512", "-v", "/abs/path/my-project:/runner/target:ro", "-v", "/abs/path/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw", "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"] } } }
Compose, offline mode, language selection, and every evidence file are in Usage.
untrusted repository (read-only)
| v /runner/target | v trusted Makefile + Makefile MCP | | | | | | Semgrep Gitleaks OSV Trivy Checkov Syft | +---- language profile selection ----+ | | | | Bandit FindSecBugs njsscan gosec Python Java Node/JS Go | v /runner/output reports, run-manifest.json, suppressions.json, audit log
The operator mounts exactly one repository at /runner/target and one writable directory at /runner/output. The audited path is never an MCP parameter, so the agent has no host-path capability. A trusted Makefile holds every scanner command; Makefile MCP decides which of its targets the agent may call. Language specialists are picked by detection (APPSEC_LANGS=auto) or by the operator, never by the agent.
| Capability | Tool | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
security.audit | everything below | complete bundle |
security.sast | Semgrep + suppression inventory | semgrep.json, suppressions.json |
security.secrets | Gitleaks | gitleaks.json |
security.dependencies | OSV-Scanner | osv.json |
security.repository | Trivy | trivy.json |
security.iac | Checkov | checkov.json |
security.language | Bandit, FindSecBugs, njsscan, gosec as applicable | language-profile.json + reports |
supply_chain.sbom | Syft | sbom.cdx.json (CycloneDX) |
The audited repository is the attacker, and the agent reading its reports may be steered by it. Read the [threat model](docs/threat-model.md): attacker goals, sixteen threats with their controls and residual risks, what is and is not guaranteed, and an operator checklist.
| Protected | Not protected |
|---|---|
| Target builds, installs, hooks, and Makefiles never run. | Scanner parser bugs; the container is the boundary. |
| Target-owned scanner settings files cannot suppress findings or load code. | Inline trivy:ignore and njsscan-ignore comments; Checkov lists its inline skips as skipped_checks. All are inventoried. |
| The agent cannot pick the target or run anything but the eight scans. | An agent that misreports what the reports say. |
| No credentials in the container; read-only, unprivileged, non-root, resource-capped. | Exfiltration by a compromised scanner in online mode. Offline mode runs with no network. |
| Each run's manifest ties report digests to a fingerprint of the scanned tree. | Tampering by anyone who can write output/; the manifest is not signed. |
It is not an autonomous auditor, an LLM agent, a DAST engine, a credential manager, a report normalizer, or a shell server.
appsec-audit-hound (planned) decides why to scan, correlates evidence, writes findings
| MCP appsec-toolbox-mcp collects governed, passive evidence <- this repository | built on makefile-mcp exposes trusted Make targets to agents, deny-by-default
Makefile MCP is published on PyPI and the official MCP Registry, with its own threat model.
| Document | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Threat model | Attacker goals, threats and controls, guarantees, limits, operator checklist |
| Usage | Running, tools and evidence files, language profiles, offline mode, scanner behaviour, network use, versions, development |
| Architecture | Trust boundary, ownership, design rules |
| Tooling | Pinned versions, settings each scanner ignores, update policy |
| Security policy | Supported versions and private vulnerability reporting |
| Changelog | Released and unreleased changes |
| Contributing | How to add a scanner without widening the boundary |
pipx install pytest==8.4.2 && pipx install ruff==0.14.0
make test # ruff, unit tests, smoke test make image make test-image # the real image: known positives, hostile sample, offline mode
More in Usage.
Apache-2.0.