Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Beschreibung vom Entwickler (englisches Original)
Verify a SCITT receipt under a trust root you hold — offline, no backend, no key, no network
Diese drei werden nie zu einer Punktzahl zusammengefasst: Meinungen, Messungen und Beliebtheit sind verschiedene Dinge.
Für diesen Server haben wir noch keine Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache geschrieben. Unten stehen die Fakten, die wir aus der Registry gelesen haben.
Wähle die KI-App, die du nutzt, und kopiere die Einstellungen.
Du brauchst
Welche App nutzt du?
Wähle oben deine App. Wir merken sie uns, damit der Button beim nächsten Mal „In … installieren“ anzeigt.
Öffne Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config und füge dies in claude_desktop_config.json ein
{
"mcpServers": {
"verify": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@forestrie/mcp-verify"
]
}
}
}Führe das in deinem Terminal aus
claude mcp add verify -- npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verifyIn .cursor/mcp.json in deinem Projekt oder in ~/.cursor/mcp.json einfügen
{
"mcpServers": {
"verify": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@forestrie/mcp-verify"
]
}
}
}Dein Browser fragt, ob er die App öffnen darf, dann zeigt die App die Einstellungen und bittet dich um Bestätigung. Schlüsselwerte bleiben leer, damit du sie selbst einträgst.
In .vscode/mcp.json in deinem Projekt einfügen
{
"servers": {
"verify": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@forestrie/mcp-verify"
]
}
}
}Dein Browser fragt, ob er die App öffnen darf, dann zeigt die App die Einstellungen und bittet dich um Bestätigung. Schlüsselwerte bleiben leer, damit du sie selbst einträgst.
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer, und ChatGPT kann sich nur mit Servern im Internet verbinden. Wähle eine andere App.
Deine Auswahl bleibt in einem Cookie auf diesem Gerät; kein Konto nötig.
Diese Einstellungen werden aus dem Registry-Eintrag des Entwicklers erzeugt. Wenn in der README etwas anderes steht, folge der README.
Läuft auf deinem Computer; die Tool-Liste erscheint nach der Installation in deiner KI-App.
Wir prüfen Informationen, die jeder sehen kann; den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Checks, die nicht zutreffen, werden nicht mitgezählt. · Geprüft am 6. Nov. 2026
Der Registry-Name wurde über die Domain forestrie.dev bestätigt (die Registry prüft, wem die Domain gehört)
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer; es gibt keinen Endpunkt im Internet
Läuft auf deinem Computer und nutzt stattdessen lokale Einstellungen
Läuft auf deinem Computer; Tool-Listen können wir nur von Endpunkten im Internet lesen
Verglichen mit allen aktiven Servern dieser Kategorie in der Registry. Sterne zählen nur, wenn dem Herausgeber das Repo gehört.
Er hat 1 von 1 zutreffenden Basischecks bestanden. Den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Bevor du einen Schlüssel oder Token hinzufügst, sieh nach, welche Zugriffe der Server verlangt, und nutze einen Schlüssel, der nur die Berechtigungen hat, die du brauchst.
Die Registry nennt keinen erforderlichen Schlüssel, manche Server bitten dich aber bei der ersten Nutzung, dich anzumelden.
Er läuft auf deinem Computer. Deine KI-App startet ihn bei Bedarf, und die Daten laufen nicht über die Server des Entwicklers (außer der Server ruft selbst einen Onlinedienst auf).
Das GitHub-Repo wurde zuletzt – geändert, und die neueste Version (0.8.1) kam vor 4 Tagen in die Registry.
Apps, die MCP unterstützen, etwa Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor und VS Code. Außerdem brauchst du Node.js auf deinem Computer.
In derselben Kategorie: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, debuff
Server derselben Kategorie von anderen Entwicklern, sortiert nach Sternen.
So liest du eine Karte:★ GitHub-SterneiDrei Säulen: Bewertungen · Checks · NutzungiAktualisiert = neueste Version in der Registry veröffentlichti
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Let coding agents play, test and tune your 2D web game: live state, explained errors, replays, fuzz.
Unverändert aus dem Repo des Entwicklers übernommen. PopNx MCP hat den Inhalt weder geprüft noch empfiehlt es ihn. HTML, Bilder und Skripte wurden entfernt. Links führen von dieser Website weg.
Verify a SCITT receipt from a Forestrie transparency log under a trust root you hold. Offline: no backend, no account, no key, no network. An MCP server whose only tools verify and decode receipts.
{
"mcpServers": { "forestrie-verify": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@forestrie/mcp-verify"] } } }
npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify demo
Agents act on statements they did not witness being made: a quote, an approval, a tool result, another agent's output. Usually the record of what was said is kept by the party that said it, so nobody downstream can ask "did you really say that, and did you say it to everyone?"
A Forestrie receipt is a proof that a statement was sealed into an append-only transparency log. This package checks that proof against a trust root you hold, in your own process, without contacting Forestrie. With the right root it also answers the harder question: whether the log you were shown is the log everyone else was shown. What transparency adds, where it stops, and what a receipt contains: TRANSPARENCY.md.
| Tool | Reference verb | What it answers |
|---|---|---|
verify_receipt | forestrie verify | Were these exact payload bytes sequenced at this entry id? |
verify_grant_receipt | forestrie verify-grant | Was this grant admitted to this log — i.e. was the signer entitled to write? |
verify_self | forestrie verify | Does this package's own release receipt vouch for the bytes it ships? |
decode_receipt | forestrie decode-receipt --json | What is actually in this receipt? (Renders the CBOR only. Verifies nothing.) |
Every tool is annotated readOnlyHint: true, openWorldHint: false. That is not decoration: it is the machine-readable form of _"this tool touches nothing"_, and an agent can see it without running anything.
You do not ask for "verification". You say which root you trust, and the result says what that root can see:
| Root | What you supply |
|---|---|
genesis | the forest's genesis document, captured when you registered |
known-log-key | a log owner key (keyXy, P-256) or KS256 address (ks256Address) you hold out of band |
known-accumulator | a snapshot of the log's peaks, from a chain read |
checkpoint-chain | a retained chain of .sth checkpoints, plus genesis or keyXy; delegation limits enforced per link |
KS256 (secp256k1) roots verify offline too. An EOA root verifies by ecrecover, from a genesis or a known-log-key with ks256Address. A contract root (a Safe) cannot be checked without a chain read, which this package never makes: pass ks256Attestation, an ERC-1271 record fetched elsewhere (@forestrie/mcp-resolve's fetch_ks256_attestation tool, or forestrie-cli's fetch-ks256-attestation). The result is then valid _under the contract's signers at the attested block_, and says which block. A 20-byte ks256Address asserts, and does not prove, which log it owns. checkpoint-chain takes ks256Attestation too, with the KS256 genesis for the forest chain id; one attestation covers one delegation certificate, so a Safe that rotated its delegate needs one per certificate: pass them as the ks256Attestations array. Every attestation is reported in the result as used, or unused with a reason; none is silently ignored. checkpoint-chain also enforces each link's delegation limits (mmrStart, mmrEnd, expiresAt): delegation_out_of_range, delegation_expired. Since 0.7.0 a peak attached to a receipt is checked against the leaf and inclusion path rather than trusted (@forestrie/receipt-verify 3.2.0), which closes a hole in the known-accumulator and checkpoint-chain roots. Details: docs/trust-roots.md.
The roots are not ordered by strength. The first two check the operator's signature locally and cannot see a split view. The last two match the peak against an accumulator the operator does not control, and can. Every result answers four questions, sealing, split-view, append-authority and attribution, each ok, failed, or not_answered_by_this_root. The last is a real answer and must reach the user; a client that renders only ok is using this tool wrong.
When each root is the effective choice, why a genesis document fetched at check time is weaker than one kept from registration, what a signature root cannot distinguish, and the demo transcript: docs/trust-roots.md.
A receipt means something without assuming the Forestrie operator is honest:
An operator can still decline to act, and that is visible: it can refuse admission, withhold data it serves, or stop sealing. It cannot rewrite or fork anchored history, or sign for a log that has not leased its key. Who holds which key, and what an operator can and cannot do: key custody and operator powers.
Software provenance is the familiar use case for a transparency log, so this package applies it to itself. Every release registers a small statement (package name, version, git commit) in a Forestrie log and ships the receipt inside the tarball. npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify verify --self, or the verify_self tool, checks it offline. This complements npm's SLSA provenance; it does not replace it. Today the receipt chains to a log on the public development lane. Details: docs/self-registration.md.
That bundle is also the subject of a worked example: fetching this package's own release receipt from the public lane, verifying it under the bundled key, seeing the documented delegation_invalid under the genesis root, and getting split-view ok from a chain read — end to end in a few seconds, with no account. It lives in @forestrie/mcp-resolve's README, because fetching is that package's job, not this one's.
The verification arithmetic comes from @forestrie/receipt-verify, pinned to an exact version and published and attested separately. The tarball ships src and the frozen conformance vectors it is tested against (fixtures/PROVENANCE.md), so the arithmetic can be re-run rather than taken on trust.
Installing the package pulls in more than a verifier needs. @modelcontextprotocol/sdk brings a web stack, including express, hono, jose, cors and ajv, for HTTP transports this package never uses: it constructs only the stdio transport. The verification core never imports the SDK, and the browser-safety gate enforces that, so importing the package's "." export gives you the arithmetic without any of it.
The tarball ships its fixtures as forestrie://fixtures/… MCP resources, so an agent that holds nothing of its own can run a real verification. Two calls reach a pass from resources alone; both are asserted by test/node/mcp-smoke.test.ts.
A grant receipt at the genesis root — verify_grant_receipt with:
| Argument | Resource |
|---|---|
receipt | golden/grant-receipt.cbor |
committedGrant | golden/committed-grant.cbor (derived from golden/manifest.json at read time) |
entryId | the text of golden/entry-id.txt |
trust | {root: "genesis", genesis: golden/grant-genesis.cbor} |
Result: verify-grant: PASS · root=genesis · sealing ok, split-view not answered at this root, append-authority ok, attribution ok.
A payload receipt at an accumulator root, offline, against a real anchor — verify_receipt with the lane-A bundle (fixtures/lane-a/PROVENANCE.md): a real receipt from a public lane and the accumulator the univocity contract had published for its log at block 46770471, captured by an independent chain read. (That lane's content was reset on 2026-09-20; the bytes still verify, the URLs they came from no longer resolve.)
| Argument | Resource |
|---|---|
receipt | lane-a/receipt.cbor |
payload | lane-a/statement.cose |
entryId | the text of lane-a/entry-id.txt |
trust | {root: "known-accumulator", accumulator: lane-a/accumulator.cbor} |
Result: verify: PASS · root=known-accumulator · sealing ok, split-view ok, append-authority ok, attribution ok, with anchor.matchedPeak set. Unlike the demo's self-derived snapshot, this anchor is the contract's published state, so the split-view answer is evidence as of that block. The same receipt passes under {root: "known-log-key", keyXy: {b64: }} and reports delegation_invalid under {root: "genesis", genesis: lane-a/genesis.cbor}, because its log is a grandchild of the forest root (docs/self-registration.md).
A resource's bytes are passed back as {b64: }; a text resource such as lane-a/log-key.xy.b64 is base64 text already, so its text goes in b64 as is. golden/burial/public-key.xy.b64 offers the burial chain's root key the same way, so checkpoint-chain can be driven from resources — to its documented negative verdict, since the burial bundle ships no leaf preimage.
This server is listed as dev.forestrie/verify in the official MCP registry.
mise install # node 22.14.0, pnpm 10.6.5
pnpm install pnpm test # browser-safe gate + encoding-copy gate + server.json gate + unit tests pnpm build
Conventions, invariants and the release checklist: AGENTS.md.
MIT.