RAWThink
Überblick
Beschreibung vom Entwickler (englisches Original)
Persistent memory for AI thinking partnerships: hybrid search and a temporal knowledge graph.
Die drei Säulen von PopNx MCP
Diese drei werden nie zu einer Punktzahl zusammengefasst: Meinungen, Messungen und Beliebtheit sind verschiedene Dinge.
- Stimmen der NutzeriNoch keine BewertungenBewertungen starten in einem späteren Schritt zusammen mit Benutzerkonten
- Unsere Basischecksi1 von 1 bestandenAnhand öffentlicher Informationen geprüft; Code noch nicht gescannt
- NutzungiGanz neu↓ 20/Wo. · ★ –
Was du damit machen kannst
Für diesen Server haben wir noch keine Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache geschrieben. Unten stehen die Fakten, die wir aus der Registry gelesen haben.
- Verbindung: Läuft auf deinem Computer
- Transport: stdio
- Kategorie: Suche & KI-Gedächtnis
Installation
Wähle die KI-App, die du nutzt, und kopiere die Einstellungen.
Bevor du installierst
- Basischecks: 1 von 1 bestanden
- Läuft auf deinem Computer mit den Rechten deines Benutzerkontos (Dateien, Netzwerk, Apps).
- Das trägst du selbst ein:
RAWTHINK_VAULT,MEMORY_FILE_PATH,QDRANT_URL,QDRANT_PATH,OLLAMA_URL,OLLAMA_MODEL,RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE,RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE,RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL
Du brauchst
- PyPIuv für Python installiert (für den Befehl uvx)
Welche App nutzt du?
Wähle oben deine App. Wir merken sie uns, damit der Button beim nächsten Mal „In … installieren“ anzeigt.
Öffne Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config und füge dies in claude_desktop_config.json ein
{
"mcpServers": {
"rawthink": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"rawthink-mcp"
],
"env": {
"RAWTHINK_VAULT": "your-value",
"MEMORY_FILE_PATH": "your-value",
"QDRANT_URL": "your-value",
"QDRANT_PATH": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_URL": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_MODEL": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Führe das in deinem Terminal aus
claude mcp add rawthink --env RAWTHINK_VAULT=your-value --env MEMORY_FILE_PATH=your-value --env QDRANT_URL=your-value --env QDRANT_PATH=your-value --env OLLAMA_URL=your-value --env OLLAMA_MODEL=your-value --env RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE=your-value --env RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE=your-value --env RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL=your-value -- uvx rawthink-mcpTrag die leeren Werte ein, bevor du ihn startest.
Oder kopier die Einstellungen selbst
In .cursor/mcp.json in deinem Projekt oder in ~/.cursor/mcp.json einfügen
{
"mcpServers": {
"rawthink": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"rawthink-mcp"
],
"env": {
"RAWTHINK_VAULT": "your-value",
"MEMORY_FILE_PATH": "your-value",
"QDRANT_URL": "your-value",
"QDRANT_PATH": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_URL": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_MODEL": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Dein Browser fragt, ob er die App öffnen darf, dann zeigt die App die Einstellungen und bittet dich um Bestätigung. Schlüsselwerte bleiben leer, damit du sie selbst einträgst.
Oder kopier die Einstellungen selbst
In .vscode/mcp.json in deinem Projekt einfügen
{
"servers": {
"rawthink": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"rawthink-mcp"
],
"env": {
"RAWTHINK_VAULT": "your-value",
"MEMORY_FILE_PATH": "your-value",
"QDRANT_URL": "your-value",
"QDRANT_PATH": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_URL": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_MODEL": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Dein Browser fragt, ob er die App öffnen darf, dann zeigt die App die Einstellungen und bittet dich um Bestätigung. Schlüsselwerte bleiben leer, damit du sie selbst einträgst.
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer, und ChatGPT kann sich nur mit Servern im Internet verbinden. Wähle eine andere App.
Deine Auswahl bleibt in einem Cookie auf diesem Gerät; kein Konto nötig.
Werte, die du selbst einträgst
RAWTHINK_VAULTenvPath to the vault directory holding sessions, qnotes and the knowledge graph.MEMORY_FILE_PATHenvPath to memory.jsonl. Defaults to /memory.jsonl.QDRANT_URLenvQdrant server URL.QDRANT_PATHenvSet to a directory to run Qdrant embedded instead of via Docker.OLLAMA_URLenvOllama server URL. Without it, retrieval degrades to sparse-only.OLLAMA_MODELenvEmbedding model. Changing it requires a full reindex.RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILEenvWhich tools to expose: recall (4, read-only), record (5, the write path), or full (17).RAWTHINK_BM25_STATEenvPath to the BM25 state file. Defaults to /.bm25_state.json.RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVELenvLog level for diagnostics on stderr.
Diese Einstellungen werden aus dem Registry-Eintrag des Entwicklers erzeugt. Wenn in der README etwas anderes steht, folge der README.
Was er kann
Läuft auf deinem Computer; die Tool-Liste erscheint nach der Installation in deiner KI-App.
Basischecksi
Wir prüfen Informationen, die jeder sehen kann; den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Checks, die nicht zutreffen, werden nicht mitgezählt. · Geprüft am 8. Nov. 2026
- ✓ Bestanden
Entwickler passt zum Repo
Der Registry-Name wurde mit dem GitHub-Konto ygtalp bestätigt, dem das Repo gehört
- … Noch nicht geprüft
Wird noch gepflegt
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
- … Noch nicht geprüft
Hat eine Lizenz
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
- – Nicht zutreffend
Endpunkt antwortet
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer; es gibt keinen Endpunkt im Internet
- – Nicht zutreffend
Anmeldung mit OAuth
Läuft auf deinem Computer und nutzt stattdessen lokale Einstellungen
- … Noch nicht geprüft
Keine versteckten Anweisungen in Tool-Beschreibungen
Läuft auf deinem Computer; Tool-Listen können wir nur von Endpunkten im Internet lesen
Im Vergleich mit anderen in Suche & KI-Gedächtnisi
- Mehr Sterne als 0 % der anderen 5717 Server in dieser Kategorie
- Neuer in der Registry veröffentlicht als 27 % der anderen 5717 Server in dieser Kategorie
- Basischecks gleich gut wie oder besser als bei 100 % der anderen 5717 Server in dieser Kategorie
Verglichen mit allen aktiven Servern dieser Kategorie in der Registry. Sterne zählen nur, wenn dem Herausgeber das Repo gehört.
Häufige Fragen
Ist RAWThink sicher?
Er hat 1 von 1 zutreffenden Basischecks bestanden. Den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Bevor du einen Schlüssel oder Token hinzufügst, sieh nach, welche Zugriffe der Server verlangt, und nutze einen Schlüssel, der nur die Berechtigungen hat, die du brauchst.
Welche Schlüssel oder Codes braucht er?
Die Registry nennt keinen erforderlichen Schlüssel, manche Server bitten dich aber bei der ersten Nutzung, dich anzumelden.
Läuft er auf meinem Computer oder in der Cloud?
Er läuft auf deinem Computer. Deine KI-App startet ihn bei Bedarf, und die Daten laufen nicht über die Server des Entwicklers (außer der Server ruft selbst einen Onlinedienst auf).
Wird er noch gepflegt?
Das GitHub-Repo wurde zuletzt – geändert, und die neueste Version (2.0.1) kam vor 3 Monaten in die Registry.
Welche Apps können ihn nutzen?
Apps, die MCP unterstützen, etwa Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor und VS Code. Außerdem brauchst du Python (uv) auf deinem Computer.
Was kann ich stattdessen nutzen?
In derselben Kategorie: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
Alternativen
Server derselben Kategorie von anderen Entwicklern, sortiert nach Sternen.
So liest du eine Karte:↓ Downloads pro Wochei★ GitHub-SterneiDrei Säulen: Bewertungen · Checks · NutzungiAktualisiert = neueste Version in der Registry veröffentlichti
Codebase Memory
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Exa
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
README vom Entwickler
README öffnen
Unverändert aus dem Repo des Entwicklers übernommen. PopNx MCP hat den Inhalt weder geprüft noch empfiehlt es ihn. HTML, Bilder und Skripte wurden entfernt. Links führen von dieser Website weg.
RAWThink
Persistent memory for AI thinking partnerships. A knowledge graph you can argue with, search that spans every session you have ever had, and a record of not just what you decided but what you rejected.
MCP server for Claude Code. Python, local, no cloud.
The problem
Every conversation with an AI starts from nothing. You explain the same context, re-derive the same conclusions, and rediscover decisions you already made — and the reasoning that produced them is gone the moment the window scrolls.
Chat history does not fix this. History is a transcript; what you need is *structure*: which ideas connect, which beliefs you have since abandoned, which alternatives you considered and dropped, and why.
RAWThink keeps that structure in three layers, in files you own.
What it does
Hybrid semantic search across every session and note — BGE-M3 dense embeddings and BM25 sparse vectors, fused with RRF. Ask "what did I think about free will?" and get the passages, not a keyword match.
A temporal knowledge graph where observations carry dates and status. Beliefs can be marked invalidated and linked to what replaced them, so the archive remembers not only what you think but what you used to think.
Session lifecycle — a close command that exports the conversation, extracts entities into the graph, and writes a handoff the next session loads automatically.
Activation decay — unused knowledge fades on a ~23-day half-life, accessed knowledge stays warm. Old material is still there; it just stops crowding out what you are working on now.
Quick start
Prerequisites
- Python 3.10+
- Docker for Qdrant — or set
QDRANT_PATHfor embedded mode - Ollama with
bge-m3:ollama pull bge-m3
Install
pip install rawthink-mcp
rawthink-install # creates ~/rawthink-vault with everything inside cd ~/rawthink-vault docker compose up -d # starts Qdrant
rawthink-install writes the vault structure, CLAUDE.md, THINKING_DIRECTIVES.md, SETUP.md, docker-compose.yml and the /rtclose command. Use rawthink-install --vault ~/my-vault for a different location.
Register with Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user rawthink -- rawthink-mcp
Check the install
rawthink-doctor
Nine checks with a fix line for each failure: vault, graph schema, BM25 state format, Qdrant, index coverage, vector dimension, Ollama, MCP registration.
The index coverage check is the one worth knowing about. Indexing can stop partway and leave a collection that looks healthy — it exists, it has points, queries return results. They are results from part of the vault, and nothing else tells you that.
Upgrading from 0.x
1.5.0 changed the graph schema and 2.0.0 changes the sparse index. Migrate the graph before writing anything:
python -m rawthink_mcp.migrate --path vault/memory.jsonl --guess-domains --heal-dangling
That is a dry run — it prints what would change and writes nothing. Read the report, then re-run with --apply. A timestamped backup is taken first.
Then re-encode the search index, because BM25 term IDs changed:
reindex(full=True)
A plain reindex skips unchanged chunks and will leave the old encoding in place. rawthink-doctor tells you if this is still pending.
See CHANGELOG.md for what changed and why.
Your first session
> search_thoughts("what have I decided about caching?")
record_decision(
name="api/cache: read-through", domain="software", decided="read-through cache in front of the read model", because="the write path is already the bottleneck; adding invalidation there costs more", rejected=["write-through — couples the write path to cache health", "no cache — p99 was 400ms against a 200ms SLO"] )
Close with /rtclose. It exports the conversation, extracts what is worth keeping into the graph, and leaves a handoff for next time — which the next session loads on its own.
The schema, and why it looks like this
This is the part worth understanding, because it is what keeps the graph queryable over years rather than months.
Role and subject are separate fields
entityType answers what role does this node play. Closed list of ten:
| type | for |
|---|---|
decision | a choice made, with alternatives rejected |
concept | an idea, theory, model, analogy |
finding | something discovered or measured — a bug, a result, an audit |
rule | a durable constraint or pattern to follow |
open-question | unresolved, waiting on evidence |
artifact | a project, tool, document, feature, source |
insight | a realisation that changed how something is seen |
task | a unit of intended work |
event | something that happened at a point in time |
thing | a person, object or substance named directly |
domain answers what subject is it about: software, music, history, philosophy, health, writing, neuro, finance, personal, galaxy.
Keeping these apart is not tidiness. When one field carries both, the type list grows by one entry per subject — a real vault reached 46 types this way, with saglik-bulgusu, teknik-karar and bug-pattern sitting next to karar. At that point nothing can be filtered, because no two entries agree on what a type means.
Unknown relation types are rejected, not warned about
Canonical vocabulary: supports, contradicts, evolved_into, depends_on, exemplifies, part_of, caused_by, enables, supersedes, related_to, investigates, informs, uses.
Close synonyms fold automatically — connected_to → related_to, aspect_of → part_of. Anything else raises.
An earlier version accepted unknown types with a warning. Nothing acted on the warning and 56 one-off types accumulated. A warning that lets the write through is a decision to allow it, written in the voice of disapproval.
Epistemic status defaults to unknown
assertion, hypothesis, speculation — or unknown when unstated.
unknown is deliberate. If a session did not establish something, recording it as an assertion promotes a claim nobody made. The migration follows the same rule: 144 entities with no epistemic field became unknown, not assertion.
Revise, do not delete
> revise(entity_name="api/cache: read-through",
observations=["read-through cache in front of the read model"], superseded_by="moved to write-through after the read model split", superseding_entity="api/cache: write-through")
The old observation is marked invalidated, dated, and linked to what replaced it. Delete tools exist but sit outside the default agent-facing profiles: an archive that forgets its own reversals cannot answer the question it was kept for.
Decisions record what was rejected
record_decision stores decided, because, and rejected as separately queryable observations. The rejected alternatives are the part worth keeping — what was chosen stays readable in the code forever, what was considered and dropped exists nowhere else. That is the question that gets asked six months later.
MCP tools
Tool definitions sit in the context window from the first token of a session, so the surface is a standing cost rather than a per-call one. Profiles load only what a given step needs.
RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE=recall # 4 tools, ~900 tokens — read-only
RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE=record # 5 tools, ~1750 tokens — the write path RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE=full # 17 tools, ~4200 tokens — everything (default)
A tool outside the active profile stays an ordinary function — reachable from the CLI and from tests. It simply is not in front of an agent that will not call it.
Search
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
search_thoughts | Hybrid search. mode="overview" gives one line per session |
get_session | Full content of a session by ID |
store_thought | Save a quick note as a qnote |
reindex | Re-index the vault into Qdrant |
Graph — reading
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
search_nodes | Bounded. Filters by domain and entity_type; reports total_matched and truncated |
open_nodes | Specific entities with their relations |
read_graph | Whole graph, paginated, with a summary mode |
Graph — writing
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
record | Entities, relations and observations in one validated, atomic call |
record_decision | A decision with its rejected alternatives |
revise | Mark observations superseded, link what replaced them |
create_entities · create_relations · add_observations | Lower-level equivalents |
invalidate_observations | Belief revision without the relation link |
delete_entities · delete_observations · delete_relations | full profile only |
record() validates the whole batch before writing any of it. A half-valid batch writes nothing — a graph left in a state nobody asked for is worse than a rejected write. Relations may only point at entities that already exist or are created in the same call.
Every tool carries MCP annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint), so a host can tell deletion apart from search.
Architecture
Claude Code
│ MCP (stdio) ▼ rawthink-mcp ├── search ──► Qdrant dense (BGE-M3) + sparse (BM25), RRF fusion ├── graph ──► memory.jsonl entities, relations, temporal observations └── export ──► vault/ sessions, qnotes, handoffs as markdown │ Ollama (bge-m3)
Everything runs locally. The vault is plain markdown with YAML frontmatter — open it in Obsidian to browse visually, no plugins needed.
Why JSONL for the graph
Human-readable, git-diffable, no dependency. You can open it, read it, and see a meaningful diff when it changes — which matters for something meant to hold your reasoning.
The tradeoff is load time: the whole file is parsed per read. Fine at a few hundred entities, slower as it grows. Past tens of thousands, SQLite is the obvious next step.
Session lifecycle
session start handoff loads automatically (SessionStart hook)
↓ think together ↓ /rtclose export → extract entities → write handoff
Nur der Anfang wird gezeigt; den Rest findest du im Repo