Prototype · Preview: every server in the official registry, synced every 30 minutes. Reviews and accounts come in a later step.
PopNx MCPMCP servers for people who use AI · explained in plain words

AppSec Toolbox MCP

by ai-ronin-systemsversion 0.3.0i★ –iRuns on your computer
Registry nameio.github.ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp

Install

Overview

Description from the maker (original English)

Passive AppSec scanners as eight parameterless MCP tools; the audited repository is data.

PopNx MCP’s three pillars

These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.

What you can do with it

We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.

  • Connection: Runs on your computer
  • Transport: stdio
  • Category: Developer tools

Install

Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.

Before you install

  • Basic checks: 1 of 1 passed
  • Runs on your computer with your user’s permissions (files, network, apps).
  • You fill in yourself: APPSEC_LANGS

You need

Which app do you use?

Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.

Open Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config, and paste this into claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "appsec-toolbox": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "-e",
        "APPSEC_LANGS",
        "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
      ],
      "env": {
        "APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

Run this in your terminal

claude mcp add appsec-toolbox --env APPSEC_LANGS=your-value -- docker run -i --rm -e APPSEC_LANGS ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0

Fill in the empty values before running it.

Open in Cursor

Or copy the settings yourself

Paste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "appsec-toolbox": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "-e",
        "APPSEC_LANGS",
        "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
      ],
      "env": {
        "APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

Open in VS Code

Or copy the settings yourself

Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project

{
  "servers": {
    "appsec-toolbox": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "-e",
        "APPSEC_LANGS",
        "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
      ],
      "env": {
        "APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.

Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.

Values you fill in

  • APPSEC_LANGS env
    Language profiles: auto, none, or a list such as python,node

These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.

What it can do

Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.

Basic checksi

We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 9, 2026

  • ✓ Pass

    Maker matches the repo

    The registry name was verified with the GitHub account ai-ronin-systems, which owns the repo

  • … Not checked yet

    Still maintained

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • … Not checked yet

    Has a licence

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • – Not applicable

    Endpoint responds

    This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint

  • – Not applicable

    Sign-in with OAuth

    Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead

  • … Not checked yet

    No hidden instructions in tool descriptions

    Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints

Compared with others in Developer toolsi

  • More stars than 0% of the other 5564 servers in this category
  • Published to the registry more recently than 64% of the other 5564 servers in this category
  • Basic checks equal to or better than 100% of the other 5564 servers in this category

Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.

Common questions

Is AppSec Toolbox MCP safe?

It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.

What keys or codes does it need?

The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.

Does it run on my computer or in the cloud?

It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).

Is it still maintained?

The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (0.3.0) reached the registry 14 days ago.

Which apps can use it?

Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need Docker on your computer.

What can I use instead?

In the same category: GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP

Alternatives

Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.

Reading a card:↓ Downloads per weeki★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi

GitHub

GitHub’s official server lets AI read and manage code, issues and pull requests in your account. Use GitHub’s hosted version or run it locally with Docker.

by githubWidely used★ 34.2KUpdated 5 days ago

Computer or cloud

Desktop Commander

MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management

by wonderwhy-erWidely used↓ 709.6K/wk★ 10.2KUpdated 17 days ago

Runs on your computer

Cloudflare MCP

Cloudflare MCP servers

by cloudflareWidely used★ 4.4KUpdated 14 months ago

Runs in the cloud✓ mcp.cloudflare.com

README from the maker

Open the README

Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.

appsec-toolbox-mcp

Let an AI agent audit code you do not trust, without giving it a shell, a path to choose, or the repository's code to run.

Ten pinned security scanners behind eight parameterless MCP tools, in one hardened container. The audited repository is treated as the attacker. The agent only ever collects evidence.

*Recorded from examples/agent_demo.py against examples/vulnerable-sample. Waiting time is shortened; the real scan time is in the last line.*

In 30 seconds

  • What it is. Semgrep, Gitleaks, OSV-Scanner, Trivy, Checkov, Syft, and language specialists (Bandit, FindSecBugs, njsscan, gosec) exposed to any MCP client as fixed capabilities: security.sast, security.secrets, security.dependencies, and so on.
  • The threat model. The repository under audit is hostile: it controls every file the scanners parse and every string the agent reads back. So the agent gets nothing to steer: no arguments, no target path, no shell, no way to run the repository's build or code.
  • What you get. Native scanner reports, a run manifest that ties each report's SHA-256 to a recomputable fingerprint of the scanned tree, and an audit log of every tool call.

Engineering highlights

Each claim links to the code or test that proves it.

ProblemApproachProof
A prompt-injected agent with a shell can do anything.The agent's whole surface is eight parameterless tasks, governed by Makefile MCP. Maintenance targets exist but are refused..makefile-mcp.yaml, the demo
Scanning untrusted code usually runs it: setup.py, postinstall, Gradle plugins, Go toolchain downloads, scanner plug-ins.Strictly passive analysis: no build, install, or dependency resolution; Go runs with GOPROXY=off and GOTOOLCHAIN=local. An adversarial review found that a planted .checkov.yaml could make Checkov import the repository's Python; that path is closed and regression-tested.examples/hostile-sample, tests/image.sh
A hostile repository can silence its own findings with .semgrepignore, .gitleaksignore, # nosec, # nosemgrep...Every scanner runs on toolbox-owned configuration. Inline suppressions are disabled where the scanner allows it, and every marker found is inventoried for the reviewer either way.settings table, output/suppressions.json
Evidence is only worth something if it is tied to what was scanned.The manifest fingerprints the tree exactly like `find . -type f -print0 \LC_ALL=C sort -z \xargs -0 sha256sum \sha256sum, including file names that are not UTF-8 or that sha256sum` escapes, and records each report's digest, tool versions, and data sources.scripts/write-manifest.py, tests/unit/test_manifest.py
One malformed file should not let the target stop the audit.Input a scanner cannot read because of the target (an unloadable Go package, a corrupt lockfile) becomes a recorded coverage limit: not a failed bundle, and not a fake clean result.scripts/run-language-profiles.py, scripts/run-osv.sh
Results should be reproducible, and a compromised scanner should have nowhere to send the code.Offline mode: fetch rule and advisory data once, then scan under --network none. The manifest records the data's age and digest.Offline mode
A security tool is a supply-chain target.Every downloaded binary is checked against its published SHA-256 per architecture; the base image is pinned by digest; Actions are pinned by commit; release jobs that run project code hold no write token; images carry signed build provenance.Dockerfile, release.yml

Verification in layers. Unit tests cover the scripts. A smoke test drives the Makefile through Makefile MCP with fake scanners whose stubs fail if any hardening flag is missing. The image test runs the real scanners against a known-vulnerable sample, a hostile sample that tries every attack above, and offline mode, under the documented resource limits. Independent adversarial reviews attacked the image; every confirmed finding was fixed with a regression test, and what remains is written down in the threat model.

Quick start

IMAGE=ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0

docker pull "$IMAGE" gh attestation verify "oci://$IMAGE" --owner ai-ronin-systems

Offline mode, the resource limits, and the target-settings hardening are on main and ship in the next release. To use them now: docker build -t appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev . and IMAGE=appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev.

Run it as an MCP stdio server against one repository:

docker run --rm -i \

--read-only --cap-drop=ALL --security-opt=no-new-privileges:true \ --tmpfs /tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g --memory=6g --pids-limit=512 \ --user "$(id -u):$(id -g)" \ -v "$PWD/my-project:/runner/target:ro" \ -v "$PWD/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw" \ "$IMAGE"

Register the same command as a stdio server in any MCP client:

{

"mcpServers": { "appsec-toolbox": { "command": "docker", "args": ["run", "--rm", "-i", "--read-only", "--cap-drop=ALL", "--security-opt=no-new-privileges:true", "--tmpfs", "/tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g", "--memory=6g", "--pids-limit=512", "-v", "/abs/path/my-project:/runner/target:ro", "-v", "/abs/path/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw", "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"] } } }

Compose, offline mode, language selection, and every evidence file are in Usage.

How it works

untrusted repository (read-only)

| v /runner/target | v trusted Makefile + Makefile MCP | | | | | | Semgrep Gitleaks OSV Trivy Checkov Syft | +---- language profile selection ----+ | | | | Bandit FindSecBugs njsscan gosec Python Java Node/JS Go | v /runner/output reports, run-manifest.json, suppressions.json, audit log

The operator mounts exactly one repository at /runner/target and one writable directory at /runner/output. The audited path is never an MCP parameter, so the agent has no host-path capability. A trusted Makefile holds every scanner command; Makefile MCP decides which of its targets the agent may call. Language specialists are picked by detection (APPSEC_LANGS=auto) or by the operator, never by the agent.

CapabilityToolEvidence
security.auditeverything belowcomplete bundle
security.sastSemgrep + suppression inventorysemgrep.json, suppressions.json
security.secretsGitleaksgitleaks.json
security.dependenciesOSV-Scannerosv.json
security.repositoryTrivytrivy.json
security.iacCheckovcheckov.json
security.languageBandit, FindSecBugs, njsscan, gosec as applicablelanguage-profile.json + reports
supply_chain.sbomSyftsbom.cdx.json (CycloneDX)

Threat model

The audited repository is the attacker, and the agent reading its reports may be steered by it. Read the [threat model](docs/threat-model.md): attacker goals, sixteen threats with their controls and residual risks, what is and is not guaranteed, and an operator checklist.

ProtectedNot protected
Target builds, installs, hooks, and Makefiles never run.Scanner parser bugs; the container is the boundary.
Target-owned scanner settings files cannot suppress findings or load code.Inline trivy:ignore and njsscan-ignore comments; Checkov lists its inline skips as skipped_checks. All are inventoried.
The agent cannot pick the target or run anything but the eight scans.An agent that misreports what the reports say.
No credentials in the container; read-only, unprivileged, non-root, resource-capped.Exfiltration by a compromised scanner in online mode. Offline mode runs with no network.
Each run's manifest ties report digests to a fingerprint of the scanned tree.Tampering by anyone who can write output/; the manifest is not signed.

Design choices

  • Evidence, not verdicts. Reports stay in each scanner's native format. The toolbox never grades, deduplicates, or normalizes findings; a consumer does that with the full evidence.
  • One closed set of scanners. Four language profiles, no plug-in framework, no user-defined pipelines. Generic SCA stays with OSV and Trivy; specialists add a different analysis engine, not a duplicate one.
  • Coverage gaps are recorded, never papered over. A source-only Java project gets no FindSecBugs pass, because the toolbox will not compile untrusted code; the manifest says so.
  • Everything pinned. Scanner versions are pinned and updated one at a time against known-positive and hostile fixtures (update policy).

It is not an autonomous auditor, an LLM agent, a DAST engine, a credential manager, a report normalizer, or a shell server.

Part of a larger system

appsec-audit-hound (planned)    decides why to scan, correlates evidence, writes findings

| MCP appsec-toolbox-mcp collects governed, passive evidence <- this repository | built on makefile-mcp exposes trusted Make targets to agents, deny-by-default

Makefile MCP is published on PyPI and the official MCP Registry, with its own threat model.

Documentation

DocumentWhat it covers
Threat modelAttacker goals, threats and controls, guarantees, limits, operator checklist
UsageRunning, tools and evidence files, language profiles, offline mode, scanner behaviour, network use, versions, development
ArchitectureTrust boundary, ownership, design rules
ToolingPinned versions, settings each scanner ignores, update policy
Security policySupported versions and private vulnerability reporting
ChangelogReleased and unreleased changes
ContributingHow to add a scanner without widening the boundary

Development

pipx install pytest==8.4.2 && pipx install ruff==0.14.0

make test # ruff, unit tests, smoke test make image make test-image # the real image: known positives, hostile sample, offline mode

More in Usage.

License

Apache-2.0.

Ask PopNx