Finance Toolkit
500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.
Description from the maker (original English)
Constitutional verdict layer for AI agents. SEAL/HOLD before mutation. F1-F13 floors; audit ledger.
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
You need
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
Works in Claude on the web, desktop and mobile:
https://mcp.arif-fazil.com/mcpRun this in your terminal
claude mcp add --transport http arifos https://mcp.arif-fazil.com/mcpPaste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"arifos": {
"url": "https://mcp.arif-fazil.com/mcp"
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project
{
"servers": {
"arifos": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.arif-fazil.com/mcp"
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
ChatGPT connects only to servers on the internet:
https://mcp.arif-fazil.com/mcpMenu names can differ slightly by plan and over time.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
We have not read this server’s tool list yet; we check endpoints in rotation.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 7, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account ariffazil, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation
Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation
Not checked yet; we read the tool list when we check the endpoint
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs in the maker’s cloud. Connect over the internet with nothing to install, but what you send passes through the maker’s servers.
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (1!2026.10.11) reached the registry 22 days ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. It connects by URL, so apps that accept remote MCP servers work too, such as ChatGPT in developer mode.
In the same category: Finance Toolkit, SolidInvoice, Korea Tax Calculator
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.
Create and send invoices and quotes, manage clients, and track payments in SolidInvoice.
Korean tax calculation and tax-audit judgment MCP: 96 tools with statutory citations.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
### ⚠️ Current verified state — generated, never hand-edited
Runtime self-measurement (
http://127.0.0.1:8088/health @2026-10-29T17:02:36Z): kernel degraded · floors 12/13 measured pass · vault999 healthy · releasearifos-5564ca6f7f61· driftaligned(source=built=deployed) · tools exposed 9. Per-floor provenance:.well-known/current-state.json.
Independent audit (2026-10-11, live re-probe by FI-008 + claim-level hand audit; receipts:
AAA/forge_work/grant-arifos-reality-reforge-2026-10-11/): floors 2 pass · fail F2, F11, F12, F13 · 7 unmeasured = 13 distinct (raw key-count 10 includes L11/L12/L13, L-prefix aliases of the failing F11/F12/F13) · actor binding not verified (observed calls unsigned) · receipt fidelity broken on invocation-telemetry surface (HOLD persisted as ok:true) · independent reconstruction: no external verifier bound.
These are two different witness objects. Self-measurement ≠ independent audit;
unmeasured is not pass. If this block conflicts with the live endpoint, the endpoint
wins — re-run
python scripts/generate_current_state.py.
Machine state:
.well-known/current-state.json·
Badge feed:
.well-known/badges/·
Known gaps: What Is Not Yet Proven
arifOS is a model-independent authority plane for AI agents. It evaluates consequential proposals against thirteen constitutional floors *before* execution, returns a governed verdict, preserves the human veto, and records what happened as an auditable receipt.
In a world where intelligence is abundant, authority becomes the scarce resource. arifOS keeps judgment independent from execution.
Documentation · Live Kernel · MCP · MCP Registry (Glama) · PyPI · Security · Evidence
Proposer ≠ Judge ≠ Executor ≠ Witness
Human sovereignty > machine authority
What arifOS is not: not an AI model · not an agent framework · not an execution engine (A-FORGE executes) · not an attention plane (AAA attends) · not the witness (FRAME witnesses; VAULT999 remembers) · not a substitute for authentication, sandboxing, or legal review.
| Audience | What you get |
|---|---|
| Human | A quiet veto: the agent proposes, the kernel records a verdict, you stay sovereign |
| Agent / A2A | MCP tools + receipts. You do not get the keys. Judgment by arifOS, discovery by AAA, execution by A-FORGE |
| Institution | Policy floors F1–F13, a hash-chained VAULT999 audit trail, model-vendor independence |
| Machine / MCP | Streamable HTTP endpoint, 8 canonical verbs, published schemas |
| Registries & Indexers | Glama MCP Directory (Score: A) · server.json (Official MCP Registry) · CURRENT_VERIFIED_STATE.md · llms.txt · CITATION.cff |
Live: https://arifos.arif-fazil.com · MCP :8088 · sister organs AAA · A-FORGE · GEOX
arifOS was built by Arif Fazil, a senior exploration geoscientist who spent his career making decisions where observations are incomplete, interpretations are probabilistic, provenance matters, and irreversible action must be gated. He transferred that discipline into agent runtime governance.
I am a geologist, not a programmer. I did not write this codebase and I do not read it line by line. What I do is point at where the problem is — and the agents in my federation solve it, inside the constitution and the review gates I set, with the commit trail to show who ran what.
Read the commits if you want to check that claim: the author fields are agent handles, not aliases of mine. That is the deliberate shape of this project, not a detail being hidden. It also sets the honest expectation — the design and the judgment are mine, the implementation is theirs, and where the two disagree, the bug is mine to answer for.
The system is named after its founder and reflects a core belief: governance is a systems problem, not a model problem.
One human, and the agents he directs.
pip install arifos
python examples/enterprise_operations_demo.py
Three of the six graded scenarios:
Read customer account data → SEAL (receipt RCPT-…)
Major refund (50× the ceiling) → HOLD (awaiting human) Delete account + audit trail → VOID (blocked by a hard floor)
Full transcript: docs/QUICKSTART.md. The demo runs in-process — no real records or funds are touched.
gate: hard_deterministic, llm_consulted: false).forge_work/lingkaran1/, measured 2026-10-29/30.Every row names its own gap. Repairing a claim by substituting a stronger one is worse than the stale claim it replaced. (Closed rows are receipted in docs/evidence/GAP_HISTORY.md.)
| Gap | Risk | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Independent security audit | Adversarial bypass testing not published | In progress — external researcher reviewing since 2026-08-25. Findings so far: fetch-surface SSRF (fixed, 1!2026.9.1); Cypher injection (HIGH — key whitelist landed) and fastmcp path traversal (MEDIUM — containment guard landed). See SECURITY.md |
| Sovereign-binding of irreversible acknowledgement | ack_irreversible and actor_signature are transported as payload fields; nothing published shows a human signature bound to (transaction_hash ‖ state_hash ‖ nonce), single-use, scoped, unforgeable by the proposing agent | Open — design drafted (docs/judgment-integrity-2026-09-22/), not implemented. F13 is enforced by convention and band-gating, not cryptographic transaction binding |
| Ledger head not externally anchored or signed | A hash chain held entirely by one party cannot detect wholesale rewrite by that party | Open — VAULT999 today is self-verifiable, not independently attestable |
| Third-party evaluation | No external reviewer has published findings | In progress since 2026-08-25; nothing published |
| Reproducible demo by strangers | Onboarding path not independently tested | Partial — demo verified here; no stranger has reproduced it unaided |
| Enterprise deployment | No production customer reference | Open |
| Standards conformance | MCP/A2A results not published externally | Partial — report: result: PARTIAL, per-tool schema validation DEFERRED |
| SBOM and signed releases | Supply-chain integrity unverified externally | Partial — CycloneDX on publish; no signing, no CVE scan |
| Test suite | Needs a live kernel (tests/conftest.py refuses without :8088, by design) | 7,668 tests collect clean (2026-10-05); the identity/authority subset carries 34 pre-existing failures vs 321 passes (2026-09-30) — quote a failure *set*, never a bare pass count |
| Observability | Tracing partially wired | Partial — sovereign Postgres + arifFlow live; OTel spans on all 8 verbs; caller-side propagation incomplete |
| Semantic layer (Graphiti) | Knowledge graph retired from the read path | graphiti_read: retired_888 (2026-09-04); semantic floor disabled by choice (ARIFOS_ML_FLOORS=0) |
| Comparative benchmark | No published comparison against alternative frameworks | Open |
| Maintainer continuity | Single sovereign, single reviewer; no succession or key-recovery procedure published | Open — relevant to institutional adoption |
| Identity registry in two copies | contracts/identity.py ↔ arifosmcp/contracts/identity.py had diverged; a one-sided edit ships split-brain identity | Mitigated 2026-09-30 (tripwire tests, 18 actors aligned) — consolidation to one owner still open |
See SECURITY.md for the threat model and disclosure policy, and docs/evidence/claims.yaml for the machine-readable claim registry.
Agent proposes action
│ ▼ ┌─────────────────┐ │ arifOS Kernel │ Evaluates against 13 constitutional floors │ (:8088) │ Records provenance + evidence refs + hashes └────────┬────────┘ │ ┌──────┼────────┬──────────┬───────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ SEAL HOLD SABAR PARTIAL VOID (go) (wait for (defer — (proceed (blocked by human) evidence with a floor) pending) cooling) │ │ ▼ ▼ Execute Human via reviews A-FORGE │ ▼ Receipt in VAULT999 (append-only hash chain)
The judge never executes. The executor never certifies.
Verdicts are ordered and non-compensatory — a
Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo