Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Description from the maker (original English)
Learn and adopt the Capability Host Protocol — the agentic web's open evidence layer.
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
You need
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
Works in Claude on the web, desktop and mobile:
https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcpRun this in your terminal
claude mcp add --transport http chp https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcpPaste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"chp": {
"url": "https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcp"
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project
{
"servers": {
"chp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcp"
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
ChatGPT connects only to servers on the internet:
https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcpMenu names can differ slightly by plan and over time.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
We have not read this server’s tool list yet; we check endpoints in rotation.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 6, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account capabilityhostprotocol, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation
Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation
Not checked yet; we read the tool list when we check the endpoint
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs in the maker’s cloud. Connect over the internet with nothing to install, but what you send passes through the maker’s servers.
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (0.8.0) reached the registry 4 months ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. It connects by URL, so apps that accept remote MCP servers work too, such as ChatGPT in developer mode.
In the same category: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Dechonet MCP
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
30 security tools for AI agents: phishing links, exposure maps, DNS, SSL, PQC, history, pivots.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
CHP is the open protocol for declaring, governing, and proving what agents, tools, and systems do — the single signed plane where a human approval, an agent's action, and a system call become the same governed, tamper-evident, replayable event.
The hook is simple:
See what your agents and tools actually did — and what governed it.
Your coding agent reads files, runs commands, calls tools. This puts a governed boundary at the point of action — no application code changes:
pip install chp-core
chp hooks install # hooks Claude Code chp hooks install --all-harnesses # ...or Claude Code + Codex + Gemini CLI
Use your agent normally, then look at what it did:
chp session list
chp session tree
Every tool call is a typed evidence event, hash-chained and stored locally in ~/.chp/evidence.sqlite. A denial is a first-class event with a reason code — not a swallowed exception — and the chain is tamper-evident, so someone who did not run the agent can still tell whether the record is intact.
Prefer to drive the protocol directly? chp serve-demo starts a governed host and prints a copy-pasteable first invocation.
Full guide: docs/quickstart.md · why it exists: docs/why-chp.md · docs site: docs.capabilityhostprotocol.com
Replay is by correlation ID, and the record answers more than "what happened" — from examples/agent-operations-demo/:
[
{"sequence": 1, "event_type": "execution_started", "capability_id": "trace_execution", "outcome": null}, {"sequence": 3, "event_type": "execution_completed", "capability_id": "trace_execution", "outcome": "success"}, {"sequence": 7, "event_type": "execution_started", "capability_id": "tool.add", "outcome": null}, {"sequence": 12, "event_type": "execution_started", "capability_id": "tool.multiply", "outcome": null}, {"sequence": 13, "event_type": "execution_completed", "capability_id": "tool.multiply", "outcome": "success"} ]
You can also ask what a policy *would* have done to a run that already happened:
{
"invariant": {"id": "deny_multiply_tool", "kind": "capability_id_matches"}, "would_have_denied": true, "violating_events": [{"capability_id": "tool.multiply", "event_type": "execution_started"}] }
CHP is not another agent framework, tool protocol, or workflow engine. It is the governed evidence plane at the capability boundary: what ran *and* what governed it (policy, risk tier, safety checks, human approval, autonomy budgets, denial) emit onto one signed, correlated record. Observability tools split execution across separate, optional, unsigned signals and carry no governance; CHP unifies both and proves them.
Status: CHP is a pre-1.0 release candidate (v0.9.3) — a frozen, additive wire surface backed by two independent implementations (Python + TypeScript) that pass conformance. chp-core ships on PyPI.
pip install chp-core # zero runtime dependencies
pip install 'chp-core[schema]' # enforce declared input_schema pip install 'chp-core[signing]' # ed25519 — signed hosts, bundles, mandates npm install @capabilityhostprotocol/sdk # TypeScript client + verifier (alpha)
chp host verify smoke-tests the install in under a second and reports whether input-schema validation is enforced.
From this checkout: python -m pip install -e packages/python.
from chp_core import LocalCapabilityHost, capability
host = LocalCapabilityHost("example-host")
@capability( id="math.add", version="1.0.0", description="Add two numbers.", ) def add(a: int, b: int): return {"sum": a + b}
host.register(add)
result = host.invoke( "math.add", {"a": 2, "b": 3}, correlation_id="demo-correlation", )
print(result.outcome) # "success" print(result.data) # {"sum": 5}
for event in host.replay("demo-correlation"): print(event.event_type) # execution_started, execution_completed
The host emits execution_started and execution_completed evidence for the invocation. If execution fails, it emits execution_failed. If the host denies invocation, it emits execution_denied.
spec/README.md: the specification index — core (v0.1), governance vocabulary, invocation pipeline, HTTP binding, evidence integrity + anchors (v0.2), reserved names, test vectors, changelog, proposal processschemas/: JSON Schemas for protocol objectspackages/python/chp_core/: reference host (Python)packages/chp-sdk/ + packages/chp-host-ts/: the second implementation (TypeScript)examples/capability-host-endpoint-demo/: HTTP-served host demoexamples/agent-operations-demo/: agent/tool observability demoexamples/codex-self-observation-demo/: Codex dogfooding demoexamples/mcp-bridge-demo/: experimental MCP-style bridge prototypeconformance/: conformance runnerdocs/quickstart.md: install, first run, serving, meshdocs/why-chp.md: the problem and the thesisdocs/adapter-authoring.md: writing your own capability adapterdocs/production-runbook.md: operations, backup/restore, key compromisedocs/comparisons/chp-vs-mcp.md: precise MCP comparisondocs/comparisons/chp-and-opentelemetry.md: OpenTelemetry alignment notedocs/comparisons/landscape.md: adjacent framework comparisondocs/security/threat-model-v0.1.md: v0.1 threat modelThe reference implementation is hardened for production operation: WAL multi-writer safety with hot backup (chp store backup --verify), SIGTERM drain (in-flight work completes before exit), a fail-loud auth flag (CHP_HOST_REQUIRE_AUTH=1), scheduled retention, and operator metrics (store size, witness-loop liveness, revocation counts, internal errors). Operations, backup/restore, rolling upgrades, and the key-compromise runbook: docs/production-runbook.md. Vulnerability reporting: SECURITY.md.
MCP exposes tools and context to AI applications. CHP governs and evidences execution of capabilities.
They fit together. MCP can be a source of capability invocation, and CHP adds correlation, replay, evidence, denial semantics, and governance at the execution boundary.
Read more: docs/comparisons/chp-vs-mcp.md.
Read CONTRIBUTING.md first. One thing to know before you open a pull request: this repository is a generated mirror of a private development repository. CI rejects pull requests that touch packages/, docs/, spec/, schemas/, or examples/ from a branch that is not sync/*, so a code PR against those paths will fail by construction no matter how good it is.
That is not a brush-off — it is the publishing model, and we would rather say so up front than let you find out from a red check. Issues, spec proposals, comparisons, and discussion are the highest-bandwidth way in today; open an issue and we will route the change through the internal flow with attribution.
Open source should include local visibility:
Commercial value can remain around production trust:
Guiding rule:
Local visibility should be free. Production trust should be paid.
CHP is dual-licensed by asset:
packages/, conformance/, examples/, scripts/): Apache License 2.0 — see LICENSE.spec/, schemas/, docs/): Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) — see LICENSE-DOCS. Implementing the specification is additionally covered by a royalty-free patent grant — see PATENTS.TRADEMARK.md.Contributions are accepted under the Contributor License Agreement; see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Copyright © 2026 Project Auxo, Inc. See NOTICE.