Context7
Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.
Description from the maker (original English)
Accountability infrastructure for long-running AI agents. Shared memory is a provenance graph.
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
The maker has not listed install details in the registry. See the maker’s README below.
Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 7, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account cirwel, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint
Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead
Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (3.6.0) reached the registry 11 days ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code.
In the same category: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
A self-hosted record your agents write to. Across sessions and runtimes, any agent or operator can look up who claimed what, on what evidence, who disputed it, and what replaced it.
Agent work outlives the process that started it. Git, scratchpads, and handoff notes carry code and in-flight task state; UNITARES keeps the shared record of claims, reviews, and outcomes across runs. When a finding is corrected or a change is challenged, the next session reads the updated record instead of acting on a superseded claim.
UNITARES is a server you run that keeps that record. Any agent or model that speaks MCP or HTTP can connect (with ready integrations for Claude Code, Codex, and Hermes Agent) and write its findings, reviews, and results to one operator-owned record. A later agent, or you, can read it back and see where each piece came from.
[See one incident without installing anything →](https://cirwel.github.io/unitares/demo.html) · Read the evidence · Install
| Question | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Who said it? | Identity and lineage: every write to the record is bound to the process that made it, and a successor can declare which process it continues. |
| What supports it? | Claims and evidence: findings keep their sources and corrections outside any single context window. When a newer finding replaces an older one, the older one links to it. |
| Who challenged it? | Governed review: objections, conditions, and their resolution stay on the work they concern. Asking for review is not the same as passing it. |
| What happened? | Outcome grounding: test, build, and task results are recorded against the check-ins that predicted them. |
| What can a successor recover? | Reconstruction: a new process can search or export prior findings, open review conditions, and outcomes before it acts. |
Digital proprioception runs on the check-in path: EISV summarizes behavioral observations over time and returns state feedback and a policy recommendation (computation contract). Second opinions let consult ask a connected local or orchestrated model, and structured dialectic records thesis, challenge, and resolution on the work.
Agent A (Codex) finds a bug, records it, and exits. Agent B (Claude Code) later finds the real cause and records a finding that supersedes A's. Agent C (Hermes Agent) works on the same area in a later session and reads the record before touching the code (reading needs no identity): its search returns A's finding marked superseded, with a link to B's. C then declares lineage from A. This API sketch is separate from the hosted service-reload incident.
# Agent A (Codex)
start_session {"force_new": true} -> agent A's id store_finding {"summary": "upload retry test is flaky", ...} -> finding a record_result {"outcome_type": "test_failed", ...}
start_session {"force_new": true} -> agent B's id store_finding {"summary": "upload retry fails on clock skew", ...} -> finding b use_tool {"tool_name": "knowledge", "arguments": {"action": "supersede", "discovery_id": " ", "supersedes_id": " "}, ...}
search_shared_memory {"query": "upload retry test"} -> finding a (superseded, points to b), finding b start_session {"force_new": true, "parent_agent_id": " ", "spawn_reason": "explicit"}
The Claude Code and Codex plugin's session start points each new session at the record. For a complete call-by-call sequence, see the captured two-process walkthrough.
Homebrew preview, recommended for an Apple Silicon desktop Mac: the cirwel/unitares tap installs the services natively; follow its install and first-time setup. The packaged unitares update coordinates writer shutdown, verified backup, migrations, prior-state restoration, and deep health when writers restart (schema verification when they remain stopped); kegs that predate it use the tap's one-time manual transition.
Docker Compose, on any platform: with Git, curl, and Docker Compose installed, one command starts the latest published release of the local stack (the server, PostgreSQL with AGE and pgvector, Redis, and the coordination plane; add docker-compose.full.yml for local semantic search and hybrid ranking, or use the core profile to run only the first two):
v=$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cirwel/unitares/master/PUBLISHED_VERSION) && git clone --branch "v$v" --depth 1 https://github.com/cirwel/unitares.git && cd unitares && docker compose up -d --wait
http://localhost:8767/mcp/, or open the dashboard at http://localhost:8767/dashboard (Docker quickstart). On Docker, ./scripts/unitares update backs up the database, applies migrations, and verifies deep health (updating).docker compose down (without -v) in an earlier checkout before starting another (stop is not enough, because stopped containers still hold their fixed container_name values, and restart: unless-stopped revives un-stopped containers when the Docker daemon restarts), or use the managed launcher (scripts/install/launch.sh), which checks ownership first.Connect your agents and models (Integrating agents):
unitares-governance-plugin wires MCP, lifecycle hooks, skills, and per-file edit leases (via the stack's lease plane, so concurrent work in the same checkout does not overwrite another agent's file).npx mcp-remote for stdio-only clients, or Bearer / OAuth on a dedicated public listener for hosted connectors like Claude.ai and ChatGPT), the Python SDK (pip install unitares-sdk), or the resident agent runtime../scripts/unitares model to connect a local OpenAI-compatible server (Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, llama.cpp) for consult and in-process review, or add the agent orchestrator for cross-family CLI review.For an operator running several long-lived AI agents across vendors on infrastructure they control, who wants one queryable record of identities, findings, reviews, and outcomes across the fleet.
UNITARES works alongside Git, issue trackers, handoff notes, scratchpads, evals, and guardrails: those carry code, task state, and runtime checks, while UNITARES keeps the shared record that ties the agents' claims, reviews, and outcomes together. Each agent keeps its own loop and model. Inferred pauses are advisory by default, and the operator decides when hard holds are enforced. Identity, authorization, archive, and coordination boundaries are enforced by the server.
UNITARES is self-hosted accountability infrastructure for operators running multiple AI agents. Its single-operator federation kernel connects independent runtimes to one operator-controlled server over MCP or HTTP, where they share a durable record while keeping their own models, tools, and runtimes. They interoperate with each other over their own transports or A2A; UNITARES is the record behind them, not the transport between them. Together this is an operator-owned accountability layer for coding, research, background, and resident agents. What it adds to an activity log is lineage and supersession: claims and evidence, reviews, and outcomes stay bound to the process that recorded them, and a replaced claim points to its replacement, for review and for reconstruction later.
Storage is PostgreSQL (with Apache AGE for supersession graph links and pgvector for embeddings) and Redis, with no required external model API. The check-in's behavioral state estimate is a form of runtime proprioception; its policy recommendation is retained in the record and is advisory by default, with optional hard-hold enforcement.
Empirical evaluations, operational measurements, and scope are documented in Evidence and limits and the Reviewer Guide.
| Goal | Guide |
|---|---|
| Try it | Install → two-process walkthrough |
| Connect an agent or application | MCP integration · Python SDK |
| Operate a deployment | Operator manual |
| Understand the product and architecture | Product definition · Architecture |
| Research behind it | Evidence and limits · Paper · Public dataset |
| Contribute | Contributing · Development guide |
| Everything else | Documentation index |
Kenny Wang (ORCID 0009-0006-7544-2374), CIRWEL Systems. See CITATION.cff for the versioned citation.
@misc{wang2026unitares,
author = {Wang, Kenny}, title = {{UNITARES}: Information-Theoretic Governance of Heterogeneous Agent Fleets}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.19647159} }
Apache License 2.0. See [LICENSE](
Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo