Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Description from the maker (original English)
Recursive Claude spawning for autonomous project builds with self-healing test loops
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
ANTHROPIC_API_KEYValues marked secret are keys to your account. Never share them or paste them into a chat.
You need
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
Open Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config, and paste this into claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"context-foundry": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"context-foundry"
],
"env": {
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Run this in your terminal
claude mcp add context-foundry --env ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-value -- uvx context-foundryFill in the empty values before running it.
Paste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"context-foundry": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"context-foundry"
],
"env": {
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project
{
"servers": {
"context-foundry": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"context-foundry"
],
"env": {
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 6, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account context-foundry, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint
Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead
Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
You need to fill in: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (2.2.1) reached the registry 12 months ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need Python (uv) on your computer.
In the same category: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, 오늘냥이 (Oneul Nyangi)
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Real cat photos, diaries, profiles, age and food reference calculators, and breeds.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
Autonomous build loop that plans, builds, reviews, and learns.
Foundry reads a TASKS.md task list and works through it using Claude Code agents in a TUI, committing each completed task. Several run modes control what happens next: run forever with discovery (Auto), stop when done (Sprint), pause for human review after each task (Review), or run unattended for the build service (Service).
When to use the pipeline: the harness is a multiplier for verifiable engineering work — tasks with file:line references the planner can ground against, constraints the auditor can check, and behavior that BUILD or AUDIT can exercise against the code. For prose work (README updates, brainstorming, architecture decision records, documentation rewrites), the pipeline pays plan-review and audit costs for zero marginal benefit because there's nothing for it to verify. Write those directly. Full guidance: docs/task-composition.md.
Load patterns from ~/.foundry/patterns/
│ SCOUT → .buildloop/scout-report.md (investigate codebase) │ PLAN (+ patterns + scout report) → .buildloop/current-plan.md │ IMPLEMENT → build the code, run checks │ VERIFY (fresh context) → audit claims, fix issues, write verdict │ PATTERN EXTRACTOR → merge into ~/.foundry/patterns/ │ LOCAL GIT COMMIT → feat(task_id) or WIP(task_id) │ OPTIONAL AUTO-PUSH → only if auto_push_remote is configured
Foundry is a harness for Claude Code. Each agent (planner, builder, reviewer, fixer, discoverer) is a Claude Code CLI invocation with a role-specific prompt and scoped tool access. The Rust binary handles orchestration, streaming, and state — Claude does all the reasoning and file editing.
Without guardrails, an autonomous build loop degrades fast. Task 3 builds on task 2's mistakes, which built on task 1's mistakes. Errors compound and the codebase drifts from the intended architecture.
The core design principle: no agent shares a context window with any other agent. Every stage starts with a clean context and receives only curated artifacts from the previous stage. The scout writes a structured report. The planner reads that report and writes a plan. The builder reads that plan and writes code. The verifier reads the code with zero knowledge of why it was written that way. No shared conversation history, no accumulated reasoning, no inherited blind spots. Each stage gets signal, not noise. This is how foundry prevents compounding errors across a long task queue.
Foundry's loop is designed around two forms of backpressure:
Short-term: the verify gate. After implementation, a verify agent -- in a completely fresh context with no shared history from the builder -- audits the changes by running build checks, tests, and a structured code audit. A model that just wrote the code retains its reasoning and is less likely to question its own decisions. An independent instance, given only the claims and the code, catches bugs the author is blind to. If it finds HIGH or MEDIUM issues, it fixes them and re-runs verification. If everything passes, the task gets a feat(task-id) commit. If issues remain, it gets a WIP(task-id) commit. The verify gate prevents bad code from silently flowing forward.
Pipeline tracking (QRPBA). Every task carries a progress indicator that records which pipeline stages ran and whether they succeeded. The indicator is persisted in TASKS.md next to each task and committed with the code, so you get a permanent audit trail.
- [x] T1.1: Set up project scaffolding [QRPBA]
Each character represents a pipeline stage:
| Position | Letter | Stage | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q | Query | - = skipped |
| 2 | R | Research | - = skipped |
| 3 | P | Plan | - = skipped (simple task) |
| 4 | B | Build | Builder ran |
| 5 | A | Audit | - = skipped |
| suffix | ! | Audit did not pass (WIP commit) |
Examples: QRPBA = full pipeline, clean pass. --PBA = query and research skipped, planned, built, and audited. QRPBA! = full pipeline but audit found unfixable issues (WIP commit). See docs/progress-indicators.md for the full reference.
The TUI shows these indicators in the task queue with color coding, and they survive across restarts since they're written directly into the task file.
Why curated context matters. This isolated-context architecture is the same multi-instance review pattern described in Anthropic's Claude Certified Architect program as a production best practice. The key: agents communicate through structured file artifacts (.buildloop/scout-report.md, current-plan.md, build-claims.md, review-report.md), not through shared conversation history. Every artifact is a curated handoff -- the planner doesn't get the scout's full tool call history, it gets a concise report. The builder doesn't get the planner's reasoning, it gets a deterministic plan with file operations and verification commands.
Long-term: pattern learning. After each validated task, a pattern extractor agent scans the build artifacts, review findings, and plan to extract reusable lessons (e.g., "CFrame not Position for moving Roblox parts" or "always validate UTF-8 boundaries before string slicing"). These get saved as structured JSON to ~/.foundry/patterns/. On the next task — in any project — matched patterns are injected into the planner and reviewer prompts as reference data. Patterns that recur 3+ times get auto-promoted (auto_apply), meaning they're scored higher when they match -- but they still require at least one keyword or tech_stack overlap with the task to be included. This is how the system gets better over time: a mistake made once becomes a check applied everywhere.
Complexity-scaled pipeline. Not every task needs the full pipeline. A task complexity classifier scores each task as Simple, Medium, or Complex based on description length, keyword signals, and file count hints. Simple tasks skip query, research, and planner, get fewer patterns (0-2 instead of 10), and can skip the audit loop entirely -- straight from builder to commit. The QRPBA indicator reflects this: ---B- means query, research, planner, and audit were all skipped. Complex tasks always get the full treatment.
Learned doubt confidence. The doubt loop tracks pass/fail history per task shape using Ollama embeddings for semantic clustering. Task descriptions that consistently pass review (5+ consecutive clean passes) earn "trusted" status and skip doubt automatically. Any failure resets the cluster to zero. This compounds over time -- foundry learns which kinds of changes it reliably gets right and reserves thorough review for where it's needed.
Parallel builder. For multi-file tasks, the builder can split into parallel sub-agents. The plan's File Operations section is parsed to build a dependency graph -- files with no cross-references run in parallel worktrees, dependent files run sequentially. The doubt loop catches any integration issues from the merge. Opt-in via parallel_builder: true in .foundry.json.
Session event logging. Every pipeline event (task started, agent done, review findings, commits, pattern usage, rate limits) is appended as a JSON line to ~/.foundry/observatory/events.jsonl. This is the data collection layer for the upcoming Foundry Observatory analytics dashboard (separate project). Best-effort -- never blocks the pipeline.
Context Foundry's architecture aligns with the principles in Anthropic's Claude Certified Architect -- Foundations exam guide: 43 of 55 principles implemented, 3 partial (architectural constraints), 0 open gaps. The full cross-reference mapping each principle to specific code locations is in the CCA Alignment Matrix (interactive version).
Foundry has several run modes that control how the pipeline advances between tasks. Toggle with Ctrl+M on the startup screen or set run_mode in .foundry.json.
| Mode | Behavior | Discovery | PRs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auto (default) | Runs all tasks, then discovers new work and keeps going indefinitely | Yes | No |
| Sprint | Runs all tasks, then stops | No | No |
| Review | Runs one task at a time, creates a PR per task, pauses for approval | No | Yes (per task) |
| Coach | Runs an intake pre-flight that clarifies SPEC.md before Scout, then proceeds like Auto | Yes | No |
| Service | Unattended build-service mode: runs all tasks then stops; a WIP/audit-failed task is terminal (no retry) | No | No |
Auto is the fully autonomous mode. The loop never stops on its own -- when the task queue empties, a discovery agent scans the codebase for new work and appends it to TASKS.md. This is the mode shown in the demo videos.
Sprint is semi-autonomous. It works through every pending task with the same pipeline as Auto (scout, plan, implement, verify, commit), but stops when the queue is empty instead of running discovery. Use this when you have a known task list and want foundry to finish, not find more work.
Review is the human-in-the-loop mode for team workflows. After each task completes, foundry pushes a feature branch (foundry/{task_id}), creates a GitHub PR, and pauses. The TUI shows PAUSED (Review) and waits for either:
gh pr view (configurable via pr_poll_interval_secs, default 30s)If a reviewer requests changes, the TUI surfaces that status. Review mode requires the gh CLI to be installed and authenticated.
{
"run_mode": "review", "pr_poll_interval_secs": 30, "create_issue_on_wip": true }
The create_issue_on_wip flag works in any mode -- when a task fails verification and gets a WIP() commit, foundry auto-creates a GitHub issue with the review findings.
Service is the unattended mode used by the Context Foundry build service (foundry serve). Like Sprint it runs every pending task then stops with no discovery, but it also treats a WIP / audit-failed task as terminal: the task is recorded with its ! failure indicator and WIP() commit, and the loop advances to the next task with no retry and no consecutive-WIP stop. Headless runs (--no-tui) in this mode also skip the background GitHub update check. Service is meant for automated, bounded build jobs, not interactive use.
Foundry can run tasks through different AI providers. Toggle with Ctrl+D on the startup screen or set dual_selection in `.foundry
Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo