Prototype · Preview: every server in the official registry, synced every 30 minutes. Reviews and accounts come in a later step.
PopNx MCPMCP servers for people who use AI · explained in plain words

DJZS Trust MCP

by SIFR0-devversion 1.0.0i★ –iRuns in the cloud
Registry nameai.djzs/trust-mcp

Install

Overview

Description from the maker (original English)

Deterministic pre-execution audit for trading agents. PASS/WAIT/FAIL, reproducible verdict_hash.

PopNx MCP’s three pillars

These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.

What you can do with it

We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.

  • Connection: Runs in the cloud
  • Transport: Streamable HTTP
  • Category: Accounting, finance & tax

Install

Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.

Before you install

  • Basic checks: 1 of 1 passed
  • Runs on the maker’s server: what you ask it goes through their server.
  • The registry lists no key to fill in.

You need

Which app do you use?

Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.

Works in Claude on the web, desktop and mobile:

  1. Open Settings → Connectors
  2. Press Add custom connector
  3. Paste the address below and press Add
  4. If it asks you to sign in, sign in with the maker
SettingsConnectors1+ Add2https://…3
https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp

Run this in your terminal

claude mcp add --transport http trust https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp

Open in Cursor

Or copy the settings yourself

Paste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trust": {
      "url": "https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

Open in VS Code

Or copy the settings yourself

Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project

{
  "servers": {
    "trust": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

ChatGPT connects only to servers on the internet:

  1. Open ChatGPT on the web → Settings → Connectors (Apps)
  2. Press Create or Add (some plans need Developer mode under Advanced first)
  3. Paste the address below, give it a name and save
  4. If it asks you to sign in, sign in with the maker
SettingsConnectors1+ Create2https://…3
https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp

Menu names can differ slightly by plan and over time.

Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.

These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.

What it can do

We have not read this server’s tool list yet; we check endpoints in rotation.

Basic checksi

We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 8, 2026

  • ✓ Pass

    Maker matches the repo

    The registry name was verified against the domain djzs.ai (the registry checks domain ownership)

  • … Not checked yet

    Still maintained

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • … Not checked yet

    Has a licence

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • … Not checked yet

    Endpoint responds

    Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation

  • … Not checked yet

    Sign-in with OAuth

    Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation

  • … Not checked yet

    No hidden instructions in tool descriptions

    Not checked yet; we read the tool list when we check the endpoint

Compared with others in Accounting, finance & taxi

  • More stars than 0% of the other 2949 servers in this category
  • Published to the registry more recently than 20% of the other 2949 servers in this category
  • Basic checks equal to or better than 100% of the other 2949 servers in this category

Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.

Common questions

Is DJZS Trust MCP safe?

It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.

What keys or codes does it need?

The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.

Does it run on my computer or in the cloud?

It runs in the maker’s cloud. Connect over the internet with nothing to install, but what you send passes through the maker’s servers.

Is it still maintained?

The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (1.0.0) reached the registry 4 months ago.

Which apps can use it?

Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. It connects by URL, so apps that accept remote MCP servers work too, such as ChatGPT in developer mode.

What can I use instead?

In the same category: Finance Toolkit, SolidInvoice, Korea Tax Calculator

Alternatives

Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.

Reading a card:↓ Downloads per weeki★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi

Finance Toolkit

500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.

by JerBoumaWidely used↓ 15.5K/wk★ 5.5KUpdated 2 days ago

Computer or cloud

SolidInvoice

Create and send invoices and quotes, manage clients, and track payments in SolidInvoice.

by SolidInvoiceGrowing★ 981Updated 9 days ago

Runs in the cloud✓ solidinvoice.co

Korea Tax Calculator

Korean tax calculation and tax-audit judgment MCP: 96 tools with statutory citations.

by UpstageAIGrowing↓ 3.2K/wk★ 97Updated today

Runs on your computer

README from the maker

Open the README

Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.

DJZS Deterministic Pre-Execution Audit for Agents

DJZS audits the reasoning behind an autonomous agent's move *before* capital is committed, and returns one of three verdicts PASS, WAIT, or FAIL with the specific reasoning defects flagged and a reproducible hash of the decision.

The wedge: transaction-security tools answer *"is this transaction safe to sign?"*. DJZS answers a different question *"should this position be taken at all?"*. A perfectly safe transaction can still rest on broken reasoning; DJZS is the layer that catches the bad thesis.


Use it now — the live MCP gate

verify_pm_trade is deployed as a Model Context Protocol tool (streamable HTTP) on a Cloudflare Worker. Add it to an MCP-capable agent in one line:

claude mcp add --transport http djzs-trust https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp

Then call verify_pm_trade with a free-text prediction-market trade thesis. It extracts the reasoning, audits it against the calibrated DJZS-M taxonomy, and returns PASS → PROCEED / FAIL / WAIT → HALT, with the flagged defects and a verdict_hash.

First external audit on record. An outside agent audited a benchmark thesis (pm-block-008) through the deployed tool and received:

verdict:       FAIL

flags: DJZS-M03 (PROBABILITY_UNSOURCED), DJZS-M04 (CONSENSUS_NO_EDGE) risk_score: 40 disagreements: [] verdict_hash: 0x85918814b3dffa31b00d6892c2e00b2001efd35f7e0044b4cd3789fe1df14937

Behavioral parity against the offline batteries (verdict + flags + extracted input) is green. Hash parity is a pending re-mint the calibration key lapsed during deployment so the live hash above stands as the record until it is re-run.


Pay it over HTTP x402 - the ecosystem rail

Beyond the MCP transport above, verify_pm_trade is now payable over the HTTP x402 transport, live on Base mainnet:

POST https://mcp.djzs.ai/x402/verify

An unpaid request returns an HTTP 402 challenge (exact scheme, eip155:8453, USDC, 2.00 USDC to the treasury); the client signs an EIP-3009 authorization and retries. This is the same rail Base MCP, MetaMask Agent Wallet, and x402-axios speak, so any HTTP x402 client can pay the gate directly - no MCP integration required.

Free-refusal is preserved on both transports: an out-of-scope intent is answered 402 and never settled, so a refused audit costs nothing. Verified end to end on Base Sepolia (paid settlement plus an on-chain zero-delta refusal) before the mainnet deploy.

Architecture C — extraction reports, the engine decides

DJZS separates the model-bound step from the trusted step:

free-text intent

│ ▼ EXTRACTION (LLM, N=3 consensus) reports observable FACTS, never a verdict · per-field state unanimity across the 3 samples; any disagreement → unknown · quote gates: a claimed "absent" must quote the intent verbatim, or it demotes to unknown · evidence-unanimity: a critical-driving "absent" needs the same quote across all samples │ ▼ AuditInput (each fact is tri-state: present / absent / unknown) │ ▼ DETERMINISTIC ENGINE (pure code — no model, no network, no clock) rules fire → weighted score → verdict │ ▼ PASS · WAIT · FAIL + verdict_hash

Why this shape: the verdict rules are model-independent. The LLM only turns messy text into a structured struct; the audit *rules* that decide the verdict are frozen code. Swap the model and the extraction quality changes the rules, weights, and hash do not.

Determinism by construction. The same AuditInput always yields the same verdict and the same hash:

verdict_hash = sha256(canonicalize({ verdict, risk_score, flags: codes.sorted(), unknown_fields }))

WAIT is never silent. An under-specified thesis — one where a decision-critical fact is unknown — resolves to WAIT, mapped to HALT for the caller, with unknown_fields returned so the agent knows exactly what to clarify. Abstention is a first-class outcome, never a guessed PASS or FAIL.


Taxonomies (frozen)

DJZS-M — Prediction Market (DJZS-PM-v1.0) the calibrated, live path

Weights sum to 100; FAIL threshold 25. All four codes are implemented and calibrated.

CodeNameSeverityWeightDetects
DJZS-M01NARRATIVE_RESOLUTION_GAPCRITICAL30Thesis reasons about a narrative adjacent to the actual resolution question.
DJZS-M02FALSIFICATION_ABSENTCRITICAL30No stated condition that would prove the thesis wrong before resolution.
DJZS-M03PROBABILITY_UNSOURCEDHIGH25Market or model probability asserted without verifiable basis.
DJZS-M04CONSENSUS_NO_EDGEMEDIUM15Thesis restates consensus at an extreme price with no differentiated edge.

M04 is advisory-grade. On its own it does not block a lone M04 rides a PASS with the flag on the certificate (weight 15 is below the FAIL threshold). It contributes to a block only by stacking with another finding (e.g. M03 + M04 = 40 → FAIL, as in the first audit above).

verify_pm_trade is PM-only: if the intent does not extract as a prediction-market thesis (including the undetermined case), it returns in_scope: false rather than silently running a perpetuals audit.

DJZS-LF — Perpetuals / general reasoning (DJZS-LF-v1.1)

Weights sum to 200. The taxonomy is frozen at 11 codes; 3 are wired live in the engine today (marked ●). The rest are defined and weighted but not yet firing — coverage is stated honestly rather than implied.

CodeNameCategorySeverityWeightLive
DJZS-S01CIRCULAR_LOGICStructuralCRITICAL30
DJZS-S02LAYER_INVERSIONStructuralHIGH25
DJZS-S03DEPENDENCY_GHOSTStructuralMEDIUM18
DJZS-E01ORACLE_UNVERIFIEDEpistemicHIGH25●
DJZS-E02CONFIDENCE_INFLATIONEpistemicMEDIUM18
DJZS-I01FOMO_LOOPIncentiveMEDIUM16●
DJZS-I02MISALIGNED_REWARDIncentiveMEDIUM16
DJZS-I03DATA_UNVERIFIEDIncentiveMEDIUM16
DJZS-X01EXECUTION_UNBOUNDExecutionCRITICAL15●
DJZS-X02RACE_CONDITIONExecutionHIGH9
DJZS-T01STALE_REFERENCETemporalLOW12

Both weight tables are hash-locked (WEIGHTS_HASH / TAXONOMY_HASH, and the PM equivalents, are exported constants); changing a weight is a deliberate re-derive, not a hot patch.


MCP tools

The deployed Worker exposes three tools over streamable HTTP at /mcp:

ToolWhat it does
verify_pm_tradePre-execution audit of a prediction-market thesis (the gate described above).
query_pol_certificatesRead prior ProofOfLogic certificates from the Irys datachain.
query_agent_trustLIVE on-chain trust score (subgraph-indexed): totalAudits, failRate, latest verdict, action PROCEED/HALT/NO_HISTORY.

Honest v1 posture

What the tool does not do yet — recorded deliberately, to be re-ruled before the gate is broadly promoted:

  • No ProofOfLogic write on the tool. verify_pm_trade returns a verdict_hash but does not yet anchor a certificate. Existing Irys certificates are prior-architecture lineage, not output of this tool.
  • Taxonomy hashes not in the response. The four hash constants are exported from the frozen tables but are not yet included in the tool's JSON response.

The response contract today is: verdict, action, risk_score, flags, unknown_fields, disagreements (the per-field sample-agreement telemetry), verdict_hash, extraction_failsafe, in_scope, and taxonomy versions.

Known divergence: the subgraph's raw failCount counts WAIT as FAIL

query_agent_trust excludes WAIT verdicts from both sides of the fail rate and reports them as wait_count. Anyone reading the subgraph directly, rather than through the tool, gets a different answer. djzs-subgraph/src/trust-score.ts handleScoreUpdated increments failCount on an else branch (verdict == "PASS" / else), so a WAIT — an abstention, not a failure — lands in failCount and inflates the rate for any agent that ever received one.

The Worker recomputes from per-audit verdicts, so the tool is right. The indexed counters are not, and they stay that way until the mapping is corrected and re-indexed. Both numbers are returned side by side (subgraph_counters, labelled) so the discrepancy is visible rather than discovered. Tracked as a follow-up; deliberately not folded into the read-layer fix, because a mapping change needs a subgraph redeploy and a re-index.


Legacy HTTP API (backward-compatible)

Before the MCP gate, DJZS ran as a paid HTTP audit service. Those endpoints remain for backward compatibility the MCP gate above is the current surface. The tiers are metered in USDC on Base Mainnet via an x-payment-proof header:

TierEndpointPriceMemo limit
MicroPOST /api/audit/micro$0.102,000 chars
FounderPOST /api/audit/founder$1.005,000 chars
TreasuryPOST /api/audit/treasury$10.00unlimited

POST /api/audit aliases the Micro tier, and an escrow-settled variant (POST /api/audit/escrow) takes on-chain escrow in place of a payment header. These tiers run the older detection path, not the Architecture C engine — treat their output as legacy.


On-chain artifacts

The A2A manifest (agent.json) attests four DJZS contracts on Base Mainnet, each marked verified. Source for each lives in contracts/:

ContractAddressSource
DJZSLogicTrustScore0xB3324D07A8713b354435FF0e2A982A504e81b137contracts/DJZSLogicTrustScore.sol
DJZSEscrowLock0xB041760147a60F63Ca701da9e431412bCc25Cfb7contracts/DJZSEscrowLock.sol
DJZSAgentRegistry0xe40d5669Ce8e06A91188B82Ce7292175E2013E41contracts/DJZSAgentRegistry.sol
DJZSStaking0xA362947D23D52C05a431E378F30C8A962De91e8Acontracts/DJZSStaking.sol

Addresses are as recorded in agent.json; verify any of them on BaseScan.

A fifth contract, contracts/DJZSProofOfLogicNFT.sol, exists as source only — it is not in the deployed manifest, and this document makes no claim that certificate NFTs are live or mintable.

Prior ProofOfLogic certificates live on the Irys datachain and are readable via the query_pol_certificates MCP tool. They are prior-architecture lineage, not output of verify_pm_trade.


Read the log

The commit history is the product's own audit trail: each verdict-bearing change ships with a PENDING note naming what is still unproven, and the next commit that closes it discharges that note explicitly. Every claim a recall number, a parity result, a live verdict hash — is cited to a specific run at the moment it is pushed, not asserted after the fact. If you want to know what is proven versus deferred, git log is the source of truth and this file is downstream of it.


Operator settings (not in code — set on the platform, easy to lose)

These are configured outside the repository. They are recorded here because nothing in the tree enforces them, and a silent revert would change live behaviour with no diff to point at.

SettingWhereWhy

| Browser Integrity Check: OFF for `mcp.djzs.ai` | Cloudflare dashboard → Configuration Rules | BIC returns a Cloudflare 403, `error code: 1010` to banned client signatures *before the Worker runs*. Measured 2026-09-13: Python-urllib/2.7, /3.4, /3.11, Java/1.8.0_292 and libwww-perl/6.15 were all blocked, while python-requests, curl, Wget, Go-http-client, httpx, aiohttp, node-fetch, Postman, an empty UA and custom UAs passed. mcp.djzs.ai is an API host, not a browser surface — a stdlib

Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo

Ask PopNx