Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Description from the maker (original English)
Parse, check, prove and translate logic formulas: first-order, modal, description, higher-order.
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
You need
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
Open Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config, and paste this into claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"unicode-logic-kit": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"unicode-logic-kit",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}Run this in your terminal
claude mcp add unicode-logic-kit -- uvx unicode-logic-kit mcpPaste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"unicode-logic-kit": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"unicode-logic-kit",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project
{
"servers": {
"unicode-logic-kit": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"unicode-logic-kit",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 6, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account fvossel, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint
Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead
Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (0.35.0) reached the registry 12 days ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need Python (uv) on your computer.
In the same category: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Reelsaw
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Drive a self-hosted Reelsaw: turn long videos into vertical clips, edit, re-render and export them.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
A Python toolkit for logic with Unicode operators — *parse, transform, and reason about* formulas of classical first-order logic and well beyond it: modal, temporal, hybrid, many-valued, fuzzy, intuitionistic, relevant, second- and third-order, description, dependence/IF, substructural, and a range of further non-classical logics. On top of that sits infrastructure for NL→logic research: one small API a verification loop can drive, one uniform verdict type over a dozen provers, and an evaluation toolbox for scoring LLM-generated formulas against benchmark gold data.
from unicode_logic_kit import MSFLParser, is_valid
phi = MSFLParser().parse( "∀x (Human(x) → Mortal(x)) ∧ Human(socrates) → Mortal(socrates)") print(is_valid(phi)) # True
Renamed in 0.31.0. Up to 0.30.0 this package was
unicode-fol-kit
(
import unicode_fol_kit): first-order logic is one of the logics it handles,
not the whole of it.
pip install -U unicode-fol-kitstill works — it installs
this package and forwards the old import name with a
DeprecationWarning— but
new code should
pip install unicode-logic-kitandimport unicode_logic_kit.
Nothing else changed its name, the
UFK_environment variables included.
api.parse_any (dialect auto-detection over Unicode / TPTP / LaTeX / Prover9 / SMT-LIB — never raises, records every parser's objection), api.check (well-formedness + signature conformance with did-you-mean suggestions), api.equivalent, api.prove, api.countermodel, api.repair (a diagnose→suggest→fix generator whose fixer callback is *your* LLM), api.translate (logic-to-logic via a comorphism registry). Every result has a JSON-compatible to_dict(), and the API carries an explicit stability policy.FOL(MSFOL(f)) converts a sorted formula and keeps its side axioms (each sort is non-empty, each sorted constant lies in its sort) *with* the term, as a Sentence; api.prove adds them as premises itself, which is the difference between a proof and a spurious countermodel. Each of the nine registry edges declares what it preserves (comorphism.GUARANTEES), which side axioms its image needs and which options it reads; a composed path reports the weakest guarantee on it. There is no implicit coercion between logics on purpose — see Translating between logics for why a translation is not an upcast.pip install unicode-logic-kit[mcp], then python -m unicode_logic_kit.mcp (or, with nothing installed, uvx "unicode-logic-kit[mcp]" mcp) exposes the toolkit as thirty-seven Model Context Protocol tools (23 general-purpose, 6 for chemistry, 8 for description logic) — any MCP client (Claude Code/Desktop, agent frameworks, editors) can parse, prove, diagnose and translate without writing Python; the repair loop inverts naturally (the client LLM is the fixer). An error-analysis layer comes along: prediction-vs-gold breakdowns with symbol diffs (compare_formulas), corpus metrics (score_batch), satisfiability of premise sets with model witnesses (check_consistency), normal forms, cross-syntax rendering, truth tables, signature extraction, and DRS→FOL for discourse phenomena.FiniteStructure + evaluate_in_structure answer that directly: no prenex form, no CNF (both are documented timeout sources elsewhere), quantifiers ranging over indexed candidate sets rather than the whole domain, counting quantifiers counted instead of expanded, and properties that are decidable on a structure but not first-order definable over it (connectivity, ring membership) admitted as computed predicates. unicode_logic_kit.chem turns a SMILES string into such a structure over the ChemLog signature.unicode_logic_kit.ilp turns those same structures into an ILP task (Popper's bk.pl / exs.pl / bias.pl) and reads the learned Prolog clause back as a kit formula you can model-check. Two encoding mistakes produce a hypothesis that scores precision 1.00 and means nothing — example-local individual names a learner joins across, and the example argument on every predicate — and both are refused rather than documented, on the way out and on the way back. check_separation asks the question that has to come first: does your reference definition separate the two example sets at all?prob.entailment_bounds answers "what does P(bird)=0.9 entail about P(fly)?" with the exact tightest interval (Nilsson's probabilistic entailment as a rational LP over possible worlds, conditionals included); prob.query answers ProbLog-style queries over definite programs with independent probabilistic facts under Sato's distribution semantics — every result an exact Fraction, every unsupported fragment a loud refusal.Verdict with a semantic status (proved / refuted / unknown / error), a separate *why-not-more* axis (timeout ≠ bound_hit ≠ incomplete ≠ unsupported), the SZS status, wall time, and JSON-able witnesses. Chains, portfolios (portfolio_prove, parallel with agreement thresholds and a soundness alarm on prover disagreement), and cached batch runs (batch_decide) are built on top.api.countermodel returns a machine-readable witness *plus* a plain-English rendering ("The countermodel has 2 possible worlds. … At world 0 the formula fails."), and refutation actually covers the temporal fragment: Ⓕ P → P comes back refuted with a two-world Kripke witness, not "unknown".from unicode_logic_kit import api
result = api.parse_any("∀x (Raven(x) → Black(x))") # LLM output, any dialect report = api.check(result.formula, signature={"predicates": {"Raven": 1, "Black": 1}}) verdict = api.prove(api.parse_any("Black(tweety)").formula, premises=[result.formula, api.parse_any("Raven(tweety)").formula]) print(verdict.status, verdict.backend, verdict.szs_status) # proved z3 Theorem
One parser class, MSFLParser, reads classical logic at the first, second and third order, each with or without sorts and with or without the modal family (modal/temporal/epistemic/deontic/hybrid): twelve combinations of three constructor flags. A fourth flag, fuzzy, puts the Łukasiewicz connectives in place of the two-valued ones in each of the twelve. Next to them stand team-semantic dependence/IF logic, intuitionistic linear logic, and the Lambek calculus. The surface syntax is natural Unicode (∀ ∃ ∧ ∨ ¬ → ↔ ⊕ ⊗ □ ◇ @ ⊸ 𝟙 …) with no ASCII fallbacks.
On top of the AST sits a full reasoning stack — four proof methods (a built-in resolution prover, Fitch natural deduction with checker *and* searcher, the Gentzen sequent calculi LK/LJ — the latter backed by Dyckhoff's G4ip, a genuine terminating decision procedure for propositional intuitionistic logic — and analytic tableaux), a finite model finder, SMT (Z3) and external-prover (Prover9 / Vampire) backends, truth tables, and dedicated semantics for every logic. Every proof method has an independent checker — including check_resolution_proof, which certifies externally produced resolution derivations (paramodulation steps included) with its own from-scratch unification, and check_tableau_proof, which re-derives every α/β/γ/δ step of a recorded tableau with its own substitution and δ-freshness check. Formulas import/export to TPTP (incl. header Status/Rating metadata via parse_tptp_problem), Prover9, SMT-LIB, LaTeX, and JSON.
Full guide and API reference: [https://unicode-logic-kit.readthedocs.io/](https://unicode-logic-kit.readthedocs.io/)
The documentation walks through every logic with runnable examples — start with the Quickstart and Choosing a tool.
Beyond deciding formulas: Model checking (evaluate a formula in a structure you already have — including molecules), Verification (is a definition *set* coherent, or just too easily satisfied?), Probabilistic logic (exact bounds and queries, no sampling), and MCP (the toolkit, grammar included, as tools for a language model).
pip install unicode-logic-kit
Requires Python 3.10+. Z3 ships with the package. pip install "unicode-logic-kit[cvc5]" adds cvc5 as a second in-process SMT backend (it then joins the default proving chain right after Z3); [mcp] adds the MCP server (python -m unicode_logic_kit.mcp); [hf] add
Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo