Yamagishi Sync Lab: wages and business risks

What you can do with it

We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.

• Connection: Runs in the cloud
• Transport: Streamable HTTP
• Category: Other

Install

Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.

You need

• Runs in the cloudNothing to install; it connects over the internet

Which app do you use?

https://www.aluzza.jp/mcp/

claude mcp add --transport http wages-risk https://www.aluzza.jp/mcp/

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wages-risk": {
      "url": "https://www.aluzza.jp/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "servers": {
    "wages-risk": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.aluzza.jp/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

https://www.aluzza.jp/mcp/

Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.

These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.

What it can do

Tool names and descriptions exactly as the server reported them on Nov 7, 2026. The maker wrote them, not us; we show them as plain text.

• compare_wages

  同じ仕事の時給を、日本・米国・英国・ドイツで比べる（56 の仕事）。円に直さず、その国の仕事全体の平均の時給の何倍か（ratio）で返す。query は日本語の仕事の名前か、英語の職業名（例：薬剤師・保育士・software・nurse）。field で分野だけに絞れる。どちらも省くと仕事の一覧。

• wages_ranking

  一つの国の中で、仕事全体の平均に対する倍率（ratio）の高い順か低い順に並べる。

• france_groups

  フランス（Insee の職業の大くくり 9 区分）と、日本でそれに当たる職業をまとめた時給の倍率の比べ。

• risk_categories

  日本 3,766 社と米国 3,808 社の上場企業が「事業のリスク」の見出しに書いた心配ごとの 31 の種類。日米の順位・割合・順位の差。query で種類の名前を絞れる。sort_by は JP（日本の順位）・US（米国の順位）・gap（順位の差が大きい順）。

• risk_overview

  日米の事業のリスクのまとめ：社数・1 社あたりの見出しの数・米国で AI・生成 AI・関税・Google と書いた会社の数と割合・米国の業種ごとの AI と Google の割合・小売の会社の 8 つの軸（日米）。

• about_data

  このデータの範囲と、二つの読みもののページ。

Basic checksi

We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 7, 2026

• ! Caution

  Maker matches the repo

  The registry lists no source repo, so we cannot match the publisher (aluzza.jp) to the code

• … Not checked yet

  Still maintained

  We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

• … Not checked yet

  Has a licence

  We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

• ✓ Pass

  Endpoint responds

  Responded in 699 ms (HTTP 200)

• – Not applicable

  Sign-in with OAuth

  No sign-in needed

• ✓ Pass

  No hidden instructions in tool descriptions

  Read 6 tool descriptions and found no hidden instructions to the AI

Compared with others in Otheri

• More stars than 0% of the other 18353 servers in this category
• Published to the registry more recently than 76% of the other 18353 servers in this category
• Basic checks equal to or better than 36% of the other 18353 servers in this category

Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.

Alternatives

Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.

Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi

README from the maker

No README found in the repo