Context7
Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.
Description from the maker (original English)
Production-ready RAG + MCP demo: eval-in-CI merge gate, Langfuse traces, structure-aware chunking.
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
The maker has not listed install details in the registry. See the maker’s README below.
Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 6, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account kimsb2429, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint
Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead
Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (0.1.0) reached the registry 7 months ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code.
In the same category: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
A public Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline exposed as an MCP server. Sample content from Veterans Affairs education manuals.
The repo implements evaluation, observability, and structure-aware ingestion. Cost/latency tuning, tenant-level access control, and other production concerns are discussed in the article linked below.
**📖 Full writeup in *Towards AI*:** Enterprise Internal Knowledge Base RAG MCP: POC-to-Production
RAG demos tend to focus on the quality of the retrieval pipeline, without recognizing that production RAG fails on the next ten steps: prompt or model changes that pass code review but tank answer quality, cost and latency drift that cannot be traced to specific queries, cross-tenant leakage that only surfaces in audit. This repo shows what catching them looks like in practice.
The corpus is public (VA Education manuals — 238 documents, 9,000+ chunks) so anyone can clone, run, and adapt the pipeline.
git clone https://github.com/kimsb2429/internal-knowledge-base
cd internal-knowledge-base
docker compose up -d
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate pip install -r requirements.txt
docker exec -i ikb_pgvector pg_restore -U ikb -d ikb < evals/fixture_v1.dump
python scripts/test_mcp_server.py # 7/7 tests pass
python scripts/mcp_server.py
Add to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "ikb": { "command": "python", "args": ["/absolute/path/to/internal-knowledge-base/scripts/mcp_server.py"] } } }
Then ask Claude things like *"What RPO handles GI Bill claims in Texas?"* — the MCP server returns ranked chunks with citations.
Ingestion (one-time per corpus):
graph LR
A[KnowVA crawler HTML + PDF] --> B[Source-specific preprocessor] B --> C[Structure-aware chunker] C --> D[mxbai-embed-large local, 1024-dim] D --> E[(pgvector)] F[Anthropic Contextual Retrieval] -.-> E E -.-> F style E fill:#e1f5fe
Query (per MCP tool call):
graph LR
A[Claude Desktop MCP client] --> B[FastMCP server] B --> C[pgvector top-K] C --> D[Reranker mxbai or FlashRank] D --> E[Claude Sonnet generation] E --> A E --> F[Langfuse trace] style F fill:#fff9c4
Stack:
content_tsv GIN index for hybrid-readyquery), Resources (document://{source_id}), Prompts (cite_from_chunks)Full 110-question golden set, contextualized chunks + reranker:
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Faithfulness | 0.95 |
| Answer Relevance | 0.91 |
| Context Precision | 0.61 |
| Context Recall | 0.52 |
| Context Relevance | 0.56 |
🔗 [Live Langfuse trace](https://us.cloud.langfuse.com/project/cmo0wah7a00pfad071nk6x84c/traces/a574193bbff7d5438f7fae9e27f4bb83) (public, no login).
Notable result: Anthropic's Contextual Retrieval pattern produced modest lift on top of reranking (+4.8pp AnsRel, +4.1pp CtxPrec) at this scale — well short of the +35% recall their published numbers suggested. Reported as found; juiced numbers would defeat the point.
Every PR runs the golden set in fast mode (FlashRank reranker, ~3-4 min wall, $0.30 in Sonnet calls) against a fixture DB. PRs that regress more than ±5pp on top1/topk/keyword_recall, or +10pp on idk_rate, are blocked.
Forever-artifact: PR #5 — a deliberate failing-then-passing PR. Red CI catches a 20pp top1 regression; green CI confirms the fix. The Actions tab is the proof.
Workflow: .github/workflows/eval-gate.yml.
A few production-shape items are seams, not implementations:
auth_context parameter present on every MCP tool, typed, currently unused (labels the SSO/ACL seam)content_tsv GIN index is live; BM25 + RRF fusion at query time stays a post-launch additionThe writeup linked above covers these topics.
docs/ Research, evidence base, deep-dives
data/ Crawled corpus + golden query set scripts/ crawl_knowva.py eGain v11 API crawler enrich_metadata.py Headings, ACL, authority tier, content_category knowva_preprocess.py Source-specific HTML normalization chunk_documents.py Structure-aware splitter (preserves table colspan/rowspan) embed_and_store.py mxbai-embed-large → pgvector contextualize_chunks.py Anthropic Batches API for Contextual Retrieval rerank.py mxbai-rerank + FlashRank retrieve.py / generate.py RAG path mcp_server.py FastMCP exposure run_eval.py / score_eval.py / check_regression.py Eval harness + CI gate evals/ Fixture DB dump + baseline JSON .github/workflows/ eval-gate.yml — merge-gate workflow
Each script is idempotent and resume-safe.
python scripts/crawl_knowva.py # Crawl raw HTML (skip if data/knowva_manuals/articles/ exists)
python scripts/enrich_metadata.py # Add headings, ACL, authority tier python scripts/knowva_preprocess.py # Normalize HTML quirks python scripts/chunk_documents.py # Structure-aware split python scripts/embed_and_store.py # mxbai → pgvector python scripts/contextualize_chunks.py # Anthropic Batches API (~$12, optional but recommended)
Then python scripts/run_eval.py --fast to verify the eval baseline reproduces.
docs/2026-04-11-engineering-rag-evidence-and-howtos.md — engineering analysis, evidence base, Zero-to-MCP plandocs/2026-04-12-rag-pipeline-buy-vs-build.md — buy-vs-build map per pipeline stagedocs/deep-dive/2026-04-16-docs-vs-code-rag-adjudication.md — when unified RAG stops workingMIT — see LICENSE.