Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Description from the maker (original English)
Runtime gate for AI agent claims. Catches sycophantic drift, circular self-validation, causal errors
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
AuthorizationValues marked secret are keys to your account. Never share them or paste them into a chat.
You need
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
This address needs a key in a request header, which the add-connector menu cannot set. Use Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code instead.
Run this in your terminal
claude mcp add --transport sse eif https://eif.leocelis.com/sse --header 'Authorization: Bearer {api_key}'Fill in the empty values before running it.
Paste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"eif": {
"url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer {api_key}"
}
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project
{
"servers": {
"eif": {
"type": "sse",
"url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer {api_key}"
}
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
This address needs a key in a request header, which the add-connector menu cannot set. Use Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code instead.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
Authorization secret required HTTP headerThese settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
The server asks you to sign in before it lists its tools.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 6, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account leocelis, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
Responded in 592 ms (HTTP 401)
Needs a key or token that you copy and paste yourself
Not checked yet; we read the tool list when we check the endpoint
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 2 of 3 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
You need to fill in: Authorization
It runs in the maker’s cloud. Connect over the internet with nothing to install, but what you send passes through the maker’s servers.
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (4.2.0) reached the registry yesterday.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. It connects by URL, so apps that accept remote MCP servers work too, such as ChatGPT in developer mode.
In the same category: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, zanadir
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Find what a repository's CI is missing, and which security checks cannot fail the build.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
EIF - Epistemic Integrity Framework
Apply the scientific method to every assumption your AI agent makes.
AI agents compound errors. Each assumption that goes unchallenged becomes the foundation for the next one. A 90%-accurate agent running 10-step tasks produces correct output only 35% of the time - that's the compound error curve. That 0.9^10 curve is an upper bound: it assumes independent, non-recoverable per-step errors, whereas real pipelines have correlated and recoverable steps, so EIF's value is framed as reducing the error rate per load-bearing step rather than as the literal compound figure. In high-stakes domains (compliance, engineering decisions, financial advice), this translates to real cost.
The dominant source of that cost is not hallucinated facts, but unchallenged assumptions that are never tested against evidence.
EIF goes past a naive hallucination check: it tests each claim against independent evidence before the agent acts, then routes it to ACT, REVISE or HALT.
EIF is a Python library and MCP server that runs an 8-phase scientific-method pipeline on every load-bearing assumption in an agent's response:
DECLARE → name every assumption: KNOWN / ASSUMED / GUESSED
FALSIFY → collect independent evidence via P1 code, P2 tools, P3 web search CAUSAL_GATE → check Pearl causal level; flag confounders and disjunctive bias CALIBRATE → Bayesian posterior update (prior × likelihood → route) CHALLENGE → adversarial critic produces counter-evidence and competing hypothesis UPDATE → sequential Bayes update; EIG stopping rule EXPLAIN → hard-to-vary check (Deutsch): every detail must be functionally irreplaceable RECORD → provenance record with EU AI Act compliance mapping
Plus auxiliary gates that run before/after the core loop:
INPUT_GUARD → detect adversarial or manipulative inputs before the pipeline runs
SYCOPHANCY_GATE → detect position drift, unfaithful CoT, and face-preserving framing HYPOTHESIS_AGENDA → rank claims by Expected Information Gain before FALSIFY REPLICATE → pre-registered replication protocol for cross-session reproducibility PROGRAMME → Lakatos health monitor: PROGRESSIVE / STABLE / DEGENERATIVE
At the end of each turn, EIF routes the agent's output:
EIF was validated against 14 multi-agent conversation scenarios across 5 domains (clinical, engineering, compliance, investment, M&A).
Scope note: the 14-scenario corpus is constructed and illustrative - it demonstrates the mechanisms, not field results. A separate field-validation track on real agent traffic is the basis for production false-positive measurement. EIF can also estimate a modeled dollar cost per HALT-routed claim (a distinct feature); those figures and their methodology live in
validation/CORPUS_REPORT.md, not here.
| Scenario | Domain | Turns | HALT | REVISE | ACT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S8v31 ML Model Deployment (FDA SaMD) | clinical | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| S7v31 Code Review / API Security | engineering | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S6v31 Investment Decision - Series A | investment | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S10 Sycophancy Validation | investment | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S11 Sycophancy Market Gap | investment | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| S20 Sycophancy Full-Signal | compliance | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| S18 Reasoning Theater | compliance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| S19b Model Scaling Ablation (gpt-4o) | investment | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| S16 REVERSED CEP - Beta-carotene/CARET | clinical | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| S15 CAUSAL_GATE v4 - Phase 3 Protocol | clinical | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| S9v31 M&A Due Diligence | manda | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| S14 EXPLAIN Cold-Start Baseline | engineering | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| S17 Disjunctive Bias - clinical supplements | clinical | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| S19a Model Scaling Ablation (gpt-4o-mini) | investment | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| TOTAL | 84 | 35 | 25 | 15 |
P4 (circular LLM self-validation) rate: 0.0% across all 14 scenarios. Every piece of evidence came from an independent source - executable code, coordinator tool outputs, or live web search.
Full evidence: validation/CORPUS_REPORT.md. Per-scenario reports available on request via GitHub Discussions.
pip install -e ".[mcp]" # local dev (the MCP extra powers the examples below)
import asyncio
from eif import session as session_store from eif.mcp_server.server import eif_extract_claims_from_decision, eif_verify
async def run(): sess = await session_store.new_session() sid = sess.session_id
extracted = eif_extract_claims_from_decision( "Commission a 10-article series on Hollow Ascent. " "The game has 5,000+ IGDB hype followers and strong community demand." )
result = await eif_verify( session_id=sid, decision="Commission content series based on IGDB metrics", claims=extracted["claims"], )
print(f"Verdict: {result['verdict']}") # "HALT" or "PASS" for card in result["halt_cards"]: print(card)
asyncio.run(run())
When your agent has access to an authoritative data source (IGDB, your database, an internal API), register it as a P0 host tool. EIF calls it directly - no web search, no guessing.
from eif.falsify.evidence_collector import HostTool, HostToolRegistry
def igdb_lookup(query: str) -> str: import requests resp = requests.get("https://api.igdb.com/v4/games", ...) # your IGDB call return str(resp.json())
registry = HostToolRegistry([ HostTool( name="igdb_api", description="IGDB game database - hype count, ratings, community size", capability_keywords=["igdb", "hype", "game", "demand", "followers"], fn=igdb_lookup, data_scope="PUBLIC", ) ])
P0 is the highest-priority evidence tier. Without a registered tool, EIF falls back to web search (P3), which can return false-positive SUPPORTS for specific numeric metrics. For production use, register the tool.
See examples/quickstart.py for a complete end-to-end example (a different scenario, an infrastructure-migration decision, walking DECLARE through EXPLAIN in one script).
Per-client setup guides (register the server, install the rules block, verify, troubleshoot) live in docs/integrations/: Claude Code · Cursor · Claude Desktop. The short version:
Option A - hosted endpoint (private alpha, zero install):
Request a key by opening a Discussion, then add the config for your client.
Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json) and Claude Desktop (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_KEY_HERE" } } } }
VS Code / GitHub Copilot (.vscode/mcp.json): use "servers" (not "mcpServers") and add "type": "http" to the entry.
The hosted endpoint is in private alpha. Everything below runs fully on your own machine with no key.
Option B - local venv (works today, fully self-hosted):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "command": "/path/to/venv/bin/python", "args": ["-m", "eif.mcp_server.server"] } } }
Option C - uvx (zero-install, works today):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["--from", "eif-engine[mcp]", "eif-mcp-server"] } } }
uv runs the executable matching the package name by default; since the console scripts are eif-mcp-server / eif-mcp-http-server (not eif-engine), --from is required. Bare uvx eif-engine fails with "An executable named eif-engine is not provided by package eif-engine".
EIF exposes 25 tools your agent can call:
Session (1 tool):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_new_session | Create a session; every other tool requires its session_id |
Core pipeline (8 tools):
| Tool | Phase | What it does |
|---|---|---|
eif_get_context | - | Load EIF principles into agent context |
eif_declare | DECLARE | Register and classify every assumption |
eif_falsify | FALSIFY | Collect independent evidence; run SPRT |
eif_causal_gate | CAUSAL_GATE | Check Pearl causal level; flag confounders |
eif_calibrate | CALIBRATE | Bayesian posterior; compute routing |
eif_challenge | CHALLENGE | Adversarial critic with counter-evidence |
eif_update | UPDATE | Sequential posterior update; EIG stopping |
eif_explain | EXPLAIN | Hard-to-vary check on the mechanism |
Gates and monitors (5 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_input_guard | Detect adversarial or manipulative inputs |
eif_sycophancy_gate | Detect position drift, unfaithful CoT, face-preserving framing |
eif_programme_health | Lakatos health monitor for the session |
eif_record | Write provenance record; EU AI Act compliance mapping |
eif_replicate | Pre-registered replication protocol |
Calibration and agenda (4 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_record_outcome | Log a session's labeled outcome (true/false) for cross-session ECE calibration |
eif_calibration_report | Return ECE state, empirical prior, and sessions-to-grounded count |
eif_catch_rate_report | Empirical HALT catch-rate across all sessions for a domain |
eif_hypothesis_agenda | Rank outstanding hypotheses by Expected Information Gain before FALSIFY |
Utilities (7 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_verify | One-call full pipeline: declare → falsify → calibrate → route |
eif_extract_claims_from_decision | Extract structured claims from free-form agent text |
eif_compliance_report | Generate EU AI Act compliance report for a session |
eif_provenance |
Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo