Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Description from the maker (original English)
Runtime permission, approval, and audit layer for AI agent tool execution.
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
You need
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
Works in Claude on the web, desktop and mobile:
https://api.oakallow.io/mcpRun this in your terminal
claude mcp add --transport http oakallow https://api.oakallow.io/mcpPaste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"oakallow": {
"url": "https://api.oakallow.io/mcp"
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project
{
"servers": {
"oakallow": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.oakallow.io/mcp"
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
ChatGPT connects only to servers on the internet:
https://api.oakallow.io/mcpMenu names can differ slightly by plan and over time.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
We have not read this server’s tool list yet; we check endpoints in rotation.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 6, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account oakallow, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation
Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation
Not checked yet; we read the tool list when we check the endpoint
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs in the maker’s cloud. Connect over the internet with nothing to install, but what you send passes through the maker’s servers.
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (1.1.0) reached the registry 13 days ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. It connects by URL, so apps that accept remote MCP servers work too, such as ChatGPT in developer mode.
In the same category: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, AI Deprecations
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
AI model shutdown dates, replacements, change feed and webhook alerts for 8 providers.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
Runtime permission, approval, and audit governance for AI agent tool execution.
Oakallow is a hosted remote MCP server. It sits between an agent and the actions it wants to take, so that a specific action can be checked, gated behind human approval when it is risky, authorized with a single-use signed token, and recorded in an immutable audit log, at the moment of execution.
https://api.oakallow.io/mcp (Streamable HTTP)Oakallow injects a governance checkpoint into a workflow that may also use other connectors. An agent does its investigative work (for example, looking up an account through another connector), forms a recommendation, and calls Oakallow to request approval for the action. A human approver then decides in the Oakallow dashboard or mobile app, under enforced multi-factor authentication.
The connector is a requester and pass-through, not a decider:
| Tool | Purpose | Reads only |
|---|---|---|
list_my_tools | Enumerate the tools available to the signed-in user in the named org (org arg; see below) | yes |
check_permission | Ask whether a given tool call would be allowed, require approval, or be blocked (takes an org arg; see below) | yes* |
list_pending_approvals | List approval requests still awaiting a human decision | yes |
check_approval_status | Poll a pending approval request by reference number | yes |
\* check_permission returns a read-only verdict only. It does NOT create an approval or a reference. (The approval and its REF-… are created when you call the gated tool itself through oakallow.) It does have one side effect by design: checking an unregistered tool makes Oakallow auto-create a gated draft entry for it (with conservative, fail-closed defaults) so the eventual call is governed and the owner can triage it from the dashboard. This is intentional: an unknown tool is never silently trusted.
An Oakallow account can have more than one organization, and each org sets its own tools, permission rules, approvers, and alert paths. So an action must be checked against the right org, because that is what determines who gets asked to approve and under which rules.
check_permission and list_my_tools accept an optional `org` argument: the org's external id (e.g. org_oak_…). The rule:
org. The connector uses your only org.org naming the org the action targets. If you omit it, the call is refused with guidance rather than guessing the wrong org.You don't ask the connector to list your orgs; there is no org-enumeration tool. Instead, download the org-specific skill from that org's dashboard. Each org's skill carries its own org id and tells the agent to pass it. Install one skill per org you operate in; the agent reads the matching skill and passes the right org on every call.
The connector authorizes the org you pass against your signed-in identity: you can only target an org you can actually act in (you are its team owner/admin, or you are in that org's approver group). Passing an org you don't have access to is refused. The skill is a convenience, not a grant of access.
Alongside the four standard tools, tools/list returns the customer-defined tools your org has approved. Calling one of those through oakallow is how an approval gets created: there is no separate "request approval" tool. A direct tool accepts two optional arguments, plus org as above:
| Argument | Purpose |
|---|---|
reason | Short, non-sensitive summary of why the call is being made. This is what the human approver reads. Oakallow redacts SSN, card, email, phone, and address patterns before storing it. |
agent | An identifier for the calling agent (a name, code, or number). The org's governance report uses it to show which agent submitted each call instead of attributing everything to the signed-in account. Send the same value consistently. Ignored when the caller authenticates with an oak_agent_ token, whose own identity is used. |
The response is one of allowed (run the action on its own connector), requires_approval (an approval request was created and a REF-… is returned for polling with check_approval_status), or disabled (stop; the action is blocked by policy).
Every permission decision on an approved tool returns a signed decision receipt, whatever the verdict: allowed, requires_approval, and disabled are all signed the same way. The receipt is an HMAC-SHA256 signature over the decision, the tool, a hash of the call's parameters, the tenant, resource, method, and org, and it is stored so the decision can be re-verified later. A disabled receipt is the proof that oakallow blocked the action.
If a decision cannot be signed or recorded, the check fails closed: oakallow returns no verdict rather than one it cannot prove.
By default oakallow is a checkpoint beside your tools: it decides, and you execute. OakGuard lets an org register its own MCP servers with oakallow so that oakallow becomes the transport to them instead:
tools/list. Newly discovered tools land as drafts that require approval until an admin enables them.Servers are registered, paused, and revoked from the OakGuard tab in the dashboard.
oakallow exposes two read-only MCP resources. They are preflight signals an agent (or a client UI) can read before committing to route an action through oakallow. Both require the mcp:read scope, neither is a tool call, and neither is billed.
| Resource | Returns | Reads only |
|---|---|---|
oakallow://status | Liveness of the connector for the signed-in session: status, endpoint, server version, protocol version, and the granted scopes. A successful read is itself the proof the session is valid. No account identity or PII is returned. | yes |
oakallow://credits | Whether a governed call would currently be funded for the org this session resolves to, so an agent can fail fast before requesting an approval that could not be paid for. | yes |
oakallow://credits is scoped to the caller's own billing org and resolves it the same way a real tool call does, so a can_fund: true result genuinely means the eventual approval will be funded (including team-pool fallback). It returns only a can_fund boolean and the org's name and external id. It deliberately discloses no balance figures: dollar amounts are surfaced only to the team owner in the dashboard, never over the connector. If the session resolves to no org, or to more than one, it returns can_fund: false with a reason rather than guessing which org would be billed.
There is no anonymous access. An oakallow account is the prerequisite for connecting, and the endpoint accepts two credential types: interactive OAuth 2.1 (PKCE) for a human-driven client, or an oak_agent_ bearer token for an autonomous agent (see Autonomous agents below).
For the human-driven OAuth path, add https://api.oakallow.io/mcp as a custom connector in your MCP client (Claude, Claude Desktop, Cowork, ChatGPT, or any Streamable HTTP MCP host). You will be redirected to sign in to Oakallow and approve the requested scopes:
mcp:read: list tools, view pending approvals, check permissions, read activity.mcp:write: create approval requests and mint run tokens.You don't configure any of this by hand: an unauthenticated request returns 401 with a WWW-Authenticate header pointing to the endpoint's RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata (/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource), so a spec-compliant MCP client discovers the authorization server and runs the OAuth flow automatically.
See examples/ for a Claude Desktop config, an OAuth flow walkthrough, and an oak_agent_ token walkthrough. tools.json has the exact schemas of the standard tools.
oak_agent_ token)OAuth assumes a human can complete the interactive sign-in. An autonomous agent that runs on its own authenticates to the same https://api.oakallow.io/mcp endpoint with a pre-issued bearer token instead: Authorization: Bearer oak_agent_.... The endpoint checks for an oak_agent_ bearer before the OAuth provider, so no consent screen or interactive login is involved.
An agent identity is scoped to one organization, can submit and check permission requests but never approve, is rate-limited per identity, and is stored only as a SHA-256 hash (the raw token is shown once at creation). Provision one from the dashboard's Account → Agents page (owner/admin only). See oakallow.io/info/agents for the full model.
SKILL.md is an agent skill that documents when and how to use the oakallow tools: the request, approve, poll, and act workflow, how to phrase approval reasons, and what to do on allowed, requires_approval, or disabled verdicts. Point your agent at it to govern tool actions correctly.
PROMPT.md has short, copy-paste one-liners to drop into your agent's system prompt so it actually consults the skill. The skill is the procedure; a trigger prompt is what makes the agent look. Three options, from "gate every tool call" to "gate a customer-named set," plus an inline example pattern for a real request.
reason, and its agent id.REF-… to poll. Once a human approves under MFA, the action runs exactly once.For direct tools, Oakallow lives outside the execution path: it governs and records what was reported, and it does not run your tools or receive your tool parameters beyond a PII-scrubbed reason. For OakGuard gateway tools, it is the transport for approved calls but still keeps none of the payloads.
Outside MCP, the REST
Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo