Context7
Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.
Description from the maker (original English)
Git-aware memory store for AI coding agents; memories are anchored to git blob hashes.
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
You need
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
Open Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config, and paste this into claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}Run this in your terminal
claude mcp add robo-cortex -- uvx robo-cortex mcpPaste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project
{
"servers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 7, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account robotel-limited, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint
Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead
Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (0.4.1) reached the registry 4 months ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need Python (uv) on your computer.
In the same category: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
Git-aware knowledge integrity for AI coding agents.
Your AI agent debugs a bug, learns the lesson, and forgets it by next week — or worse, keeps citing a "lesson" that the code has since made false. robo-cortex is a local knowledge base built for that specific failure mode: memories are anchored to git blob hashes, so when the code they're about changes, the memory is automatically flagged for review instead of being silently trusted or silently lost. In other words: drift detection and stale-memory detection for AI agent memory, done deterministically from git history — not an LLM guess, not an embedding-similarity heuristic.
Most agent-memory tools are embeddings + a vector database + a cloud dependency. robo-cortex is deliberately none of that. Four things it does that a generic key-value memory store doesn't:
needs_review on the next retrieve/search/affected call — and a committed revert automatically heals it back. The healing requires three conditions: (a) the revert must be committed (git blob hash must match HEAD again), (b) the memory must have been flagged by the system (not manually via change_status), and (c) you must run a lazy trigger (retrieve/search/affected) after the revert to scan for changes. Few memory tools tie themselves to your actual code's history this deterministically — no embedding similarity, no LLM judgment call, just a git blob hash matching or not.provisional memory only becomes active once real evidence backs it, or a human explicitly promotes it..cortex/memory.db is just a file — inspect it with sqlite3 any time.active → superseded → archived, etc.) requires a --reason, permanently recorded. Nothing disappears silently; wrong lessons are marked invalidated, not deleted.A 30-session benchmark (3 real historical bugs from this repo, re-introduced and solved 10× each by a small model — Claude Haiku 4.5 — with and without a robo-cortex memory pack) measured, at identical fix quality (30/30 correct, zero disqualifications): ~12% fewer fresh tokens and ~15% lower API-equivalent cost (medians of paired per-task deltas), scaling up to −26% tokens / −39% cost on the task whose fix was hardest to locate unaided. Recording a lesson was itself metered: a memory pays for itself after ~1–6 sessions that reuse it (median ≈ 5). We make no wall-clock claim — time differences were noise-dominated. Full methodology, per-run raw evidence (usage logs, diffs, prompts), and the reusable harness are in the repo: docs/benchmark-results.md, benchmark-results-20260718/, scripts/benchmark/. Known limits, stated plainly: one subject model (small — an earlier n=3 pilot on a larger model measured a smaller 2.7% effect, see EVALUATION.md §9), one well-documented codebase (likely compresses the effect), 3 task types. We'd rather publish a modest number we measured than a dramatic one we didn't.
Prerequisite: robo-cortex requires a git repository (staleness detection needs git history to compare against):
git init && git add -A && git commit -m "initial commit"
pip install robo-cortex
If pip install refuses with error: externally-managed-environment (common on recent Debian/Ubuntu), use a virtual environment or pipx:
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate && pip install robo-cortex
If you plan to use robo-cortex with an MCP-capable agent (Claude Desktop/Code, etc.), install the MCP extra instead:
pip install 'robo-cortex[mcp]'
cd /path/to/your/project
roco init
roco record --type lesson --scope repo \ --statement "Copy-to-clipboard fails on HTTP; use a textarea+execCommand fallback." \ --confidence high
roco retrieve --task "copy to clipboard http"
matched=1 returned=1 needs_review=0 contradicted=0 [1] score=0.650 repo lesson Copy-to-clipboard fails on HTTP; use a textarea+execCommand fallback.
--path links a memory to a file, but only accepts a path that already exists at HEAD (no memory is ever born pointing at a dead link). For code you just wrote but haven't committed yet: record the memory without --path now, commit, then attach the path afterward:
roco record --type decision --scope repo --statement "..." --confidence high
git add new_module.py && git commit -m "add new_module.py" roco record 7 --add-path new_module.py
Reusable lessons (not specific to this project) use scope=global and require --assumptions — the conditions under which the lesson applies, so it doesn't get suggested everywhere by accident:
roco record --type lesson --scope global \
--statement "Safari 14 breaks CSS grid+gap. Use flexbox+margin instead." \ --confidence high \ --assumptions "css grid gap safari"
Global-scope commands (record --scope global, show, search, status, link, evidence, list) work from anywhere, including outside any git repository — the global store (~/.cortex/global.db) isn't tied to a project. retrieve is the one exception: it's local-repo-aware by design, so it still requires an initialized repo.
roco hooks install
Installs a git pre-commit hook: if the commit touches code linked to a memory that's active/provisional/needs_review, the commit is blocked with the memory's id and a review prompt, until you've reviewed it or bypassed explicitly. Example, for a memory linked to src/scanner.py when that file is part of the commit:
robo-cortex: this commit touches code linked to memories that need review:
[1] path_changed:src/scanner.py@working_tree scanner batches at 50 items deliberately
Review with: roco show Then either re-verify (roco status activate --reason "...") or supersede it, and commit again. To bypass this check: git commit --no-verify
The bypass is real and documented — git commit --no-verify skips it, same as any git hook. This is "enforcement by default, bypass explicit," not "impossible to skip." See roco hooks --help for uninstall/status. For a CI-level check on pull requests instead of (or in addition to) local commits, see docs/ci-example.yml.
There's also an optional post-commit hook, purely informational (it never blocks — the commit it reports on already happened by the time it runs):
roco hooks install --post-commit
It runs roco affected --diff-range HEAD~1..HEAD after each commit and reports anything at risk, so a flag shows up immediately instead of waiting for the next retrieve/search/affected call. --post-commit also works with uninstall/status, independently of the pre-commit hook.
rocoBoth robo-cortex and roco are identical commands (same binary, two script entry points). Use whichever fits your fingers:
roco retrieve --task "..." # Shorter alias
robo-cortex retrieve --task "..." # Full name, backwards compatible
Name collision note: PyPI already has an unrelated package named roco ("Runtime Config Generator"). If that package is also installed in the same environment, whichever was installed last wins the roco command — use the full robo-cortex name to be unambiguous, or check roco --version to confirm which one you're actually running.
roco completion bash >> ~/.bashrc
Completes subcommand names and each subcommand's own flags (not flag values, and not nested sub-subcommands like hooks install). It's a static script generated from the installed version — re-run the command after upgrading to pick up new commands or flags.
| Scenario | Best method | Why |
|---|---|---|
| One-off CLI commands (shell, scripts, manual testing) | CLI: roco retrieve --task "..." | Simplest, no dependencies, immediate |
| Python agent or script running your own code | Python SDK: from robo_cortex import retrieve, record | In-process (no subprocess), real exceptions, not string-parsed errors |
| LLM agent (Claude Code, or any MCP client) with tool-calling | MCP server: add to your MCP config | Agent decides when to call; tool descriptions ship with the package |
All three call the same underlying robo_cortex.core functions — pick based on what the calling code already uses.
{
"mcpServers": { "robo-cortex": { "command": "roco", "args": ["mcp", "--repo", "/path/to/project"] } } }
Available tools: retrieve_context, record_memory, search_memory, attach_evidence, verify_evidence, change_status, get_memory, list_affected. Full contract in MCP_TOOLS.md.
from robo_cortex import retrieve, record
memories = retrieve("feature description", repo_path="/srv/project") if memories["data"]: print(f"Found solution: {memories'data'['statement']}")
record( type="lesson", statement="What you learned", confidence="high", repo_path="/srv/project", )
Full API, including the RoboCortex class for multiple calls against the same repo, in PYTHON_SDK.md.
Every memory has a status that reflects its confidence and applicability. New memories start provisional; manual review or evidence changes their status:
| Status | Meaning | Can transition to |
|---|---|---|
| provisional | New memory, not yet validated | active, needs_review, abandoned |
| active | Confident, applicable to futur
Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo