Prototype · Preview: every server in the official registry, synced every 30 minutes. Reviews and accounts come in a later step.
PopNx MCPMCP servers for people who use AI · explained in plain words

Assay MCP Server

by Rul1anversion 6.22.3i★ –iRuns on your computer
Registry nameio.github.Rul1an/assay-mcp-server

Install

Overview

Description from the maker (original English)

Policy-enforcing MCP proxy with portable evidence output.

PopNx MCP’s three pillars

These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.

What you can do with it

We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.

  • Connection: Runs on your computer
  • Transport: stdio
  • Category: Other

Install

Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.

Before you install

  • Basic checks: 1 of 1 passed
  • Runs on your computer with your user’s permissions (files, network, apps).
  • The registry lists no key to fill in.

Which app do you use?

Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.

Download the maker’s .mcpb file

The link goes to the maker’s own file; we do not host or repackage it. Open the file and Claude Desktop installs it.

Run this in your terminal

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.

Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.

These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.

What it can do

Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.

Basic checksi

We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 8, 2026

  • ✓ Pass

    Maker matches the repo

    The registry name was verified with the GitHub account Rul1an, which owns the repo

  • … Not checked yet

    Still maintained

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • … Not checked yet

    Has a licence

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • – Not applicable

    Endpoint responds

    This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint

  • – Not applicable

    Sign-in with OAuth

    Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead

  • … Not checked yet

    No hidden instructions in tool descriptions

    Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints

Compared with others in Otheri

  • More stars than 0% of the other 18490 servers in this category
  • Published to the registry more recently than 97% of the other 18490 servers in this category
  • Basic checks equal to or better than 100% of the other 18490 servers in this category

Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.

Common questions

Is Assay MCP Server safe?

It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.

What keys or codes does it need?

The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.

Does it run on my computer or in the cloud?

It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).

Is it still maintained?

The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (6.22.3) reached the registry yesterday.

Which apps can use it?

Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need MCPB on your computer.

What can I use instead?

In the same category: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Talexio MCP by usefulapi

Alternatives

Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.

Reading a card:↓ Downloads per weeki★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi

Spec Driven Development

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

by formulahendryEarly↓ 66/wk★ 440Updated 14 months ago

Runs on your computer

Remote Desktop Commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

by desktop-commanderGrowing★ 211Updated 3 days ago

Runs in the cloud✓ desktopcommander.app

Talexio MCP by usefulapi

Read employees, approved pay lines, approved time off and shift templates in Talexio.

by m190EarlyUpdated today

Runs in the cloud✓ usefulapi.io

README from the maker

Open the README

Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.

Assay

The open, recomputable evidence profile for privileged MCP tool actions.

Assay records what a privileged tool call decided, what was observed, and what stays unproven, so a reviewer can replay the claim offline instead of trusting the agent's account of itself. In enforcement mode, the proxy gate for routed MCP tools/call requests is deterministic and fail-closed, and the enforcing proxy is the reference producer rather than the contract itself. Optional eBPF/LSM instrumentation on supported Linux hosts adds kernel-level observations. CI-native, no backend, bounded by design.

Quickstart · How it works · See it work · MCP example · OWASP MCP Top 10 · Discussions


Agents got real tool access through MCP — and tool poisoning, rug pulls, and confused-deputy OAuth came with it. Assay sits at the tool-call boundary and does three things, in order.

One golden path: the release-pinned agent journey records the nine driven CLI/MCP steps and their exit/stdout contracts. Its protected-action fixture lives in examples/privileged-action-gate/.

Enforce, prove, stay honest
  • Enforce. In enforcement mode, the gate decides tools/call requests routed through it before forwarding, with the precise reason for each allow or deny. Separate controls on supported Linux hosts include cgroup eBPF IPv4/TCP connect filtering (whose hook error path allows connections) and Landlock TCP-connect port allowlisting. assay sandbox --enforce refuses an unavailable backend or conflicting filesystem policy unless --allow-audit-fallback is explicit. --enforce-net requires --enforce; active Landlock network enforcement rejects policies it cannot express as TCP-port allowlists, even with audit fallback enabled.
  • Prove. Configured producers can record decisions and bounded observations for export into offline-verifiable, tamper-evident evidence bundles. The privileged-action flow carries the verdict, pre-call establish journey, and declared-vs-observed conformance for CI review without a hosted backend. assay mcp wrap --decision-log records tool-call decisions; assay evidence prepare-incident-package turns that log into an incident package verify-incident-package accepts, with the surface grades the verifier derives. The package is not a count of all calls, not completeness of capture, not proof of what the server did, and an allow is not proof a human accepted.
  • Stay honest. Trust Basis classifies supported claims as verified, self_reported, inferred, or absent; its gates check the declared claim boundaries. A tool returning "success" is the provider's assertion, never proof. Assay ships no single safety score; read each artifact’s source, coverage and non-claims before relying on it.
Quickstart
# Fast path: release installer for Linux and macOS.

curl -fsSL https://getassay.dev/install.sh | sh

Confirm the command resolves; if setup fails, run assay doctor.

assay --version

Source-build alternative (requires Rust):

cargo install assay-cli --version 6.22.3 --locked

python3 examples/mcp-quickstart/run.py

For v6.22.3, run the last command from a source checkout or an extracted published CLI archive. The installer is binary-only and does not carry the bounded quickstart assets. The live getassay.dev installer verifies the selected archive against its published SHA-256 sidecar before extraction. Set ASSAY_REQUIRE_PROVENANCE=1 to additionally require GitHub artifact provenance; the default reports provenance_not_requested and strict success reports provenance_verified. A checksum proves byte equality with the published sidecar, not producer identity. Provenance identifies the source and build, not runtime safety or semantic correctness.

Captured runner output (the bundled local mock performs no external action):

assay quickstart: PASS

mcp_requests=initialize,tools/list,tools/call decision=allow tool=read_file decision_artifact=.assay/quickstart/decisions.ndjson non_claim=forwarded_to_local_mock_only

Released surfaces:

  • Static project manifests are shipped for Claude Code and Cursor; Codex uses the equivalent TOML entry documented in the editor MCP recipe. Manifest presence is not host-discovery proof. assay mcp config-path supports Claude Desktop and Cursor only.
  • Published v6.22.3 CLI archives cover Linux x86_64/arm64, macOS x86_64/arm64, and Windows x86_64. The Python wheels cover CPython 3.12, 3.13, and 3.14 on macOS x86_64/arm64 and Linux x86_64; other interpreters and platforms are not claimed.
  • Published assay-mcp-server archives cover Linux x86_64/arm64. MCPB and server.json package descriptors are also published; their presence is not host-discovery proof.
  • CI: GitHub Action. Core flows need no hosted backend or API key. New to the threat model? The OWASP MCP Top 10 mapping states, per risk, what Assay covers and deliberately does not.

What ships

OutputWhat it is
Policy gateassay mcp wrap — deterministic allow/deny before tools run, with the reason.
Evidence bundleOffline-verifiable, tamper-evident archive for audit and replay.
Trust Basis / Trust CardCanonical trust-basis.json (bounded claim classification) plus review-friendly trustcard.{json,md,html}.
External receiptsEval outcomes, runtime decisions, and model inventory as bounded receipts with JSON Schema contracts.
Tool-decision logsFor handled known-tool calls, the assay-mcp-server stdio server emits an info-level tool_decision event when enabled by its log filter; decision contains a JSON-encoded observed decision entry with projected target fields.
SARIF / CIGitHub Action, Security-tab integration, policy gates on PRs.
AttestationSign an evidence bundle as a DSSE-wrapped in-toto v1 Statement with the evidence-bundle/v1 predicate.
  Agent ──► Assay ──► MCP Server

├─ ✅ ALLOW / ❌ DENY (policy, with reason) ├─► 📋 Evidence bundle (offline-verifiable) └─► 📊 Trust Basis → Trust Card → SARIF / CI

Current release: v6.22.3. CHANGELOG.md and release notes remain the authority for released behavior; merged changes after the tag are Unreleased, and crates.io publication is separate from merge state. Launch definition and support commitment: docs/LAUNCH.md.

Is this for me?

Yes if you already have eval output, runtime decisions, inventory artifacts, or MCP tool-call tests, and you want a small reviewable CI artifact instead of a dashboard — bounded auditability, not a scalar trust badge.

Not yet if you need Assay to judge model correctness for you, want a hosted dashboard as the product, or want a compliance claim rather than a bounded evidence boundary. Assay is not a trust-score engine, a generic eval dashboard, or a hosted observability product — see what it is and is not.

See it work

An agent tries a privileged action — github.add_deploy_key — through the enforcing proxy, decided per call before it forwards, offline against a local mock (no real credentials):

cd examples/privileged-action-gate && ./run.sh

A deny is fail-closed caution, not a verdict on intent; an allow is the decision to forward, never proof the action happened. Declared-vs-observed conformance is recorded beside the verdict, never as a gate. Full walkthrough: privileged-action-gate.

Pick your path

You haveWhat you getStart here
Promptfoo JSONL from CI evalsEval outcome receipts + verified bundle + Trust Basis diffPromptfoo JSONL
OpenFeature EvaluationDetailsDecision receipt + verified bundleOpenFeature
CycloneDX ML-BOM model componentInventory receipt + verified bundleCycloneDX ML-BOM
MCP tool callsAllow/deny audit trail + observed-behavior evidenceMCP Quick Start
A GitHub PR gateTrust Basis diff, gate status, SARIF/JUnit-ready outputCI Guide
A Runner archive / coverage annotationCoverage descriptors + claim-class cells + a claimed-vs-observed checkCoverage-honesty walkthrough

The workflow stays small: import or record a bounded outcome, bundle and verify it, compile trust-basis.json, gate the Trust Basis diff. Assay doesn't make the upstream tool the source of truth; it makes the evidence boundary inspectable. For privileged tool actions, the MCP proxy records each tools/call as a structured tool-decision surface — keeping the asserted-versus-verified line honest.

Policy is simple

version: "2.0"

name: "my-policy" tools: allow: ["read_file", "list_dir"] deny: ["exec", "shell", "write_file"] schemas: read_file: type: object properties: path: { type: string, pattern: "^/app/.*" } required: ["path"]

assay init --from-trace trace.jsonl generates the runtime-observation policy used by the trace-generation flow (files, network, and processes); it is not an MCP authorization policy. Migrate a legacy MCP constraints: policy with assay policy migrate. See Policy Files.

Why Assay

Canonical evidenceAssay's evidence model is the stable contract; OpenTelemetry and protocol adapters (ACP / A2A projection profile / UCP) map into it.
DeterministicThe policy gate uses explicit rules; its decision depends on the request, policy and applicable session state. This does not make live evaluators or external effects deterministic.
Bounded claimsExplicit about verified vs visible vs absent — no score-first UX.
Offline-firstNo backend required for core enforcement and bundle verification.
Checkable provenanceWhich piece of the source-class and coverage model shipped when, as commits you can git log rather than claims you have to take — provenance, prior art credited first.

Learn more

  • MCP Quickstart · Editor MCP recipe — policy-enforcing MCP in Cursor / Claude Code / Codex
  • [MCP 2025/2026 protocol-era parity](https://docs.geta

Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo

Ask PopNx