Context7
Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.
Description from the maker (original English)
Lean 4 theorem prover MCP: automated proof search, mathlib integration, job management
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
Download the maker’s .mcpb file
The link goes to the maker’s own file; we do not host or repackage it. Open the file and Claude Desktop installs it.
Run this in your terminal
Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 7, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account sandraschi, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint
Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead
Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (0.1.1) reached the registry 19 days ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need MCPB on your computer.
In the same category: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
MCP server for AI-driven formal proof search in Lean 4. Submit a theorem with sorry; get back a machine-verified proof. Implements Agent A from AlphaProof Nexus (DeepMind, May 2026).
Stack: Python 3.12+ . FastMCP 3.4+ . FastAPI . React/Vite . Tailwind . Zustand . Biome . Lean 4 / Mathlib
Feed it a Lean 4 theorem with a sorry placeholder. It runs N parallel agents in a loop: the LLM proposes a proof edit, the Lean compiler judges it, errors feed back to the LLM. First agent to produce a sorry-free compile wins.
-- Input
theorem sum_formula (n : ℕ) : 2 * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), i = n * (n + 1) := by sorry
-- Output (machine-verified) theorem sum_formula (n : ℕ) : 2 * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), i = n * (n + 1) := by induction n with | zero => simp | succ n ih => rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]; ring_nf; linarith
The compiler is the only oracle -- if it compiles without sorry, the proof is correct.
git clone https://github.com/sandraschi/leanforge-mcp
cd leanforge-mcp uv sync Copy-Item config.example.toml config.toml
Then add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "leanforge": { "command": "uv", "args": ["--directory", "C:\\path\\to\\leanforge-mcp", "run", "python", "-m", "leanforge_mcp"], "env": { "DEEPSEEK_API_KEY": "...", "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "..." } } } }
See INSTALL.md for the Lean + Mathlib workspace setup (~4GB, one-time -- already provisioned and verified on Goliath as of 2026-07-09).
"Prove that the sum of the first n natural numbers is n*(n+1)/2"
"Submit this MiniF2F problem and check back in 10 minutes"
"Show me all the proof attempts for job abc-123 -- why is it stuck?"
"Run validate_lean on this tactic proof to see if it compiles"
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
submit_theorem | Submit a theorem statement → job ID (async) |
submit_lean_file | Submit a full .lean file with sorry placeholders |
get_proof_status | Poll job status; returns proof when complete |
list_attempts | Inspect the attempt trajectory per agent/turn |
list_jobs | List all jobs with status summary |
validate_lean | Raw Lean 4 compile -- no job tracking |
verify_proof | Re-check a proven file with verified kernels (con-leche, con-ron) -- needs workspace on Lean >= 4.35.0, see docs/VERIFIED_KERNELS.md |
cancel_job | Cancel a running job |
leanforge_shutdown | Gracefully shut down the server (cancels live jobs, exits) |
get_mathlib_search | Natural language search over Mathlib theorems |
winget install leanprover.elan)deepseek-prover-v2:7b for tier-1 (local, free)| Piece | Value |
|---|---|
| MCP server | stdio (uv run python -m leanforge_mcp) |
| Web backend (FastAPI) | http://127.0.0.1:10867 |
| Web frontend (Vite) | http://127.0.0.1:10868 |
| Config file | config.toml (copy from config.example.toml; gitignored) |
| Environment | DEEPSEEK_API_KEY (tier 2), ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (tier 3) — see .env.example; keys stay in server env, never in the browser |
| Doc | Contents |
|---|---|
| INSTALL.md | Prerequisites, Lean workspace setup, Claude Desktop config |
| docs/ONBOARDING.md | First-timer setup: costs, pitfalls, sanity check |
| docs/CONFIGURATION.md | All config options and environment variables |
| docs/TOOLS.md | Full tool reference with parameters and examples |
| docs/ARCHITECTURE.md | Proof loop, tier escalation, job lifecycle, SQLite schema |
| docs/LEAN.md | Lean 4 language reference, tactic guide, bibliography, link collection |
| docs/VERIFIED_KERNELS.md | Why verify_proof exists, what con-leche/con-ron are, workspace upgrade path |
| docs/LEAN_PRIMER.md | Quick Lean 4 intro for engineers (short version) |
| docs/ALPHAPROOF_NEXUS.md | The technique: AlphaProof Nexus paper explained |
| docs/COVERAGE_GAP.md | Why DeepMind got MSM coverage and a startup wouldn't |
| docs/BENCHMARK_RESULTS.md | MiniF2F, PutnamBench, Erdős results |
| docs/DEVELOPMENT.md | Contributing, dev setup, test commands |
| docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md | Common errors and fixes |
| llms-full.txt | Full LLM context: tools, endpoints, config, ports |
| Phase | What | Status |
|---|---|---|
| A | Core loop: LLM proposes, Lean judges, error feeds back | Done |
| B | Correctness hardening, edge case handling, timeout tuning | Done (2026-07-09) -- tamper guard closed against default-arg truncation and a decoy-duplicate attack, cross-process job ownership/cancellation fixed, stateless-prompting mitigations added. 56/56 tests passing on real hardware. See docs/ASSESSMENT_2026-06-24.md |
| C | Performance and safety: REPL worker pool (compile-time is the real bottleneck), LLM timeout/retry, token/cost accounting (hard gate before any batch run) | In progress -- see TODO.md |
| D | Multi-agent parallel scheduling (Agent B from paper) -- run N loops in parallel, first to finish wins | Planned |
| E | Self-critique step -- LLM reviews its own proof before compile, catches obvious errors early | Planned |
| F | Webapp proof explorer -- interactive tree view of attempted proof paths, live tactic streaming | Planned |
| G | Premise selection -- before generating tactics, search Mathlib for relevant lemmas | Planned |
| H | Cumulative context windowing -- smart summarization of long error chains instead of blind concatenation | Planned |
| I | Benchmark dashboard -- webapp page tracking MiniF2F, PutnamBench, Erdős results per model/config | Stretch |
| J | Human-in-the-loop -- when the agent is stuck, pause and surface the current state for a human hint | Stretch |
| K | Proof caching -- deduplicate sub-proofs so repeated lemmas compile instantly | Stretch |
A + B let you submit a theorem and get a proof back on the other end. It works, it's useful, but it's single-threaded, pays a full compile per turn, and has no spend controls -- Phase C closes those gaps.
D changes the game: N parallel agents means wall-clock time drops from "however long one LLM takes" to "however long the fastest of N LLMs takes." For hard theorems where the LLM wanders into dead ends, this is the difference between 5 minutes and 30 seconds.
E prevents the LLM from wasting compiles on obviously wrong tactics. Cheap to add (one extra LLM call per attempt) and the paper shows it improves solve rate by ~15 percentage points on Agent A alone.
F is the user-facing payoff: instead of staring at "status: running" and polling, you watch the LLM try tactics in real time, see which paths it abandoned, and understand why it eventually succeeded or failed.
G addresses the most common failure mode: the LLM writes a correct tactic for a lemma that doesn't exist in the current context. Premise selection (a small retrieval step before tactic generation) cuts this dramatically.
H is invisible but critical: as the LLM accumulates 10+ failed attempts, the error context grows past the model's window. Smart summarization keeps relevant signal without drowning the LLM in noise.
Full gap analysis: docs/ASSESSMENT_2026-06-24.md
MIT