Prototype · Preview: every server in the official registry, synced every 30 minutes. Reviews and accounts come in a later step.
PopNx MCPMCP servers for people who use AI · explained in plain words

Leanforge MCP

by sandraschiversion 0.1.1i★ –iRuns on your computer
Registry nameio.github.sandraschi/leanforge-mcp

Install

Overview

Description from the maker (original English)

Lean 4 theorem prover MCP: automated proof search, mathlib integration, job management

PopNx MCP’s three pillars

These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.

What you can do with it

We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.

  • Connection: Runs on your computer
  • Transport: stdio
  • Category: Search & AI memory

Install

Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.

Before you install

  • Basic checks: 1 of 1 passed
  • Runs on your computer with your user’s permissions (files, network, apps).
  • The registry lists no key to fill in.

Which app do you use?

Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.

Download the maker’s .mcpb file

The link goes to the maker’s own file; we do not host or repackage it. Open the file and Claude Desktop installs it.

Run this in your terminal

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.

Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.

These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.

What it can do

Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.

Basic checksi

We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 7, 2026

  • ✓ Pass

    Maker matches the repo

    The registry name was verified with the GitHub account sandraschi, which owns the repo

  • … Not checked yet

    Still maintained

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • … Not checked yet

    Has a licence

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • – Not applicable

    Endpoint responds

    This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint

  • – Not applicable

    Sign-in with OAuth

    Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead

  • … Not checked yet

    No hidden instructions in tool descriptions

    Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints

Compared with others in Search & AI memoryi

  • More stars than 0% of the other 7256 servers in this category
  • Published to the registry more recently than 67% of the other 7256 servers in this category
  • Basic checks equal to or better than 100% of the other 7256 servers in this category

Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.

Common questions

Is Leanforge MCP safe?

It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.

What keys or codes does it need?

The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.

Does it run on my computer or in the cloud?

It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).

Is it still maintained?

The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (0.1.1) reached the registry 19 days ago.

Which apps can use it?

Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need MCPB on your computer.

What can I use instead?

In the same category: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa

Alternatives

Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.

Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi

Context7

by upstash

Feeds AI the latest docs for libraries and frameworks before it answers, so code it writes does not use outdated, removed functions.

Computer or cloud★ 64,224MITUpdated today
Install

Codebase Memory

by DeusData

Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.

Runs on your computer★ 48,148MITUpdated 20 days ago
Install

Exa

by exa-labs

Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.

Runs in the cloud★ 5,213MITUpdated last month
Install

README from the maker

Open the README

Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.

leanforge-mcp

MCP server for AI-driven formal proof search in Lean 4. Submit a theorem with sorry; get back a machine-verified proof. Implements Agent A from AlphaProof Nexus (DeepMind, May 2026).

Stack: Python 3.12+ . FastMCP 3.4+ . FastAPI . React/Vite . Tailwind . Zustand . Biome . Lean 4 / Mathlib


Table of Contents

  • What it does
  • Quick Install
  • What You Can Do
  • Tools
  • Requirements
  • Documentation
  • Status
  • License

What it does

Feed it a Lean 4 theorem with a sorry placeholder. It runs N parallel agents in a loop: the LLM proposes a proof edit, the Lean compiler judges it, errors feed back to the LLM. First agent to produce a sorry-free compile wins.

-- Input

theorem sum_formula (n : ℕ) : 2 * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), i = n * (n + 1) := by sorry

-- Output (machine-verified) theorem sum_formula (n : ℕ) : 2 * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), i = n * (n + 1) := by induction n with | zero => simp | succ n ih => rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]; ring_nf; linarith

The compiler is the only oracle -- if it compiles without sorry, the proof is correct.


Quick Install

git clone https://github.com/sandraschi/leanforge-mcp

cd leanforge-mcp uv sync Copy-Item config.example.toml config.toml

Then add to claude_desktop_config.json:

{

"mcpServers": { "leanforge": { "command": "uv", "args": ["--directory", "C:\\path\\to\\leanforge-mcp", "run", "python", "-m", "leanforge_mcp"], "env": { "DEEPSEEK_API_KEY": "...", "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "..." } } } }

See INSTALL.md for the Lean + Mathlib workspace setup (~4GB, one-time -- already provisioned and verified on Goliath as of 2026-07-09).


What You Can Do

"Prove that the sum of the first n natural numbers is n*(n+1)/2"

"Submit this MiniF2F problem and check back in 10 minutes"

"Show me all the proof attempts for job abc-123 -- why is it stuck?"

"Run validate_lean on this tactic proof to see if it compiles"


Tools

ToolDescription
submit_theoremSubmit a theorem statement → job ID (async)
submit_lean_fileSubmit a full .lean file with sorry placeholders
get_proof_statusPoll job status; returns proof when complete
list_attemptsInspect the attempt trajectory per agent/turn
list_jobsList all jobs with status summary
validate_leanRaw Lean 4 compile -- no job tracking
verify_proofRe-check a proven file with verified kernels (con-leche, con-ron) -- needs workspace on Lean >= 4.35.0, see docs/VERIFIED_KERNELS.md
cancel_jobCancel a running job
leanforge_shutdownGracefully shut down the server (cancels live jobs, exits)
get_mathlib_searchNatural language search over Mathlib theorems

Requirements

  • Python 3.11+
  • Lean 4 via elan (winget install leanprover.elan)
  • Mathlib workspace with cached oleans (~4GB, one-time setup -- see INSTALL.md)
  • Ollama with deepseek-prover-v2:7b for tier-1 (local, free)
  • DeepSeek or Anthropic API key for tier-2/3 (optional)

Ports & configuration

PieceValue
MCP serverstdio (uv run python -m leanforge_mcp)
Web backend (FastAPI)http://127.0.0.1:10867
Web frontend (Vite)http://127.0.0.1:10868
Config fileconfig.toml (copy from config.example.toml; gitignored)
EnvironmentDEEPSEEK_API_KEY (tier 2), ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (tier 3) — see .env.example; keys stay in server env, never in the browser

Documentation

DocContents
INSTALL.mdPrerequisites, Lean workspace setup, Claude Desktop config
docs/ONBOARDING.mdFirst-timer setup: costs, pitfalls, sanity check
docs/CONFIGURATION.mdAll config options and environment variables
docs/TOOLS.mdFull tool reference with parameters and examples
docs/ARCHITECTURE.mdProof loop, tier escalation, job lifecycle, SQLite schema
docs/LEAN.mdLean 4 language reference, tactic guide, bibliography, link collection
docs/VERIFIED_KERNELS.mdWhy verify_proof exists, what con-leche/con-ron are, workspace upgrade path
docs/LEAN_PRIMER.mdQuick Lean 4 intro for engineers (short version)
docs/ALPHAPROOF_NEXUS.mdThe technique: AlphaProof Nexus paper explained
docs/COVERAGE_GAP.mdWhy DeepMind got MSM coverage and a startup wouldn't
docs/BENCHMARK_RESULTS.mdMiniF2F, PutnamBench, Erdős results
docs/DEVELOPMENT.mdContributing, dev setup, test commands
docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.mdCommon errors and fixes
llms-full.txtFull LLM context: tools, endpoints, config, ports

Roadmap

PhaseWhatStatus
ACore loop: LLM proposes, Lean judges, error feeds backDone
BCorrectness hardening, edge case handling, timeout tuningDone (2026-07-09) -- tamper guard closed against default-arg truncation and a decoy-duplicate attack, cross-process job ownership/cancellation fixed, stateless-prompting mitigations added. 56/56 tests passing on real hardware. See docs/ASSESSMENT_2026-06-24.md
CPerformance and safety: REPL worker pool (compile-time is the real bottleneck), LLM timeout/retry, token/cost accounting (hard gate before any batch run)In progress -- see TODO.md
DMulti-agent parallel scheduling (Agent B from paper) -- run N loops in parallel, first to finish winsPlanned
ESelf-critique step -- LLM reviews its own proof before compile, catches obvious errors earlyPlanned
FWebapp proof explorer -- interactive tree view of attempted proof paths, live tactic streamingPlanned
GPremise selection -- before generating tactics, search Mathlib for relevant lemmasPlanned
HCumulative context windowing -- smart summarization of long error chains instead of blind concatenationPlanned
IBenchmark dashboard -- webapp page tracking MiniF2F, PutnamBench, Erdős results per model/configStretch
JHuman-in-the-loop -- when the agent is stuck, pause and surface the current state for a human hintStretch
KProof caching -- deduplicate sub-proofs so repeated lemmas compile instantlyStretch
What each phase enables

A + B let you submit a theorem and get a proof back on the other end. It works, it's useful, but it's single-threaded, pays a full compile per turn, and has no spend controls -- Phase C closes those gaps.

D changes the game: N parallel agents means wall-clock time drops from "however long one LLM takes" to "however long the fastest of N LLMs takes." For hard theorems where the LLM wanders into dead ends, this is the difference between 5 minutes and 30 seconds.

E prevents the LLM from wasting compiles on obviously wrong tactics. Cheap to add (one extra LLM call per attempt) and the paper shows it improves solve rate by ~15 percentage points on Agent A alone.

F is the user-facing payoff: instead of staring at "status: running" and polling, you watch the LLM try tactics in real time, see which paths it abandoned, and understand why it eventually succeeded or failed.

G addresses the most common failure mode: the LLM writes a correct tactic for a lemma that doesn't exist in the current context. Premise selection (a small retrieval step before tactic generation) cuts this dramatically.

H is invisible but critical: as the LLM accumulates 10+ failed attempts, the error context grows past the model's window. Smart summarization keeps relevant signal without drowning the LLM in noise.

Full gap analysis: docs/ASSESSMENT_2026-06-24.md


License

MIT

Ask PopNx