Prototype · Preview: every server in the official registry, synced every 30 minutes. Reviews and accounts come in a later step.
PopNx MCPMCP servers for people who use AI · explained in plain words

Verificate MCP

by Verificate-Devversion 1.8.7i★ –iRuns in the cloud
Registry nameai.verificate/mcp

Install

Overview

Description from the maker (original English)

Agentic code review, no signup to try: reality gates + frontier-model review, with veto.

PopNx MCP’s three pillars

These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.

What you can do with it

We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.

  • Connection: Runs in the cloud
  • Transport: Streamable HTTP
  • Category: Developer tools
  • You need to fill in: Authorization

Install

Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.

Before you install

  • Basic checks: 1 of 1 passed
  • Runs on the maker’s server: what you ask it goes through their server.
  • You fill in yourself: Authorization

Values marked secret are keys to your account. Never share them or paste them into a chat.

You need

Which app do you use?

Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.

This address needs a key in a request header, which the add-connector menu cannot set. Use Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code instead.

Run this in your terminal

claude mcp add --transport http verificate https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp --header 'Authorization: your-value'

Fill in the empty values before running it.

Open in Cursor

Or copy the settings yourself

Paste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "verificate": {
      "url": "https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

Open in VS Code

Or copy the settings yourself

Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project

{
  "servers": {
    "verificate": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

This address needs a key in a request header, which the add-connector menu cannot set. Use Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code instead.

Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.

Values you fill in

  • Authorization secret required HTTP header
    Bearer — from your Verificate dashboard (30-day free trial, no card: https://verificate.ai/auth/signup)

These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.

What it can do

We have not read this server’s tool list yet; we check endpoints in rotation.

Basic checksi

We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 7, 2026

  • ✓ Pass

    Maker matches the repo

    The registry name was verified against the domain verificate.ai (the registry checks domain ownership)

  • … Not checked yet

    Still maintained

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • … Not checked yet

    Has a licence

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • … Not checked yet

    Endpoint responds

    Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation

  • … Not checked yet

    Sign-in with OAuth

    Not checked yet; we check endpoints in rotation

  • … Not checked yet

    No hidden instructions in tool descriptions

    Not checked yet; we read the tool list when we check the endpoint

Compared with others in Developer toolsi

  • More stars than 0% of the other 1394 servers in this category
  • Published to the registry more recently than 37% of the other 1394 servers in this category
  • Basic checks equal to or better than 100% of the other 1394 servers in this category

Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.

Common questions

Is Verificate MCP safe?

It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.

What keys or codes does it need?

You need to fill in: Authorization

Does it run on my computer or in the cloud?

It runs in the maker’s cloud. Connect over the internet with nothing to install, but what you send passes through the maker’s servers.

Is it still maintained?

The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (1.8.7) reached the registry 3 months ago.

Which apps can use it?

Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. It connects by URL, so apps that accept remote MCP servers work too, such as ChatGPT in developer mode.

What can I use instead?

In the same category: GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP

Alternatives

Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.

Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi

GitHub

by github

GitHub’s official server lets AI read and manage code, issues and pull requests in your account. Use GitHub’s hosted version or run it locally with Docker.

Computer or cloud★ 34,245MITUpdated 3 days ago
Install

Desktop Commander

by wonderwhy-er

MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management

Runs on your computer★ 10,225MITUpdated 15 days ago
Install

Cloudflare MCP

by cloudflare

Cloudflare MCP servers

Runs in the cloud★ 4,446Apache-2.0Updated 14 months ago
Install

README from the maker

Open the README

Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.

Verificate MCP — your vibe-coded MVP, all the way to production

Real output from the live server: 12 lines of AI-written payment code — rejected, fixed, approved, in seconds.

You vibe-coded the demo. This ships it. Between a working demo and a launched product used to stand an experienced CTO and a senior dev team — the people who catch the mock refund path, the invented SDK call, the loop that dies at real traffic. Verificate MCP is that review team as an MCP server: 17 deterministic reality gates with veto power, fused with a frontier-model enterprise review (ISO/IEC 25010: performance, scalability, reliability), run on every AI-written change before it reaches your codebase. The AI writes; the gate holds the bar; you ship. Hosted, zero-install, binary verdict in seconds — in Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf or any MCP client.

Not another linter wrapper. The code-quality shelf on every MCP directory is two things: scanners (ESLint, Semgrep and SonarQube bridges — deterministic rules, no judgment) and prompt relays that pipe your repo to your own LLM key (self-review with extra steps). Verificate is neither: the gates hold veto power that no model output can override.

Your coding assistant writes a mock and calls it done. It invents an SDK call that doesn't exist. It ships an N+1 loop that passes every test and dies under load. Verificate MCP runs the deep review pass on every AI output — deterministic reality gates first (any one can veto), then an enterprise-grade review scores what survives — before the code reaches your codebase.

A real rejection (verbatim)

12 plausible lines of AI-written payment code were sent through the production gateway. Verdict: REJECTED — score 30.8/100, vetoed by `code_reality_gate`, with findings including:

*"N+1 synchronous API calls … For 100 items, this results in 100 sequential HTTP roundtrips, taking ~10–20 seconds and blocking the event loop/worker thread … will trigger Stripe rate limiting (100 req/sec limit)."*

*"stripe.Inventory is not a valid Stripe SDK resource."*

*"Floating-point representation issues lead to rounding errors in financial transactions; Stripe API requires integer cents."*

Each of those is an afternoon of production debugging, caught in seconds.

Measured — vs. asking the model to review its own code

A frontier model asked *"is this OK to merge?"* in a natural workflow missed reward-gaming (a test that only does assert True) and a hallucinated API (stripe.Refund.create_partial) in 0 of 6 runs each. Verificate's gate caught both 6 of 6 — deterministically, with 0 false positives on clean code.

Adversarial caseLLM review aloneVerificate gate
Reward-gaming (assert True test)0 / 66 / 6
Hallucinated API (nonexistent SDK call)0 / 66 / 6

Battle-tested: 2,581 audited validations over 5 weeks (66 rejected, 270 flagged unfit), including guarding the write-path of a 21M-entity source-cited knowledge base (98.6% cited, 100% licensed across 268 sources). Reproduce it: scripts/ · full write-up: COMPARISON.md.

Tools

Each tool has one job — two gates that return verdicts, one advisor that doesn't, one generator:

ToolJobReturns
validate_ai_outputThe merge gate for AI-written code. Deterministic reality gates (mock/placeholder veto, gaming & bypass detection, invented-API checks) run first and can't be overridden; ISO/IEC 25010 review scores what survives.Binary approve/reject verdict + severity-ranked findings
validate_planThe gate for plans and designs, before any code exists — completeness, feasibility, scalability implications, risk. The cheapest place to catch a bad design.Binary approve/reject verdict + findings
analyze_codeAdvisory deep-dive on existing code — hot paths, rate-limit math, failure modes, tech debt. Use it to understand a rejection or review inherited code.Scores + findings, deliberately no verdict
generate_codeGenerate + gate in one step — the LLM writes it, the same protection engine vets it before you see it.Gated code (no placeholders, no invented APIs)
Beyond tools

The server also ships prompts and resources for a richer client experience:

  • Prompts gate_my_changes / review_my_plan — one-click workflows that loop validate → fix → re-validate until approved.
  • Resources verificate://gates (what each of the 17 deterministic gates watches for) and verificate://example-verdict (a verbatim production rejection).

Quick start — no signup, no token, 30 seconds

Every machine gets 25 free validations — no account, no card, no key. Add the URL and go:

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http verificate https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp

Cursor / VS Code — one-click install:

*LM Studio and Goose one-click buttons are at https://verificate.ai/mcp (GitHub strips their custom-protocol links).*

Windsurf / any MCP client (JSON)

{

"mcpServers": { "verificate": { "url": "https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp", "transport": "http" } } }

Cursor: ~/.cursor/mcp.json. Windsurf: ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json.

Then ask your assistant to *"validate this function with verificate"* — a structured verdict comes back in seconds, and every free-tier response shows how many validations you have left and what the gate has caught for you.

Keep going after the free 25

Sign up at https://verificate.ai/auth/signup (30-day trial, no card — then $30/mo) and add your token to the same config:

claude mcp add --transport http verificate \

https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp \ --header "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_TRIAL_TOKEN"

or in the JSON config add "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_TRIAL_TOKEN" }.

Make gating the default

Tools an agent *may* call are tools it will skip under pressure. Add a standing rule (Claude Code: CLAUDE.md; Cursor: a rule file):

Before presenting any substantive code change as complete:
  1. Call validate_ai_output on the change.
  2. If the verdict is REJECTED, fix the findings and re-validate.
  3. Never claim tests pass or systems are deployed without proof.

One-paste setup prompts that install these rules for you: PROMPTS.md. Or wire it into CI as a merge gate — see examples/.

How it decides

AI output ──► Reality gates (deterministic, any one vetoes)

• mock/placeholder in the wire path • invented/hallucinated APIs • claimed-complete without proof • gaming & bypass detection │ survivors only ▼ Enterprise review (ISO/IEC 25010 + MLOps) performance · scalability · reliability · tech debt │ ▼ Verdict: score /100 + severity-ranked findings (REJECTED = agent fixes findings and re-validates)

The two stages are deliberately separate: if reality and quality were blended into one score, a beautifully structured function that fakes its refund path could still average out to "acceptable." A veto architecture makes that impossible.

The category, honestly

Everything else on the MCP code-quality shelf is free — and that's fair, because a wrapper should be free. What you can't get for free is judgment with authority:

What you'll find on the directoriesWhat it isWhat it structurally can't do
Linter wrappers — ESLint MCP, Semgrep MCP, SonarQube MCPRule-based scanners exposed as MCP tools. Deterministic, free, worth running.No judgment. Rules can't know the refund function *never calls the payment provider*, or that stripe.Inventory doesn't exist. No verdict, no veto — findings your agent is free to ignore.
BYO-key review relaysYour repo + a review prompt, piped to your own OpenAI/Anthropic key.Self-review with extra steps: the reviewer shares the generator's blind spots, there are no deterministic gates underneath, and whatever the model says goes. You maintain keys, versions and hosting.
A bigger modelHope the generator reviews itself better.Self-review inherits self-blindness. An external gate holds the same bar for every model — which also makes smaller, cheaper models safe to ship with: same gate either way.
Human review of every AI diffThe gold standard, at human speed.Doesn't scale at AI generation speed. The gate does the first pass in seconds; humans review verdicts, not raw diffs.
Verificate MCPDeterministic reality gates with veto, then a frontier-model enterprise review — fused into one binary verdict. Hosted, always on the current model.—

That second layer is the part you pay for: a frontier agent doing the deep review — production arithmetic, failure modes, SDK reality — with a deterministic floor under it that the agent itself cannot argue away.

Run locally (stdio bridge)

This repo is also a runnable, zero-dependency MCP server: a stdio bridge that serves initialize/tools/list locally and forwards tool calls to the hosted gateway. Use it with clients that prefer stdio servers:

VERIFICATE_TOKEN=<your-token> npx github:Verificate-Dev/verificate-mcp-quickstart

Or with Docker:

docker build -t verificate-mcp .

docker run -i -e VERIFICATE_TOKEN= verificate-mcp

Without VERIFICATE_TOKEN, introspection still works and tool calls return instructions for getting a trial token.

FAQ

Does it slow the agent down? Each validation takes seconds, inside the loop, before work is presented. Compare with a defect found in CI or production plus the context switch to fix it — gating is net-faster for any change that matters.

Which languages? Validation is language-agnostic; analysis covers mainstr

Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo

Ask PopNx