Prototype · Preview: every server in the official registry, synced every 30 minutes. Reviews and accounts come in a later step.
PopNx MCPMCP servers for people who use AI · explained in plain words

Agent Claim MCP

by vk0devversion 1.0.2i★ –iRuns on your computer
Registry nameio.github.vk0dev/agent-claim-mcp

Install

Overview

Description from the maker (original English)

File-claim coordination for parallel AI coding agents: claim files before edits, no stomping.

PopNx MCP’s three pillars

These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.

What you can do with it

We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.

  • Connection: Runs on your computer
  • Transport: stdio
  • Category: Other

Install

Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.

Before you install

  • Basic checks: 1 of 1 passed
  • Runs on your computer with your user’s permissions (files, network, apps).
  • The registry lists no key to fill in.

You need

  • npmNode.js installed (for the npx command)

Which app do you use?

Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.

Open Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config, and paste this into claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-claim": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vk0/agent-claim-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Run this in your terminal

claude mcp add agent-claim -- npx -y @vk0/agent-claim-mcp

Open in Cursor

Or copy the settings yourself

Paste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-claim": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vk0/agent-claim-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

Open in VS Code

Or copy the settings yourself

Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project

{
  "servers": {
    "agent-claim": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vk0/agent-claim-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.

This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.

Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.

These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.

What it can do

Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.

Basic checksi

We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 7, 2026

  • ✓ Pass

    Maker matches the repo

    The registry name was verified with the GitHub account vk0dev, which owns the repo

  • … Not checked yet

    Still maintained

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • … Not checked yet

    Has a licence

    We have not read this repo from GitHub yet

  • – Not applicable

    Endpoint responds

    This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint

  • – Not applicable

    Sign-in with OAuth

    Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead

  • … Not checked yet

    No hidden instructions in tool descriptions

    Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints

Compared with others in Otheri

  • More stars than 0% of the other 32572 servers in this category
  • Published to the registry more recently than 16% of the other 32572 servers in this category
  • Basic checks equal to or better than 100% of the other 32572 servers in this category

Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.

Common questions

Is Agent Claim MCP safe?

It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.

What keys or codes does it need?

The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.

Does it run on my computer or in the cloud?

It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).

Is it still maintained?

The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (1.0.2) reached the registry 4 months ago.

Which apps can use it?

Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need Node.js on your computer.

What can I use instead?

In the same category: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, AvaHR

Alternatives

Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.

Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi

Spec Driven Development

by formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

Runs on your computer★ 440MITUpdated 14 months ago
Install

Remote Desktop Commander

by desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

Runs in the cloud★ 211Updated yesterday
Install

AvaHR

by avahr.com

Read hiring data and create inactive assessment and questionnaire drafts for human review.

Runs in the cloudUpdated today
Install

README from the maker

Open the README

Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.

Agent Claim MCP

Languages: English · 日本語 · 简体中文 · Русский · Español

Use Agent Claim MCP when multiple coding agents share one worktree and you need a tiny local coordination primitive before edits, not a full orchestration framework. It gives agents one job: claim paths, detect collisions, and release ownership so parallel work stops stomping the same files.

Agent Claim MCP is a local-first MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, and other MCP clients that need file ownership coordination without queues, planners, or custom AGENTS.md conventions. The current release surface centers on three bounded actions only: claim normalized paths, inspect who owns them, and release by path or claim id with explicit conflict reporting across separate sessions.

Release status: @vk0/agent-claim-mcp@1.0.0 is live on npm, so the npx -y @vk0/agent-claim-mcp install path is now the truthful default for external users. Phase 5 external proof may be satisfied by either Official MCP Registry validation or a live Smithery listing, but the current proof state remains pending until one of those public artifacts is explicitly verified. Official MCP Registry validation is still pending, so do not describe the package as registry-accepted or marketplace-listed until a real registry or Smithery proof URL is cited.

Milestone truth: the product wedge stays narrow, 3 tools plus a local JSON ledger for shared-worktree collision prevention, not a broader orchestration platform.

Current next manual step: complete the pending human rerun and verification path for Official MCP Registry proof, then record the verdict from that run instead of assuming acceptance from npm availability.

Registry rerun quickstart

Current truthful state:

  • npm 1.0.0 is live
  • Official MCP Registry acceptance is still pending
  • workflow 25282612113 did not complete the registry validation path
  • the repo is now past the earlier NPM_TOKEN secret-fix step, but the registry proof still needs a human rerun plus verification before it can be treated as accepted

Exact rerun command:

gh run rerun 25282612113 --repo vk0dev/agent-claim-mcp

After the rerun, verify in this order:

  1. confirm the rerun completed successfully in GitHub Actions
  2. run npm run preflight:registry
  3. follow docs/official-registry-validation-runbook.md
  4. only then record registry acceptance as proven

Operator shortcut: use the runbook's Quick operator path for the exact rerun-to-verification order, and treat npm-live status as separate from registry-proof status.

Why / When to use

Choose this server when your workflow already has task routing, but still needs a simple lock-like primitive at edit time:

  • two or more agents can touch the same repo in parallel
  • you want collision detection before file edits, not after merge conflicts
  • you want claims to expire automatically with TTLs
  • you want a narrow primitive that another agent can understand from name + description alone
  • you do not want a bundled rules engine, queue runner, or orchestration platform

Installation

The canonical external install path is now the published npm package:

{

"mcpServers": { "agent-claim": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@vk0/agent-claim-mcp"] } } }

Status note: npm install is live today, but Official MCP Registry validation and Smithery/other marketplace proof are still not established, so treat the package as npm-available first rather than marketplace-verified.

If you are developing from a local checkout instead of the published package, you can still point your MCP client at the built dist/server.js directly.

{

"mcpServers": { "agent-claim": { "command": "node", "args": ["/absolute/path/to/agent-claim-mcp/dist/server.js"] } } }

That second example is for local development only. On Windows, point your MCP client at the built dist/server.js path on your own machine instead of copying a POSIX path literally.

Build once before using the local path:

cd /Users/vkdev/projects/agent-claim-mcp

npm ci npm run build

Claude Code

Add the stdio server to your Claude Code MCP config:

{

"mcpServers": { "agent-claim": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@vk0/agent-claim-mcp"] } } }

Claude Desktop

Claude Desktop uses ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json on macOS and %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json on Windows:

{

"mcpServers": { "agent-claim": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@vk0/agent-claim-mcp"] } } }

After saving claude_desktop_config.json, fully restart Claude Desktop so it reloads the MCP server configuration.

Cursor
{

"mcpServers": { "agent-claim": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@vk0/agent-claim-mcp"] } } }

Cline
{

"mcpServers": { "agent-claim": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@vk0/agent-claim-mcp"] } } }

Limitations

This server is intentionally narrow and local-first. Install it when your agents share one filesystem view, not when you need distributed coordination.

  • Claims live in a local ledger on disk, so they only coordinate sessions that can read and write the same worktree.
  • It is not a hosted lock service, queue, or scheduler, and it does not replicate claims across machines by itself.
  • TTL expiry is protective cleanup, not a substitute for higher-level task ownership or human review.
  • Path normalization reduces shape mismatches, but agents still need to point at the same repo root or cwd for claims to line up.
  • If your workflow needs cross-host coordination, central audit policy, or mandatory approvals, pair this server with a separate orchestration layer instead of stretching the claim ledger beyond its scope.

For a real multi-agent run before publishing, see DOGFOOD.md and the proof artifacts in docs/dogfood-report.md.

Tools

claim_files

Create or refresh a local file-claim entry so parallel agents can see ownership before editing and avoid stomping the same worktree paths during active tasks. Conflict responses are explicit, so overlapping claims across separate sessions do not stay implicit or in-memory only.

Input

{

"agentId": "coder-a", "taskId": "task-123", "paths": ["src/foo.ts", "src/bar.ts"], "ttlSeconds": 3600, "note": "working on parser cleanup", "cwd": "/repo" }

Output

{

"ok": true, "claimed": ["/repo/src/bar.ts", "/repo/src/foo.ts"], "conflicts": [], "ledgerVersion": 1, "claimedUntil": "2026-05-03T16:00:00.000Z" }

If any requested path is already claimed by another active owner, the tool returns ok: false and writes nothing.

release_claim

Remove an existing claim owned by the current agent so finished, paused, or reassigned work stops blocking other agents from safely editing the same paths.

Input

{

"agentId": "coder-a", "paths": ["src/foo.ts"], "cwd": "/repo" }

Output

{

"ok": true, "released": ["/repo/src/foo.ts"], "missing": [], "ledgerVersion": 1 }

Only the current owner can release an active claim, whether you target it by claimId or by normalized paths, so cleanup works after real multi-agent runs and path-shape variants resolve consistently.

whose_claim

Read the local ledger and explain whether a file path is free or currently claimed, including owner, task, note, and expiry metadata for safe coordination across separate sessions sharing the same worktree.

Input

{

"paths": ["src/foo.ts", "src/bar.ts"], "cwd": "/repo", "includeExpired": false }

Output

{

"results": [ { "path": "/repo/src/bar.ts", "claimed": false }, { "path": "/repo/src/foo.ts", "claimed": true, "ownerAgentId": "coder-a", "taskId": "task-123", "note": "working on parser cleanup", "expiresAt": "2026-05-03T16:00:00.000Z", "claimId": "2a08b70c-4203-44a2-b833-31592472de1e" } ], "ledgerVersion": 1 }

Real samples

1. coder-A claims foo.ts
{

"tool": "claim_files", "arguments": { "agentId": "coder-A", "taskId": "task-42", "paths": ["src/foo.ts"], "note": "refactoring the claim parser", "cwd": "/repo" } }

{

"ok": true, "claimed": ["/repo/src/foo.ts"], "conflicts": [], "ledgerVersion": 1, "claimedUntil": "2026-05-03T16:00:00.000Z" }

2. coder-B collides on the same file
{

"tool": "claim_files", "arguments": { "agentId": "coder-B", "paths": ["src/foo.ts", "src/new.ts"], "cwd": "/repo" } }

{

"ok": false, "claimed": [], "conflicts": [ { "path": "/repo/src/foo.ts", "ownerAgentId": "coder-A", "expiresAt": "2026-05-03T16:00:00.000Z" } ], "ledgerVersion": 1, "claimedUntil": "2026-05-03T16:00:00.000Z" }

3. coder-A releases the file
{

"tool": "release_claim", "arguments": { "agentId": "coder-A", "paths": ["src/foo.ts"], "cwd": "/repo" } }

{

"ok": true, "released": ["/repo/src/foo.ts"], "missing": [], "ledgerVersion": 1 }

Troubleshooting

claim_files returns ok: false

This means at least one requested path is already claimed by another active owner, so nothing new was written. Check the conflicts array for the exact overlapping normalized paths and the current ownerAgentId, then inspect the same paths with whose_claim before retrying.

{

"tool": "whose_claim", "arguments": { "paths": ["src/foo.ts", "src/new.ts"], "cwd": "/repo" } }

If one path collides, a mixed request is still all-or-nothing. Split the work or wait for the current owner to release the conflicting path.

release_claim with a claim id returns missing: ["..."]

That claim id was not active in the local ledger at release time. It may already be released, expired, or never existed on this machine. This is not treated as a partial success.

release_claim with paths returns released: []

If ok is still true but released is empty, the requested normalized paths did not match any active claim owned by the caller. The missing array tells you which normalized paths were not matched.

Use whose_claim first when you are unsure whether the path is free, owned by another agent, or already gone from the ledger.

Releasing someone else’s claim

Only the current owner can release an active claim. If another agent still owns the path, inspect it with whose_claim, coordinate with that owner, or wait for the TTL to expire.

Comparison

ToolBest atWhere Agent Claim MCP is different
Agent Claim MCPOne narrow coordination primitive for shared worktreesIt only answers: who owns this path, can I claim it, and can I release it?
madebyaris/agent-orchestrationBroader orchestration patterns, rules, routing, queues, and AGENTS.md-style coordinationAgent Claim MCP does much less on purpose. It does not bundle queueing, planner behavior, or repo policy. It is the smallest local primitive you can compose into another workflow.

Choose Agent Claim MCP when you already have your own tasking layer and only need path ownership coordination.

Choose a broader orchestration project when you want one package to define agent rules, work queues, coordination policy, and higher-level execution flow.

##

Only the beginning is shown; read the rest in the repo

Ask PopNx