Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Description from the maker (original English)
MCP server that decodes V8 CPU profiles into token-efficient bottleneck summaries for AI agents
These three are never merged into one score: opinions, measurements and popularity are different things.
We have not written a plain-language summary for this one yet. Below are the facts we read from the registry.
Pick the AI app you use, then copy the settings.
You need
Which app do you use?
Pick your app above. We remember it, so next time the button says “Install in …”.
Open Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config, and paste this into claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"v8-cpu-profile-decoder": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcp"
]
}
}
}Run this in your terminal
claude mcp add v8-cpu-profile-decoder -- npx -y v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcpPaste into .cursor/mcp.json in your project, or ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"v8-cpu-profile-decoder": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcp"
]
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
Paste into .vscode/mcp.json in your project
{
"servers": {
"v8-cpu-profile-decoder": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcp"
]
}
}
}Your browser asks to open the app, then the app shows the settings and asks you to confirm. Key values are left empty for you to fill in.
This one runs on your computer, and ChatGPT can only connect to servers on the internet. Pick another app.
Your choice stays on this device in a cookie; no account needed.
These settings are generated from the maker’s registry entry. If the README says otherwise, follow the README.
Runs on your computer; the tool list appears in your AI app after you install it.
We check information anyone can see; we have not read the code. Checks that do not apply are left out of the count. · Checked Nov 8, 2026
The registry name was verified with the GitHub account vola-trebla, which owns the repo
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
We have not read this repo from GitHub yet
This one runs on your computer; there is no internet endpoint
Runs on your computer and uses local settings instead
Runs on your computer; we can only read tool lists from internet endpoints
Compared with every active server in this category in the registry. Stars count only when the publisher owns the repo.
It passed 1 of 1 applicable basic checks. We have not read the code. Before adding a key or token, see what access the server asks for and use a key with only the permissions you need.
The registry does not list a required key, though some servers ask you to sign in on first use.
It runs on your computer. Your AI app starts it when needed, and data does not pass through the maker’s servers (unless it calls an online service itself).
The GitHub repo last changed –, and the latest version (0.3.0) reached the registry 6 months ago.
Apps that support MCP, such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code. You also need Node.js on your computer.
In the same category: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Tethered Trust
Servers in the same category from other makers, sorted by stars.
Reading a card:★ GitHub starsiThree pillars: reviews · checks · usageiUpdated = latest version published to the registryi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Fit, compatibility and recall checks for AI agents before they buy: verdicts, evidence, receipts.
Copied from the maker’s repo as written. PopNx MCP has not reviewed or endorsed it. HTML, images and scripts are removed. Links lead off this site.
An MCP server that decodes V8 CPU profiles into token-efficient bottleneck summaries for AI agents.
Your Node.js app is slow. You ran --cpu-prof. Now you have a 20MB .cpuprofile file — and your AI agent is completely blind to it.
V8 CPU profiles are massive. A typical .cpuprofile from a production Node.js app is 5–50MB of raw JSON — millions of lines mapping memory addresses, tick counts, and microsecond execution sequences. It looks like this:
{
"nodes": [ { "id": 1482, "callFrame": { "functionName": "processRequest", "url": "file:///app/dist/server.js", "lineNumber": 847 }, "hitCount": 3241, "children": [1483, 1490] }, ... ], "samples": [1482, 1483, 1482, 1490, 1482, ...], "timeDeltas": [120, 98, 115, 102, ...] }
An AI agent attempting to read this file instantly collapses its context window and fails. Even if it could read it, it can't run the aggregation algorithms needed to compute inclusive/exclusive CPU times across the call tree.
So when you ask your agent:
...it's guessing. It has no access to the profiling data.
v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcp fixes that. It decodes the profile locally and hands the agent a 10-line semantic summary instead of a 50MB file.
extract_hottest_functionsParses the .cpuprofile and returns the top N functions ranked by exclusive CPU time (self time). Filters out V8 internals and Node.js built-ins — only user code.
{
"profile_path": "/app/profiles/CPU.20260516.cpuprofile", "top_n": 5, "min_self_percent": 1.0 }
[
{ "rank": 1, "functionName": "hashPassword", "url": "file:///app/dist/auth/crypto.js", "lineNumber": 42, "selfTimeMs": 1842.5, "totalTimeMs": 1842.5, "selfPercent": 61.32, "totalPercent": 61.32, "hitCount": 3241 }, { "rank": 2, "functionName": "parseJsonBody", "url": "file:///app/dist/middleware/body.js", "lineNumber": 18, "selfTimeMs": 412.1, "totalTimeMs": 412.1, "selfPercent": 13.71, "totalPercent": 13.71, "hitCount": 724 } ]
analyze_call_tree_pathFinds all callers of a specific function and shows how often each one invoked it. Accepts partial, case-insensitive function name matching.
{
"profile_path": "/app/profiles/CPU.20260516.cpuprofile", "function_name": "hashPassword", "top_callers": 3 }
{
"targetFunction": "hashPassword", "matchedNodes": 2, "totalSelfTimeMs": 1842.5, "totalPercent": 61.32, "callers": [ { "functionName": "loginHandler", "url": "file:///app/dist/routes/auth.js", "lineNumber": 94, "callCount": 2180, "selfTimeMs": 240.1 }, { "functionName": "validateSession", "url": "file:///app/dist/middleware/auth.js", "lineNumber": 31, "callCount": 1061, "selfTimeMs": 116.8 } ] }
correlate_source_codeMaps compiled JS bottlenecks back to their original TypeScript source locations using .js.map files. Falls back gracefully to compiled JS locations if no source map is found.
{
"profile_path": "/app/profiles/CPU.20260516.cpuprofile", "top_n": 5 }
{
"resolved": [ { "rank": 1, "generatedUrl": "file:///app/dist/auth/crypto.js", "generatedLine": 42, "source": { "originalFile": "src/auth/crypto.ts", "originalLine": 38, "originalColumn": 2, "originalFunction": "hashPassword" }, "selfTimeMs": 1842.5, "selfPercent": 61.32 } ], "sourcemapErrors": [] }
analyze_gc_pressureReports garbage collection overhead as a percentage of profiling duration, broken down by GC type. Flags when GC exceeds a configurable threshold and provides a targeted recommendation.
{
"profile_path": "/app/profiles/CPU.cpuprofile", "threshold_percent": 10 }
{
"gc_ticks": 184, "total_ticks": 1240, "gc_percentage": 14.84, "gc_type_breakdown": { "scavenger": 122, "mark_sweep": 0, "mark_compact": 0, "incremental": 62, "generic": 0 }, "exceeds_threshold": true, "threshold_percent": 10, "verdict": "GC consumed 14.84% of CPU — exceeds the 10% threshold. Dominated by Scavenger (short-lived object pressure). Consider object pooling, reusing buffers, or reducing closure captures." }
diff_profilesCompares two .cpuprofile files (before/after an optimization) and returns per-function CPU time deltas, normalized against each profile's total duration. Frames are matched by call-frame coordinates, not transient node IDs, so alignment is stable across profiling sessions.
{
"before_profile_path": "/app/profiles/before.cpuprofile", "after_profile_path": "/app/profiles/after.cpuprofile", "top_n": 5 }
{
"before_duration_ms": 5000, "after_duration_ms": 4800, "total_execution_delta_ms": -200, "total_execution_delta_percent": -4, "top_improvements": [ { "function_name": "hashPassword", "url": "file:///app/dist/auth/crypto.js", "line_number": 42, "before_ms": 1842.5, "after_ms": 620.1, "absolute_diff_ms": -1222.4, "relative_diff_percent": -66.34 } ], "top_regressions": [], "only_in_before": [], "only_in_after": [] }
analyze_async_bottlenecksDetects event-loop overhead by identifying V8 internal frames representing async machinery — microtask queue processing, nextTick saturation, and timer/immediate callbacks.
{
"profile_path": "/app/profiles/CPU.cpuprofile", "threshold_percent": 10 }
{
"total_ticks": 1240, "async_ticks": 186, "event_loop_overhead_ms": 372, "event_loop_overhead_percent": 15.0, "dominant_async_patterns": [ { "pattern": "promise_chains", "ticks": 142, "percent": 11.45 }, { "pattern": "nexttick_saturation", "ticks": 44, "percent": 3.55 } ], "verdict": "Event-loop overhead is 15.0% of CPU — exceeds the 10% threshold. Promise chain overhead is visible in the profile. Consider batching microtasks, using Promise.all() to parallelise I/O, or offloading CPU-bound continuations to worker threads." }
npx v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcp
Or install globally:
npm install -g v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcp
# Single run
node --cpu-prof your-script.js
node --cpu-prof --cpu-prof-dir ./profiles your-script.js
Or programmatically via Chrome DevTools → Performance tab → Record.
{
"mcpServers": { "v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcp": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "v8-cpu-profile-decoder-mcp"] } } }
_"Here's my CPU profile at
/app/profiles/CPU.cpuprofile— which function is consuming the most CPU?"_
_"Find what's calling
processRequestin this profile and how often"_
_"Map the top 10 hottest functions back to their original TypeScript files"_
_"My Node.js API is slow under load — profile is at
/tmp/CPU.cpuprofile, find the bottleneck"_
_"Is GC the bottleneck? Check the profile at
/tmp/CPU.cpuprofileand tell me what kind of allocation is causing it"_
_"Compare these two profiles before and after my optimization — which functions improved and which regressed?"_
_"Is this app spending too much CPU on async overhead and event-loop machinery?"_
MIT © vola-trebla