Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Descripción del creador (original en inglés)
Read-only semantic filtering, code search, log triage and traceable evidence for AI agents.
Estos tres nunca se combinan en una sola puntuación: las opiniones, las mediciones y la popularidad son cosas distintas.
Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.
Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.
TYPESAFE_API_KEYLos valores marcados como secretos son llaves de tu cuenta. Nunca los compartas ni los pegues en un chat.
Necesitas
¿Qué app usas?
Elige tu app arriba. La recordamos, así que la próxima vez el botón dirá “Instalar en …”.
Abre Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config y pega esto en claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"jev-filter": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@apixly/jev-filter",
"mcp",
"--root",
"{workspace}"
],
"env": {
"TYPESAFE_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Ejecuta esto en tu terminal
claude mcp add jev-filter --env TYPESAFE_API_KEY=your-value -- npx -y @apixly/jev-filter mcp --root '{workspace}'Completa los valores vacíos antes de ejecutarlo.
Pégalo en .cursor/mcp.json de tu proyecto, o en ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"jev-filter": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@apixly/jev-filter",
"mcp",
"--root",
"{workspace}"
],
"env": {
"TYPESAFE_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Pégalo en .vscode/mcp.json de tu proyecto
{
"servers": {
"jev-filter": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@apixly/jev-filter",
"mcp",
"--root",
"{workspace}"
],
"env": {
"TYPESAFE_API_KEY": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora, y ChatGPT solo puede conectarse a servidores en internet. Elige otra app.
Tu elección se guarda en una cookie en este dispositivo; no necesitas cuenta.
Esta configuración se genera a partir de la ficha del creador en el registro. Si el README dice otra cosa, sigue el README.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; la lista de herramientas aparece en tu app de IA después de instalarlo.
Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 7 nov 2026
El nombre en el registro se verificó con la cuenta de GitHub apixly-ai, dueña del repo
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora; no hay endpoint en internet
Se ejecuta en tu computadora y usa ajustes locales en su lugar
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; solo podemos leer listas de herramientas de endpoints en internet
Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.
Superó 1 de 1 revisiones básicas aplicables. No hemos leído el código. Antes de agregar una clave o un token, revisa qué acceso pide el servidor y usa una clave que tenga solo los permisos que necesitas.
Debes completar: TYPESAFE_API_KEY
Se ejecuta en tu computadora. Tu app de IA lo inicia cuando hace falta, y los datos no pasan por los servidores del creador (a menos que el propio servidor llame a un servicio en línea).
El repo de GitHub cambió por última vez –, y la última versión (0.4.2) llegó al registro hace 14 días.
Las apps compatibles con MCP, como Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. También necesitas Node.js en tu computadora.
En la misma categoría: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.
Cómo leer una tarjeta:★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Copiado tal cual del repo del creador. PopNx MCP no lo ha revisado ni lo respalda. Se quitaron HTML, imágenes y scripts. Los enlaces llevan fuera de este sitio.
简体中文 · Quick start · Documentation · Agent setup · Benchmarks
Semantic filtering for AI agent tool results. Turn large tool outputs into compact, typed decisions before they enter your agent's context. Keep source records inside your program, return relevant evidence and unresolved IDs, and recover originals by ID.
An independent MIT project maintained by Apixly. Official npm package: `@apixly/jev-filter`. What it does and when to use it.
Discover and connect: View the MCP Servers listing ↗ · Set up a client and four read-only tools →
Node.js 22+ · macOS / Linux · Python included in the npm distribution. Windows: use WSL or install Python natively. Installation and doctor are offline; inference needs a TypeSafe Jev API key.
npm install -g @apixly/jev-filter
jev-filter doctor
Run this from any directory:
export TYPESAFE_API_KEY='your-key'
jev-filter query --input - --mode choose \ --task 'Choose the CURRENT unresolved DNS failure' <<'JSON' [ {"id":"a","text":"DNS recovered; requests now succeed."}, {"id":"b","text":"DNS lookup still fails before connection."} ] JSON
Expected selection, with diagnostics omitted:
{"selected_ids":["b"],"review_ids":[],"complete":true}
For real batches, collect and filter in one call, before raw output reaches the conversation:
jev-filter exec --task 'Find unresolved network failures' \
--analysis analysis.json -- your-collector --json
Start with the copyable analysis contract. Parse the packet even on exit 2: complete=false and review_ids need attention. Small examples teach the interface; exact paths, IDs, selectors, calculations and short outputs usually belong in native tools. Installation, keys and result handling →
Copyable synthetic inputs and analysis contracts are included. Read the tutorials on the documentation site · FAQ.
Paid live evidence from 2026-10-04, using synthetic inputs. Source hashes, per-run usage, timing and failures are public; each result belongs to its stated scope.
Latency and cost vary. Five of six whole-operation cells were slower by 0.1–18.4%; cold API-equivalent cost ranged from 23.2% lower to 1.1% higher. Subscription billing remains unknown. Smaller context does not guarantee lower latency or billing.
Methods, negative results and reproduction · Per-run whole-operation data
Selection paths, measured results and scope
Fast semantic selection, checked against the same expected answer. All paths screened 96 records against two semantic conditions and returned exactly the same 48 matching IDs.
| Measured path | Median screening time | Exact complete runs |
|---|---|---|
| Jev `jev-1.13.0` · auto-batched API | 1.313 s | 3/3 |
Luna gpt-5.6-luna · signed-in Codex CLI | 13.421 s | 3/3 |
Astra gpt-6-astra · signed-in Codex CLI | 14.543 s | 3/3 |
This compares available execution paths, including CLI startup and the primary-agent turn; native model latency is not isolated. Primary paths use medium reasoning and no tools. Three repetitions are a smoke sample, not a whole-agent speedup or workload guarantee. Per-run evidence · Method and reproduction
| Advantage | Observed result | Scope and trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Get repeated judgments sooner | 2.58× filtering speed: 3.215 → 1.246 s, 61.2% less elapsed time; 56.5% fewer Jev input tokens. | Single-record parallel vs automatic batch-parallel Jev, 96 synthetic records × two predicates, three repetitions per arm; all 12/12 runs exact. Jev stage only, parallel worker cap 12; not a primary-model speed comparison. Data |
| Keep the agent's context focused | 91.6–97.2% less returned tool context; filtered completion 12/12, raw 11/12; all 24/24 ID sets correct. | 24 real agent runs, three synthetic scenarios, two primary models, two repetitions per arm. Five/six cells slower by 0.1–18.4%; cold API-equivalent cost ranged from 23.2% lower to 1.1% higher. Subscription billing remains unknown. Data |
| Recover more relevant code | Correct matches 4/12 → 10/12, zero false positives. | Exact vs opt-in recall, both with native semantic filtering. Returned context grew 5,284 → 9,706 bytes; absent lexical overlap still misses. Data |
| Inspect the change that matters | All 4/4 target changes selected in each repetition; returned context 23.9% lower than retaining every file. | Eight synthetic files, two repetitions. Semantic triage adds model usage and increases median whole-operation time 503 → 1,465 ms. Data |
| Connect real interfaces | 13/13 paid E2E checks pass, including exact MCP evidence recovery and 64/64 survey topic labels. | Python CLI, fresh npm 0.4.0 JS/native package, official MCP, local Chromium extraction and survey. Small synthetic fixtures; resolved model identity is unavailable from these public adapters. Data |
| Reach inside a scroll container | Verified nested-scroll completion 0/3 → 3/3 under the same strict 0.55 / 0.10 policy. | Pinned browser source A/B; program adds observed container evidence. Six ordinary goal runs still need review. More successful work consumes more calls, context and time. Data |
Whole-operation chart and reproduction
Method and all live results · Per-run JSON · CSV · Reproducible driver
Earlier evidence: offline contracts, batching and open-web limitations
| Experiment | Dated result | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Offline release contracts · 2026-10-04 | 3/13 → 13/13 expected behaviors; 3 → 0 false fixture actions. | Scripted responses, no model calls; reviews and diagnostic context increase. Data |
| Jev batching · 2026-09-22 | 56.5% fewer input tokens; batch + parallel 32.4% faster than single-record parallel. | 96 synthetic records × two predicates, two repetitions; Jev stage only. Data |
| Historical whole operation · 2026-09-23 | 88–97% less returned tool context. | 48 runs over four synthetic scenarios; cost and latency vary. Data |
| Historical hosted fixtures · 2026-09-30 | Browser 15/15 Camofox, 18/18 CDP; desktop 12/12. | Local fixtures under the then-current planner policy; not a current strict-policy or open-web completion guarantee. Data |
| Public websites · 2026-09-30 | 16/48 read-only goals reached; 16/34 after excluding access walls and provider failures. | 24 goals in one environment. Custom widgets and verification were weak. Data |
Full methods and historical data. The latest browser experiments retain failed pruning variants and unknown provider attempts; they do not turn a safe stop into a completed goal.
<img src="docs/assets/showcase/browse.gif" alt="Recorded synthetic shop run: Jev selects observed controls, the program pauses before placing an order, and verification follows confirmation" width="100%"
Solo se muestra el principio; lee el resto en el repo