Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Descripción del creador (original en inglés)
Text-blind context control plane for AI agents. Select high-utility context under token budgets.
Estos tres nunca se combinan en una sola puntuación: las opiniones, las mediciones y la popularidad son cosas distintas.
Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.
Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.
¿Qué app usas?
Elige tu app arriba. La recordamos, así que la próxima vez el botón dirá “Instalar en …”.
Descargar el archivo .mcpb del creador
El enlace lleva al archivo del propio creador; no lo alojamos ni lo reempaquetamos. Abre el archivo y Claude Desktop lo instalará.
Ejecuta esto en tu terminal
Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora, y ChatGPT solo puede conectarse a servidores en internet. Elige otra app.
Tu elección se guarda en una cookie en este dispositivo; no necesitas cuenta.
Esta configuración se genera a partir de la ficha del creador en el registro. Si el README dice otra cosa, sigue el README.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; la lista de herramientas aparece en tu app de IA después de instalarlo.
Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 7 nov 2026
El nombre en el registro se verificó con la cuenta de GitHub cole-h06, dueña del repo
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora; no hay endpoint en internet
Se ejecuta en tu computadora y usa ajustes locales en su lugar
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; solo podemos leer listas de herramientas de endpoints en internet
Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.
Superó 1 de 1 revisiones básicas aplicables. No hemos leído el código. Antes de agregar una clave o un token, revisa qué acceso pide el servidor y usa una clave que tenga solo los permisos que necesitas.
El registro no indica ninguna clave obligatoria, aunque algunos servidores te piden iniciar sesión la primera vez que los usas.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora. Tu app de IA lo inicia cuando hace falta, y los datos no pasan por los servidores del creador (a menos que el propio servidor llame a un servicio en línea).
El repo de GitHub cambió por última vez –, y la última versión (1.0.9) llegó al registro hace 12 días.
Las apps compatibles con MCP, como Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. También necesitas MCPB en tu computadora.
En la misma categoría: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Agent Data Tools: Utilities
Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.
Cómo leer una tarjeta:★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
103 tools: JSON repair, CSV, hashes, cron, dates, units, validators. 25 free calls.
Copiado tal cual del repo del creador. PopNx MCP no lo ha revisado ni lo respalda. Se quitaron HTML, imágenes y scripts. Los enlaces llevan fuera de este sitio.
Provenance-aware context control plane for AI agents.
Omneum is an open-source context control plane for AI agents, built to optimize the evidence entering an LLM's context window.
Agents accumulate context from retrieval, tools, memory, and previous sessions, but longer context windows don't guarantee better reasoning. Context rot can slowly degrade downstream answer accuracy even when the relevant information has already been retrieved.
Install Omneum:
pip install omneum
Run the context reconstruction demo:
git clone https://github.com/cole-h06/omneum.git
cd omneum python -m examples.context_quality_demo.before_after
Five retrieved chunks, four distinct claims, 80-unit context budget.
Compare retrieval-order packing with Omneum's claim-coverage selection under the same context budget.
| Metric | Raw RAG | Omneum |
|---|---|---|
| Chunks retained | 3 | 2 |
| Claim coverage | 2/4 | 4/4 |
| Budget used | 75/80 | 51/80 |
Packing chunks in retrieval order consumes 75 units while covering only two claims. Omneum retains two original chunks covering all four, using 32% less context capacity.
The demo measures its budget with the SDK's word/punctuation counter.
Set up the MCP server →
Omneum uses a graph-based mathematical analysis, calculated from Observation objects, to estimate the structural reliability of sources and the support for claims found in retrieved context.
Importantly, this analysis does not naively assume every source has derived its information independently. The same information often propagates across multiple sources. Without dependency tracking, five observations from different sources can be difficult to distinguish from five reports derived from the same upstream source.
For example, consider:
Source A: Acme's 2025 annual report
Claim: Acme reported $4.2 billion in revenue for 2025.
Source B: Financial article reporting the same claim Claim: Acme reported $4.2 billion in revenue for 2025. Upstream: Acme's 2025 annual report
How much support should that claim receive? That depends partly on the reliability of the sources reporting it. But how do we determine the reliability of the sources? By looking at the claims they support.
This definition seems circular, and it is. Nonetheless, it provides a well-defined notion of reliability that helps distinguish strongly supported context from weakly supported context.
Of course claim-level scores are only useful for context selection if they can be mapped back to chunks. To bridge this gap, Omneum stores a claim-to-chunk mapping: each chunk retains its original text and chunk_id, while its associated claim_ids reference the claims evaluated in the graph. A chunk can contain multiple claims, and the same claim can appear across multiple chunks. This allows the algorithm to associate claim support with the actual passages competing for space in the context window.
But selecting context is not simply a matter of ranking chunks by their individual scores. Omneum derives chunk utility from the claims associated with each passage, then ranks chunks to fill the model's window under a limited token budget. When a nonempty question is supplied, finalized claim contributions are weighted by deterministic, local lexical relevance over the original passage text. Repeated evidence from the same inferred source cluster earns only an improvement over its best selected relevance. Without a question, Omneum keeps its question-blind claim-coverage selection. Selected passages are reconstructed from their original text.
The selected passages are then reconstructed from their original text into the context passed to the LLM. The analysis itself never needs to read that text because it operates exclusively on structured relationships between sources and claims.
Omneum runs between retrieval and generation. The Python SDK accepts retrieved chunks and relevance scores from the calling retrieval pipeline, or computes relevance locally using BM25 or MiniLM when explicitly enabled.
Retrieval / tools
│ ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ContextMapper / Observation input │ │ │ │ Source, claim and provenance mapping │ │ Structured Observation construction │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Structured observations ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Python SDK · prepare_context() │ │ │ │ Retrieved chunks and relevance scores │ │ Query conditioning / candidate discovery │ │ Original text retained locally │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Structured observations ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Omneum evaluator │ │ │ │ Provenance-aware graph inference │ │ Dependency-adjusted claim support │ │ No original source text required │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Graph evaluation ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Python SDK │ │ │ │ Claim-to-chunk score mapping │ │ Question-weighted claim support │ │ Marginal claim coverage │ │ Token-budget enforcement │ │ Original text reconstruction │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Reconstructed context ▼ Agent / LLM
client.prepare_context() uses Omneum's provenance-aware graph inference to evaluate source reliability and claim support, accounting for dependencies between sources. The SDK uses those results to rank and select retrieved passages within the token budget, then reconstructs their original text for the model.
The prepared context is returned in result["context"], with selected passages in result["chunks"] and evaluation scores in result["evaluation"].
Note: Omneum supports Python 3.11–3.14 on macOS and Ubuntu. The Python SDK is the currently supported client library.
Supported Platforms:
| Platform | Supported |
|---|---|
| macOS (Apple Silicon / arm64) | ✅ |
| macOS (Intel / x86_64) | ✅ |
| Linux (Ubuntu 22.04+ / x86_64) | ✅ |
Run the installer to configure the local evaluator:
omneum install
Run omneum install from your normal login account. Don't run the command with sudo.
The installer runs unprivileged while it downloads and verifies the evaluator release. The daemon version is pinned to the installed Python package version. For example, Omneum 1.0.3 only accepts daemon assets from v1.0.3; it doesn't resolve latest or fall back to another release.
The archive is verified against the release SHA256SUMS before installation. A missing checksum, mismatched digest, unexpected archive entry, link, or path traversal stops the install before anything from the archive runs.
Administrator access is requested only when installing machine-level service files. On Ubuntu, this includes the managed runtime under:
/opt/omneum
and public client configuration at:
/etc/omneum/config.toml
The evaluator runs under a dedicated service identity, isolating its VOPRF private key from the login account and MCP server process. macOS uses launchd; Ubuntu uses systemd.
omneum-server exposes Omneum's MCP tools over stdio and communicates with the locally installed evaluator service. The installer finishes by sending a VOPRF request through that path and verifying the response against the configured public key. A running service alone does not count as a successful installation.
See docs/guides/installation.md for service accounts, sockets, installed paths, custom endpoints, and failure handling.
Add Omneum to your MCP configuration:
{
"mcpServers": { "omneum": { "command": "omneum-server" } } }
Restart the MCP client. It launches omneum-server over stdio and exposes Omneum's tools to your agent.
If the executable isn't found, locate it with command -v omneum-server and use the returned absolute path as command.
Ask your agent to call Omneum's ping tool. A successful connection returns:
{
"status": "ok" }
Omneum evaluates structured observations, selects retrieved chunks under a token budget, and reconstructs the selected text for the downstream LLM. The evaluator computes dependency-adjusted claim support, while the Python SDK handles chunk selection and reconstruction.
In this example, the FAQ derives its audit retention claim from the security policy. The upstream dependency is recorded through upstream_sources.
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from omneum import ContextMapper, Source from omneum.information import SourceReference from omneum.context_selection import claim_id
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc) policy_url = "https://example.com/security-policy"
records = [ { "id": "obs-policy", "url": policy_url, "attribute": "audit_retention_days", "value": 90, "upstream": [], "text": "Audit logs are retained for 90 days.", }, { "id": "obs-faq", "url": "https://example.com/faq", "attribute": "audit_retention_days", "value": 90, "upstream": [ SourceReference(kind="web_document", identifier=policy_url) ], "text": "Audit logs are retained for 90 days.", }, { "id": "obs-incident", "url": "https://example.com/incident-report",
Solo se muestra el principio; lee el resto en el repo