Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Descripción del creador (original en inglés)
Auditable memory for AI agents: provenance, cascade retraction, conflict refusal
Estos tres nunca se combinan en una sola puntuación: las opiniones, las mediciones y la popularidad son cosas distintas.
Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.
Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.
El creador no incluyó detalles de instalación en el registro. Consulta el README del creador más abajo.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; la lista de herramientas aparece en tu app de IA después de instalarlo.
Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 7 nov 2026
El nombre en el registro se verificó con la cuenta de GitHub factum-project, dueña del repo
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora; no hay endpoint en internet
Se ejecuta en tu computadora y usa ajustes locales en su lugar
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; solo podemos leer listas de herramientas de endpoints en internet
Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.
Superó 1 de 1 revisiones básicas aplicables. No hemos leído el código. Antes de agregar una clave o un token, revisa qué acceso pide el servidor y usa una clave que tenga solo los permisos que necesitas.
El registro no indica ninguna clave obligatoria, aunque algunos servidores te piden iniciar sesión la primera vez que los usas.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora. Tu app de IA lo inicia cuando hace falta, y los datos no pasan por los servidores del creador (a menos que el propio servidor llame a un servicio en línea).
El repo de GitHub cambió por última vez –, y la última versión (0.1.3) llegó al registro hace 2 meses.
Las apps compatibles con MCP, como Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. También necesitas Rust en tu computadora.
En la misma categoría: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.
Cómo leer una tarjeta:★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Copiado tal cual del repo del creador. PopNx MCP no lo ha revisado ni lo respalda. Se quitaron HTML, imágenes y scripts. Los enlaces llevan fuera de este sitio.
Status: v0.1.3 — Early stage, seeking early collaborators.
Core write/query/retract pipeline works. Not production-ready. Architectural decisions are still open to change.
[Interactive docs](https://factum-project.github.io/factum/) — animated syntax parsing, 7-tuple explorer, query pipeline, token efficiency chart, and MCP architecture diagram.
Every fact an agent writes carries mandatory provenance. When a source is retracted, everything derived from it is invalidated automatically — cascade retraction. When facts conflict, Factum returns Ambiguous instead of guessing.
A structured knowledge language (S-expression based), Rust implementation, stdio MCP server — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP client.
Status: v0.1.3, early stage. Core write/query/retract pipeline works; no semantic search or memory consolidation yet — Factum handles verified structured facts, not conversation context. Best suited for compliance-sensitive agents, multi-agent shared knowledge bases, and anywhere "why did the agent believe X" needs an answer. See the multi-agent usage guide for shared knowledge base patterns.
Unique to Factum: grammar-enforced provenance · cascade retraction · conflict refusal.
Not (yet) in Factum: embedding-based semantic retrieval · memory consolidation · HTTP transport.
Complementary: Mem0/Letta store and retrieve context; Factum stores auditable structured facts. They can run side by side via MCP.
| Agent memory pain point | Factum mechanism |
|---|---|
| Can't tell "user said" from "LLM inferred" | 5-level provenance + grammar-enforced model name on Extracted nodes |
| Stale memory used as current fact | Soft delete + cascade retraction via reverse dependency graph |
| Conflicting memories silently pick one | Ambiguous — refuses to answer rather than guess |
| Memory pollution (prompt injection) | Provenance chain makes contamination traceable and retractable |
| Enterprise can't let agents store sensitive data | Index-level permission filtering — no post-query leakage |
Academic context: The STALE benchmark (2025) shows that even the best LLM agents achieve only 55.2% accuracy at detecting when their own memories are outdated — confirming that memory staleness is an unsolved problem in agent systems.
:note for human-readable context"auto" as the node ID in factum_insert or factum_assert to auto-generate content-based IDs — no manual ID managementExtracted nodes MUST carry model + version — the parser rejects them if missing (not just a documentation convention)deps_rev reverse dependency graph); configurable node limit prevents cascade explosion in large knowledge basesfactum_assert returns corroborated (not an error) — independent agreement is the most valuable multi-agent signalAmbiguous when it cannot uniquely resolveDec(i128, u8) — zero floating-point error| Module | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| factum-core (types, lexer, parser, serialize) | ✅ Implemented | 100% syntactic round-trip |
| factum-rt (store, query, arbitration, permissions, verifiers) | ✅ Implemented | In-memory store (default) + RocksDB persistence (--features rocksdb); 5 column families, WriteBatch atomic writes |
| factum-mcp (JSON-RPC bridge) | ✅ Protocol + handler | stdio transport verified end-to-end; HTTP transport not yet implemented (remote deployment requires custom wrapper) |
| factum-bench (benchmarks) | ✅ Implemented | Syntax round-trip + token efficiency + query perf |
| factum-l (latent space projection) | ❌ Not started | Research item — see ROADMAP.md |
| Wikidata/Mathlib corpus converters | ❌ Not started | M2 milestone |
| Lean/Z3 verifiers | ❌ Not started | Only Schema + DecimalRange verifiers implemented |
| Embedding-based semantic search | ❌ Not started | Not on roadmap — consider using Mem0 alongside Factum |
| Memory consolidation/summarization | ❌ Not started | Not on roadmap — consider using Letta alongside Factum |
| Inspector (visual debugger) | ❌ Not started |
# Build
cargo build
cargo test
cargo run -p factum-demo
cargo build --features rocksdb cargo test --features rocksdb
cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --features rocksdb --bin factum-mcp-server
cargo +nightly fuzz run fuzz_parser -- -max_total_time=600
# Build the MCP server binary (in-memory, default)
cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --bin factum-mcp-server
cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --features rocksdb --bin factum-mcp-server
claude mcp add --transport stdio --scope local factum -- "$(pwd)/target/release/factum-mcp-server"
claude mcp add --transport stdio --scope local factum -- \ "$(pwd)/target/release/factum-mcp-server" --db-path ~/.factum/store
claude mcp get factum
See Getting Started with Factum MCP for the full guide.
; Acme Corp knowledge graph
(node n001 :pred (instance-of @ACME-CORP organization) :conf 0.99 :auth 0.95 :perm public :src (asserted "wikidata"))
(node n004 :pred (shareholder-major @ACME-CORP @FOUNDER-1 0.73 :since #date(2001-03-15)) :conf 0.85 :auth 0.8 :perm confidential :src (extracted "doc002" [100 200] (model "claude-sonnet-4" "2025-01")))
(node n006 :pred (subsidiary-of @ACME-SUB @ACME-CORP :since #date(2001-03-15)) :src (derived n001 "rule-subsidiary-merge") :deps [n001])
When n001 is retracted, n006 is automatically invalidated — the agent knows it can no longer trust the subsidiary relationship.
| Layer | What It Means | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Read | Agent receives Factum-F as context via MCP — lower token overhead than verbose JSON | ✅ Token efficiency measured (real o200k_base: canonical −62%, compact −53% vs JSON) |
| Agent Write | Agent generates Factum-F nodes — parse uniqueness guarantees one valid interpretation, error classes enable self-correction | ✅ See authoring guide |
| Latent Reasoning | factum-l: encode Factum-F into continuous thought vector, reason in latent space, decode back for audit | 🔬 Research item — not started, not blocking layers 1-2 |
A structured knowledge language underpins the memory layer — S-expression based for parse uniqueness, with Dec(i128, u8) for lossless numerics and mandatory model references for LLM self-auditing. Full design rationale in docs/design-rationale.md.
TL;DR: Factum canonical form saves ~62% tokens vs verbose JSON with the same metadata. All numbers measured with real o200k_base (GPT-4o) tokenizer via tiktoken-rs.
| Format | Real tokens (5 nodes) | vs verbose JSON | What it includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factum canonical | 238 | −62% | Full 7-tuple: provenance + confidence + validity + permissions |
| Factum compact (JSON) | 290 | −53% | Same 7-tuple, JSON with numeric tags |
| Markdown | 181 | −71% | Assertion text only — no provenance, no confidence, no permissions |
| JSON (pretty) | 623 | baseline | Same 7-tuple metadata in verbose JSON encoding |
Run
cargo test -p factum-bench test_token_efficiency_real_tokenizer -- --nocaptureto reproduce.
Key finding: The canonical S-expression form (238 tokens) is more token-efficient than the compact JSON form (290 tokens) — BPE tokenizers split JSON delimiters but merge S-expression parentheses. The form designed for correctness is also the most token-efficient.
parse(serialize(parse(x))) == parse(x). 100% and verified by the test suite + fuzzing. This is the trust foundation.morphemes.toml via build.rs)morphemes.toml codegen is a future M2 item for external contributions.| Format | How Factum Differs |
|---|---|
| RDF / JSON-LD | RDF triples carry no per-node provenance, confidence, or permissions. Factum makes these first-class and non-optional. |
| Markdown | Markdown has zero metadata. Factum trades human readability for machine verifiability. |
| JSON | JSON has no schema, no provenance, no temporal validity. Factum compact form uses JSON as transport but adds structure and audit chain. |
| Mem0 / Zep / Letta | These store and retrieve agent memory. Factum adds grammar-enforced provenance, cascade retraction, and conflict refusal. Complementary, not competitive. |
factum/
├── crates/ │ ├── factum-core/ # Data model, lexer, parser, serialization │ ├── factum-rt/ # Runtime: store (InMemory + RocksDB), query, arbitration, permissions, verifiers │ ├── factum-mcp/ # MCP bridge: JSON-RPC tools/resources, stdio transport │ ├── factum-bench/ # Benchmarks: round-trip, token efficiency, query perf │ └── factum-demo/ # End-to-end demonstration ├── fuzz/ # cargo-fuzz targets (parser, serialize round-trip, lexer) ├── spec/ # Conformance test vectors (JSON, language-agnostic) ├── docs/site/ # Interactive visualization (GitHub Pages) ├── .github/workflows/ # CI: test + fuzz + gitleaks + Pages deploy ├── Cargo.toml # Workspace root ├── ROADMAP.md # What's planned and in what order ├── SECURITY.md # Vulnerability disclosure ├── CONTRIBUTING.md # How to contribute ├── CHANGELOG.md # Version history ├── docs/design-rationale.md # Why each architectural decisio
Solo se muestra el principio; lee el resto en el repo