GLO Law

Qué puedes hacer con él

Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.

• Conexión: Se ejecuta en la nube
• Transporte: Streamable HTTP
• Categoría: Derecho y datos públicos

Instalación

Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.

Necesitas

• Se ejecuta en la nubeNo hay nada que instalar; se conecta por internet

¿Qué app usas?

https://mcp.glolaw.org/mcp

claude mcp add --transport http glo-law https://mcp.glolaw.org/mcp

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glo-law": {
      "url": "https://mcp.glolaw.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "servers": {
    "glo-law": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.glolaw.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

https://mcp.glolaw.org/mcp

Tu elección se guarda en una cookie en este dispositivo; no necesitas cuenta.

Esta configuración se genera a partir de la ficha del creador en el registro. Si el README dice otra cosa, sigue el README.

Qué puede hacer

Nombres y descripciones de las herramientas tal como los informó el servidor el 6 nov 2026. Los escribió el creador, no nosotros; los mostramos como texto sin formato.

• search

  Case-name metadata search over the local CourtListener mirror. Punctuation-insensitive trigram match on the case name ("Brown v board of education" matches "Brown v. Board of Education"). Returns cluster rows: id, case_name, case_name_short, date_filed, precedential_status, citat

• fts

  Keyword full-text search (BM25) over opinion body text in the local mirror. Keyword, not concept: matches the exact words given (case-insensitive) with no stemming ("petition" does not match "petitions"); all words must appear; "double quotes" mark an exact phrase. A case that st

• semantic_search

  Semantic (vector) search over embedded opinion chunks: finds cases by concept or plain-language description when there is no fixed term of art. Returns one row per case: opinion_id, cluster_id, metadata, matched_chunk, distance, similarity, matched_text (the passage the case matc

• similar

  Given one opinion id, returns other opinions whose wording overlaps it, ranked by keyword match (BM25 more-like-this). Keyword overlap only: not a finding that the neighbors address the same issue, reach the same result or remain good law, and not complete. The seed opinion and i

• citation

  Resolves a reporter citation " " (e.g. 347 U.S. 483) to the matching case cluster(s) in the local mirror, optionally with member opinions and parallel citations. A 404 means the citation is not in this mirror, not that the case does not exist. A resolved citation shows the case i

• cluster

  Full case (cluster) detail by cluster id: cluster metadata, member opinions and parallel citations. Metadata only; the opinion tool returns full text. Every response carries a "note" stating that response’s source and coverage limits.

• opinion

  Full text of one opinion by opinion id, plus metadata. The text is the best stored text extracted from the mirror (HTML stripped; body_source names the extraction source and fallback_used flags a lower-precedence one), bounded to 200k characters with truncated and text_available

• citations

  Given one opinion id, lists the cases it cites (direction=authorities) or the cases that cite it (direction=cited_by). Textual reference only: an edge means one opinion’s text names the other; it is not treatment, agreement, validity or "good law", and not a Shepard’s or KeyCite

• parentheticals

  Given one opinion id, returns the one-line parentheticals later courts wrote about that case, verbatim. A parenthetical is the later court’s own characterisation: not a holding of the described case, not a summary written by this service, and not treatment, validity or "good law"

• treatment

  Later courts, in their own words, reporting that one case was overruled, abrogated, superseded, reversed or vacated. Takes a cluster id (the case-record id), not an opinion id. Every row carries the citing court’s own sentence, cut from its stored text; the label is a filter over

• brief_check

  Checks the case citations in a document the user supplies (a draft filing, brief or motion) against this collection and court-reported negative history, showing which cited cases to read before filing. Nothing is ever cleared: there is no pass mark or "verified" state. Per citati

• statute

  Exact lookup of one statute section or one regulation section by citation, in a point-in-time snapshot of published law. Returns the text verbatim with jurisdiction, corpus, citation, heading, path, source_url, as_of, act_status, last_amended_year and repaired. Enacted text only:

• statute_search

  Keyword (BM25) search over the body text of statute sections and, in the default source, Kansas administrative regulations, in the same snapshot as the statute tool; source= searches one regulation source alone. Without jurisdiction=, results mix states: on 6,852 benchmark housin

• statute_citing

  Lists the opinions whose text cites one U.S. Code section. Federal only: no state statute-citation links exist, and a state citation returns a visible error. An entry means the opinion’s text names the section; it does not say how the court treated it and carries no treatment, va

• corrections_policy

  Internal policies of a state department of corrections, or of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (state="bop", federal), as the department posts them, by number or by keyword search (query; no stemming). Not law: not statutes, regulations or court rules (a Maine policy the department

• deadline

  Counts a deadline from a date the user gives, under a rule whose text is in GLO’s mirror, and returns every counting step beside that text. Counted: K.S.A. 60-206 (Kansas civil procedure; a period in days the user supplies from the rule or order that sets it, forward or backward,

• sources

  Returns GLO’s coverage statements as text, so each tool’s and each source’s limits can be read on request. With a tool name alone: that tool’s full statement of coverage, measured limits and field meanings ("server" gives the full server overview). With a source or state code: fo

Revisiones básicasi

Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 8 nov 2026

• ! Precaución

  El creador coincide con el repo

  El registro no indica ningún repo de código fuente, así que no podemos relacionar a quien lo publicó (glolaw.org) con el código

• … Aún sin revisar

  Sigue en mantenimiento

  Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub

• … Aún sin revisar

  Tiene licencia

  Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub

• ✓ Superada

  El endpoint responde

  Respondió en 153 ms (HTTP 200)

• – No aplica

  Inicio de sesión con OAuth

  No hace falta iniciar sesión

• ✓ Superada

  Sin instrucciones ocultas en las descripciones de herramientas

  Leímos 17 descripciones de herramientas y no encontramos instrucciones ocultas para la IA

Comparado con otros en Derecho y datos públicosi

• Más estrellas que el 0% de los otros 1744 servidores de esta categoría
• Publicado en el registro más recientemente que el 88% de los otros 1744 servidores de esta categoría
• Revisiones básicas iguales o mejores que el 40% de los otros 1744 servidores de esta categoría

Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.

Alternativas

Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.

Cómo leer una tarjeta:★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi

README del creador

No se encontró un README en el repo