Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Descripción del creador (original en inglés)
Runtime gate for AI agent claims. Catches sycophantic drift, circular self-validation, causal errors
Estos tres nunca se combinan en una sola puntuación: las opiniones, las mediciones y la popularidad son cosas distintas.
Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.
Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.
AuthorizationLos valores marcados como secretos son llaves de tu cuenta. Nunca los compartas ni los pegues en un chat.
Necesitas
¿Qué app usas?
Elige tu app arriba. La recordamos, así que la próxima vez el botón dirá “Instalar en …”.
Esta dirección necesita una clave en un header de la solicitud, y el menú para agregar conectores no puede ponerla. Usa Claude Code, Cursor o VS Code.
Ejecuta esto en tu terminal
claude mcp add --transport sse eif https://eif.leocelis.com/sse --header 'Authorization: Bearer {api_key}'Completa los valores vacíos antes de ejecutarlo.
Pégalo en .cursor/mcp.json de tu proyecto, o en ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"eif": {
"url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer {api_key}"
}
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Pégalo en .vscode/mcp.json de tu proyecto
{
"servers": {
"eif": {
"type": "sse",
"url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer {api_key}"
}
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Esta dirección necesita una clave en un header de la solicitud, y el menú para agregar conectores no puede ponerla. Usa Claude Code, Cursor o VS Code.
Tu elección se guarda en una cookie en este dispositivo; no necesitas cuenta.
Authorization secreto obligatorio HTTP headerEsta configuración se genera a partir de la ficha del creador en el registro. Si el README dice otra cosa, sigue el README.
El servidor pide iniciar sesión antes de mostrar sus herramientas.
Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 6 nov 2026
El nombre en el registro se verificó con la cuenta de GitHub leocelis, dueña del repo
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Respondió en 592 ms (HTTP 401)
Necesita una clave o un token que debes copiar y pegar a mano
Aún sin revisar; leemos la lista de herramientas cuando revisamos el endpoint
Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.
Superó 2 de 3 revisiones básicas aplicables. No hemos leído el código. Antes de agregar una clave o un token, revisa qué acceso pide el servidor y usa una clave que tenga solo los permisos que necesitas.
Debes completar: Authorization
Se ejecuta en la nube del creador. Te conectas por internet sin instalar nada, pero lo que envías pasa por los servidores del creador.
El repo de GitHub cambió por última vez –, y la última versión (4.2.0) llegó al registro ayer.
Las apps compatibles con MCP, como Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. Se conecta por URL, así que también funcionan las apps que aceptan servidores MCP remotos, como ChatGPT en modo desarrollador.
En la misma categoría: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, debuff
Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.
Cómo leer una tarjeta:★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Let coding agents play, test and tune your 2D web game: live state, explained errors, replays, fuzz.
Copiado tal cual del repo del creador. PopNx MCP no lo ha revisado ni lo respalda. Se quitaron HTML, imágenes y scripts. Los enlaces llevan fuera de este sitio.
EIF - Epistemic Integrity Framework
Apply the scientific method to every assumption your AI agent makes.
AI agents compound errors. Each assumption that goes unchallenged becomes the foundation for the next one. A 90%-accurate agent running 10-step tasks produces correct output only 35% of the time - that's the compound error curve. That 0.9^10 curve is an upper bound: it assumes independent, non-recoverable per-step errors, whereas real pipelines have correlated and recoverable steps, so EIF's value is framed as reducing the error rate per load-bearing step rather than as the literal compound figure. In high-stakes domains (compliance, engineering decisions, financial advice), this translates to real cost.
The dominant source of that cost is not hallucinated facts, but unchallenged assumptions that are never tested against evidence.
EIF goes past a naive hallucination check: it tests each claim against independent evidence before the agent acts, then routes it to ACT, REVISE or HALT.
EIF is a Python library and MCP server that runs an 8-phase scientific-method pipeline on every load-bearing assumption in an agent's response:
DECLARE → name every assumption: KNOWN / ASSUMED / GUESSED
FALSIFY → collect independent evidence via P1 code, P2 tools, P3 web search CAUSAL_GATE → check Pearl causal level; flag confounders and disjunctive bias CALIBRATE → Bayesian posterior update (prior × likelihood → route) CHALLENGE → adversarial critic produces counter-evidence and competing hypothesis UPDATE → sequential Bayes update; EIG stopping rule EXPLAIN → hard-to-vary check (Deutsch): every detail must be functionally irreplaceable RECORD → provenance record with EU AI Act compliance mapping
Plus auxiliary gates that run before/after the core loop:
INPUT_GUARD → detect adversarial or manipulative inputs before the pipeline runs
SYCOPHANCY_GATE → detect position drift, unfaithful CoT, and face-preserving framing HYPOTHESIS_AGENDA → rank claims by Expected Information Gain before FALSIFY REPLICATE → pre-registered replication protocol for cross-session reproducibility PROGRAMME → Lakatos health monitor: PROGRESSIVE / STABLE / DEGENERATIVE
At the end of each turn, EIF routes the agent's output:
EIF was validated against 14 multi-agent conversation scenarios across 5 domains (clinical, engineering, compliance, investment, M&A).
Scope note: the 14-scenario corpus is constructed and illustrative - it demonstrates the mechanisms, not field results. A separate field-validation track on real agent traffic is the basis for production false-positive measurement. EIF can also estimate a modeled dollar cost per HALT-routed claim (a distinct feature); those figures and their methodology live in
validation/CORPUS_REPORT.md, not here.
| Scenario | Domain | Turns | HALT | REVISE | ACT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S8v31 ML Model Deployment (FDA SaMD) | clinical | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| S7v31 Code Review / API Security | engineering | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S6v31 Investment Decision - Series A | investment | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S10 Sycophancy Validation | investment | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| S11 Sycophancy Market Gap | investment | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| S20 Sycophancy Full-Signal | compliance | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| S18 Reasoning Theater | compliance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| S19b Model Scaling Ablation (gpt-4o) | investment | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| S16 REVERSED CEP - Beta-carotene/CARET | clinical | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| S15 CAUSAL_GATE v4 - Phase 3 Protocol | clinical | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| S9v31 M&A Due Diligence | manda | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| S14 EXPLAIN Cold-Start Baseline | engineering | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| S17 Disjunctive Bias - clinical supplements | clinical | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| S19a Model Scaling Ablation (gpt-4o-mini) | investment | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| TOTAL | 84 | 35 | 25 | 15 |
P4 (circular LLM self-validation) rate: 0.0% across all 14 scenarios. Every piece of evidence came from an independent source - executable code, coordinator tool outputs, or live web search.
Full evidence: validation/CORPUS_REPORT.md. Per-scenario reports available on request via GitHub Discussions.
pip install -e ".[mcp]" # local dev (the MCP extra powers the examples below)
import asyncio
from eif import session as session_store from eif.mcp_server.server import eif_extract_claims_from_decision, eif_verify
async def run(): sess = await session_store.new_session() sid = sess.session_id
extracted = eif_extract_claims_from_decision( "Commission a 10-article series on Hollow Ascent. " "The game has 5,000+ IGDB hype followers and strong community demand." )
result = await eif_verify( session_id=sid, decision="Commission content series based on IGDB metrics", claims=extracted["claims"], )
print(f"Verdict: {result['verdict']}") # "HALT" or "PASS" for card in result["halt_cards"]: print(card)
asyncio.run(run())
When your agent has access to an authoritative data source (IGDB, your database, an internal API), register it as a P0 host tool. EIF calls it directly - no web search, no guessing.
from eif.falsify.evidence_collector import HostTool, HostToolRegistry
def igdb_lookup(query: str) -> str: import requests resp = requests.get("https://api.igdb.com/v4/games", ...) # your IGDB call return str(resp.json())
registry = HostToolRegistry([ HostTool( name="igdb_api", description="IGDB game database - hype count, ratings, community size", capability_keywords=["igdb", "hype", "game", "demand", "followers"], fn=igdb_lookup, data_scope="PUBLIC", ) ])
P0 is the highest-priority evidence tier. Without a registered tool, EIF falls back to web search (P3), which can return false-positive SUPPORTS for specific numeric metrics. For production use, register the tool.
See examples/quickstart.py for a complete end-to-end example (a different scenario, an infrastructure-migration decision, walking DECLARE through EXPLAIN in one script).
Per-client setup guides (register the server, install the rules block, verify, troubleshoot) live in docs/integrations/: Claude Code · Cursor · Claude Desktop. The short version:
Option A - hosted endpoint (private alpha, zero install):
Request a key by opening a Discussion, then add the config for your client.
Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json) and Claude Desktop (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "url": "https://eif.leocelis.com/sse", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_KEY_HERE" } } } }
VS Code / GitHub Copilot (.vscode/mcp.json): use "servers" (not "mcpServers") and add "type": "http" to the entry.
The hosted endpoint is in private alpha. Everything below runs fully on your own machine with no key.
Option B - local venv (works today, fully self-hosted):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "command": "/path/to/venv/bin/python", "args": ["-m", "eif.mcp_server.server"] } } }
Option C - uvx (zero-install, works today):
{
"mcpServers": { "eif": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["--from", "eif-engine[mcp]", "eif-mcp-server"] } } }
uv runs the executable matching the package name by default; since the console scripts are eif-mcp-server / eif-mcp-http-server (not eif-engine), --from is required. Bare uvx eif-engine fails with "An executable named eif-engine is not provided by package eif-engine".
EIF exposes 25 tools your agent can call:
Session (1 tool):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_new_session | Create a session; every other tool requires its session_id |
Core pipeline (8 tools):
| Tool | Phase | What it does |
|---|---|---|
eif_get_context | - | Load EIF principles into agent context |
eif_declare | DECLARE | Register and classify every assumption |
eif_falsify | FALSIFY | Collect independent evidence; run SPRT |
eif_causal_gate | CAUSAL_GATE | Check Pearl causal level; flag confounders |
eif_calibrate | CALIBRATE | Bayesian posterior; compute routing |
eif_challenge | CHALLENGE | Adversarial critic with counter-evidence |
eif_update | UPDATE | Sequential posterior update; EIG stopping |
eif_explain | EXPLAIN | Hard-to-vary check on the mechanism |
Gates and monitors (5 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_input_guard | Detect adversarial or manipulative inputs |
eif_sycophancy_gate | Detect position drift, unfaithful CoT, face-preserving framing |
eif_programme_health | Lakatos health monitor for the session |
eif_record | Write provenance record; EU AI Act compliance mapping |
eif_replicate | Pre-registered replication protocol |
Calibration and agenda (4 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_record_outcome | Log a session's labeled outcome (true/false) for cross-session ECE calibration |
eif_calibration_report | Return ECE state, empirical prior, and sessions-to-grounded count |
eif_catch_rate_report | Empirical HALT catch-rate across all sessions for a domain |
eif_hypothesis_agenda | Rank outstanding hypotheses by Expected Information Gain before FALSIFY |
Utilities (7 tools):
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
eif_verify | One-call full pipeline: declare → falsify → calibrate → route |
eif_extract_claims_from_decision | Extract structured claims from free-form agent text |
eif_compliance_report | Generate EU AI Act compliance report for a session |
eif_provenance |
Solo se muestra el principio; lee el resto en el repo