Vexa
Meeting bot and transcripts for Google Meet, Teams and Zoom. Live or after, speakers labelled.
Descripción del creador (original en inglés)
Bulk email verification: live SMTP mailbox check, MX, catch-all, disposable and role detection.
Estos tres nunca se combinan en una sola puntuación: las opiniones, las mediciones y la popularidad son cosas distintas.
Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.
Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.
AuthorizationLos valores marcados como secretos son llaves de tu cuenta. Nunca los compartas ni los pegues en un chat.
Necesitas
¿Qué app usas?
Elige tu app arriba. La recordamos, así que la próxima vez el botón dirá “Instalar en …”.
Esta dirección necesita una clave en un header de la solicitud, y el menú para agregar conectores no puede ponerla. Usa Claude Code, Cursor o VS Code.
Ejecuta esto en tu terminal
claude mcp add --transport http email-verifier 'https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier' --header 'Authorization: your-value'Completa los valores vacíos antes de ejecutarlo.
Pégalo en .cursor/mcp.json de tu proyecto, o en ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"email-verifier": {
"url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Pégalo en .vscode/mcp.json de tu proyecto
{
"servers": {
"email-verifier": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Esta dirección necesita una clave en un header de la solicitud, y el menú para agregar conectores no puede ponerla. Usa Claude Code, Cursor o VS Code.
Tu elección se guarda en una cookie en este dispositivo; no necesitas cuenta.
Authorization secreto HTTP headerEsta configuración se genera a partir de la ficha del creador en el registro. Si el README dice otra cosa, sigue el README.
Todavía no hemos leído la lista de herramientas de este servidor; revisamos los endpoints por turnos.
Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 6 nov 2026
El nombre en el registro se verificó con la cuenta de GitHub sumitrmardy, dueña del repo
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Aún sin revisar; revisamos los endpoints por turnos
Aún sin revisar; revisamos los endpoints por turnos
Aún sin revisar; leemos la lista de herramientas cuando revisamos el endpoint
Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.
Superó 1 de 1 revisiones básicas aplicables. No hemos leído el código. Antes de agregar una clave o un token, revisa qué acceso pide el servidor y usa una clave que tenga solo los permisos que necesitas.
Debes completar: Authorization
Se ejecuta en la nube del creador. Te conectas por internet sin instalar nada, pero lo que envías pasa por los servidores del creador.
El repo de GitHub cambió por última vez –, y la última versión (1.0.0) llegó al registro hace 16 días.
Las apps compatibles con MCP, como Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. Se conecta por URL, así que también funcionan las apps que aceptan servidores MCP remotos, como ChatGPT en modo desarrollador.
En la misma categoría: Vexa, emailmd, MCP WhatsApp Cloud
Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.
Cómo leer una tarjeta:★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi
Meeting bot and transcripts for Google Meet, Teams and Zoom. Live or after, speakers labelled.
Render markdown into email-safe HTML, lint drafts for deliverability problems, and preview emails.
MCP server for WhatsApp Cloud API (Meta) — messages, media, and templates via Graph API
Copiado tal cual del repo del creador. PopNx MCP no lo ha revisado ni lo respalda. Se quitaron HTML, imágenes y scripts. Los enlaces llevan fuera de este sitio.
English | 简体中文
Verify email addresses in bulk: RFC 5322 syntax → DNS/MX → disposable, role and free-provider lists → a live SMTP handshake with a mandatory catch-all probe. No email is ever sent — the check opens an SMTP session, reads the reply codes and hangs up.
{
"email": "john@example.com", "status": "deliverable", "sub_status": "valid_mailbox", "score": 100, "checks": { "syntax": true, "domain_exists": true, "mx_found": true, "smtp_connectable": true, "mailbox_exists": true, "catch_all": false, "disposable": false, "role_based": false, "free_provider": false, "a_record_fallback": false, "has_tag": false }, "mx_record": "aspmx.l.google.com" }
Most verifiers are written for a human reading a dashboard. This one assumes the caller is code.
That changes what the output has to guarantee:
1. `status` is always one of four values. deliverable, undeliverable, risky, unknown. Never null, never empty, never a fifth value. Enumerate them once and stay correct.
2. All eleven `checks` keys are present on every record. A check that never ran is false, and the reason lives in sub_status. Nothing disappears.
3. Catch-all domains and Gmail-type providers are reported honestly. They come back risky with a reason, not a fabricated "valid".
Those three together mean you write this:
const mailable = results.filter(r => r.status === 'deliverable');
const neverSend = results.filter(r => r.status === 'undeliverable' || r.checks.disposable); const retryLater = results.filter(r => r.status === 'unknown');
and not this:
const mailable = results.filter(r => r?.status === 'valid' && (r.checks?.catch_all ?? false) === false);
The second line is what every nullable-by-default API forces on you. It matters more for an agent than for a person: an agent cannot write `?? false` — it acts on what it reads. A field that sometimes vanishes is not an inconvenience, it is a wrong answer delivered with confidence.
status | sub_status | What to do |
|---|---|---|
deliverable | valid_mailbox | Send |
risky | role_based | Send only if a shared inbox is acceptable |
risky | catch_all | Mailbox unconfirmable — send at low volume, or enrich another way |
risky | free_provider_unverifiable | Treat as a consumer address; mailbox unknowable over SMTP |
risky | full_mailbox | Hold, retry in a few days |
risky | disposable | Do not send; block at signup |
unknown | greylisted | Retry in 30–60 min — not a bad address |
unknown | smtp_timeout | Retry later; if it persists, treat as unverified |
unknown | internal_error | Retry once |
undeliverable | any | Remove from the list |
Full table with scores and reasoning: [docs/statuses.md](docs/statuses.md)
The distinction that matters: undeliverable means *we found out it is dead*; unknown means *we could not find out*. Tools that merge the two report better-looking numbers and quietly delete real customers from your list.
Every template calls the Actor with the core HTTP Request node — no community node to install, works on n8n Cloud and self-hosted. Authentication is an n8n Header Auth credential named Apify API; no token is stored in any file here.
| Template | What it does | Import | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verify a Google Sheets lead list | Reads rows with no verdict, verifies in batches, writes status/score back. Safe to re-run and to schedule. | t1-google-sheets.json | ||
| Block disposable emails at signup | Webhook in, `{allow\ | review\ | block}` out, with the policy in one editable Code node. | t2-signup-check.json |
| Clean a CSV before cold email | Upload an Apollo/Instantly/HubSpot export, get back send_safe / review / drop as three CSVs. Greylisted rows are retried once. | t3-clean-csv.json | ||
| AI agent tool | An AI Agent with the verifier as its only tool, and a system prompt that teaches it the action table above. | t4-ai-agent-tool.json |
Chinese versions of all four, with localized sticky notes: workflows/zh-CN/
To import: download the JSON, then in n8n use *Workflows → Import from File*. Setup steps are on a sticky note inside each workflow.
MCP — the Apify MCP server, scoped to this one Actor. Config for Claude Desktop and Cursor: agents/mcp/
OpenAPI — one file that Dify, Coze, GPT Actions and LangChain's OpenAPI toolkit can all import: openapi/email-verifier.openapi.yaml
Tool definitions — ready-made JSON for OpenAI function calling and the Anthropic tool API: agents/tool-definitions/
For the agent itself — llms.txt is the whole contract in one pass: endpoint, input, output, the action table, batching limits.
Chinese-first setup guides: Dify · Coze / 扣子
curl -X POST "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/sumitr_mardy~email-verifier/run-sync-get-dataset-items" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $APIFY_TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"emails":["john@example.com","someone@gmail.com"]}'
Python and Node examples, each under 25 lines and with no SDK required: examples/
Addresses go in one batch per call, never one call per address — batching is what makes this cheap and fast.
A synchronous Apify run must finish inside 300 seconds. Past that, use the async pattern: start the run, wait for it, then fetch the dataset. Working example: examples/batch-large-list/
Measured throughput and the batch size to use: docs/pricing-and-batching.md
Pay per event: one charge per address that gets a verdict — including undeliverable and unknown, because the work was done either way, and a confirmed bad address is exactly the result you were paying for. No per-run charge.
The rate is tiered by your Apify plan and is adjusted to track the market, so it is not reprinted here where it would go stale: [see current pricing](https://apify.com/sumitr_mardy/email-verifier/pricing).
You need an Apify account to call the API; there is a free tier.
Stated plainly, because you would find them anyway.
250 for addresses that do not exist, then bounce at delivery. Any vendor claiming a per-mailbox Gmail verdict from SMTP is guessing. You get risky/free_provider_unverifiable and checks.mailbox_exists: false.421/450 come back as unknown/greylisted, which is retryable. Template T3 does the retry for you.Does it send an email? No. It opens an SMTP session, sends EHLO, MAIL FROM and RCPT TO, reads the reply codes and disconnects. It never issues DATA, so no message body exists anywhere in the process.
Can it verify Gmail addresses? It verifies that the syntax and domain are valid and that the address is not disposable. It cannot confirm that a specific Gmail mailbox exists — Google answers identically for real and fake addresses. Nothing that uses SMTP can do better; tools that claim otherwise are guessing.
What is a catch-all domain? A domain configured to accept mail for every address, existing or not. Before asking about your address, the verifier sends a RCPT TO for a random local part that cannot exist. If that is accepted, the domain is catch-all and every address on it is reported risky/catch_all.
How many emails per call? As many as finish inside the 300-second sync limit. Measure with your own list; see docs/pricing-and-batching.md. Beyond that, use the async pattern.
How do I use it with an Apollo / Instantly / Lemlist export? Template T3 — upload the CSV, get three cleaned lists back. It picks the email column automatically and deduplicates first, so you are not charged twice for the same address.
What happens to duplicates? They are charged. Deduplicate before you call; every template here already does.
MIT licensed. Issues and pull requests welcome — particularly corrections to the n8n templates from anyone running a version where something behaves differently.