Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Descripción del creador (original en inglés)
Tamper-evident audit trails for AI agents — Ed25519-signed, hash-chained, EU AI Act ready.
Estos tres nunca se combinan en una sola puntuación: las opiniones, las mediciones y la popularidad son cosas distintas.
Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.
Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.
Necesitas
¿Qué app usas?
Elige tu app arriba. La recordamos, así que la próxima vez el botón dirá “Instalar en …”.
Abre Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config y pega esto en claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-audit-trail": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"ai-audit-trail"
]
}
}
}Ejecuta esto en tu terminal
claude mcp add ai-audit-trail -- uvx ai-audit-trailPégalo en .cursor/mcp.json de tu proyecto, o en ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-audit-trail": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"ai-audit-trail"
]
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Pégalo en .vscode/mcp.json de tu proyecto
{
"servers": {
"ai-audit-trail": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"ai-audit-trail"
]
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora, y ChatGPT solo puede conectarse a servidores en internet. Elige otra app.
Tu elección se guarda en una cookie en este dispositivo; no necesitas cuenta.
Esta configuración se genera a partir de la ficha del creador en el registro. Si el README dice otra cosa, sigue el README.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; la lista de herramientas aparece en tu app de IA después de instalarlo.
Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 8 nov 2026
El nombre en el registro se verificó con la cuenta de GitHub sundsoffice-tech, dueña del repo
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora; no hay endpoint en internet
Se ejecuta en tu computadora y usa ajustes locales en su lugar
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; solo podemos leer listas de herramientas de endpoints en internet
Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.
Superó 1 de 1 revisiones básicas aplicables. No hemos leído el código. Antes de agregar una clave o un token, revisa qué acceso pide el servidor y usa una clave que tenga solo los permisos que necesitas.
El registro no indica ninguna clave obligatoria, aunque algunos servidores te piden iniciar sesión la primera vez que los usas.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora. Tu app de IA lo inicia cuando hace falta, y los datos no pasan por los servidores del creador (a menos que el propio servidor llame a un servicio en línea).
El repo de GitHub cambió por última vez –, y la última versión (0.4.7) llegó al registro hace 6 meses.
Las apps compatibles con MCP, como Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. También necesitas Python (uv) en tu computadora.
En la misma categoría: Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, SwarmMemo
Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.
Cómo leer una tarjeta:↓ Descargas por semanai★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Talk with agent swarms: rooms, private messages and paid tasks for AI agents
Copiado tal cual del repo del creador. PopNx MCP no lo ha revisado ni lo respalda. Se quitaron HTML, imágenes y scripts. Los enlaces llevan fuera de este sitio.
Prove what your AI did, why, and that nobody changed the record.
Tamper-evident Decision Receipts with Ed25519 signatures, SHA-256 hash-chains,
and formal compliance mappings. No blockchain, no SaaS, no lock-in.
Self-hosted, offline-verifiable, Python-native.
The EU AI Act becomes mandatory for high-risk AI systems in August 2026. It requires tamper-evident logs proving every decision was made correctly (Art. 12). Most teams are solving this with normal logging — which is neither tamper-evident nor legally defensible in an audit.
ai-audit-trail closes this gap with cryptographic receipts that any auditor can verify offline, without accessing your systems. Same principle as a blockchain — without the blockchain overhead, the SaaS dependency, or the vendor lock-in.
pip install and 3 lines of code, not a platform migrationai-audit-trail provides the technical building blocks that support EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and NIST AI RMF compliance. It does not, by itself, guarantee regulatory compliance — compliance is an organizational obligation that extends beyond any single software component. See our Shared Responsibility Model below.
pip install ai-audit-trail # Core (Ed25519 + SHA-256 + PII)
pip install "ai-audit-trail[redis]" # + Redis persistence pip install "ai-audit-trail[otel]" # + OpenTelemetry metrics pip install "ai-audit-trail[all]" # Everything
Requirements: Python 3.11+ | No external services required | Works air-gapped
from ai_audit import (
AuditConfig, init_audit_config, ReceiptCollector, ReceiptStore, ReceiptAction, verify_chain, get_verify_key_hex, )
init_audit_config(AuditConfig(is_production=False)) store = ReceiptStore()
collector = ReceiptCollector(trace_id="req-1", tenant_id="acme") collector.set_input("What is our GDPR policy?") collector.add_check("safety", score=0.02, threshold=0.8, fired=False) collector.set_output("Our GDPR policy states that...") collector.set_action(ReceiptAction.ALLOW) collector.emit(store) collector.cleanup()
result = verify_chain(store.get_by_tenant("acme"), get_verify_key_hex()) assert result.valid # Ed25519 + SHA-256 + hash-chain verified
Receipt Creation Verification & Compliance Agentic AI Audit
───────────────── ────────────────────────── ────────────────── ReceiptCollector ──> verify_chain() ToolCallReceipt set_input() build_compliance_summary() TraceGraph (DAG) add_check() build_crosswalk() BehavioralContract set_output() export_evidence_package() ProvenanceChain set_action() SPRTMonitor emit() DriftMonitor │ EpochManager v ReceiptStore ──> StorageBackend ABC (in-memory LRU) InMemoryBackend
Every AI pipeline decision produces a Decision Receipt — a cryptographically sealed, hash-chained record:
| What's proven | How |
|---|---|
| Input integrity | SHA-256 of NFKC-normalized, PII-stripped input |
| Output integrity | SHA-256 of generated output |
| Check results | Ordered check records with scores and thresholds |
| Decision | Action taken (ALLOW / REJECT / ESCALATE / ...) |
| Model provenance | Model ID + config digest |
| Non-repudiation | Ed25519 signature (libsodium) |
| Ordering | Hash-chain linkage (prev_receipt_hash) |
Three-stage verification (< 0.1 ms per receipt):
Ed25519 signature → detects forgery
SHA-256 self-hash → detects corruption Hash-chain link → detects insertions / deletions / reordering
Personal data is stripped before hashing — the audit log never contains raw PII.
from ai_audit import PiiConfig, PiiMode, PiiType
config = PiiConfig( enabled_types=frozenset({PiiType.EMAIL, PiiType.PHONE, PiiType.IP}), mode=PiiMode.REDACT, # or HASH (SHA-256) or MASK (a***m) ) collector = ReceiptCollector(tenant_id="acme", pii_config=config)
| Mode | alice@corp.com becomes |
|---|---|
REDACT | [EMAIL] |
HASH | 3d4e5f8a... (deterministic SHA-256) |
MASK | a***@c***.com |
Encrypt PII fields with per-tenant AES-256-GCM keys. Destroy the key = data permanently unreadable, hash-chain intact.
from ai_audit.shredding import AESGCMDEKStore, encrypt_field, shred_tenant
dek_store = AESGCMDEKStore() dek_store.create_dek("tenant-acme")
field = encrypt_field("sensitive PII", dek_store, "tenant-acme") shred_tenant("tenant-acme", dek_store) # Key destroyed — data unrecoverable
Maps receipt data directly to recognized management controls with evidence pointers.
from ai_audit.crosswalk import build_crosswalk, nist_function_map
crosswalk = build_crosswalk(receipts, chain_intact=True) for entry in crosswalk: print(f"[{entry.status}] {entry.framework} {entry.control_id} — {entry.control_name}")
nist = nist_function_map(receipts) print(nist["GOVERN"].coverage) # 0.0–1.0 print(nist["MEASURE"].status) # PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL
ISO 42001 Controls: A.6.2.8 (Logging), A.7.5 (Provenance), A.6.2.6 (Performance), A.8.4 (Output), A.5.3 (Risk) NIST AI RMF: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE — with quantitative coverage scores
from ai_audit.report import ComplianceReportGenerator
gen = ComplianceReportGenerator(summary, verify_key_hex=get_verify_key_hex()) gen.to_markdown() # Documentation portals gen.to_json() # Automated pipelines gen.to_html() # Air-gapped servers
Covers Art. 9 (Risk), Art. 12 (Record-Keeping), Art. 13 (Transparency), Art. 17 (Quality), Art. 18 (Logging).
Self-contained signed ZIP for external auditors — no system access required.
from ai_audit.export import export_evidence_package, verify_evidence_package
export_evidence_package(receipts, verify_key_hex, signing_key, "audit_2026.zip")
Sequential Probability Ratio Test — live compliance status per tenant.
from ai_audit.sprt import SPRTMonitor
monitor = SPRTMonitor(tenant_id="acme") for receipt in receipts: state = monitor.update(is_reject=(receipt.action == "reject")) print(state.status) # CERTIFIED | MONITORING | FLAGGED print(state.confidence) # 0.0–1.0
Detects behavioral shifts in real-time — pure Python, no scipy required.
from ai_audit.drift import DriftMonitor
monitor = DriftMonitor(window_size=100) for receipt in receipts: state = monitor.update(receipt.action.value) print(state.status) # STABLE | DRIFTING | CRITICAL_DRIFT print(state.drift_score) # JSD 0.0–1.0
Formal (p, delta, k)-Satisfaction with Reliability Index Theta — transforms EU AI Act requirements into testable specifications.
from ai_audit.contracts import BehavioralContract, Constraint, ContractMonitor
contract = BehavioralContract( contract_id="safety-v1", constraints=[ Constraint(name="no_pii_leak", kind="hard", field="action", operator="!=", value="reject"), Constraint(name="quality", kind="soft", field="checks.safety.score", operator="<=", value=0.1, delta=0.5), ], ) monitor = ContractMonitor(contract) for receipt in receipts: state = monitor.evaluate(receipt)
print(state.p) # Hard constraint satisfaction probability print(state.delta) # Maximum soft deviation observed print(state.k) # Recovery steps after last violation print(state.reliability_index) # Theta: single compliance metric (0.0–1.0) print(state.status) # COMPLIANT | DEGRADED | VIOLATED
Every agent API call Ed25519-signed — no existing framework provides this.
from ai_audit.toolcall import seal_tool_call, verify_tool_call_chain
receipt = seal_tool_call( agent_id="researcher", tool_name="web_search", tool_args={"query": "EU AI Act compliance"}, tool_result="Found 5 relevant documents...", private_key=signing_key, tenant_id="acme", ) assert receipt.verify(signing_key.verify_key)
Audit delegation, handoff, and parallel orchestration — not just linear logs.
from ai_audit.tracegraph import TraceGraph
graph = TraceGraph(trace_id="workflow-1", tenant_id="acme") root = graph.add_node(agent_id="orchestrator", action="plan") graph.add_node(agent_id="researcher", action="search", parent_id=root.node_id) graph.add_node(agent_id="writer", action="draft", parent_id=root.node_id)
assert graph.verify_integrity() # Hash-based tamper detection assert not graph.has_cycles() # DAG validation lineage = graph.get_agent_lineage(leaf_node.node_id) # Root-to-leaf trace
Track WHERE every piece of information came from — proves a decision was not influenced by prompt injection.
from ai_audit.provenance import ProvenanceChain, ProvenanceRecord, SourceType
chain = ProvenanceChain(receipt_id="r1", tenant_id="acme") chain.add(ProvenanceRecord(source_type=SourceType.SYSTEM, source_id="prompt", trust_level=1.0, content_hash="...")) chain.add(ProvenanceRecord(source_type=SourceType.DOCUMENT, source_id="doc-123", trust_level=0.8, content_hash="...")) chain.add(ProvenanceRecord(source_type=SourceType.UNKNOWN, source_id="???", trust_level=0.0, content_hash="..."))
summary = chain.trust_s
Solo se muestra el principio; lee el resto en el repo