GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
Descripción del creador (original en inglés)
Agentic code review, no signup to try: reality gates + frontier-model review, with veto.
Estos tres nunca se combinan en una sola puntuación: las opiniones, las mediciones y la popularidad son cosas distintas.
Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.
Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.
AuthorizationLos valores marcados como secretos son llaves de tu cuenta. Nunca los compartas ni los pegues en un chat.
Necesitas
¿Qué app usas?
Elige tu app arriba. La recordamos, así que la próxima vez el botón dirá “Instalar en …”.
Esta dirección necesita una clave en un header de la solicitud, y el menú para agregar conectores no puede ponerla. Usa Claude Code, Cursor o VS Code.
Ejecuta esto en tu terminal
claude mcp add --transport http verificate https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp --header 'Authorization: your-value'Completa los valores vacíos antes de ejecutarlo.
Pégalo en .cursor/mcp.json de tu proyecto, o en ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"verificate": {
"url": "https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Pégalo en .vscode/mcp.json de tu proyecto
{
"servers": {
"verificate": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Esta dirección necesita una clave en un header de la solicitud, y el menú para agregar conectores no puede ponerla. Usa Claude Code, Cursor o VS Code.
Tu elección se guarda en una cookie en este dispositivo; no necesitas cuenta.
Authorization secreto obligatorio HTTP headerEsta configuración se genera a partir de la ficha del creador en el registro. Si el README dice otra cosa, sigue el README.
Todavía no hemos leído la lista de herramientas de este servidor; revisamos los endpoints por turnos.
Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 6 nov 2026
El nombre en el registro se verificó con el dominio verificate.ai (el registro comprueba quién es dueño del dominio)
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Aún sin revisar; revisamos los endpoints por turnos
Aún sin revisar; revisamos los endpoints por turnos
Aún sin revisar; leemos la lista de herramientas cuando revisamos el endpoint
Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.
Superó 1 de 1 revisiones básicas aplicables. No hemos leído el código. Antes de agregar una clave o un token, revisa qué acceso pide el servidor y usa una clave que tenga solo los permisos que necesitas.
Debes completar: Authorization
Se ejecuta en la nube del creador. Te conectas por internet sin instalar nada, pero lo que envías pasa por los servidores del creador.
El repo de GitHub cambió por última vez –, y la última versión (1.8.7) llegó al registro hace 3 meses.
Las apps compatibles con MCP, como Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. Se conecta por URL, así que también funcionan las apps que aceptan servidores MCP remotos, como ChatGPT en modo desarrollador.
En la misma categoría: GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.
Cómo leer una tarjeta:★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
Cloudflare MCP servers
Copiado tal cual del repo del creador. PopNx MCP no lo ha revisado ni lo respalda. Se quitaron HTML, imágenes y scripts. Los enlaces llevan fuera de este sitio.
Real output from the live server: 12 lines of AI-written payment code — rejected, fixed, approved, in seconds.
You vibe-coded the demo. This ships it. Between a working demo and a launched product used to stand an experienced CTO and a senior dev team — the people who catch the mock refund path, the invented SDK call, the loop that dies at real traffic. Verificate MCP is that review team as an MCP server: 17 deterministic reality gates with veto power, fused with a frontier-model enterprise review (ISO/IEC 25010: performance, scalability, reliability), run on every AI-written change before it reaches your codebase. The AI writes; the gate holds the bar; you ship. Hosted, zero-install, binary verdict in seconds — in Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf or any MCP client.
Not another linter wrapper. The code-quality shelf on every MCP directory is two things: scanners (ESLint, Semgrep and SonarQube bridges — deterministic rules, no judgment) and prompt relays that pipe your repo to your own LLM key (self-review with extra steps). Verificate is neither: the gates hold veto power that no model output can override.
Your coding assistant writes a mock and calls it done. It invents an SDK call that doesn't exist. It ships an N+1 loop that passes every test and dies under load. Verificate MCP runs the deep review pass on every AI output — deterministic reality gates first (any one can veto), then an enterprise-grade review scores what survives — before the code reaches your codebase.
12 plausible lines of AI-written payment code were sent through the production gateway. Verdict: REJECTED — score 30.8/100, vetoed by `code_reality_gate`, with findings including:
*"N+1 synchronous API calls … For 100 items, this results in 100 sequential HTTP roundtrips, taking ~10–20 seconds and blocking the event loop/worker thread … will trigger Stripe rate limiting (100 req/sec limit)."*
*"
stripe.Inventoryis not a valid Stripe SDK resource."*
*"Floating-point representation issues lead to rounding errors in financial transactions; Stripe API requires integer cents."*
Each of those is an afternoon of production debugging, caught in seconds.
A frontier model asked *"is this OK to merge?"* in a natural workflow missed reward-gaming (a test that only does assert True) and a hallucinated API (stripe.Refund.create_partial) in 0 of 6 runs each. Verificate's gate caught both 6 of 6 — deterministically, with 0 false positives on clean code.
| Adversarial case | LLM review alone | Verificate gate |
|---|---|---|
Reward-gaming (assert True test) | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 |
| Hallucinated API (nonexistent SDK call) | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 |
Battle-tested: 2,581 audited validations over 5 weeks (66 rejected, 270 flagged unfit), including guarding the write-path of a 21M-entity source-cited knowledge base (98.6% cited, 100% licensed across 268 sources). Reproduce it: scripts/ · full write-up: COMPARISON.md.
Each tool has one job — two gates that return verdicts, one advisor that doesn't, one generator:
| Tool | Job | Returns |
|---|---|---|
validate_ai_output | The merge gate for AI-written code. Deterministic reality gates (mock/placeholder veto, gaming & bypass detection, invented-API checks) run first and can't be overridden; ISO/IEC 25010 review scores what survives. | Binary approve/reject verdict + severity-ranked findings |
validate_plan | The gate for plans and designs, before any code exists — completeness, feasibility, scalability implications, risk. The cheapest place to catch a bad design. | Binary approve/reject verdict + findings |
analyze_code | Advisory deep-dive on existing code — hot paths, rate-limit math, failure modes, tech debt. Use it to understand a rejection or review inherited code. | Scores + findings, deliberately no verdict |
generate_code | Generate + gate in one step — the LLM writes it, the same protection engine vets it before you see it. | Gated code (no placeholders, no invented APIs) |
The server also ships prompts and resources for a richer client experience:
gate_my_changes / review_my_plan — one-click workflows that loop validate → fix → re-validate until approved.verificate://gates (what each of the 17 deterministic gates watches for) and verificate://example-verdict (a verbatim production rejection).Every machine gets 25 free validations — no account, no card, no key. Add the URL and go:
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http verificate https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp
Cursor / VS Code — one-click install:
*LM Studio and Goose one-click buttons are at https://verificate.ai/mcp (GitHub strips their custom-protocol links).*
Windsurf / any MCP client (JSON)
{
"mcpServers": { "verificate": { "url": "https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp", "transport": "http" } } }
Cursor: ~/.cursor/mcp.json. Windsurf: ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json.
Then ask your assistant to *"validate this function with verificate"* — a structured verdict comes back in seconds, and every free-tier response shows how many validations you have left and what the gate has caught for you.
Sign up at https://verificate.ai/auth/signup (30-day trial, no card — then $30/mo) and add your token to the same config:
claude mcp add --transport http verificate \
https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp \ --header "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_TRIAL_TOKEN"
or in the JSON config add "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_TRIAL_TOKEN" }.
Tools an agent *may* call are tools it will skip under pressure. Add a standing rule (Claude Code: CLAUDE.md; Cursor: a rule file):
Before presenting any substantive code change as complete:
One-paste setup prompts that install these rules for you: PROMPTS.md. Or wire it into CI as a merge gate — see examples/.
AI output ──► Reality gates (deterministic, any one vetoes)
• mock/placeholder in the wire path • invented/hallucinated APIs • claimed-complete without proof • gaming & bypass detection │ survivors only ▼ Enterprise review (ISO/IEC 25010 + MLOps) performance · scalability · reliability · tech debt │ ▼ Verdict: score /100 + severity-ranked findings (REJECTED = agent fixes findings and re-validates)
The two stages are deliberately separate: if reality and quality were blended into one score, a beautifully structured function that fakes its refund path could still average out to "acceptable." A veto architecture makes that impossible.
Everything else on the MCP code-quality shelf is free — and that's fair, because a wrapper should be free. What you can't get for free is judgment with authority:
| What you'll find on the directories | What it is | What it structurally can't do |
|---|---|---|
| Linter wrappers — ESLint MCP, Semgrep MCP, SonarQube MCP | Rule-based scanners exposed as MCP tools. Deterministic, free, worth running. | No judgment. Rules can't know the refund function *never calls the payment provider*, or that stripe.Inventory doesn't exist. No verdict, no veto — findings your agent is free to ignore. |
| BYO-key review relays | Your repo + a review prompt, piped to your own OpenAI/Anthropic key. | Self-review with extra steps: the reviewer shares the generator's blind spots, there are no deterministic gates underneath, and whatever the model says goes. You maintain keys, versions and hosting. |
| A bigger model | Hope the generator reviews itself better. | Self-review inherits self-blindness. An external gate holds the same bar for every model — which also makes smaller, cheaper models safe to ship with: same gate either way. |
| Human review of every AI diff | The gold standard, at human speed. | Doesn't scale at AI generation speed. The gate does the first pass in seconds; humans review verdicts, not raw diffs. |
| Verificate MCP | Deterministic reality gates with veto, then a frontier-model enterprise review — fused into one binary verdict. Hosted, always on the current model. | — |
That second layer is the part you pay for: a frontier agent doing the deep review — production arithmetic, failure modes, SDK reality — with a deterministic floor under it that the agent itself cannot argue away.
This repo is also a runnable, zero-dependency MCP server: a stdio bridge that serves initialize/tools/list locally and forwards tool calls to the hosted gateway. Use it with clients that prefer stdio servers:
VERIFICATE_TOKEN=<your-token> npx github:Verificate-Dev/verificate-mcp-quickstart
Or with Docker:
docker build -t verificate-mcp .
docker run -i -e VERIFICATE_TOKEN= verificate-mcp
Without VERIFICATE_TOKEN, introspection still works and tool calls return instructions for getting a trial token.
Does it slow the agent down? Each validation takes seconds, inside the loop, before work is presented. Compare with a defect found in CI or production plus the context switch to fix it — gating is net-faster for any change that matters.
Which languages? Validation is language-agnostic; analysis covers mainstr
Solo se muestra el principio; lee el resto en el repo