Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Descripción del creador (original en inglés)
Local persistent memory for AI agents with recall, search, forgetting, and encrypted storage.
Estos tres nunca se combinan en una sola puntuación: las opiniones, las mediciones y la popularidad son cosas distintas.
Todavía no escribimos un resumen sencillo para este. Abajo están los datos que leímos del registro.
Elige la app de IA que usas y copia la configuración.
Necesitas
¿Qué app usas?
Elige tu app arriba. La recordamos, así que la próxima vez el botón dirá “Instalar en …”.
Abre Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config y pega esto en claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"warm": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"writerslogic-warm-mcp"
]
}
}
}Ejecuta esto en tu terminal
claude mcp add warm -- npx -y writerslogic-warm-mcpPégalo en .cursor/mcp.json de tu proyecto, o en ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"warm": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"writerslogic-warm-mcp"
]
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Pégalo en .vscode/mcp.json de tu proyecto
{
"servers": {
"warm": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"writerslogic-warm-mcp"
]
}
}
}Tu navegador te pide permiso para abrir la app; luego la app muestra la configuración y te pide confirmar. Los valores de las claves quedan vacíos para que los completes tú.
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora, y ChatGPT solo puede conectarse a servidores en internet. Elige otra app.
Tu elección se guarda en una cookie en este dispositivo; no necesitas cuenta.
Esta configuración se genera a partir de la ficha del creador en el registro. Si el README dice otra cosa, sigue el README.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; la lista de herramientas aparece en tu app de IA después de instalarlo.
Revisamos información que cualquiera puede ver; no hemos leído el código. Las revisiones que no aplican no se cuentan. · Revisado el 7 nov 2026
El nombre en el registro se verificó con la cuenta de GitHub writerslogic, dueña del repo
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Todavía no hemos leído este repo en GitHub
Este se ejecuta en tu computadora; no hay endpoint en internet
Se ejecuta en tu computadora y usa ajustes locales en su lugar
Se ejecuta en tu computadora; solo podemos leer listas de herramientas de endpoints en internet
Comparado con todos los servidores activos de esta categoría en el registro. Las estrellas solo cuentan cuando quien lo publica es dueño del repo.
Superó 1 de 1 revisiones básicas aplicables. No hemos leído el código. Antes de agregar una clave o un token, revisa qué acceso pide el servidor y usa una clave que tenga solo los permisos que necesitas.
El registro no indica ninguna clave obligatoria, aunque algunos servidores te piden iniciar sesión la primera vez que los usas.
Se ejecuta en tu computadora. Tu app de IA lo inicia cuando hace falta, y los datos no pasan por los servidores del creador (a menos que el propio servidor llame a un servicio en línea).
El repo de GitHub cambió por última vez –, y la última versión (0.1.5) llegó al registro hace 7 días.
Las apps compatibles con MCP, como Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. También necesitas Node.js, Python (uv) en tu computadora.
En la misma categoría: Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
Servidores de la misma categoría hechos por otros creadores, ordenados por estrellas.
Cómo leer una tarjeta:★ Estrellas de GitHubiTres pilares: reseñas · revisiones · usoiActualizado = fecha en que se publicó la última versión en el registroi
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Copiado tal cual del repo del creador. PopNx MCP no lo ha revisado ni lo respalda. Se quitaron HTML, imágenes y scripts. Los enlaces llevan fuera de este sitio.
WritersLogic Adaptive Retention & Memory.
Hybrid search, graph indexing, and vector-symbolic memory.
Local memory for agents and apps: full-text and vector search, a memory API and a vector-symbolic fact store in one embeddable Rust engine that makes no network calls.
Website · Docs · Get started · Standards and provenance · Results · Capabilities · Limits · Contribute
WARM is a Rust library that stores text, vectors and facts in a directory on your machine and finds them again. It ships with Node.js bindings, C, WASM and UniFFI bindings, an HTTP server with a Python client, and an MCP server. There are no service calls, no telemetry and no model downloads unless you turn on a feature that asks for one.
| Capability | What you get |
|---|---|
| Document search | Chunking, stemmed BM25 over blocked postings, Boolean and phrase queries, hybrid fusion with embeddings you supply, metadata filters, byte offsets |
| Vector index | Graph index with a memory-mapped vertex file, an updatable delta for inserts and deletes, optional query-aware routing trained on sample queries |
| Memory API | remember, recall, forget and explain with time validity and supersession; conversation memory with source provenance |
| Storage | Atomic replace and delete, crash-safe journal and checkpoints, verified compaction, one writer per store |
| Security | Optional AES-256-GCM storage encryption with documented coverage and limits, signed audit log, COSE/SCITT provenance |
| Vector-symbolic layer | Sparse hypervectors with bind, bundle and permute, triples with multi-hop queries, Hopfield cleanup |
| You are building | What you get |
|---|---|
| An agent or assistant that needs memory | A memory API with forgetting that removes facts from the store, and an MCP server for editors and agent hosts |
| A local-first or offline app | Embedded search and storage in one directory, with no server process and optional encryption |
| A service that needs vector or text search | warm-server over HTTP with tenants and scoped keys, or the library in-process |
| Research on vector-symbolic memory | The bind/bundle algebra, meaning memory and capacity experiments with their result files |
Every row links to the committed file it comes from. These are single machines and stated protocols, not a substitute for testing your own data.
| Result | Conditions | Source file |
|---|---|---|
| Bemula forgetting score 0.322; best published row 0.310 (LangMem) | Full split: 50 dialogues, 135 forget requests. Agent and judge both deepseek-v4-flash-0731 through OpenRouter pinned to DeepSeek, temperature 0; the judge snapshot is inferred from the authors' run metadata. Recall k=5 hybrid with text-embedding-3-small. Compared with the paper's published DeepSeek rows; a same-day rerun of the suite's naive RAG baseline scored 0.075. One run. | bemula_v1.json |
| LongMemEval dev 89.75 of 100 correct (mean of 4 runs, range 87 to 93) | Official generation and judge prompts, gpt-4o-2024-08-06 as reader and judge, top 10 context. Retrieval is the reference turn ranking over cached Qwen3 scores, not native conversation-memory recall. k was chosen on dev; there is no held-out result. | longmemeval_official_dev_summary.json |
| VIBE llama-128-ip strict recall@100 up to 0.99687 at 1,457 QPS | Official test queries, one thread, query-aware graph (ef=512). Neither frozen RoarGraph configuration reached 0.99. Behind at 0.95 and 0.99 QPS (see below). | query_aware_graph_v1/README.md |
| VIBE yi-128-ip at recall 0.95: 3,214 QPS against 1,953 (MLANN RF80) | Same protocol; compared only with the frozen RoarGraph and MLANN configurations measured there. Recall 0.99 was not reached. | query_aware_graph_v1/README.md |
| SIFT-1M at recall@10 0.95: 23,918 QPS against hnswlib 8,125 (2.94x, interval 2.75 to 3.01); 3.09x at 0.99, 1.40x faster build, 1.83x less serving RSS, 3.74x faster cold start | Core Ultra 9 185H at 4b7a849f, 10,000 queries issued one at a time from one client thread, index built with 8 threads; WARM through the Rust API, hnswlib through its Python binding; Bonferroni-adjusted bootstrap intervals | heavy-ann-sift-...-185h-22c-27g.json |
| BM25 search on SciFact, NFCorpus and the memory corpus: 1.66x to 2.00x the single-thread QPS of the fastest of tantivy 0.27, Lucene 10.6 and SQLite FTS5, with 1.69x to 2.91x less serving memory and 3.1x to 5.7x faster cold start, at tied nDCG@10 | Two machines (Core Ultra 9 185H at 4b7a849f, Modal 8 vCPU at 7ba2d4fe, same engine source), 5 and 3 interleaved serve rounds, Bonferroni-adjusted bootstrap intervals exclude parity for every win. Lexical only, one chunk per document | COMPARISON.md, standard-text-beir-scifact-...-185h-22c-27g.json |
| SciFact nDCG@10 hybrid 0.729, above its own BM25 (0.688) and dense (0.645) | 5,183 documents, 300 queries, MiniLM embeddings supplied by the harness. NFCorpus: 0.355 against 0.323 and 0.317. | public_scifact.json, public_nfcorpus.json |
| Result | Conditions | Source file |
|---|---|---|
| ann-benchmarks at recall 0.95: sift 2,819 QPS against faiss-ivfpqfs 3,788 (0.74x); glove 1,019 against ScaNN 1,535 (0.66x) | Official ann-benchmarks runner, each run pinned to one CPU, AVX2 host | ann_benchmarks_harness_wl02_v1.json |
| VIBE llama-128-ip QPS: 24.6% behind RoarGraph at recall 0.95, 54.8% behind MLANN RF80 at 0.99 | One thread, official test queries | query_aware_graph_v1/README.md |
| SIFT-1M index file 1,389 MiB against hnswlib's 752 (0.54x, no interval); peak build RSS 0.94x of hnswlib's | Same run as the SIFT-1M row above | docs/benchmarks/GAPS.md |
| BEIR FiQA (57,600 documents) single-thread BM25 QPS: 1,269 against Lucene 10.6's 1,625 (0.78x); p50 and p99 latency also behind | Core Ultra 9 185H at 4b7a849f, 5 interleaved serve rounds; serving memory (1.26x less than SQLite FTS5) and cold start (2.37x faster than tantivy) still win | standard-text-beir-fiqa-...-185h-22c-27g.json |
| Text ingest: peak build memory 1.1x to 2.1x SQLite FTS5's on every corpus; ingest time behind SQLite FTS5 on SciFact, NFCorpus and memory (0.46x to 0.97x), tied on FiQA | Same runs, both machines | docs/benchmarks/GAPS.md |
| glove-100-angular with the sparse vector path: recall@10 0.252 at 33.7 QPS against FAISS HNSW 0.832 at 4,111 QPS | One thread, Apple M4; the sparse path is experimental | public_glove-100-angular.json |
Method, intervals and every loss: docs/benchmarks and the benchmarks pages.
_Generated from benchmarks/results/competitive/ by warm-bench table; method and caveats in docs/benchmarks/COMPARISON.md. W = WARM ahead (95% interval excludes parity), T = tie, L = a comparator is ahead, - = no verdict (unpinned source revision, no interval, or not comparable). Rows are compared only within one machine._
| Dataset | Machine | Metric | WARM | Best other | Advantage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | QPS @ recall@10 >= 0.95 (QPS) | 23,918 | hnswlib 8,125 | 2.94x | W |
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | p99 latency @ 0.95 (us) | 97 | hnswlib 251 | 2.60x | W |
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | Build time (s) | 121.44 | hnswlib 170.02 | 1.40x | W |
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | RSS, serving (MiB) | 490 | hnswlib 898 | 1.83x | W |
| sift-128-euclidean | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | Index size (MiB) | 1,389.1 | hnswlib 751.8 | 0.54x | - |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | nDCG@10 | 0.2654 | SQLite FTS5 0.2678 | 0.99x | T |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | QPS (single thread) (QPS) | 1,269 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 1,625 | 0.78x | L |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | p99 latency (us) | 1,828 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 1,486 | 0.81x | L |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | Ingest/build time (s) | 1.55 | SQLite FTS5 1.44 | 0.93x | T |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | Peak RSS, serving (MiB) | 31 | SQLite FTS5 39 | 1.26x | W |
| beir:fiqa | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | On-disk size (MiB) | 9.7 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 12.1 | 1.25x | W |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | nDCG@10 | 0.4561 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 0.4627 | 0.99x | T |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | QPS (single thread) (QPS) | 4,138 | tantivy 2,185 | 1.89x | W |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | p99 latency (us) | 533 | tantivy 798 | 1.50x | W |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | Ingest/build time (s) | 1.91 | SQLite FTS5 1.75 | 0.92x | L |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | Peak RSS, serving (MiB) | 17 | SQLite FTS5 41 | 2.42x | W |
| memory | modal-x86_64-8vcpu-32g | On-disk size (MiB) | 3.5 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM) 10.3 | 2.92x | W |
| memory | linux-x86_64-intel-ultra-9-185h-22c-27g | nDCG@10 | 0.4561 | Apache Lucene 10.6.0 (JVM
Solo se muestra el principio; lee el resto en el repo