Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Semantic memory for AI agents with hybrid search, knowledge graph, and consolidation
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"neuromcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"neuromcp"
]
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add neuromcp -- npx -y neuromcpプロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"neuromcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"neuromcp"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"neuromcp": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"neuromcp"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月6日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント AdelElo13 で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(0.30.2)がレジストリに届いたのは22 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにNode.jsも必要です。
同じカテゴリには:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
Any model. Your memory. Stays local.
neuromcp is the first Sovereign Memory layer for AI: an open-source MCP server that gives Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Ollama persistent, searchable memory — stored entirely on your machine. No API keys. No cloud sync. No subscription required to remember who you are.
Sovereign Memory = data that you own outright, lives on hardware you control, and is portable across every model you use. Cloud memory products own your data; Sovereign Memory means *you* do.
npx neuromcp-init # one command: detects your MCP clients, writes configs, sets up the wiki
Or run the bare server without any setup: npx neuromcp. Something not working? npx neuromcp-doctor diagnoses the daemon, Ollama, embeddings and the database in one run.
*The built-in memory browser: the most-connected entities in a namespace and the relations between them, as a force-directed graph you can drag, zoom and click — served from localhost, never from a cloud. See Memory browser & Obsidian.*
The LLM is a commodity. Your memory is the moat. GPT-5, Claude 4, Gemini — they all converge. The model you use next year will differ. The memory of every conversation, decision, and preference you build is yours. neuromcp keeps that layer on your machine and makes it portable across any MCP-compatible client.
Local-first is a design choice, not a limitation. No telemetry. No data leaves your laptop. No vendor has a copy of your conversations. Audit every line of code that touches your memory. SQLite + local embeddings; everything fits on one disk.
One install. Every client. Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Codex CLI, Continue, LibreChat, Open WebUI — neuromcp speaks MCP, so it works wherever MCP is supported. Switch models tomorrow; your memory follows.
Real recall, not keyword matching. Hybrid retrieval combines vector search (nomic-embed-text, 768-dim), BM25 full-text, graph links, and a learned usefulness prior. At 500 distractors on LongMemEval, R@5 holds at 93.3%. Your context window gets the right memory, not just the most recent.
| Run | Score | Sample | Config |
|---|---|---|---|
| v7 (current) | 96.08% (98/102) | n=102 | Opus generator + Opus judge, single-model |
| v6 | 95.10% (97/102) | n=102 | Same as v7, prior hint set |
Repro: OMB_ANSWER_LLM=claude OMB_ANSWER_MODEL=opus OMB_JUDGE_LLM=claude OMB_JUDGE_MODEL=opus uv run omb run --dataset longmemeval -s s -m neuromcp -c "single-session-user,single-session-assistant,multi-session,temporal-reasoning,knowledge-update,single-session-preference" --query-limit 17
Sample size honesty. n=102 (17 per category × 6 categories). Wilson 95% CI for 98/102 ≈ 90.5–98.7%. Full 500q run with the same config is the next milestone before any "top-tier" claim.
| Mode | R@5 | R@10 | Hit Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extracted (hybrid) | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Oracle-split LongMemEval isolates the correct memory in a small corpus. Every local MCP memory system claims ~99% here. It measures "does the ranker work on clean inputs" — nothing more.
Same 30 questions + 1000 random distractor memories drawn from other questions' haystacks. The correct memory now competes against real noise.
| Embedder | Distractors | N | R@5 | R@10 | MRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ollama nomic-embed-text | 0 (oracle) | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Ollama nomic-embed-text | 200 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Ollama nomic-embed-text | 500 | 30 | 93.3% | 93.3% | 80.3% |
Ollama nomic-embed-text | 1000 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 74% |
Reproduce: npx tsx eval/longmemeval-distractor-runner.ts --limit 5 --distractors 1000
Sample sizes. The 500-distractor row is n=30 (Wilson 95% CI for
28/30 ≈ 78-99% R@5). The 1000-distractor row is n=5 — preliminary,
Wilson 95% CI [57%, 100%]. The 1000-distractor n=30 run takes ~36 min
on a single Ollama instance; cached-distractor batching is v0.19.0
work. Treat 500-distractor numbers as defensible, 1000-distractor as
directionally positive but underpowered.
Head-to-head comparison is explicit v0.19.0 work. Hindsight (local
OSS MCP, ~94.6% LongMemEval claimed) and Mem0/Zep publish their own
numbers on their own harnesses. Until we run all of them against the
same corpus + embedder, calling any local MCP server "state of the art"
is marketing, not measurement. neuromcp publishes its numbers with
sample-size caveats so you can judge direction; don't read absolute
superiority into them yet.
Hybrid ranker (BM25 + vector + attention + graph + usefulness prior) keeps R@5 = 100% at 1000:1 distractor:target ratio on the observed sample. MRR drops to 74% because the correct memory is sometimes not rank-1 but always rank ≤ 5 in what we saw. Earlier v0.18.0 numbers (R@5 23%) were from a test FakeEmbedder — fixed in v0.18.1.
What this benchmark does NOT prove: end-to-end answer correctness, long-horizon multi-session reasoning, or superiority over commercial cloud systems (Mem0, Zep) on their own benchmarks. Those comparisons need their numbers on the same distractor split, which hasn't been published.
AI agents forget everything between sessions. Existing solutions either store flat key-value pairs (useless for real knowledge) or require cloud infrastructure and API keys.
neuromcp gives you two layers of memory:
Inspired by Karpathy's LLM Wiki, Mastra's Observational Memory, and Zep's temporal knowledge graphs — but simpler than all of them. No vector DB, no embeddings pipeline, no cloud. Just Markdown files + Git + hooks.
~/.neuromcp/
├── memory.db ← SQLite: hybrid search, MCP tools ├── wiki/ ← Compiled knowledge (git-tracked) │ ├── index.md ← Routekaart — LLM reads this FIRST │ ├── schema.md ← Operating rules for the LLM │ ├── log.md ← Append-only changelog │ ├── people/ ← User profiles, preferences │ ├── projects/ ← Project knowledge (stack, auth, URLs) │ ├── systems/ ← Infrastructure (tools, MCP servers) │ ├── patterns/ ← Reusable patterns (error fixes, routing) │ ├── decisions/ ← Architecture decisions with context │ └── skills/ ← Repeatable procedures └── raw/sessions/ ← Raw session logs (auto-generated)
| When | What happens |
|---|---|
| Session start | Hook injects index.md + user profile + auto-detected project page (~1300 tokens) |
| During session | LLM updates wiki pages when learning something persistent |
| Every 8 tool calls | Hook reminds LLM to update the wiki |
| Session end | Hook writes raw session log + git auto-commits all wiki changes |
| Crash | Checkpoint every 5 tool calls to file. Git history for rollback. |
Every ~4h the launchd agent runs run-consolidation.sh, which orchestrates four steps end-to-end:
related: frontmatter. Makes the wiki act like a graph without a separate graph database.index.md and per-category -index.md files. Categories over 10 pages are auto-split so the session-start router stays compact as the wiki scales.The pipeline is idempotent — safe to re-run at any time.
Schema (operating rules) → How to maintain the wiki
Index (knowledge map) → What knowledge exists User profile → Who you are, how you work Project page → Current project details (auto-detected from cwd) Last session → What happened last time
npx neuromcp-init
Detects your installed MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf), writes the neuromcp entry into each config (with a backup of the original), initializes the wiki + hooks, and checks whether Ollama is available. --dry-run previews everything without writing.
For GUI clients (Claude Desktop, Codex Desktop) install permanently first: npm install -g neuromcp && neuromcp-init. Only a permanent install lets init write the absolute node + script paths those clients need — from the bare-npx cache (garbage-collected) it deliberately falls back to a PATH-dependent npx entry, which GUI clients usually cannot resolve.
1. Start the MCP server
npx neuromcp
2. Initialize the wiki + hooks (required for closed-loop attribution)
npx neuromcp-init-wiki
This creates the wiki structure, installs hooks (Claude Code) and rules (other editors), and configures everything automatically. Without this step, npx neuromcp still runs as a plain MCP server with 46 tools, but the critic hook that closes the attribution loop is not installed — retrieval works but usefulness scores never accumulate. Safe to run multiple times — won't overwrite existing config.
neuromcp works with any MCP-compatible editor. Two tiers of integration:
| Feature | Claude Code | Cursor / Windsurf / Cline / Copilot / JetBrains / Zed |
|---|---|---|
| MCP tools (46) | Full | Full |
| Context at session start | Hooks (automatic) | Rules (LLM-driven, best-effort) |
| Persist at session end | Hooks (automatic) | Rules (LLM-driven, best-effort) |
| Wiki reminders | Every 8 tool calls | No |
| Crash-resilient checkpoints | Yes | No |
Claude Code gets the full experience via native hooks — context injection and persistence happen automatically, even if the LLM forgets.
Other editors get rules files that instruct the LLM to call neuromcp tools at session start/end. This depends on LLM compliance — it works well in practice but is not guaranteed like hooks.
# Auto冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます