GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Passive AppSec scanners as eight parameterless MCP tools; the audited repository is data.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
APPSEC_LANGS必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add appsec-toolbox --env APPSEC_LANGS=your-value -- docker run -i --rm -e APPSEC_LANGS ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0動かす前に、空欄の値を入力してください。
プロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"appsec-toolbox": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"-e",
"APPSEC_LANGS",
"ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
],
"env": {
"APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
APPSEC_LANGS envこの設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月8日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント ai-ronin-systems で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(0.3.0)がレジストリに届いたのは14 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにDockerも必要です。
同じカテゴリには:GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:↓ 週あたりのダウンロードi★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
Let an AI agent audit code you do not trust, without giving it a shell, a path to choose, or the repository's code to run.
Ten pinned security scanners behind eight parameterless MCP tools, in one hardened container. The audited repository is treated as the attacker. The agent only ever collects evidence.
*Recorded from examples/agent_demo.py against examples/vulnerable-sample. Waiting time is shortened; the real scan time is in the last line.*
security.sast, security.secrets, security.dependencies, and so on.Each claim links to the code or test that proves it.
| Problem | Approach | Proof | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A prompt-injected agent with a shell can do anything. | The agent's whole surface is eight parameterless tasks, governed by Makefile MCP. Maintenance targets exist but are refused. | .makefile-mcp.yaml, the demo | |||
Scanning untrusted code usually runs it: setup.py, postinstall, Gradle plugins, Go toolchain downloads, scanner plug-ins. | Strictly passive analysis: no build, install, or dependency resolution; Go runs with GOPROXY=off and GOTOOLCHAIN=local. An adversarial review found that a planted .checkov.yaml could make Checkov import the repository's Python; that path is closed and regression-tested. | examples/hostile-sample, tests/image.sh | |||
A hostile repository can silence its own findings with .semgrepignore, .gitleaksignore, # nosec, # nosemgrep... | Every scanner runs on toolbox-owned configuration. Inline suppressions are disabled where the scanner allows it, and every marker found is inventoried for the reviewer either way. | settings table, output/suppressions.json | |||
| Evidence is only worth something if it is tied to what was scanned. | The manifest fingerprints the tree exactly like `find . -type f -print0 \ | LC_ALL=C sort -z \ | xargs -0 sha256sum \ | sha256sum, including file names that are not UTF-8 or that sha256sum` escapes, and records each report's digest, tool versions, and data sources. | scripts/write-manifest.py, tests/unit/test_manifest.py |
| One malformed file should not let the target stop the audit. | Input a scanner cannot read because of the target (an unloadable Go package, a corrupt lockfile) becomes a recorded coverage limit: not a failed bundle, and not a fake clean result. | scripts/run-language-profiles.py, scripts/run-osv.sh | |||
| Results should be reproducible, and a compromised scanner should have nowhere to send the code. | Offline mode: fetch rule and advisory data once, then scan under --network none. The manifest records the data's age and digest. | Offline mode | |||
| A security tool is a supply-chain target. | Every downloaded binary is checked against its published SHA-256 per architecture; the base image is pinned by digest; Actions are pinned by commit; release jobs that run project code hold no write token; images carry signed build provenance. | Dockerfile, release.yml |
Verification in layers. Unit tests cover the scripts. A smoke test drives the Makefile through Makefile MCP with fake scanners whose stubs fail if any hardening flag is missing. The image test runs the real scanners against a known-vulnerable sample, a hostile sample that tries every attack above, and offline mode, under the documented resource limits. Independent adversarial reviews attacked the image; every confirmed finding was fixed with a regression test, and what remains is written down in the threat model.
IMAGE=ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0
docker pull "$IMAGE" gh attestation verify "oci://$IMAGE" --owner ai-ronin-systems
Offline mode, the resource limits, and the target-settings hardening are on main and ship in the next release. To use them now: docker build -t appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev . and IMAGE=appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev.
Run it as an MCP stdio server against one repository:
docker run --rm -i \
--read-only --cap-drop=ALL --security-opt=no-new-privileges:true \ --tmpfs /tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g --memory=6g --pids-limit=512 \ --user "$(id -u):$(id -g)" \ -v "$PWD/my-project:/runner/target:ro" \ -v "$PWD/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw" \ "$IMAGE"
Register the same command as a stdio server in any MCP client:
{
"mcpServers": { "appsec-toolbox": { "command": "docker", "args": ["run", "--rm", "-i", "--read-only", "--cap-drop=ALL", "--security-opt=no-new-privileges:true", "--tmpfs", "/tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g", "--memory=6g", "--pids-limit=512", "-v", "/abs/path/my-project:/runner/target:ro", "-v", "/abs/path/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw", "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"] } } }
Compose, offline mode, language selection, and every evidence file are in Usage.
untrusted repository (read-only)
| v /runner/target | v trusted Makefile + Makefile MCP | | | | | | Semgrep Gitleaks OSV Trivy Checkov Syft | +---- language profile selection ----+ | | | | Bandit FindSecBugs njsscan gosec Python Java Node/JS Go | v /runner/output reports, run-manifest.json, suppressions.json, audit log
The operator mounts exactly one repository at /runner/target and one writable directory at /runner/output. The audited path is never an MCP parameter, so the agent has no host-path capability. A trusted Makefile holds every scanner command; Makefile MCP decides which of its targets the agent may call. Language specialists are picked by detection (APPSEC_LANGS=auto) or by the operator, never by the agent.
| Capability | Tool | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
security.audit | everything below | complete bundle |
security.sast | Semgrep + suppression inventory | semgrep.json, suppressions.json |
security.secrets | Gitleaks | gitleaks.json |
security.dependencies | OSV-Scanner | osv.json |
security.repository | Trivy | trivy.json |
security.iac | Checkov | checkov.json |
security.language | Bandit, FindSecBugs, njsscan, gosec as applicable | language-profile.json + reports |
supply_chain.sbom | Syft | sbom.cdx.json (CycloneDX) |
The audited repository is the attacker, and the agent reading its reports may be steered by it. Read the [threat model](docs/threat-model.md): attacker goals, sixteen threats with their controls and residual risks, what is and is not guaranteed, and an operator checklist.
| Protected | Not protected |
|---|---|
| Target builds, installs, hooks, and Makefiles never run. | Scanner parser bugs; the container is the boundary. |
| Target-owned scanner settings files cannot suppress findings or load code. | Inline trivy:ignore and njsscan-ignore comments; Checkov lists its inline skips as skipped_checks. All are inventoried. |
| The agent cannot pick the target or run anything but the eight scans. | An agent that misreports what the reports say. |
| No credentials in the container; read-only, unprivileged, non-root, resource-capped. | Exfiltration by a compromised scanner in online mode. Offline mode runs with no network. |
| Each run's manifest ties report digests to a fingerprint of the scanned tree. | Tampering by anyone who can write output/; the manifest is not signed. |
It is not an autonomous auditor, an LLM agent, a DAST engine, a credential manager, a report normalizer, or a shell server.
appsec-audit-hound (planned) decides why to scan, correlates evidence, writes findings
| MCP appsec-toolbox-mcp collects governed, passive evidence <- this repository | built on makefile-mcp exposes trusted Make targets to agents, deny-by-default
Makefile MCP is published on PyPI and the official MCP Registry, with its own threat model.
| Document | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Threat model | Attacker goals, threats and controls, guarantees, limits, operator checklist |
| Usage | Running, tools and evidence files, language profiles, offline mode, scanner behaviour, network use, versions, development |
| Architecture | Trust boundary, ownership, design rules |
| Tooling | Pinned versions, settings each scanner ignores, update policy |
| Security policy | Supported versions and private vulnerability reporting |
| Changelog | Released and unreleased changes |
| Contributing | How to add a scanner without widening the boundary |
pipx install pytest==8.4.2 && pipx install ruff==0.14.0
make test # ruff, unit tests, smoke test make image make test-image # the real image: known positives, hostile sample, offline mode
More in Usage.
Apache-2.0.