Finance Toolkit
500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Deterministic pre-execution audit for trading agents. PASS/WAIT/FAIL, reproducible verdict_hash.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
ウェブ、デスクトップ、モバイルのClaudeで使えます:
https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcpターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add --transport http trust https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcpプロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"trust": {
"url": "https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp"
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"trust": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp"
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
ChatGPTがつなげるのは、インターネット上のサーバーだけです:
https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcpメニューの名前は、プランや時期によって少し違うことがあります。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
このサーバーのツール一覧はまだ読み取っていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月8日にチェック
レジストリ名はドメイン djzs.ai で確認済みです(レジストリがドメインの所有を確認しています)
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントをチェックするときにツール一覧を読み取ります
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
作者のクラウドで動きます。インストール不要でインターネット経由でつながりますが、送った内容は作者のサーバーを通ります。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(1.0.0)がレジストリに届いたのは4 か月前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。URLでつながるので、リモートMCPサーバーに対応したアプリ(開発者モードのChatGPTなど)でも使えます。
同じカテゴリには:Finance Toolkit, SolidInvoice, Korea Tax Calculator
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.
Create and send invoices and quotes, manage clients, and track payments in SolidInvoice.
Korean tax calculation and tax-audit judgment MCP: 96 tools with statutory citations.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
DJZS audits the reasoning behind an autonomous agent's move *before* capital is committed, and returns one of three verdicts PASS, WAIT, or FAIL with the specific reasoning defects flagged and a reproducible hash of the decision.
The wedge: transaction-security tools answer *"is this transaction safe to sign?"*. DJZS answers a different question *"should this position be taken at all?"*. A perfectly safe transaction can still rest on broken reasoning; DJZS is the layer that catches the bad thesis.
verify_pm_trade is deployed as a Model Context Protocol tool (streamable HTTP) on a Cloudflare Worker. Add it to an MCP-capable agent in one line:
claude mcp add --transport http djzs-trust https://mcp.djzs.ai/mcp
Then call verify_pm_trade with a free-text prediction-market trade thesis. It extracts the reasoning, audits it against the calibrated DJZS-M taxonomy, and returns PASS → PROCEED / FAIL / WAIT → HALT, with the flagged defects and a verdict_hash.
First external audit on record. An outside agent audited a benchmark thesis (pm-block-008) through the deployed tool and received:
verdict: FAIL
flags: DJZS-M03 (PROBABILITY_UNSOURCED), DJZS-M04 (CONSENSUS_NO_EDGE) risk_score: 40 disagreements: [] verdict_hash: 0x85918814b3dffa31b00d6892c2e00b2001efd35f7e0044b4cd3789fe1df14937
Behavioral parity against the offline batteries (verdict + flags + extracted input) is green. Hash parity is a pending re-mint the calibration key lapsed during deployment so the live hash above stands as the record until it is re-run.
Beyond the MCP transport above, verify_pm_trade is now payable over the HTTP x402 transport, live on Base mainnet:
POST https://mcp.djzs.ai/x402/verify
An unpaid request returns an HTTP 402 challenge (exact scheme, eip155:8453, USDC, 2.00 USDC to the treasury); the client signs an EIP-3009 authorization and retries. This is the same rail Base MCP, MetaMask Agent Wallet, and x402-axios speak, so any HTTP x402 client can pay the gate directly - no MCP integration required.
Free-refusal is preserved on both transports: an out-of-scope intent is answered 402 and never settled, so a refused audit costs nothing. Verified end to end on Base Sepolia (paid settlement plus an on-chain zero-delta refusal) before the mainnet deploy.
DJZS separates the model-bound step from the trusted step:
free-text intent
│ ▼ EXTRACTION (LLM, N=3 consensus) reports observable FACTS, never a verdict · per-field state unanimity across the 3 samples; any disagreement → unknown · quote gates: a claimed "absent" must quote the intent verbatim, or it demotes to unknown · evidence-unanimity: a critical-driving "absent" needs the same quote across all samples │ ▼ AuditInput (each fact is tri-state: present / absent / unknown) │ ▼ DETERMINISTIC ENGINE (pure code — no model, no network, no clock) rules fire → weighted score → verdict │ ▼ PASS · WAIT · FAIL + verdict_hash
Why this shape: the verdict rules are model-independent. The LLM only turns messy text into a structured struct; the audit *rules* that decide the verdict are frozen code. Swap the model and the extraction quality changes the rules, weights, and hash do not.
Determinism by construction. The same AuditInput always yields the same verdict and the same hash:
verdict_hash = sha256(canonicalize({ verdict, risk_score, flags: codes.sorted(), unknown_fields }))
WAIT is never silent. An under-specified thesis — one where a decision-critical fact is unknown — resolves to WAIT, mapped to HALT for the caller, with unknown_fields returned so the agent knows exactly what to clarify. Abstention is a first-class outcome, never a guessed PASS or FAIL.
DJZS-PM-v1.0) the calibrated, live pathWeights sum to 100; FAIL threshold 25. All four codes are implemented and calibrated.
| Code | Name | Severity | Weight | Detects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DJZS-M01 | NARRATIVE_RESOLUTION_GAP | CRITICAL | 30 | Thesis reasons about a narrative adjacent to the actual resolution question. |
| DJZS-M02 | FALSIFICATION_ABSENT | CRITICAL | 30 | No stated condition that would prove the thesis wrong before resolution. |
| DJZS-M03 | PROBABILITY_UNSOURCED | HIGH | 25 | Market or model probability asserted without verifiable basis. |
| DJZS-M04 | CONSENSUS_NO_EDGE | MEDIUM | 15 | Thesis restates consensus at an extreme price with no differentiated edge. |
M04 is advisory-grade. On its own it does not block a lone M04 rides a PASS with the flag on the certificate (weight 15 is below the FAIL threshold). It contributes to a block only by stacking with another finding (e.g. M03 + M04 = 40 → FAIL, as in the first audit above).
verify_pm_trade is PM-only: if the intent does not extract as a prediction-market thesis (including the undetermined case), it returns in_scope: false rather than silently running a perpetuals audit.
DJZS-LF-v1.1)Weights sum to 200. The taxonomy is frozen at 11 codes; 3 are wired live in the engine today (marked ●). The rest are defined and weighted but not yet firing — coverage is stated honestly rather than implied.
| Code | Name | Category | Severity | Weight | Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DJZS-S01 | CIRCULAR_LOGIC | Structural | CRITICAL | 30 | |
| DJZS-S02 | LAYER_INVERSION | Structural | HIGH | 25 | |
| DJZS-S03 | DEPENDENCY_GHOST | Structural | MEDIUM | 18 | |
| DJZS-E01 | ORACLE_UNVERIFIED | Epistemic | HIGH | 25 | ● |
| DJZS-E02 | CONFIDENCE_INFLATION | Epistemic | MEDIUM | 18 | |
| DJZS-I01 | FOMO_LOOP | Incentive | MEDIUM | 16 | ● |
| DJZS-I02 | MISALIGNED_REWARD | Incentive | MEDIUM | 16 | |
| DJZS-I03 | DATA_UNVERIFIED | Incentive | MEDIUM | 16 | |
| DJZS-X01 | EXECUTION_UNBOUND | Execution | CRITICAL | 15 | ● |
| DJZS-X02 | RACE_CONDITION | Execution | HIGH | 9 | |
| DJZS-T01 | STALE_REFERENCE | Temporal | LOW | 12 |
Both weight tables are hash-locked (WEIGHTS_HASH / TAXONOMY_HASH, and the PM equivalents, are exported constants); changing a weight is a deliberate re-derive, not a hot patch.
The deployed Worker exposes three tools over streamable HTTP at /mcp:
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
verify_pm_trade | Pre-execution audit of a prediction-market thesis (the gate described above). |
query_pol_certificates | Read prior ProofOfLogic certificates from the Irys datachain. |
query_agent_trust | LIVE on-chain trust score (subgraph-indexed): totalAudits, failRate, latest verdict, action PROCEED/HALT/NO_HISTORY. |
What the tool does not do yet — recorded deliberately, to be re-ruled before the gate is broadly promoted:
verify_pm_trade returns a verdict_hash but does not yet anchor a certificate. Existing Irys certificates are prior-architecture lineage, not output of this tool.The response contract today is: verdict, action, risk_score, flags, unknown_fields, disagreements (the per-field sample-agreement telemetry), verdict_hash, extraction_failsafe, in_scope, and taxonomy versions.
failCount counts WAIT as FAILquery_agent_trust excludes WAIT verdicts from both sides of the fail rate and reports them as wait_count. Anyone reading the subgraph directly, rather than through the tool, gets a different answer. djzs-subgraph/src/trust-score.ts handleScoreUpdated increments failCount on an else branch (verdict == "PASS" / else), so a WAIT — an abstention, not a failure — lands in failCount and inflates the rate for any agent that ever received one.
The Worker recomputes from per-audit verdicts, so the tool is right. The indexed counters are not, and they stay that way until the mapping is corrected and re-indexed. Both numbers are returned side by side (subgraph_counters, labelled) so the discrepancy is visible rather than discovered. Tracked as a follow-up; deliberately not folded into the read-layer fix, because a mapping change needs a subgraph redeploy and a re-index.
Before the MCP gate, DJZS ran as a paid HTTP audit service. Those endpoints remain for backward compatibility the MCP gate above is the current surface. The tiers are metered in USDC on Base Mainnet via an x-payment-proof header:
| Tier | Endpoint | Price | Memo limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micro | POST /api/audit/micro | $0.10 | 2,000 chars |
| Founder | POST /api/audit/founder | $1.00 | 5,000 chars |
| Treasury | POST /api/audit/treasury | $10.00 | unlimited |
POST /api/audit aliases the Micro tier, and an escrow-settled variant (POST /api/audit/escrow) takes on-chain escrow in place of a payment header. These tiers run the older detection path, not the Architecture C engine — treat their output as legacy.
The A2A manifest (agent.json) attests four DJZS contracts on Base Mainnet, each marked verified. Source for each lives in contracts/:
| Contract | Address | Source |
|---|---|---|
| DJZSLogicTrustScore | 0xB3324D07A8713b354435FF0e2A982A504e81b137 | contracts/DJZSLogicTrustScore.sol |
| DJZSEscrowLock | 0xB041760147a60F63Ca701da9e431412bCc25Cfb7 | contracts/DJZSEscrowLock.sol |
| DJZSAgentRegistry | 0xe40d5669Ce8e06A91188B82Ce7292175E2013E41 | contracts/DJZSAgentRegistry.sol |
| DJZSStaking | 0xA362947D23D52C05a431E378F30C8A962De91e8A | contracts/DJZSStaking.sol |
Addresses are as recorded in agent.json; verify any of them on BaseScan.
A fifth contract, contracts/DJZSProofOfLogicNFT.sol, exists as source only — it is not in the deployed manifest, and this document makes no claim that certificate NFTs are live or mintable.
Prior ProofOfLogic certificates live on the Irys datachain and are readable via the query_pol_certificates MCP tool. They are prior-architecture lineage, not output of verify_pm_trade.
The commit history is the product's own audit trail: each verdict-bearing change ships with a PENDING note naming what is still unproven, and the next commit that closes it discharges that note explicitly. Every claim a recall number, a parity result, a live verdict hash — is cited to a specific run at the moment it is pushed, not asserted after the fact. If you want to know what is proven versus deferred, git log is the source of truth and this file is downstream of it.
These are configured outside the repository. They are recorded here because nothing in the tree enforces them, and a silent revert would change live behaviour with no diff to point at.
| Setting | Where | Why |
|---|
| Browser Integrity Check: OFF for `mcp.djzs.ai` | Cloudflare dashboard → Configuration Rules | BIC returns a Cloudflare 403, `error code: 1010` to banned client signatures *before the Worker runs*. Measured 2026-09-13: Python-urllib/2.7, /3.4, /3.11, Java/1.8.0_292 and libwww-perl/6.15 were all blocked, while python-requests, curl, Wget, Go-http-client, httpx, aiohttp, node-fetch, Postman, an empty UA and custom UAs passed. mcp.djzs.ai is an API host, not a browser surface — a stdlib
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます