Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Self-hosted operating layer for AI agents: knowledge, continuity, coordination, and governance.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"firekeep": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"firekeep-client",
"gateway",
"--runtime",
"generic"
]
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add firekeep -- uvx firekeep-client gateway --runtime genericプロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"firekeep": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"firekeep-client",
"gateway",
"--runtime",
"generic"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"firekeep": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"firekeep-client",
"gateway",
"--runtime",
"generic"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月7日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント kapella-hub で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(1.8.2)がレジストリに届いたのは11 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにPython (uv)も必要です。
同じカテゴリには:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
Connect Claude Code, Codex, Kiro, OpenCode, and other MCP clients through one shared, self-hosted Keep.
Every solved problem should make the next one easier. Firekeep preserves the experience behind the work — durable knowledge, working state, procedures, coordination, and inspectable evidence — and puts it back to work in the next session, tool, or machine.
Use it for your own continuity on one workstation. Add teammates when you need them without starting the team’s context over.
[Website](https://firekeep.ai/?src=github) · [Install](https://firekeep.ai/docs.html?src=github#server) · [Product tour](https://firekeep.ai/?src=github#outcomes) · [Firekeep Studio](https://firekeep.ai/?src=github#studio) · [Evidence](https://firekeep.ai/?src=github#proof) · [Privacy](https://firekeep.ai/privacy.html) · [Support](https://github.com/kapella-hub/FirekeepHQ/issues)
flowchart LR
A["Claude Code stores a proven fix"] --> K[("your self-hosted Keep")] K --> B["Codex recalls the fix + evidence"] K --> C["Kiro reuses the procedure"] K --> D["OpenCode / MCP client continues informed"]
Agents keep their native interfaces and provider-owned sessions. What carries forward is the Firekeep context they explicitly record and recall through the same local MCP gateway. That means one person can switch tools without losing the thread, and a team can earn context once and carry it forward.
[See Claude Code and Codex share one Keep →](https://firekeep.ai/claude-code-codex-shared-memory.html?src=github)
The installer configures Claude Code, Codex, Kiro, and OpenCode together (plus Claude Desktop when its config directory exists), then asks where your Firekeep server should live. The full setup flow is in the [install guide](https://firekeep.ai/docs.html#server).
curl -fsSL 'https://firekeep.ai/latest/install?src=github' | sh # macOS / Linux
irm 'https://firekeep.ai/latest/install.ps1?src=github' | iex # Windows PowerShell
The server runs on linux/amd64 or linux/arm64 (server releases after v1.6.2; v1.6.2 and earlier are amd64-only) and needs Docker Compose v2, two CPU cores, and Git; 16 GB RAM is recommended for the default stack. It binds to 127.0.0.1 by default. See the [requirements and sizing notes](https://firekeep.ai/docs.html#requirements) before choosing a host.
Trying Firekeep for the first time? [Share what worked and where you got stuck →](https://github.com/kapella-hub/FirekeepHQ/discussions/15)
AGENTS.md guidance. Codex exposes no native hooks, so lifecycle automation and pre-edit enforcement are not implied.See the [integration guide](docs/INTEGRATIONS.md) and [Studio runtime matrix](studio/README.md#runtime-support) for the maintained details.
On the accepted 2026-08-28 LongMemEval-S run, Firekeep achieved 97.7% Evidence Recall@10: at least one labeled evidence session appeared in the first ten results for 459 of 470 scored questions. The measurement covers retrieval, not generated-answer accuracy; it is one corrected deterministic run rather than a multi-run confidence interval.
[Methodology](https://firekeep.ai/benchmarks/METHODOLOGY.md) · [Result data](https://firekeep.ai/benchmarks/longmemeval-s-20260828.json)
People do not build professional judgment by rereading every email, document, ticket, or source file from the beginning. They remember what happened, why a decision worked, how a failure was diagnosed, and which procedure held up in practice. That experience changes how they approach the next problem.
Agents should improve the same way. Firekeep connects the knowledge, working state, coordination, and evidence behind the work so the next agent can begin with the experience the last one earned.
| Capability | What it means | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | Agents remember what worked, what failed, and what matters across sessions. Semantic + graph retrieval, confidence scoring, contradiction handling, four memory types (reference / procedural / episodic / transient) with type-aware recall decay, recoverable archive-first aging, and token-conscious recall with optional LLM synthesis. Recall is re-ranked by recorded session outcomes (outcome-weighted memory) and by agent feedback on knowledge that was actually acted on (memory_feedback). | ||
| Knowledge Autopilot | The knowledge base maintains itself without deciding anything on its own. When two unconfirmed memories genuinely conflict, neither is silently dropped — both stay recallable, marked contested, until a human verdict (/memory/contested/resolve). A session reaper closes out crashed/walked-away sessions so failures count in outcome scoring. Every review queue (draft skills, stale skills, procedure proposals, contested pairs, eval dead letters) lands in one inbox with a weekly digest, and /memory/{id}/evidence shows every signal behind a memory's rank in one read. | ||
| Fleet-as-GPU (Night Shift) | The connected agents' own machines do the knowledge base's homework overnight, against a local model, and only ever produce drafts. The session-end hook queues a distill job per session; the server's nightly passes queue one job per stale skill (*re-author it*) and per contested memory pair (*propose a verdict*); firekeep night-shift drains the queue — started for you at session start whenever LM Studio or Ollama is listening. A human still activates every draft and resolves every pair, and an approval-rate ledger per job type on the Autopilot tab says whether the fleet's work is worth keeping. | ||
| Team Continuity | Memories carry verified workspace/member provenance plus an untrusted runtime agent_id label and project. Per-contributor activity reports and LLM-synthesized handoff briefs let one agent pick up where another left off. | ||
| Session Continuity | Plans, decisions, and progress recorded through the session tools survive context compression. Crashed sessions are auto-detected on next start and offered for resumption with a periodic workspace snapshot (git branch, recent commits, diff stats) embedded in the shadow. | ||
| Environment Awareness | Configured Docker, git, and file collectors monitor operational state instead of relying only on prompts. Container restarts, new commits, and file changes flow into a replayable event stream. | ||
| Agent Coordination | Shared channels, bulletin board, structured task queue, resource leases with monotonic fencing tokens, presence registry, and direct messages. Concurrent agents can assign work, track progress, and use leases to prevent overlapping edits; hook-enabled clients block an edit when another agent already holds the file lease. | ||
| Predict-then-Act Gateway | Agents declare intent before consequential actions (action_before → `allow | rethink | block), then reconcile outcomes (action_after`). Combines a runtime policy engine (lease, file risk, path deny, session health, recent failure) with a fast-path cache for repeated low-risk actions. |
| Skills | Agents author reusable "what to do when X happens" playbooks via the skill_create tool (client-side, with full session context); a docs→skills pipeline drafts more from wikis/runbooks under human review. Top matches are injected into the next session's briefing. (Server-side auto-synthesis exists behind SKILL_SYNTHESIS_ENABLED but is off by default — the CPU-only deploy can't run the generation LLM in workable time.) | ||
| Enforced Runbooks | A skill whose steps carry command matchers is a runbook a human can arm: advise (round-1 advisories), require_ack (a matched command is challenged and proceeds only after an audited acknowledgement — one-use permit bound to workspace, member, session, command hash, step, bundle version and execution), or block (fails closed, with a server receipt the client requires before honoring an allow). Evidence is scored by *success* — a step counts only when its command exits 0 — and every enforcement event lands in a deviation ledger (dashboard + inbox), storing command hashes, never command text. Modes are set by a human on an admin-only route; agents can propose runbooks, never arm them. Opt-in via PROCEDURE_ENABLED, currently being dogfooded on our own deploys — see docs/guides/living-procedures.md. | ||
| Decision Board | When a clarification needs more than a couple of questions, the agent opens a local browser board pre-populated with evidence retrieved from team memory — better questions, informed by what the team already learned. The local gateway fronts the Decision Board process and Cortex /decision/synthesize. | ||
| Living Instructions | The instruction layer measures itself: a per-instruction compliance table computed deterministically from replay (did sessions recall before answering, record as they went, declare consequential actions), with trend over time, per-runtime slices, and exposure receipts — sessions carry a content hash of the instruction text that actually reached them, and anything unverifiable reports as *unknown* rather than counted. Honest about its limits by construction: it measures behavior, not whether the behavior helped. Fleet-drafted rewrites under human verdict and A/B validation are roadmap. | ||
| Trust Ledger | A per-agent employment record built from the declarations agents already make through the gateway (action_before/action_after): declared-action count, reconciliation rate, prediction-match calibration (Brier over stated confidence vs reconciled outcome), reversals, sessions, first/last seen. Visibility only — it reports, it never gates. Honest by construction: calibration is behavior not competence, only declared actions are seen, agent_id is a self-reported label so the record is per declared identity, and calibration reads *not enough signal* below a threshold rather than inventing a number. The enforcing half (a capability broker turning the record into earned autonomy) is roadmap. | ||
| Auto-Evals + Pattern Discovery | Quality metrics computed from replay traces on session completion. Pattern detection is enabled; automated promotion/validation and A/B experiment endpoints are implemented but disabled by default until a deployment has enough session volume to use them responsibly. | ||
| Replay & Explainability | Every memory read/write, session lifecycle event, environment change, coordination action, and gateway decision is recorded as a structured trace. Inspect, narrow, and reconstruct context at any prior event. | ||
| Encrypted Secrets | Fernet-backed vault for infrastructure credentials, API tokens, and connection strings. Distinct from memory — secrets never appear in recall. | ||
| Business Knowledge | Ingest company documents (wiki pages, tickets, API docs) — manually, or via scheduled Confluence collectors. Chunks land in the vector store and surface naturally during memory recall alongside operational memories. |
| **Cod
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます