Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Git-aware memory store for AI coding agents; memories are anchored to git blob hashes.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add robo-cortex -- uvx robo-cortex mcpプロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月7日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント robotel-limited で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(0.4.1)がレジストリに届いたのは4 か月前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにPython (uv)も必要です。
同じカテゴリには:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
Git-aware knowledge integrity for AI coding agents.
Your AI agent debugs a bug, learns the lesson, and forgets it by next week — or worse, keeps citing a "lesson" that the code has since made false. robo-cortex is a local knowledge base built for that specific failure mode: memories are anchored to git blob hashes, so when the code they're about changes, the memory is automatically flagged for review instead of being silently trusted or silently lost. In other words: drift detection and stale-memory detection for AI agent memory, done deterministically from git history — not an LLM guess, not an embedding-similarity heuristic.
Most agent-memory tools are embeddings + a vector database + a cloud dependency. robo-cortex is deliberately none of that. Four things it does that a generic key-value memory store doesn't:
needs_review on the next retrieve/search/affected call — and a committed revert automatically heals it back. The healing requires three conditions: (a) the revert must be committed (git blob hash must match HEAD again), (b) the memory must have been flagged by the system (not manually via change_status), and (c) you must run a lazy trigger (retrieve/search/affected) after the revert to scan for changes. Few memory tools tie themselves to your actual code's history this deterministically — no embedding similarity, no LLM judgment call, just a git blob hash matching or not.provisional memory only becomes active once real evidence backs it, or a human explicitly promotes it..cortex/memory.db is just a file — inspect it with sqlite3 any time.active → superseded → archived, etc.) requires a --reason, permanently recorded. Nothing disappears silently; wrong lessons are marked invalidated, not deleted.A 30-session benchmark (3 real historical bugs from this repo, re-introduced and solved 10× each by a small model — Claude Haiku 4.5 — with and without a robo-cortex memory pack) measured, at identical fix quality (30/30 correct, zero disqualifications): ~12% fewer fresh tokens and ~15% lower API-equivalent cost (medians of paired per-task deltas), scaling up to −26% tokens / −39% cost on the task whose fix was hardest to locate unaided. Recording a lesson was itself metered: a memory pays for itself after ~1–6 sessions that reuse it (median ≈ 5). We make no wall-clock claim — time differences were noise-dominated. Full methodology, per-run raw evidence (usage logs, diffs, prompts), and the reusable harness are in the repo: docs/benchmark-results.md, benchmark-results-20260718/, scripts/benchmark/. Known limits, stated plainly: one subject model (small — an earlier n=3 pilot on a larger model measured a smaller 2.7% effect, see EVALUATION.md §9), one well-documented codebase (likely compresses the effect), 3 task types. We'd rather publish a modest number we measured than a dramatic one we didn't.
Prerequisite: robo-cortex requires a git repository (staleness detection needs git history to compare against):
git init && git add -A && git commit -m "initial commit"
pip install robo-cortex
If pip install refuses with error: externally-managed-environment (common on recent Debian/Ubuntu), use a virtual environment or pipx:
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate && pip install robo-cortex
If you plan to use robo-cortex with an MCP-capable agent (Claude Desktop/Code, etc.), install the MCP extra instead:
pip install 'robo-cortex[mcp]'
cd /path/to/your/project
roco init
roco record --type lesson --scope repo \ --statement "Copy-to-clipboard fails on HTTP; use a textarea+execCommand fallback." \ --confidence high
roco retrieve --task "copy to clipboard http"
matched=1 returned=1 needs_review=0 contradicted=0 [1] score=0.650 repo lesson Copy-to-clipboard fails on HTTP; use a textarea+execCommand fallback.
--path links a memory to a file, but only accepts a path that already exists at HEAD (no memory is ever born pointing at a dead link). For code you just wrote but haven't committed yet: record the memory without --path now, commit, then attach the path afterward:
roco record --type decision --scope repo --statement "..." --confidence high
git add new_module.py && git commit -m "add new_module.py" roco record 7 --add-path new_module.py
Reusable lessons (not specific to this project) use scope=global and require --assumptions — the conditions under which the lesson applies, so it doesn't get suggested everywhere by accident:
roco record --type lesson --scope global \
--statement "Safari 14 breaks CSS grid+gap. Use flexbox+margin instead." \ --confidence high \ --assumptions "css grid gap safari"
Global-scope commands (record --scope global, show, search, status, link, evidence, list) work from anywhere, including outside any git repository — the global store (~/.cortex/global.db) isn't tied to a project. retrieve is the one exception: it's local-repo-aware by design, so it still requires an initialized repo.
roco hooks install
Installs a git pre-commit hook: if the commit touches code linked to a memory that's active/provisional/needs_review, the commit is blocked with the memory's id and a review prompt, until you've reviewed it or bypassed explicitly. Example, for a memory linked to src/scanner.py when that file is part of the commit:
robo-cortex: this commit touches code linked to memories that need review:
[1] path_changed:src/scanner.py@working_tree scanner batches at 50 items deliberately
Review with: roco show Then either re-verify (roco status activate --reason "...") or supersede it, and commit again. To bypass this check: git commit --no-verify
The bypass is real and documented — git commit --no-verify skips it, same as any git hook. This is "enforcement by default, bypass explicit," not "impossible to skip." See roco hooks --help for uninstall/status. For a CI-level check on pull requests instead of (or in addition to) local commits, see docs/ci-example.yml.
There's also an optional post-commit hook, purely informational (it never blocks — the commit it reports on already happened by the time it runs):
roco hooks install --post-commit
It runs roco affected --diff-range HEAD~1..HEAD after each commit and reports anything at risk, so a flag shows up immediately instead of waiting for the next retrieve/search/affected call. --post-commit also works with uninstall/status, independently of the pre-commit hook.
rocoBoth robo-cortex and roco are identical commands (same binary, two script entry points). Use whichever fits your fingers:
roco retrieve --task "..." # Shorter alias
robo-cortex retrieve --task "..." # Full name, backwards compatible
Name collision note: PyPI already has an unrelated package named roco ("Runtime Config Generator"). If that package is also installed in the same environment, whichever was installed last wins the roco command — use the full robo-cortex name to be unambiguous, or check roco --version to confirm which one you're actually running.
roco completion bash >> ~/.bashrc
Completes subcommand names and each subcommand's own flags (not flag values, and not nested sub-subcommands like hooks install). It's a static script generated from the installed version — re-run the command after upgrading to pick up new commands or flags.
| Scenario | Best method | Why |
|---|---|---|
| One-off CLI commands (shell, scripts, manual testing) | CLI: roco retrieve --task "..." | Simplest, no dependencies, immediate |
| Python agent or script running your own code | Python SDK: from robo_cortex import retrieve, record | In-process (no subprocess), real exceptions, not string-parsed errors |
| LLM agent (Claude Code, or any MCP client) with tool-calling | MCP server: add to your MCP config | Agent decides when to call; tool descriptions ship with the package |
All three call the same underlying robo_cortex.core functions — pick based on what the calling code already uses.
{
"mcpServers": { "robo-cortex": { "command": "roco", "args": ["mcp", "--repo", "/path/to/project"] } } }
Available tools: retrieve_context, record_memory, search_memory, attach_evidence, verify_evidence, change_status, get_memory, list_affected. Full contract in MCP_TOOLS.md.
from robo_cortex import retrieve, record
memories = retrieve("feature description", repo_path="/srv/project") if memories["data"]: print(f"Found solution: {memories'data'['statement']}")
record( type="lesson", statement="What you learned", confidence="high", repo_path="/srv/project", )
Full API, including the RoboCortex class for multiple calls against the same repo, in PYTHON_SDK.md.
Every memory has a status that reflects its confidence and applicability. New memories start provisional; manual review or evidence changes their status:
| Status | Meaning | Can transition to |
|---|---|---|
| provisional | New memory, not yet validated | active, needs_review, abandoned |
| active | Confident, applicable to futur
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます