GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Git/CI MCP server with the full protocol surface (tools, resources, prompts, roots, sampling).
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"devmcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"devmcp-server",
"--repo-path",
"your-value"
]
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add devmcp -- uvx devmcp-server --repo-path your-valueこのサーバーは起動コマンドに値を入れる必要があるので、設定をコピーして入力してください。
プロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"devmcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"devmcp-server",
"--repo-path",
"your-value"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
このサーバーは起動コマンドに値を入れる必要があるので、設定をコピーして入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"devmcp": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"devmcp-server",
"--repo-path",
"your-value"
]
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月7日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント rudranaresh0201 で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(0.2.1)がレジストリに届いたのは3 か月前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにPython (uv)も必要です。
同じカテゴリには:GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
Cloudflare MCP servers
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
Listed on the official MCP Registry as io.github.rudranaresh0201/verimcp and io.github.rudranaresh0201/devmcp.
[Watch the console →](https://verimcp-console.onrender.com) — a recorded session replaying in the browser: three verified calls, five caught lies, one honest backend error.
MCP tool calls are trusted by default, in two different ways that both bite in production agent workflows:
isError: false only means the tool didn't crash, not that it did what it claimed. An agent wired up to git, CI, or infrastructure through MCP is one confidently-wrong tool response away from acting on a lie.tools/call after an ambiguous response (a timeout, a dropped connection), nothing in MCP stops the backend from just running it again — a second commit, a second CI run, a second charge. The protocol has no concept of "didn't I already do this?"`verimcp` is a transparent proxy that sits between an MCP Host and a backend server and forwards every message unchanged, except for two independent checks around each call:
--idempotent-replay, see Proof below.`devmcp` is the backend it's proven against — a real git/CI MCP server, deliberately built with the full protocol surface (tools, resources, prompts, roots, sampling), because a proxy is only as convincing as what it's shown catching.
Host <--stdio--> verimcp (pre-check: dedupe retries + post-check: verify claims) <--stdio--> devmcp (git/CI server)
Both are independently installable and have no import dependency on each other — verimcp works in front of *any* MCP backend (proven against the official mcp-server-git too, not just devmcp), and devmcp works with any Host directly, unproxied.
Two runnable benchmarks, real subprocess pipes, no mocks — the numbers below are what they actually print, gaps included:
pip install verimcp devmcp-server
python scripts/benchmark_claim_acceptance.py # does verimcp catch a lying backend? python scripts/benchmark_retry_duplication.py # does --idempotent-replay stop a retry from duplicating a side effect?
Claim-acceptance — a real MCP Host with no verification layer accepts 100% of fabricated results by construction; that's not a benchmark artifact, it's the actual gap in the protocol:
RAW claim-acceptance rate: 14/14 (100%)
verimcp claim-catch rate: 11/14 (79%)
The 79%, not 100%, is deliberate and stated in the script's own output: 3 of the 14 scenarios exploit documented, principled gaps in specific verifiers (e.g. a hash-exists check can't tell *this* call created the hash vs an old one) — named plainly rather than hidden, because a tool claiming a perfect score on its own benchmark is the real red flag.
Retry-duplication — same idea applied to --idempotent-replay, against 5 realistic non-idempotent side effects (a counter bump, a notification send, an invoice increment, an audit entry, a two-step pipeline):
RAW duplicate-action rate: 5/5 (100%)
verimcp duplicate-action rate: 0/5 (0%)
scripts/demo.py is the smaller, narrative version of the same proof — one fabricated commit hash caught, one real write confirmed and passed through unchanged. tests/test_adversarial_corpus.py and tests/test_proxy_integration.py run the same claims through the real proxy pipe in CI on every commit, not just on demand.
write_file (disk hash-compare), git_commit/git_branch (re-derived from real git state), run_ci_pipeline (self-consistency + re-execution of steps marked safe to re-run), plus resource reads (repo://status, repo://log, repo://file/{path}). New verifiers are a plugin system (importlib.metadata.entry_points, the same mechanism pytest/Black use) — see docs/writing-a-verifier.md.create_pull_request, issue_write (create) and create_branch from GitHub's official MCP server are checked against GitHub's own REST API: the PR/issue/branch must exist *and* carry the title that was requested, which also catches a server handing back a real, older PR as if it were new. A 404 only counts once the repo is confirmed visible, so a private repo without a token is left unchecked rather than falsely flagged.--receipts, on by default under wrap) — every check records what it actually observed (a PR's real title and link, a commit's real message and author, a file's real hash), where it looked and when, for claims that held as well as ones that didn't. Written to the audit log and console always, appended to the tool reply with the flag.--backend-url) — fronts a server over Streamable HTTP (MCP spec 2025-06-18: JSON and SSE replies, session ids, protocol-version header), with --header 'Authorization: Bearer ${TOKEN}' / --header-from-env so a secret never has to live in a config file or a command line. Checked against a hosted server (DeepWiki) as well as the test suite.mcp-server-git.--idempotent-replay) — a retried tools/call is only ever answered from cache if the *previous* identical call was independently verified true by the checks above; a key match with no prior verified success is a cache miss, not a false dedupe. Adapted from arXiv:2608.02645, moved to the proxy layer so it works for any Host/backend pair verimcp fronts, not just one agent framework's own retry wrapper.elicitation/create).verimcp://audit MCP resource; verimcp replay re-runs recorded traffic against a new policy to backtest "would this have changed anything."Deeper design reasoning (why prompts/roots get no verifier on principle, why policy is a separate concept from verification, etc.) lives in docs/adr/ for anyone who wants to go that deep — the summary above is everything needed to use or evaluate the project.
Fastest: protect the MCP servers you already have (0.4.0, not yet on PyPI — install from GitHub until it is):
pip install "verimcp[dashboard] @ git+https://github.com/rudranaresh0201/mcp"
verimcp wrap # puts verimcp in front of every server in Claude Code, Claude Desktop and Cursor verimcp-dashboard --audit-log ~/.verimcp/audit.jsonl # watch every verdict live at http://127.0.0.1:8787
Restart your MCP app and keep using it in plain English. wrap backs up each config file first, skips servers it can't safely front (ones that sign in through the app's own OAuth flow, legacy SSE), never puts a header token into command-line arguments, and verimcp unwrap restores the originals exactly. --dry-run shows the plan without writing anything.
What it looks like, from a real run through the official mcp-server-git and a deliberately lying file server:
[verimcp receipt] CONTRADICTED · FilesystemVerifier
todo.txt does not exist on disk
[verimcp receipt] VERIFIED · GitServerCommitVerifier commit b6fcbbd50b11 exists: 'Add hello file' by Rudra
As a user — install straight from PyPI:
pip install verimcp devmcp-server
verimcp -- devmcp --repo-path ./some-repo
Note on names: the PyPI distribution is
devmcp-server(devmcpwas blocked by
PyPI's typosquat-similarity check against an unrelated existing package), but the
Python import and CLI command are both still plain
devmcp— nothing above changes
if you're reading devmcp's own source.
Use it with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or Cursor — after pip install, add devmcp as an MCP server the normal way, just point its command at verimcp instead of devmcp directly:
{
"mcpServers": { "devmcp": { "command": "verimcp", "args": ["--root", "/path/to/your/repo", "--", "devmcp", "--repo-path", "/path/to/your/repo"] } } }
claude_desktop_config.json (macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json, Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json).claude mcp add devmcp -- verimcp --root /path/to/your/repo -- devmcp --repo-path /path/to/your/repoFrom then on your assistant sees write_file, git_commit, git_branch, run_ci_pipeline, sqlite_*, and docker_* as normal tools — no prompting change needed — except every claim those tools make gets independently re-checked before the assistant is told it succeeded.
In Docker — no local Python/git needed:
docker build -t verimcp-devmcp .
docker run -i -v /path/to/your/repo:/repo verimcp-devmcp
As a contributor — editable installs from this repo:
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pip install -e "./devmcp[dev]"
pytest tests devmcp/tests # 138 tests, real subprocess + real git repo, nothing mocked ruff check src tests devmcp/src devmcp/tests
python scripts/inspector_smoke_test.py # verify against the real MCP Inspector client (needs node/npx)
# spans/metrics print to stderr (verimcp's stdout is the live MCP protocol channel)
verimcp --otel-exporter console -- devmcp --repo-path ./some-repo
pip install "verimcp[otel]" verimcp --otel-exporter otlp --otel-endpoint localhost:4317 -- devmcp --repo-path ./some-repo
Omitting --otel-exporter entirely means zero telemetry overhead — the default, same as every other opt-in flag here.
The console read
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます