Supabase
MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Safe PostgreSQL migrations: schema drift, lock analysis, safe rewrites, data checksums. Read-only.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
SOURCE_DATABASE_URL, TARGET_DATABASE_URL, PGVOUCH_LLM「秘密」と表示された値は、あなたのアカウントの鍵です。絶対に人に教えたり、チャットに貼り付けたりしないでください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"pgvouch": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add pgvouch --env SOURCE_DATABASE_URL=your-value --env TARGET_DATABASE_URL=your-value --env PGVOUCH_LLM=your-value -- npx -y pgvouch mcp動かす前に、空欄の値を入力してください。
プロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"pgvouch": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"pgvouch": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
PGVOUCH_LLM envこの設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月7日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント Shubh-Sgr で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
入力が必要なもの:SOURCE_DATABASE_URL, TARGET_DATABASE_URL
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(0.4.4)がレジストリに届いたのは34 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにNode.jsも必要です。
同じカテゴリには:Supabase, MongoDB MCP Server, Elasticsearch MCP Server
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform
MongoDB Model Context Protocol Server
MCP server for interacting with Elasticsearch
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
An MCP server + CLI that lets AI assistants safely inspect, plan and _prove_ PostgreSQL migrations. The LLM proposes; deterministic code decides.
Real output against the seeded demo databases (1M transactions, 2M ledger entries) with the target broken as in step 2 below. Typing is real-time; command run times are shortened (the verify run took 14.0 s).
Writing ALTER TABLE is the easy part of a database migration. The hard parts are:
CREATE INDEX on a busy table blocks every write until it finishes. A "1 ms" ALTER TABLE can still cause an outage by waiting in the lock queue.AI assistants now write migrations, but they hallucinate objects, ignore locks and can't prove anything. PgVouch gives them (and you) read-only tools that answer those four questions, and it wraps every AI suggestion in deterministic checks.
All numbers come from npm run eval against the seeded Docker databases. The full tables are in evals/.
| What | Result |
|---|---|
| Drift detection over 32 seeded scenarios (tables, views, functions, triggers, enums, extensions, RLS) | 100% precision, 100% recall (34 true positives, 0 false positives, 0 missed) |
| Exact differing rows found by checksum bisection | 100% of seeded row changes, 0 false rows |
| Rows fetched to find them | 311 rows instead of 6,079,997 (the rows in the mismatched tables, both sides) |
Lock mode predicted vs lock actually taken (read from pg_locks) | 36/36 statements, on PostgreSQL 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 |
Table rewrite predicted vs actual rewrite (pg_class.relfilenode changed) | 35/35 statements |
| Sequence left behind its data after a copy (next INSERT would hit a duplicate key) | found 1/1, 0 false alarms in 10 checks |
| Rules-only migration plans that pass a shadow run on a real schema copy | 27/27 |
| LLM plans (local llama3.2, 3B), 17 drift scenarios of the first 21-scenario suite, *validator-only acceptance (v0.1.0)* | 5.9% valid on first try, 17.6% after one retry, 82.4% fell back to the rules plan; 0/3 accepted LLM plans passed the shadow run |
Application stall during the migration, measured on the 1M-row table with a probe query every ~10 ms (evals/results-rewrite.md):
| Migration | Original: max stall | PgVouch rewrite: max stall | Rewrite total time |
|---|---|---|---|
CREATE INDEX | 1.58 s | 47 ms | 2.1 s |
ADD FOREIGN KEY (2M rows) | 1.01 s | 49 ms | 1.2 s |
ADD CHECK | 440 ms | 63 ms | 0.85 s |
SET NOT NULL | 625 ms | 31 ms | 0.68 s |
ADD COLUMN ... NOT NULL DEFAULT gen_random_uuid() | 10.94 s | 964 ms | 108.7 s (batched backfill) |
ALTER COLUMN merchant_id TYPE bigint | 6.51 s | 93 ms | 28.0 s (includes re-creating its foreign key; +3 manual steps) |
What the LLM numbers show: a small local model is not reliable at migration planning. That's why PgVouch never trusts it. The validator rejected 14/17 plans (unparseable SQL, hallucinated or duplicate objects, blocking DDL). The 3 it accepted were *safe but incomplete*, and only the shadow run caught that (e.g. a missing index and a sequence left out when re-creating a dropped table). Deterministic rules plans passed all 17 (27/27 with the scenarios added later). Details: evals/results-llm.md.
What changed because of it: those numbers were measured when the validator alone decided. Now an LLM plan is accepted only if it passes the validator and a shadow run whose result matches the source exactly; a shadow failure is sent back to the LLM for one retry, then PgVouch falls back to the rules plan. So the 3 incomplete plans above would now be rejected. The LLM eval has not been re-run with the new pipeline yet, so there is no new number here.
The trade-off is visible: the rewrites that need a backfill take much longer in total, but the application keeps running. These are single runs on a laptop (Apple M1, 8 cores, Docker Desktop). Expect the absolute numbers to vary; the gap is the point.
flowchart LR
A["AI assistant (Claude Code, Cursor)"] -- "MCP (JSON-RPC, stdio)" --> S U["You (terminal)"] -- CLI --> S subgraph S["PgVouch core"] I["F1 introspect pg_catalog"] --> D["F2 diff (pure function)"] D --> P["F7 planner LLM + guardrail validator"] L["F5 lock analyzer (Postgres parser)"] --> R["F6 safe rewrites"] R --> P P --> SH["F10 shadow run (throwaway container)"] V["F3 chunked checksums"] --> B["F4 bisection"] P --> RC["F12 receipt (SHA-256)"] end S -- "read-only SQL" --> SRC[("source DB")] S -- "read-only SQL" --> TGT[("target DB")] P -. "structured facts only, no rows" .-> LLM["Ollama (local) or Gemini"]
Golden rule: the LLM never touches a database and never decides pass/fail. It proposes; the parser, the rules and the shadow run decide.
| # | Feature | How |
|---|---|---|
| F1 | Schema introspection | pg_catalog (not information_schema, which hides index methods, partial-index predicates and NOT VALID) |
| F2 | Drift detection | A pure diffSchemas(source, target) over tables, columns, indexes, constraints, sequences, views, functions, triggers (including disabled ones), enum types, extensions and row-level security: deterministic and sorted, with severity rules, and it never guesses renames |
| F3 | Data verification | md5(string_agg(md5(row::text) ORDER BY pk)) per primary-key chunk, inside a REPEATABLE READ snapshot with normalized session settings. Text keys are ordered byte-wise (COLLATE "C"), so servers with different collations agree. Also checks that every identity/serial sequence on the target is ahead of its data. On a target still being replicated to, --recheck looks at the differences again after a delay and reports only those that never catch up |
| F4 | Checksum bisection | Merkle-style: split the mismatched chunk at its median key and recurse only into halves whose hashes differ |
| F5 | Lock analyzer | libpg-query (Postgres' own parser, WASM) → rule table → risk from reltuples |
| F6 | Safe rewrites | CONCURRENTLY, NOT VALID + VALIDATE, UNIQUE ... USING INDEX, expand/contract, batched DO loops with COMMIT per batch |
| F7 | Guarded LLM planner | zod-checked JSON → validator (parses, allow-list, objects exist, no unsafe DDL) → shadow run (the result must match the source) → one retry with the errors → rules-only fallback |
| F8 | MCP server | 7 read-only tools over stdio |
| F9 | Eval suite | 32 drift/data scenarios, 36 lock statements with ground truth from Postgres, and a stall benchmark under load |
| F10 | Shadow runs | Copies the target's *schema* into a disposable container, applies the plan, and diffs the result against the source |
| F11 | Reversibility | Tags each step reversible / reversible-with-backfill / data-lossy and generates rollback SQL |
| F12 | Receipts | JSON of drift + verification + plan + shadow, with a SHA-256 over canonical (sorted-key) JSON |
| F13 | Lock-queue preflight | "Safe to run right now?": the locks each statement needs vs. live pg_locks + pg_stat_activity, using Postgres' full 8×8 lock conflict table |
| F14 | PR review action | pgvouch review --format markdown + a GitHub Action: lock analysis and safe rewrites of changed migrations as a job summary and one PR comment |
There are two ways to use PgVouch:
| Option A: npm package | Option B: clone the repo | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Your own databases, CI, or an AI assistant | Trying every feature on seeded demo databases, or contributing |
| Needs | Node 22 (or 20.12+) | Node 22 (or 20.12+) and Docker |
| Commands run as | pgvouch (or npx pgvouch ) | npm run cli -- |
1. Try it now, no database needed. Point it at any migration file:
npx pgvouch locks my_migration.sql --offline # the locks each statement takes, and the risk
npx pgvouch rewrite my_migration.sql --offline # a safe, non-blocking version of the same migration
No migration file handy? Create one: echo "CREATE INDEX idx_amount ON transactions (amount);" > my_migration.sql
2. Install it (optional: npx pgvouch works without installing):
npm install -g pgvouch
pgvouch --help
3. Point it at your databases. Create a read-only role on each database (the SQL is here), then put a .env file in the folder you run PgVouch from:
SOURCE_DATABASE_URL=postgres://pgvouch_ro:PASSWORD@staging-host:5432/your_db
TARGET_DATABASE_URL=postgres://pgvouch_ro:PASSWORD@prod-host:5432/your_db PGVOUCH_LLM=none # rules-only plans; set it to ollama to let a local LLM propose plans
Variables already set in your environment take precedence over .env. Then check that both connections are read-only:
pgvouch doctor # must say read_only=true and write privileges: none
4. Run it:
pgvouch diff # schema drift (exit code 1 if any)
pgvouch verify --rows # checksums + exact differing rows pgvouch verify --rows --recheck 3 # target still being replicated to: ignore rows in flight pgvouch locks my_migration.sql # lock impact per statement, with real table sizes pgvouch preflight my_migration.sql # would it have to wait for locks RIGHT NOW? pgvouch rewrite my_migration.sql # safe multi-step script pgvouch review --format markdown migrations/*.sql # PR-comment report (offline, used by the GitHub Action) pgvouch plan --no-llm # rules-only plan that makes target match source pgvouch plan # LLM plan (Ollama) behind guardrails pgvouch shadow # plan, then prove it on a throwaway container (needs Docker) pgvouch receipt --shadow # hashed audit record pgvouch receipt-verify pgvouch-receipt.json
locks --fail-on high exits with code 1, so it can gate a CI pipeline on risky migrations.
preflight answers a different question: not "what will this lock?" but "is anyone holding or waiting for a conflicting lock right now?". It lists the sessions it would queue behind (pid, user, application, state, transaction age; never their query text), and flags that CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY waits for every older transaction in the database. It exits with code 1 if the migration would wait. PgVouch never terminates sessions.
5. Also: use it from an AI assistant (npx -y pgvouch mcp), or review every migration pull request with the GitHub Action (step 4 there).
The repo includes two seeded Postgres databases, so you can try every feature without touching a real database. Requirements: Node 22 (or 20.12+) and Docker.
git clone https://github.com/Shubh-Sgr/pgvouch.git && cd pgvouch
npm in
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます