RAWThink
概要
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Persistent memory for AI thinking partnerships: hybrid search and a temporal knowledge graph.
PopNx MCPの3つの柱
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
- 利用者の声iレビューはまだありませんレビューは今後のステップで、アカウント機能と一緒に始まります
- 私たちの基本チェックi1項目中1項目に合格公開情報からチェック。コードはまだスキャンしていません
- 利用状況iとても新しい↓ 20/週 · ★ –
できること
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
- 接続方法: パソコンで動く
- トランスポート: stdio
- カテゴリ: 検索・AIの記憶
インストール
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
インストールの前に
- 基本チェック:1項目中1項目に合格
- あなたのパソコンで、あなたのユーザーと同じ権限(ファイル、ネットワーク、アプリ)で動きます。
- 自分で入力するもの:
RAWTHINK_VAULT,MEMORY_FILE_PATH,QDRANT_URL,QDRANT_PATH,OLLAMA_URL,OLLAMA_MODEL,RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE,RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE,RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL
必要なもの
- PyPIPythonのuvのインストール(uvxコマンドに必要)
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"rawthink": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"rawthink-mcp"
],
"env": {
"RAWTHINK_VAULT": "your-value",
"MEMORY_FILE_PATH": "your-value",
"QDRANT_URL": "your-value",
"QDRANT_PATH": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_URL": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_MODEL": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add rawthink --env RAWTHINK_VAULT=your-value --env MEMORY_FILE_PATH=your-value --env QDRANT_URL=your-value --env QDRANT_PATH=your-value --env OLLAMA_URL=your-value --env OLLAMA_MODEL=your-value --env RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE=your-value --env RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE=your-value --env RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL=your-value -- uvx rawthink-mcp動かす前に、空欄の値を入力してください。
または、設定を自分でコピーする
プロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"rawthink": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"rawthink-mcp"
],
"env": {
"RAWTHINK_VAULT": "your-value",
"MEMORY_FILE_PATH": "your-value",
"QDRANT_URL": "your-value",
"QDRANT_PATH": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_URL": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_MODEL": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
または、設定を自分でコピーする
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"rawthink": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"rawthink-mcp"
],
"env": {
"RAWTHINK_VAULT": "your-value",
"MEMORY_FILE_PATH": "your-value",
"QDRANT_URL": "your-value",
"QDRANT_PATH": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_URL": "your-value",
"OLLAMA_MODEL": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_BM25_STATE": "your-value",
"RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVEL": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
自分で入力する値
RAWTHINK_VAULTenvPath to the vault directory holding sessions, qnotes and the knowledge graph.MEMORY_FILE_PATHenvPath to memory.jsonl. Defaults to /memory.jsonl.QDRANT_URLenvQdrant server URL.QDRANT_PATHenvSet to a directory to run Qdrant embedded instead of via Docker.OLLAMA_URLenvOllama server URL. Without it, retrieval degrades to sparse-only.OLLAMA_MODELenvEmbedding model. Changing it requires a full reindex.RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILEenvWhich tools to expose: recall (4, read-only), record (5, the write path), or full (17).RAWTHINK_BM25_STATEenvPath to the BM25 state file. Defaults to /.bm25_state.json.RAWTHINK_LOG_LEVELenvLog level for diagnostics on stderr.
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
できること
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
基本チェックi
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月10日にチェック
- ✓ 合格
作者とリポジトリが一致
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント ygtalp で確認済みです
- … 未チェック
今もメンテナンスされている
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
- … 未チェック
ライセンスがある
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
- – 対象外
エンドポイントが応答する
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
- – 対象外
OAuthでサインイン
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
- … 未チェック
ツールの説明に隠れた指示がない
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
検索・AIの記憶のほかのサーバーとの比較i
- このカテゴリのほかの5842件のうち0%よりスターが多い
- このカテゴリのほかの5842件のうち26%より最近レジストリに公開
- 基本チェックの結果が、このカテゴリのほかの5842件のうち100%と同じかそれ以上
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
よくある質問
RAWThinkは安全ですか?
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
どんなキーやコードが必要ですか?
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
パソコンで動きますか、それともクラウドですか?
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
今もメンテナンスされていますか?
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(2.0.1)がレジストリに届いたのは3 か月前です。
どのアプリで使えますか?
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにPython (uv)も必要です。
代わりに使えるものは?
同じカテゴリには:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
代わりの候補
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:↓ 週あたりのダウンロードi★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
Codebase Memory
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Exa
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
作者のREADME
READMEを開く
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
RAWThink
Persistent memory for AI thinking partnerships. A knowledge graph you can argue with, search that spans every session you have ever had, and a record of not just what you decided but what you rejected.
MCP server for Claude Code. Python, local, no cloud.
The problem
Every conversation with an AI starts from nothing. You explain the same context, re-derive the same conclusions, and rediscover decisions you already made — and the reasoning that produced them is gone the moment the window scrolls.
Chat history does not fix this. History is a transcript; what you need is *structure*: which ideas connect, which beliefs you have since abandoned, which alternatives you considered and dropped, and why.
RAWThink keeps that structure in three layers, in files you own.
What it does
Hybrid semantic search across every session and note — BGE-M3 dense embeddings and BM25 sparse vectors, fused with RRF. Ask "what did I think about free will?" and get the passages, not a keyword match.
A temporal knowledge graph where observations carry dates and status. Beliefs can be marked invalidated and linked to what replaced them, so the archive remembers not only what you think but what you used to think.
Session lifecycle — a close command that exports the conversation, extracts entities into the graph, and writes a handoff the next session loads automatically.
Activation decay — unused knowledge fades on a ~23-day half-life, accessed knowledge stays warm. Old material is still there; it just stops crowding out what you are working on now.
Quick start
Prerequisites
- Python 3.10+
- Docker for Qdrant — or set
QDRANT_PATHfor embedded mode - Ollama with
bge-m3:ollama pull bge-m3
Install
pip install rawthink-mcp
rawthink-install # creates ~/rawthink-vault with everything inside cd ~/rawthink-vault docker compose up -d # starts Qdrant
rawthink-install writes the vault structure, CLAUDE.md, THINKING_DIRECTIVES.md, SETUP.md, docker-compose.yml and the /rtclose command. Use rawthink-install --vault ~/my-vault for a different location.
Register with Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user rawthink -- rawthink-mcp
Check the install
rawthink-doctor
Nine checks with a fix line for each failure: vault, graph schema, BM25 state format, Qdrant, index coverage, vector dimension, Ollama, MCP registration.
The index coverage check is the one worth knowing about. Indexing can stop partway and leave a collection that looks healthy — it exists, it has points, queries return results. They are results from part of the vault, and nothing else tells you that.
Upgrading from 0.x
1.5.0 changed the graph schema and 2.0.0 changes the sparse index. Migrate the graph before writing anything:
python -m rawthink_mcp.migrate --path vault/memory.jsonl --guess-domains --heal-dangling
That is a dry run — it prints what would change and writes nothing. Read the report, then re-run with --apply. A timestamped backup is taken first.
Then re-encode the search index, because BM25 term IDs changed:
reindex(full=True)
A plain reindex skips unchanged chunks and will leave the old encoding in place. rawthink-doctor tells you if this is still pending.
See CHANGELOG.md for what changed and why.
Your first session
> search_thoughts("what have I decided about caching?")
record_decision(
name="api/cache: read-through", domain="software", decided="read-through cache in front of the read model", because="the write path is already the bottleneck; adding invalidation there costs more", rejected=["write-through — couples the write path to cache health", "no cache — p99 was 400ms against a 200ms SLO"] )
Close with /rtclose. It exports the conversation, extracts what is worth keeping into the graph, and leaves a handoff for next time — which the next session loads on its own.
The schema, and why it looks like this
This is the part worth understanding, because it is what keeps the graph queryable over years rather than months.
Role and subject are separate fields
entityType answers what role does this node play. Closed list of ten:
| type | for |
|---|---|
decision | a choice made, with alternatives rejected |
concept | an idea, theory, model, analogy |
finding | something discovered or measured — a bug, a result, an audit |
rule | a durable constraint or pattern to follow |
open-question | unresolved, waiting on evidence |
artifact | a project, tool, document, feature, source |
insight | a realisation that changed how something is seen |
task | a unit of intended work |
event | something that happened at a point in time |
thing | a person, object or substance named directly |
domain answers what subject is it about: software, music, history, philosophy, health, writing, neuro, finance, personal, galaxy.
Keeping these apart is not tidiness. When one field carries both, the type list grows by one entry per subject — a real vault reached 46 types this way, with saglik-bulgusu, teknik-karar and bug-pattern sitting next to karar. At that point nothing can be filtered, because no two entries agree on what a type means.
Unknown relation types are rejected, not warned about
Canonical vocabulary: supports, contradicts, evolved_into, depends_on, exemplifies, part_of, caused_by, enables, supersedes, related_to, investigates, informs, uses.
Close synonyms fold automatically — connected_to → related_to, aspect_of → part_of. Anything else raises.
An earlier version accepted unknown types with a warning. Nothing acted on the warning and 56 one-off types accumulated. A warning that lets the write through is a decision to allow it, written in the voice of disapproval.
Epistemic status defaults to unknown
assertion, hypothesis, speculation — or unknown when unstated.
unknown is deliberate. If a session did not establish something, recording it as an assertion promotes a claim nobody made. The migration follows the same rule: 144 entities with no epistemic field became unknown, not assertion.
Revise, do not delete
> revise(entity_name="api/cache: read-through",
observations=["read-through cache in front of the read model"], superseded_by="moved to write-through after the read model split", superseding_entity="api/cache: write-through")
The old observation is marked invalidated, dated, and linked to what replaced it. Delete tools exist but sit outside the default agent-facing profiles: an archive that forgets its own reversals cannot answer the question it was kept for.
Decisions record what was rejected
record_decision stores decided, because, and rejected as separately queryable observations. The rejected alternatives are the part worth keeping — what was chosen stays readable in the code forever, what was considered and dropped exists nowhere else. That is the question that gets asked six months later.
MCP tools
Tool definitions sit in the context window from the first token of a session, so the surface is a standing cost rather than a per-call one. Profiles load only what a given step needs.
RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE=recall # 4 tools, ~900 tokens — read-only
RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE=record # 5 tools, ~1750 tokens — the write path RAWTHINK_TOOL_PROFILE=full # 17 tools, ~4200 tokens — everything (default)
A tool outside the active profile stays an ordinary function — reachable from the CLI and from tests. It simply is not in front of an agent that will not call it.
Search
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
search_thoughts | Hybrid search. mode="overview" gives one line per session |
get_session | Full content of a session by ID |
store_thought | Save a quick note as a qnote |
reindex | Re-index the vault into Qdrant |
Graph — reading
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
search_nodes | Bounded. Filters by domain and entity_type; reports total_matched and truncated |
open_nodes | Specific entities with their relations |
read_graph | Whole graph, paginated, with a summary mode |
Graph — writing
| tool | what it does |
|---|---|
record | Entities, relations and observations in one validated, atomic call |
record_decision | A decision with its rejected alternatives |
revise | Mark observations superseded, link what replaced them |
create_entities · create_relations · add_observations | Lower-level equivalents |
invalidate_observations | Belief revision without the relation link |
delete_entities · delete_observations · delete_relations | full profile only |
record() validates the whole batch before writing any of it. A half-valid batch writes nothing — a graph left in a state nobody asked for is worse than a rejected write. Relations may only point at entities that already exist or are created in the same call.
Every tool carries MCP annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint), so a host can tell deletion apart from search.
Architecture
Claude Code
│ MCP (stdio) ▼ rawthink-mcp ├── search ──► Qdrant dense (BGE-M3) + sparse (BM25), RRF fusion ├── graph ──► memory.jsonl entities, relations, temporal observations └── export ──► vault/ sessions, qnotes, handoffs as markdown │ Ollama (bge-m3)
Everything runs locally. The vault is plain markdown with YAML frontmatter — open it in Obsidian to browse visually, no plugins needed.
Why JSONL for the graph
Human-readable, git-diffable, no dependency. You can open it, read it, and see a meaningful diff when it changes — which matters for something meant to hold your reasoning.
The tradeoff is load time: the whole file is parsed per read. Fine at a few hundred entities, slower as it grows. Past tens of thousands, SQLite is the obvious next step.
Session lifecycle
session start handoff loads automatically (SessionStart hook)
↓ think together ↓ /rtclose export → extract entities → write handoff
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます