Oauth Auditor
概览
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Scans MCP server auth code for OAuth 2.1 anti-patterns: token passthrough, missing audience
PopNx MCP 的三大支柱
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
- 用户评价i暂无评价评价功能将在后续阶段与账户功能一起开放
- 我们的基础检查i1 项中通过 0 项依据公开信息检查;尚未扫描代码
- 使用情况i起步阶段↓ 438/周 · ★ –
它能帮你做什么
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
- 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
- 传输方式: stdio
- 分类: 营销与社交媒体
安装
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
安装之前
- 基础检查:1 项中通过 0 项
- 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
- 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。
你需要
- npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"oauth-auditor": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add oauth-auditor -- npx -y @guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor或者自己复制设置
粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"oauth-auditor": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
或者自己复制设置
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"oauth-auditor": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它能做什么
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
基础检查i
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月9日
- ! 注意
作者与仓库一致
发布者(4hmetuyar)不是仓库所有者(GuardBee);可能是其他人代为上架的
- … 尚未检查
仍在维护
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
- … 尚未检查
有许可证
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
- – 不适用
端点有响应
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
- – 不适用
使用 OAuth 登录
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
- … 尚未检查
工具描述中没有隐藏指令
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与“营销与社交媒体”中的其他服务器比较i
- 星标数多于此分类中其他 3615 个服务器的 0%
- 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 3615 个服务器的 41% 更新
- 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 3615 个服务器的 19%
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
常见问题
Oauth Auditor 安全吗?
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 0 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
它需要哪些密钥或代码?
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
它还在维护吗?
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.2)于41天前进入注册中心。
哪些应用可以使用它?
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。
有什么可以替代它?
同一分类中有:MCP YouTube Transcript, Google Analytics MCP, BibiGPT YouTube Video Summarizer
替代选择
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Google Analytics MCP
GA4 MCP server for AI agents: schema discovery, server-side aggregation, analysis-ready defaults.
BibiGPT YouTube Video Summarizer
AI video summarizer: summarize and transcribe YouTube, Bilibili, TikTok and podcast videos.
作者的 README
打开 README
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor
🇬🇧 English | 🇹🇷 Türkçe | 🇨🇳 中文 | 🇯🇵 日本語 | 🇰🇷 한국어 | 🇧🇷 Português | 🇪🇸 Español | 🇩🇪 Deutsch
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that scans an MCP server's own authorization code for OAuth 2.1 anti-patterns named in the MCP specification's own Security Considerations section.
The MCP spec doesn't leave this to guesswork — it explicitly calls out token passthrough (forwarding a client's token to a downstream API unchanged, instead of exchanging/re-scoping it) and missing audience validation (accepting a token whose aud claim was never issued for this server) as the central authorization failure modes for a server acting as an OAuth resource server. This package checks for exactly those two, plus three related anti-patterns in the same family.
Telemetry is off by default. With
GUARDBEE_TELEMETRY=1it sends the server, tool, success, duration and short parameter values such as a file path; longer strings and fields likecontent,tokenorpasswordare replaced with a placeholder. See@guardbee/mcp-telemetry.
Claude ──► oauth-auditor ──► Your MCP server's auth code
│ ├─ token-passthrough (client's token forwarded unchanged downstream) ├─ token-validation (jwt.verify() with no audience check) ├─ discovery-ssrf (OAuth/OIDC discovery URL built from client input) ├─ pkce (authorization request missing code_challenge) ├─ redirect-validation (redirect_uri checked with startsWith/includes, not exact match) └─ secrets-exposure (hardcoded client_secret)
Why these two specifically
Token passthrough matters because a token a client presented to *this* server was scoped and audienced for this server — not whatever downstream API the server's own tool handlers call next. Forwarding it unchanged means the downstream service is trusting a credential it never issued, on the basis of a server-side decision the original token issuer never approved.
Missing audience validation is the same failure from the other direction: jwt.verify(token, key) confirms a token's *signature* is valid, but says nothing about who it was issued *for*. Without an explicit audience check, a token minted for a completely unrelated resource server — one that happens to share the same issuer/signing key — will verify successfully here too. This is the textbook confused-deputy substitution the MCP spec is warning about.
The other three patterns are adjacent, concrete instances of the same "an MCP server's auth code trusts something it shouldn't" theme: an OAuth/OIDC discovery URL built from client-supplied input (the shape behind a real disclosed CVE), a redirect_uri validated with a prefix/substring check instead of an exact match (open-redirect bypass), and PKCE silently missing from an authorization request (required by OAuth 2.1 unconditionally, not just for public clients).
Features
- 6 categories: token-passthrough, token-validation, discovery-ssrf, pkce, redirect-validation, secrets-exposure
- Two of the checks (missing audience validation, missing PKCE) look for an absence near a call site rather than a fixed regex — they extract the full
jwt.verify(...)call (or the authorization-request URL construction) and confirmaudience:/code_challengeis genuinely nowhere nearby, not just matched by a lucky string position - SARIF 2.1.0 output — CI/CD integration (GitHub Code Scanning, etc.)
- Config file support via
guardbee.yml - 18 unit tests — a positive and a negative (false-positive) scenario for every pattern, plus one fully-correct OAuth flow that produces zero findings. Found and fixed a real regex bug during development (a trailing
\bafter a]character that can never match, since]isn't a word character — silently missed the bracket-notation form of header access). End-to-end verified against a fixture with all 6 anti-patterns deliberately planted (caught all 6), and against the entire guardbee-mcp monorepo (401 files — zero findings in any real third-party code; the only non-test matches were the scanner's own pattern-definition source textually containing the stringjwt.verify(inside a regex literal and a doc comment, not actual vulnerable usage)
Quick Start
Claude Desktop / MCP Client
{
"mcpServers": { "guardbee-oauth-auditor": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor"] } } }
CLI (CI/CD)
npx @guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor scan ./src --fail-on=high --format=sarif > results.sarif
MCP Tools
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
scan_text | Scans a code snippet |
scan_file | Scans a single file |
scan_directory | Recursively scans a directory |
list_patterns | Lists all supported patterns by category |
Detected Patterns
| Category | Pattern | Severity | OWASP |
|---|---|---|---|
| token-passthrough | token_passthrough_to_downstream | critical | MCP07 |
| token-validation | missing_audience_validation | high | MCP07 |
| discovery-ssrf | oauth_discovery_ssrf | critical | MCP07 |
| pkce | missing_pkce_on_auth_request | high | MCP07 |
| redirect-validation | loose_redirect_uri_validation | high | MCP07 |
| secrets-exposure | hardcoded_oauth_client_secret | high | MCP07 |
| state-handle | predictable_state_handle (+ Python) — state / session handle from Math.random, Date.now, a counter | high | MCP07 |
| state-handle | state_handle_not_bound_to_user — a handle from a tool argument looked up with no check that it is the caller's | medium | MCP07 |
| mix-up | missing_iss_validation — authorization code redeemed without checking iss (RFC 9207) | medium | MCP07 |
| auth-url | auth_url_scheme_not_validated — a server-provided URL opened with no scheme check (javascript:, data:, file:) | high | MCP07 |
| auth-url | auth_url_opened_via_shell — URL interpolated into open / xdg-open / start through a shell | critical | MCP05 |
| local-exposure | local_http_server_unauthenticated — HTTP MCP transport with no authentication | high | MCP07 |
| local-exposure | missing_host_origin_check — no Host / Origin validation (DNS rebinding) | medium | MCP07 |
| local-exposure | listen_all_interfaces — MCP server bound to 0.0.0.0 | medium | MCP07 |
Python and Go
The language comes from the file extension, and Python- and Go-specific rules run only on their own files.
- Python (FastAPI / Starlette / Flask, PyJWT, python-jose, authlib):
python_missing_audience_validation(jwt.decodewith noaudience=and no authlibclaims_optionsaud),python_audience_verification_disabled("verify_aud": False),python_token_passthrough_to_downstream(theAuthorizationheader or all ofrequest.headerson arequests/httpx/ client call),missing_pkce_on_auth_requeston authlibcreate_authorization_url/authorize_redirectwith nocode_challenge, and the discovery SSRF, redirect, state and0.0.0.0rules. - Go (golang-jwt / jwx, go-oidc, golang.org/x/oauth2, go-sdk and mcp-go HTTP transports):
go_missing_audience_validation(jwt.Parsewith nojwt.WithAudience),go_oidc_client_id_check_skipped,go_token_passthrough_to_downstream(out.Header.Set("Authorization", r.Header.Get("Authorization"))),go_hardcoded_oauth_client_secret,go_loose_redirect_uri_validation(strings.HasPrefix),go_predictable_state_handle(math/rand, time),go_oauth_discovery_ssrf,go_auth_url_opened_via_shell,missing_pkce_on_auth_requestonAuthCodeURLwith noS256ChallengeOption, andListenAndServe(":8080")aslisten_all_interfaces. - Both:
token_passthrough_via_variable— the incomingAuthorizationheader read into a variable that is then put on an outgoing request.
Every finding links its section of the MCP spec Security Best Practices (SARIF helpUri) and carries its OWASP MCP Top 10 id as a SARIF tag. The newer rules are heuristics over one file at a time: a check done in another module (an auth middleware, an iss comparison in a helper) is not seen.
Live probe
npx @guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor probe http://127.0.0.1:3000/mcp
Read-only checks of a running HTTP MCP endpoint: does it answer an initialize without credentials (probe_unauthenticated_access), and does it accept a foreign Host (probe_dns_rebinding_host_accepted) or Origin (probe_foreign_origin_accepted)? It sends no credentials, calls nothing beyond initialize, closes any session it opened, and refuses a host that resolves to a public address unless --allow-public. CLI only: an agent cannot start it through the MCP tools.
Configuration (guardbee.yml)
oauth-auditor:
fail-on: high # any | critical | high | medium | none max-files: 5000 exclude:
- ".test.ts"
Limitations (by design)
- TypeScript/JavaScript, Python and Go. Each has rules for its common libraries (above). Other languages (Rust, Java, C#, …) and other libraries are only matched where they happen to share a shape with these, e.g. a literal
client_secretorresponse_type=code. - Heuristic, not a full OAuth conformance test. This finds specific anti-patterns in source, not a live protocol conformance check against a running authorization server. It won't catch every way an OAuth flow can be misimplemented — only the handful the MCP spec calls out as the highest-stakes ones.
- The absence-based checks (audience, PKCE) use a bounded text window, not a real parser — a
jwt.verify()call whose options object happens to be built far away from the call site (a variable passed in, rather than an inline object) won't be checked foraudiencecorrectly.
Development
npm run build
npm test
License
MIT — GuardBee
Feedback
Questions, ideas, or a false positive? Start a thread in GitHub Discussions or open an issue. If GuardBee is useful to you, a ⭐ on the repository helps others find it.