原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Aegis — AI Agent Governance

作者:Acacian版本 0.1.7i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.Acacian/aegis

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Policy-based governance for AI agent tool calls. YAML policy, approval gates, audit logging.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 其他

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aegis": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agent-aegis"
      ],
      "env": {
        "AEGIS_POLICY_PATH": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add aegis --env AEGIS_POLICY_PATH=your-value -- uvx agent-aegis

运行前请先填写空着的值。

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aegis": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agent-aegis"
      ],
      "env": {
        "AEGIS_POLICY_PATH": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "aegis": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agent-aegis"
      ],
      "env": {
        "AEGIS_POLICY_PATH": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

需要你填写的值

  • AEGIS_POLICY_PATH env
    Path to YAML policy file

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 Acacian 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32708 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32708 个服务器的 4% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32708 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Aegis — AI Agent Governance 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.7)于8个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, OpenTakeoff

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211前天更新
安装

OpenTakeoff

作者:Kentucky-ai

Construction takeoff for AI agents: load plans, set scale, measure, count, export with provenance.

在你的电脑上运行今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

Agent-Aegis

The governance layer for AI agents. One API, 12 frameworks, every governance primitive.

Aegis is to agent governance what Redis is to data structures — one runtime that unifies prompt-injection blocking, PII masking, policy enforcement, trust delegation, and tamper-evident audit across every agent framework. No code changes.

pip install agent-aegis → aegis.auto_instrument() → 12 frameworks are now governed.

What is Aegis • Primitives • Frameworks • Use Cases • 30-Second Start • Research • Docs • Playground

English • 한국어



What is Aegis

Every AI agent framework reinvents the same governance primitives — and each one does it slightly differently. Aegis is the abstraction layer that unifies them.

LayerWhat it doesExamples
1. PrimitivesA universal contract for every tool callAction, ActionClaim, Policy, Result, DelegationChain, AuditEvent
2. AdaptersAuto-instrument any framework through its own hooksLangChain callbacks, CrewAI BeforeToolCallHook, OpenAI Agents tracing, Google ADK BasePlugin, MCP transport, DSPy modules, httpx middleware, Playwright context
3. GovernanceDeclarative primitives you compose into policyPrompt injection / PII / leak / toxicity guardrails, RBAC, rate limit, cost budget, drift detection, anomaly scoring, trust delegation, justification gap, selection audit, Merkle audit chain
4. LifecycleOne runtime, every stage of agent opsScan → Instrument → Policy CI/CD → Runtime → Proxy → Audit
import aegis

aegis.auto_instrument() # 12 frameworks governed. No other code changes.

You don't write a LangChain guardrail and a CrewAI guardrail and an OpenAI guardrail — you write one Policy and every framework inherits it.

How this differs from the guardrail libraries

They solve a different problem, and mostly a text-shaped one. Guardrails AI validates model output against a hub of validators; NeMo Guardrails scripts conversational and tool policy in the Colang DSL; Snyk Agent Scan — Invariant Labs' mcp-scan, since the Snyk acquisition — scans MCP servers and agent skills for known risk patterns and can proxy them at runtime; LLM Guard chained input/output scanners until it was archived in July 2026. Each one you wire in yourself, at a call site you choose. Aegis starts from the other end: auto_instrument() finds the frameworks already installed and instruments them in place, so one Policy covers all of them without a line of agent code changing. What it enforces is agent-shaped rather than prompt-shaped — delegation chains under a monotone trust constraint, audits of what an agent *excluded* rather than what it picked, the distance between an agent's declared intent and its measured impact, and a tamper-evident audit chain. All of it is deterministic, so there is no second model sitting in the request path. These are not exclusive choices: a semantic or model-based detector drops into GuardrailEngine.add() alongside the built-ins.


Primitives

The contract every adapter maps into. Framework-agnostic by design.

PrimitivePurposeModule
`Action`Unified representation of any tool / LLM / HTTP / MCP call across all frameworksaegis.core.action
`ActionClaim`Tripartite structure — Declared (agent-authored) / Assessed (Aegis-computed) / Chain (delegation)aegis.core.action_claim
`Policy`Declarative YAML rules: match → risk → approval (auto / approve / block)aegis.core.policy
`ClaimPolicy`Policy layer that evaluates 6-dimensional impact vectors, not just tool namesaegis.core.claim_policy
`Guardrails`Deterministic regex checks for injection, PII, prompt leak, toxicity — 2.65ms cold / <1µs warmaegis.guardrails
`DelegationChain`Multi-agent hand-off tracking with monotone trust constraint (non-increasing)aegis.core.agent_identity
`AuditEvent`Tamper-evident append-only log, Merkle-chained, SQLite + JSONL + webhook sinksaegis.core.merkle_audit
`SelectionAudit`Audits what an agent *excludes*, not just what it picks — detects cosmetic alignmentaegis.core.selection_audit
`JustificationGap`6D asymmetric scoring: agents declare impact, Aegis independently assesses, gap triggers escalationaegis.core.justification_gap
`CryptoAuditChain`Ed25519-signed chain for long-term compliance evidenceaegis.core.crypto_audit

Every governance feature in Aegis — anomaly detection, cost budgets, drift, cascade guards, kill switches — is a composition of these primitives. Read the Concepts guide to see how they fit together.


Frameworks

One API. 12 agent frameworks + 3 protocol-level adapters.

FrameworkHookIntegration
Google ADKBasePlugin lifecycle (tool calls, agent routing, sessions)Native — the patch only installs the plugin
CrewAIglobal BeforeToolCallHook, Crew.kickoff/kickoff_asyncHybrid — native hook for tool calls, patch for crew entry
Pydantic AIAbstractCapability · Agent.run/run_syncNative (opt-in) · Patch (auto)
OpenAI Agents SDKtool_input_guardrail/tool_output_guardrail · Runner.run/run_syncNative (opt-in) · Patch (auto)
LangChainBaseChatModel.invoke/ainvoke, BaseTool.invoke/ainvokePatch
OpenAI APICompletions.create (chat & completions)Patch
Anthropic APIMessages.createPatch
LiteLLMcompletion, acompletionPatch
Google GenAIModels.generate_content (new + legacy)Patch
LlamaIndexLLM.chat/achat/complete/acomplete on every concrete subclass, BaseQueryEngine.query/aqueryPatch
InstructorInstructor.create, AsyncInstructor.createPatch
DSPyModule.__call__, LM.forward/aforwardPatch
MCPTransport-layer proxy for any MCP server (stdio / HTTP)Proxy — no patching
httpxHttpxExecutor for raw HTTP egress (REST agents, webhooks)Wrapper — no patching
PlaywrightPlaywrightExecutor for browsing agentsWrapper — no patching

auto_instrument() detects what's installed and patches only those — no hard dependencies. Custom adapters use the same BaseAdapter interface. Every adapter above is exercised against the current upstream release daily by the integration workflow, which drives each framework's real entrypoint and asserts a guardrail fires — the unit suite fakes these frameworks, so it cannot see upstream drift on its own.

Integration policy. Native extension points win wherever one exists that can actually *block* — Google ADK's BasePlugin and CrewAI's BeforeToolCallHook both do, and there auto_instrument() patches only enough to install the native object. Pydantic AI and the OpenAI Agents SDK ship native implementations you opt into (AbstractCapability, tool_input_guardrail) alongside a patch-based path for the zero-code case. Everything else is patched because no blocking hook exists: the raw OpenAI/Anthropic SDKs and DSPy expose none, and LlamaIndex's instrumentation dispatcher emits events but swallows handler exceptions, so it can observe and not enforce.

The Pydantic AI integration is the reason this policy is written down. It was monkey-patched until core maintainer DouweM reviewed it — *"It doesn't look like those features are actually exposed as Pydantic AI capabilities?"* — and was rebuilt on the native extension API in response (src/aegis/contrib/pydantic_ai.py; the review is pydantic-ai#4888).

Patching is the fallback, not the preference — it is the part most exposed to upstream change, which is why the integration workflow exists.

Default Guardrails
GuardrailDefaultWhat it catches
Prompt injectionBlock13 attack categories, 109 patterns, 9 languages (EN/KO/ZH/JA/ES/DE/FR/TH/VI)
PII detectionWarn13 categories (email, credit card, SSN, IBAN, API keys, etc.)
Prompt leakWarnSystem prompt extraction attempts
ToxicityWarnHarmful, violent, or abusive content
MCP STDIO injectionBlockJSON-RPC injection, frame concatenation, unicode escape bypass (OX Security advisory)

Deterministic regex — no LLM calls, no network. 2.65ms cold / <1µs warm per check.


Use Cases

The same primitives, five different entry points. Pick whichever matches your workflow.

1. Runtime protection (most common)

One line. Any framework.

import aegis

aegis.auto_instrument()

Or zero code changes — AEGIS_INSTRUMENT=1 python my_agent.py. Injection blocking, PII masking, prompt-leak warnings, audit trail, and policy enforcement become active for every LangChain / CrewAI / OpenAI / Anthropic / LiteLLM / ADK / DSPy / LlamaIndex / Pydantic AI call.

Pydantic AI native capability — no monkey-patching, explicit per-agent control:

from pydantic_ai import Agent

from aegis.contrib.pydantic_ai import AegisCapability

agent = Agent( "openai:gpt-4o-mini", capabilities=[AegisCapability.default()], # injection, PII, toxicity, prompt-leak, hallucination ) result = await agent.run("What is AI governance?")

[Full Pydantic AI integration guide →](https://acacian.github.io/aegis/cookbook/pydantic-ai

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx