原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

AppSec Toolbox MCP

作者:ai-ronin-systems版本 0.3.0i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Passive AppSec scanners as eight parameterless MCP tools; the audited repository is data.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 开发者工具

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

你需要

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "appsec-toolbox": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "-e",
        "APPSEC_LANGS",
        "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
      ],
      "env": {
        "APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add appsec-toolbox --env APPSEC_LANGS=your-value -- docker run -i --rm -e APPSEC_LANGS ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0

运行前请先填写空着的值。

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "appsec-toolbox": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "-e",
        "APPSEC_LANGS",
        "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
      ],
      "env": {
        "APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "appsec-toolbox": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "-e",
        "APPSEC_LANGS",
        "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"
      ],
      "env": {
        "APPSEC_LANGS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

需要你填写的值

  • APPSEC_LANGS env
    Language profiles: auto, none, or a list such as python,node

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月9日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 ai-ronin-systems 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“开发者工具”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 5568 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 5568 个服务器的 64% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 5568 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

AppSec Toolbox MCP 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.3.0)于14天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Docker。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

GitHub

Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.

作者:github广泛使用★ 3.4万5天前更新

电脑或云端

Desktop Commander

MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management

作者:wonderwhy-er广泛使用↓ 71万/周★ 1万18天前更新

在你的电脑上运行

Cloudflare MCP

Cloudflare MCP servers

作者:cloudflare广泛使用★ 444614个月前更新

在云端运行✓ mcp.cloudflare.com

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

appsec-toolbox-mcp

Let an AI agent audit code you do not trust, without giving it a shell, a path to choose, or the repository's code to run.

Ten pinned security scanners behind eight parameterless MCP tools, in one hardened container. The audited repository is treated as the attacker. The agent only ever collects evidence.

*Recorded from examples/agent_demo.py against examples/vulnerable-sample. Waiting time is shortened; the real scan time is in the last line.*

In 30 seconds

  • What it is. Semgrep, Gitleaks, OSV-Scanner, Trivy, Checkov, Syft, and language specialists (Bandit, FindSecBugs, njsscan, gosec) exposed to any MCP client as fixed capabilities: security.sast, security.secrets, security.dependencies, and so on.
  • The threat model. The repository under audit is hostile: it controls every file the scanners parse and every string the agent reads back. So the agent gets nothing to steer: no arguments, no target path, no shell, no way to run the repository's build or code.
  • What you get. Native scanner reports, a run manifest that ties each report's SHA-256 to a recomputable fingerprint of the scanned tree, and an audit log of every tool call.

Engineering highlights

Each claim links to the code or test that proves it.

ProblemApproachProof
A prompt-injected agent with a shell can do anything.The agent's whole surface is eight parameterless tasks, governed by Makefile MCP. Maintenance targets exist but are refused..makefile-mcp.yaml, the demo
Scanning untrusted code usually runs it: setup.py, postinstall, Gradle plugins, Go toolchain downloads, scanner plug-ins.Strictly passive analysis: no build, install, or dependency resolution; Go runs with GOPROXY=off and GOTOOLCHAIN=local. An adversarial review found that a planted .checkov.yaml could make Checkov import the repository's Python; that path is closed and regression-tested.examples/hostile-sample, tests/image.sh
A hostile repository can silence its own findings with .semgrepignore, .gitleaksignore, # nosec, # nosemgrep...Every scanner runs on toolbox-owned configuration. Inline suppressions are disabled where the scanner allows it, and every marker found is inventoried for the reviewer either way.settings table, output/suppressions.json
Evidence is only worth something if it is tied to what was scanned.The manifest fingerprints the tree exactly like `find . -type f -print0 \LC_ALL=C sort -z \xargs -0 sha256sum \sha256sum, including file names that are not UTF-8 or that sha256sum` escapes, and records each report's digest, tool versions, and data sources.scripts/write-manifest.py, tests/unit/test_manifest.py
One malformed file should not let the target stop the audit.Input a scanner cannot read because of the target (an unloadable Go package, a corrupt lockfile) becomes a recorded coverage limit: not a failed bundle, and not a fake clean result.scripts/run-language-profiles.py, scripts/run-osv.sh
Results should be reproducible, and a compromised scanner should have nowhere to send the code.Offline mode: fetch rule and advisory data once, then scan under --network none. The manifest records the data's age and digest.Offline mode
A security tool is a supply-chain target.Every downloaded binary is checked against its published SHA-256 per architecture; the base image is pinned by digest; Actions are pinned by commit; release jobs that run project code hold no write token; images carry signed build provenance.Dockerfile, release.yml

Verification in layers. Unit tests cover the scripts. A smoke test drives the Makefile through Makefile MCP with fake scanners whose stubs fail if any hardening flag is missing. The image test runs the real scanners against a known-vulnerable sample, a hostile sample that tries every attack above, and offline mode, under the documented resource limits. Independent adversarial reviews attacked the image; every confirmed finding was fixed with a regression test, and what remains is written down in the threat model.

Quick start

IMAGE=ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0

docker pull "$IMAGE" gh attestation verify "oci://$IMAGE" --owner ai-ronin-systems

Offline mode, the resource limits, and the target-settings hardening are on main and ship in the next release. To use them now: docker build -t appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev . and IMAGE=appsec-toolbox-mcp:dev.

Run it as an MCP stdio server against one repository:

docker run --rm -i \

--read-only --cap-drop=ALL --security-opt=no-new-privileges:true \ --tmpfs /tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g --memory=6g --pids-limit=512 \ --user "$(id -u):$(id -g)" \ -v "$PWD/my-project:/runner/target:ro" \ -v "$PWD/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw" \ "$IMAGE"

Register the same command as a stdio server in any MCP client:

{

"mcpServers": { "appsec-toolbox": { "command": "docker", "args": ["run", "--rm", "-i", "--read-only", "--cap-drop=ALL", "--security-opt=no-new-privileges:true", "--tmpfs", "/tmp:rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3g", "--memory=6g", "--pids-limit=512", "-v", "/abs/path/my-project:/runner/target:ro", "-v", "/abs/path/appsec-output:/runner/output:rw", "ghcr.io/ai-ronin-systems/appsec-toolbox-mcp:0.3.0"] } } }

Compose, offline mode, language selection, and every evidence file are in Usage.

How it works

untrusted repository (read-only)

| v /runner/target | v trusted Makefile + Makefile MCP | | | | | | Semgrep Gitleaks OSV Trivy Checkov Syft | +---- language profile selection ----+ | | | | Bandit FindSecBugs njsscan gosec Python Java Node/JS Go | v /runner/output reports, run-manifest.json, suppressions.json, audit log

The operator mounts exactly one repository at /runner/target and one writable directory at /runner/output. The audited path is never an MCP parameter, so the agent has no host-path capability. A trusted Makefile holds every scanner command; Makefile MCP decides which of its targets the agent may call. Language specialists are picked by detection (APPSEC_LANGS=auto) or by the operator, never by the agent.

CapabilityToolEvidence
security.auditeverything belowcomplete bundle
security.sastSemgrep + suppression inventorysemgrep.json, suppressions.json
security.secretsGitleaksgitleaks.json
security.dependenciesOSV-Scannerosv.json
security.repositoryTrivytrivy.json
security.iacCheckovcheckov.json
security.languageBandit, FindSecBugs, njsscan, gosec as applicablelanguage-profile.json + reports
supply_chain.sbomSyftsbom.cdx.json (CycloneDX)

Threat model

The audited repository is the attacker, and the agent reading its reports may be steered by it. Read the [threat model](docs/threat-model.md): attacker goals, sixteen threats with their controls and residual risks, what is and is not guaranteed, and an operator checklist.

ProtectedNot protected
Target builds, installs, hooks, and Makefiles never run.Scanner parser bugs; the container is the boundary.
Target-owned scanner settings files cannot suppress findings or load code.Inline trivy:ignore and njsscan-ignore comments; Checkov lists its inline skips as skipped_checks. All are inventoried.
The agent cannot pick the target or run anything but the eight scans.An agent that misreports what the reports say.
No credentials in the container; read-only, unprivileged, non-root, resource-capped.Exfiltration by a compromised scanner in online mode. Offline mode runs with no network.
Each run's manifest ties report digests to a fingerprint of the scanned tree.Tampering by anyone who can write output/; the manifest is not signed.

Design choices

  • Evidence, not verdicts. Reports stay in each scanner's native format. The toolbox never grades, deduplicates, or normalizes findings; a consumer does that with the full evidence.
  • One closed set of scanners. Four language profiles, no plug-in framework, no user-defined pipelines. Generic SCA stays with OSV and Trivy; specialists add a different analysis engine, not a duplicate one.
  • Coverage gaps are recorded, never papered over. A source-only Java project gets no FindSecBugs pass, because the toolbox will not compile untrusted code; the manifest says so.
  • Everything pinned. Scanner versions are pinned and updated one at a time against known-positive and hostile fixtures (update policy).

It is not an autonomous auditor, an LLM agent, a DAST engine, a credential manager, a report normalizer, or a shell server.

Part of a larger system

appsec-audit-hound (planned)    decides why to scan, correlates evidence, writes findings

| MCP appsec-toolbox-mcp collects governed, passive evidence <- this repository | built on makefile-mcp exposes trusted Make targets to agents, deny-by-default

Makefile MCP is published on PyPI and the official MCP Registry, with its own threat model.

Documentation

DocumentWhat it covers
Threat modelAttacker goals, threats and controls, guarantees, limits, operator checklist
UsageRunning, tools and evidence files, language profiles, offline mode, scanner behaviour, network use, versions, development
ArchitectureTrust boundary, ownership, design rules
ToolingPinned versions, settings each scanner ignores, update policy
Security policySupported versions and private vulnerability reporting
ChangelogReleased and unreleased changes
ContributingHow to add a scanner without widening the boundary

Development

pipx install pytest==8.4.2 && pipx install ruff==0.14.0

make test # ruff, unit tests, smoke test make image make test-image # the real image: known positives, hostile sample, offline mode

More in Usage.

License

Apache-2.0.

问 PopNx