原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Aio

作者:AI-Integrity版本 0.2.0i★ –i在云端运行
注册名称org.aioq/aio

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

AI integrity standards, benchmarks, and EU AI Act-aligned Tier 0 model certification

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

你需要

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

适用于网页版、桌面版和手机版 Claude:

  1. 打开 Settings → Connectors
  2. 点击 Add custom connector
  3. 粘贴下面的地址,然后点击 Add
  4. 如果要求登录,请登录作者的服务
SettingsConnectors1+ Add2https://…3
https://aioq.org/mcp

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add --transport http aio https://aioq.org/mcp

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aio": {
      "url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "aio": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器:

  1. 打开网页版 ChatGPT → Settings → Connectors (Apps)
  2. 点击 Create 或 Add(部分套餐需要先在 Advanced 中开启 Developer mode)
  3. 粘贴下面的地址,起个名字,然后保存
  4. 如果要求登录,请登录作者的服务
SettingsConnectors1+ Create2https://…3
https://aioq.org/mcp

菜单名称可能因套餐和版本不同而略有差异。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

我们还没有读取这个服务器的工具列表;我们会轮流检查各个端点。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ! 注意

    作者与仓库一致

    发布者(aioq.org)不是仓库所有者(AI-Integrity);可能是其他人代为上架的

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    端点有响应

    尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点

  • … 尚未检查

    使用 OAuth 登录

    尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    尚未检查;我们会在检查端点时读取工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32537 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32537 个服务器的 23% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32537 个服务器的 32%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Aio 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 0 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.2.0)于3个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,所以接受远程 MCP 服务器的应用也可以使用,例如开启开发者模式的 ChatGPT。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, TF Rooms

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211昨天更新
安装

TF Rooms

作者:tfrooms.com

Live room availability, rates and stay quotes for 12 New Leaf motels in Twin Falls, Idaho.

在云端运行今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

aio-standards

Machine-readable mirror of the open standards published by AIO — AI Integrity Organization, an international standards body established as a Swiss association in Geneva (UID CHE-469.997.903).

Everything here is also served live from https://aioq.org. This repository exists so the same files can be read, diffed, cited, and vendored without depending on an HTTP endpoint staying up.

License: [CC BY 4.0](LICENSE). Attribution string: AIO — AI Integrity Organization, https://aioq.org, CC BY 4.0


What AIO measures

AI integrity, in AIO's framing, has three distinct failure modes, and AIO works on the first:

  1. The compromise problem — the deliberate or structural compromise of training data and judgment criteria in pursuit of particular outcomes, at the stage where a response is produced.
  2. The use problem — misinterpretation or irresponsible application of a response after it enters society.
  3. The error problem — the system failing to work as intended.

The AIO Framework encodes one judgment as one line:

C:MED/IXi | V:Bec<Sda | E:Exp<Gui | S:Usr<Pro

Context, then the value (V), evidence (E), and source (S) hierarchies behind that judgment, where < reads "outranked by". No user content is carried — the line records *why*, not *what*.


Contents

PathWhat it is
vocabulary/aio-00011.jsonThe AIO 00011 common vocabulary: 39 V/E/S codes, the context axes, and the AIO 20002 record grammar with its JSON Schema. Snapshot of GET https://aioq.org/api/framework/vocabulary.
standards-packs/*.json (×15 + EU)Waves 1-3 formalization drafts (draft-unverified — single-pass seed, dual verification pending): NIST AI RMF, the Korean AI Framework Act (current consolidation 법률 제21311호), the CoE Framework Convention (not yet in force — EU sole ratification), the China Generative AI Interim Measures, the EU GPAI Code of Practice, the OECD AI Principles (2024 consolidation), California TFAIA (SB 53), the China AI-content labeling Measures, the G7 Hiroshima Code of Conduct, and the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI (license-constrained: short-quote footprint only). Each entry carries verbatim, machine-checked provenance quotes.
standards-packs/eu-ai-act-v0.2.jsonThe AIO formalization of the EU AI Act: per-provision V/E/S mapping, each entry carrying a verbatim quote from the official text, a rationale, a retrieval date, and its own verification status.
standards-packs/schema.jsonJSON Schema for a standards pack. A new norm is a data file, not code.
standards-packs/FORMALIZATION_METHODOLOGY.mdHow a legal text becomes a pack, and what the status ladder means.
item-banks/eu-ai-act.public.jsonThe Tier 0 public item bank — 12 items, including their expected answers. See the note below; this is deliberate.
item-banks/agent-track-v0.public.jsonThe agent-submitted benchmark track item bank v0.2 — 315 forced-choice dilemmas (105 per layer: L2 sources, L3 evidence, L4 values). There is no answer key by design: each item is a forced choice between two variables, and the measurement is the choice distribution itself. The review block records the six-round quality review that produced v0.2; one item carries an explicit reviewNote.
item-banks/eu-ai-act.gateb-commitment.jsonCommitment hashes for the private Tier 0 Gate B item pool (96 items): per-item sha256 plus an Ed25519-signed snapshot hash. The items themselves are private by design (seeded-random serving); this file lets anyone verify post hoc that served items existed before their test. Retired items are disclosed at /content/bench-items/eu-ai-act.gateb-retired.json on aioq.org as the pool rotates.
verify/verify-certificate.mjsStandalone Ed25519 verifier for an issued certificate. No npm dependencies.
Why the item bank ships with its answer key

Tier 0 is self-assessment on a fully public item set. Publishing the expected hierarchies is not a leak — it is the design. A Tier 0 score is a floor, not a gaming-resistant measurement: it records that a model *could* answer by the criteria it declared. Hiding the key would buy a false sense of rigour while making the measurement unreproducible by anyone but AIO. Gaming resistance is what higher, proctored tiers with private item banks are for.

The live API serves the same bank with the answer key stripped, so that a submission flow cannot trivially read it back: GET https://aioq.org/api/eval/items?pack=eu-ai-act.

What "formalization" means, and what it does not

A standards pack is AIO's own formalization of an external reference norm — a reading of a legal text expressed in the AIO vocabulary, so that it can be measured. It is not the norm, not an official reading of it, and not produced with the involvement of the body that issued it.

Every pack carries a status on a fixed ladder:

draft-unverified → draft-verified → rfc → active

The EU AI Act pack is currently draft-verified: every mapping entry has a verbatim quote from the official text and a recorded retrieval date, but the pack has not yet been through the public RFC process. Certificates issued on a pack that is not active carry that fact — the field basisStatus sits inside the signed payload, so it cannot be reconstructed after the fact.


Verifying a certificate

Certificates issued by AIO are signed with Ed25519. The public key is published at https://aioq.org/.well-known/aio-cert-key.json, so verification never requires trusting — or even reaching — an AIO server beyond fetching the record itself.

node verify/verify-certificate.mjs AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX

node verify/verify-certificate.mjs AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX --json node verify/verify-certificate.mjs --file ./saved-response.json --key ./pinned-key.json

Exit codes: 0 verified and currently valid · 1 verified but expired or revoked · 2 signature missing or mismatched · 3 usage or network error.

The one rule that matters: take verification.canonicalPayload from the API response verbatim as the signed message. Do not re-serialize it. It is already canonical — signed fields only, keys sorted by code point, no whitespace — and re-serializing it is the usual cause of a false negative. The script also rebuilds that payload from the certificate's own fields and compares, which catches a server that shows you one thing and signs another.

A verified signature proves only that AIO issued that exact record. It says nothing about whether the model is safe to deploy.


Live endpoints

No authentication, CORS open, JSON, all CC BY 4.0.

Endpoint
https://aioq.org/api/openapi.jsonOpenAPI 3.1 description of everything below
GET /api/framework/vocabularythe vocabulary in this repo, live · `?layer=V\E\S · ?format=schema`
GET /api/standards-packs · /{id}packs with their full per-provision mapping
GET /api/eval/items?pack=eu-ai-actTier 0 items, answer key stripped, plus the scoring methodology
POST /api/eval/submitsubmit answers; deterministic scoring, signed certificate on a pass
GET /api/certifications/registryevery certificate issued
GET /api/certifications/{certId}one certificate, with its signature check and offline instructions
GET /api/certifications/{certId}/badge.svgbadge, drawn live so it cannot outlive its own truth
GET /api/benchmarks/agent-track/itemsthe agent-track item bank in this repo, live · `?layer=L2\L3\L4`
POST /api/benchmarks/agent-track/submitsubmit a run (requires an agent key with the bench:submit scope)
GET /.well-known/aio-cert-key.jsonEd25519 public keys
GET /.well-known/mcp/server.jsonMCP server metadata

MCP server — https://aioq.org/mcp, Streamable HTTP, protocol 2025-06-18, stateless, no auth.

{ "mcpServers": { "aio": { "type": "http", "url": "https://aioq.org/mcp" } } }

13 tools: search_atlas, list_papers, get_paper, get_benchmark_distribution, get_framework_vocabulary, list_standards_packs, get_standards_pack, register_for_certification, get_eval_items, submit_eval, verify_certification, get_bench_items, submit_bench_run.

Index for crawlers and agents: https://aioq.org/llms.txt


Related repositories

Repository
AI-Integrity/AIO20002The full specification of AIO 20002, the reasoning record standard — prose spec, examples, tests. The machine-readable grammar in vocabulary/aio-00011.json here implements it.
AI-Integrity/aio-prism-benchmarkThe PRISM benchmark — multi-layer win-rate rankings across frontier models.

Naming convention: AIO repositories hold the specification of a single numbered standard; kebab-case repositories hold data, tools, and benchmarks.


Corrections

Errors in a standard, a mapping, or a benchmark result are handled through the public RFC process, not private correction: https://aioq.org/en/rfc. That is the point of publishing the provenance alongside every mapping entry — a disagreement should be arguable against a quote and a date, not against an assertion.

Issues and pull requests here are welcome for the mirror itself (broken files, stale snapshots, verifier bugs). Substantive changes to a standard go through the RFC process.


Legal note

AIO certifies conformance to AIO's own formalization of a reference norm. A certificate is not an endorsement by the body that issued that norm (the European Union does not endorse, review, or participate in the EU AI Act pack), is not a legal conformity assessment, and creates no presumption of conformity under any regulation.

Contact: info@aioq.org · Site: https://aioq.org

问 PopNx