Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
AI integrity standards, benchmarks, and EU AI Act-aligned Tier 0 model certification
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
适用于网页版、桌面版和手机版 Claude:
https://aioq.org/mcp在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add --transport http aio https://aioq.org/mcp粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"aio": {
"url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"aio": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://aioq.org/mcp"
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器:
https://aioq.org/mcp菜单名称可能因套餐和版本不同而略有差异。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
我们还没有读取这个服务器的工具列表;我们会轮流检查各个端点。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
发布者(aioq.org)不是仓库所有者(AI-Integrity);可能是其他人代为上架的
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点
尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点
尚未检查;我们会在检查端点时读取工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 0 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.2.0)于3个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,所以接受远程 MCP 服务器的应用也可以使用,例如开启开发者模式的 ChatGPT。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, TF Rooms
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Live room availability, rates and stay quotes for 12 New Leaf motels in Twin Falls, Idaho.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Machine-readable mirror of the open standards published by AIO — AI Integrity Organization, an international standards body established as a Swiss association in Geneva (UID CHE-469.997.903).
Everything here is also served live from https://aioq.org. This repository exists so the same files can be read, diffed, cited, and vendored without depending on an HTTP endpoint staying up.
License: [CC BY 4.0](LICENSE). Attribution string: AIO — AI Integrity Organization, https://aioq.org, CC BY 4.0
AI integrity, in AIO's framing, has three distinct failure modes, and AIO works on the first:
The AIO Framework encodes one judgment as one line:
C:MED/IXi | V:Bec<Sda | E:Exp<Gui | S:Usr<Pro
Context, then the value (V), evidence (E), and source (S) hierarchies behind that judgment, where < reads "outranked by". No user content is carried — the line records *why*, not *what*.
| Path | What it is |
|---|---|
vocabulary/aio-00011.json | The AIO 00011 common vocabulary: 39 V/E/S codes, the context axes, and the AIO 20002 record grammar with its JSON Schema. Snapshot of GET https://aioq.org/api/framework/vocabulary. |
standards-packs/*.json (×15 + EU) | Waves 1-3 formalization drafts (draft-unverified — single-pass seed, dual verification pending): NIST AI RMF, the Korean AI Framework Act (current consolidation 법률 제21311호), the CoE Framework Convention (not yet in force — EU sole ratification), the China Generative AI Interim Measures, the EU GPAI Code of Practice, the OECD AI Principles (2024 consolidation), California TFAIA (SB 53), the China AI-content labeling Measures, the G7 Hiroshima Code of Conduct, and the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI (license-constrained: short-quote footprint only). Each entry carries verbatim, machine-checked provenance quotes. |
standards-packs/eu-ai-act-v0.2.json | The AIO formalization of the EU AI Act: per-provision V/E/S mapping, each entry carrying a verbatim quote from the official text, a rationale, a retrieval date, and its own verification status. |
standards-packs/schema.json | JSON Schema for a standards pack. A new norm is a data file, not code. |
standards-packs/FORMALIZATION_METHODOLOGY.md | How a legal text becomes a pack, and what the status ladder means. |
item-banks/eu-ai-act.public.json | The Tier 0 public item bank — 12 items, including their expected answers. See the note below; this is deliberate. |
item-banks/agent-track-v0.public.json | The agent-submitted benchmark track item bank v0.2 — 315 forced-choice dilemmas (105 per layer: L2 sources, L3 evidence, L4 values). There is no answer key by design: each item is a forced choice between two variables, and the measurement is the choice distribution itself. The review block records the six-round quality review that produced v0.2; one item carries an explicit reviewNote. |
item-banks/eu-ai-act.gateb-commitment.json | Commitment hashes for the private Tier 0 Gate B item pool (96 items): per-item sha256 plus an Ed25519-signed snapshot hash. The items themselves are private by design (seeded-random serving); this file lets anyone verify post hoc that served items existed before their test. Retired items are disclosed at /content/bench-items/eu-ai-act.gateb-retired.json on aioq.org as the pool rotates. |
verify/verify-certificate.mjs | Standalone Ed25519 verifier for an issued certificate. No npm dependencies. |
Tier 0 is self-assessment on a fully public item set. Publishing the expected hierarchies is not a leak — it is the design. A Tier 0 score is a floor, not a gaming-resistant measurement: it records that a model *could* answer by the criteria it declared. Hiding the key would buy a false sense of rigour while making the measurement unreproducible by anyone but AIO. Gaming resistance is what higher, proctored tiers with private item banks are for.
The live API serves the same bank with the answer key stripped, so that a submission flow cannot trivially read it back: GET https://aioq.org/api/eval/items?pack=eu-ai-act.
A standards pack is AIO's own formalization of an external reference norm — a reading of a legal text expressed in the AIO vocabulary, so that it can be measured. It is not the norm, not an official reading of it, and not produced with the involvement of the body that issued it.
Every pack carries a status on a fixed ladder:
draft-unverified → draft-verified → rfc → active
The EU AI Act pack is currently draft-verified: every mapping entry has a verbatim quote from the official text and a recorded retrieval date, but the pack has not yet been through the public RFC process. Certificates issued on a pack that is not active carry that fact — the field basisStatus sits inside the signed payload, so it cannot be reconstructed after the fact.
Certificates issued by AIO are signed with Ed25519. The public key is published at https://aioq.org/.well-known/aio-cert-key.json, so verification never requires trusting — or even reaching — an AIO server beyond fetching the record itself.
node verify/verify-certificate.mjs AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX
node verify/verify-certificate.mjs AIO-C0-XXXXXXXX --json node verify/verify-certificate.mjs --file ./saved-response.json --key ./pinned-key.json
Exit codes: 0 verified and currently valid · 1 verified but expired or revoked · 2 signature missing or mismatched · 3 usage or network error.
The one rule that matters: take verification.canonicalPayload from the API response verbatim as the signed message. Do not re-serialize it. It is already canonical — signed fields only, keys sorted by code point, no whitespace — and re-serializing it is the usual cause of a false negative. The script also rebuilds that payload from the certificate's own fields and compares, which catches a server that shows you one thing and signs another.
A verified signature proves only that AIO issued that exact record. It says nothing about whether the model is safe to deploy.
No authentication, CORS open, JSON, all CC BY 4.0.
| Endpoint | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| https://aioq.org/api/openapi.json | OpenAPI 3.1 description of everything below | ||
GET /api/framework/vocabulary | the vocabulary in this repo, live · `?layer=V\ | E\ | S · ?format=schema` |
GET /api/standards-packs · /{id} | packs with their full per-provision mapping | ||
GET /api/eval/items?pack=eu-ai-act | Tier 0 items, answer key stripped, plus the scoring methodology | ||
POST /api/eval/submit | submit answers; deterministic scoring, signed certificate on a pass | ||
GET /api/certifications/registry | every certificate issued | ||
GET /api/certifications/{certId} | one certificate, with its signature check and offline instructions | ||
GET /api/certifications/{certId}/badge.svg | badge, drawn live so it cannot outlive its own truth | ||
GET /api/benchmarks/agent-track/items | the agent-track item bank in this repo, live · `?layer=L2\ | L3\ | L4` |
POST /api/benchmarks/agent-track/submit | submit a run (requires an agent key with the bench:submit scope) | ||
GET /.well-known/aio-cert-key.json | Ed25519 public keys | ||
GET /.well-known/mcp/server.json | MCP server metadata |
MCP server — https://aioq.org/mcp, Streamable HTTP, protocol 2025-06-18, stateless, no auth.
{ "mcpServers": { "aio": { "type": "http", "url": "https://aioq.org/mcp" } } }
13 tools: search_atlas, list_papers, get_paper, get_benchmark_distribution, get_framework_vocabulary, list_standards_packs, get_standards_pack, register_for_certification, get_eval_items, submit_eval, verify_certification, get_bench_items, submit_bench_run.
Index for crawlers and agents: https://aioq.org/llms.txt
| Repository | |
|---|---|
AI-Integrity/AIO20002 | The full specification of AIO 20002, the reasoning record standard — prose spec, examples, tests. The machine-readable grammar in vocabulary/aio-00011.json here implements it. |
AI-Integrity/aio-prism-benchmark | The PRISM benchmark — multi-layer win-rate rankings across frontier models. |
Naming convention: AIO repositories hold the specification of a single numbered standard; kebab-case repositories hold data, tools, and benchmarks.
Errors in a standard, a mapping, or a benchmark result are handled through the public RFC process, not private correction: https://aioq.org/en/rfc. That is the point of publishing the provenance alongside every mapping entry — a disagreement should be arguable against a quote and a date, not against an assertion.
Issues and pull requests here are welcome for the mirror itself (broken files, stale snapshots, verifier bugs). Substantive changes to a standard go through the RFC process.
AIO certifies conformance to AIO's own formalization of a reference norm. A certificate is not an endorsement by the body that issued that norm (the European Union does not endorse, review, or participate in the EU AI Act pack), is not a legal conformity assessment, and creates no presumption of conformity under any regulation.
Contact: info@aioq.org · Site: https://aioq.org