GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Architecture diagram with concurrency capacity and bottleneck estimates from any codebase.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"workflow-generator": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"workflow-generator-mcp"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add workflow-generator -- uvx workflow-generator-mcp粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"workflow-generator": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"workflow-generator-mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"workflow-generator": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"workflow-generator-mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 askuma 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.5.0)于11天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。
同一分类中有:GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
Cloudflare MCP servers
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Scan any project and generate WORKFLOW.html — a dark-mode visual system diagram showing every component, how they talk to each other, and where your throughput ceiling actually is.
Works with Python, Node.js, Go, Java, Rust, Ruby, and mixed projects. No external dependencies for the core scanner. Vendored and generated directories (node_modules, venv, site-packages, dist, …) are never scanned, and capacity figures are clearly labeled as static-analysis estimates.
[Live demo →](https://askuma.github.io/workflow-generator/) — generated from fastapi/full-stack-fastapi-template, unmodified.
*(real CLI output, unscripted — static screenshot if you'd rather not autoplay)*
Every generated page contains:
| Section | What you get |
|---|---|
| Stat row | Workers · Concurrent I/O ceiling · Semaphore limit · Rate limit · Practical throughput |
| Architecture diagram | Layered flow: external sources → gateway → API → queues → AI → storage |
| Data flow cards | Write path, read/query path, background jobs — inferred from what's detected |
| Concurrency table | Every layer: model · ceiling · limiting factor |
| Bottleneck analysis | Ranked CRITICAL → LOW with mitigation notes |
| Codebase dependency graph | Force-directed module/import graph — click a node to isolate its neighbors, hover for file details. Import-direction edges are clearly distinguished from real observed traffic (see below) |
| Guided tour | Spotlight walkthrough of every section, shown automatically the first time a report is opened; replay anytime with the ? button |
Every source file (Python, JS/TS, Go, Java, Rust, Ruby) becomes a node; every real import becomes an edge — resolved with a language-appropriate parser (Python's ast module, regex for JS/TS/Go/ Java/Rust/Ruby), not guessed. Files that match an already-detected component (an LLM call, a database client, a queue) get an edge to that component too, so you can see exactly which files talk to Redis, OpenAI, etc. Large repos (350+ files) are automatically aggregated into directory-level nodes so the graph stays readable; override with --graph-detail files or --graph-detail dirs.
Test files (tests/, test_*.py, conftest.py, *.spec.ts, *_test.go, …) get their own Test Graph section below the main one, showing which modules and services each test reaches. Fixtures and test doubles name every service they exercise, so keeping them in the main graph buries the real dependency structure under service edges.
Both sections have a Flow | Graph toggle over the same nodes and edges. Flow (the default up to 80 nodes) is a left-to-right layered diagram: columns are dependency depth from the sources (HTTP entry and files nothing imports), every detected service is its own node in the last column, and import cycles are drawn dashed. Graph is the force-directed view. Moving dots show data going both ways: a filled dot is the call/request, a hollow dot the return/response. On graphs with more than 60 edges, only the paths of the clicked or hovered node animate. Search, "hide isolated" and the selected node are shared between the two views.
The older layered Full System Architecture diagram is collapsed by default, since the Architecture Map covers the same ground.
By default the graph only shows what the *code* says (import direction, static "this file calls Redis"), which is honest but not the same as real traffic. Pass --access-log /path/to/access.log (any combined/common log format) to overlay real observed request counts onto the HTTP-entry edges — and the generated report includes a ready-to-run k6 load-test script covering up to 5 detected routes, so the "Practical throughput" number can be checked against a real measurement instead of only a static-analysis estimate.
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| API frameworks | FastAPI, Flask, Django, Express, Nest.js, Gin |
| Gateways | nginx, Caddy, Traefik (with rate limits + worker_connections) |
| LLM providers | OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Cohere, AWS Bedrock |
| Vector stores | Qdrant, Pinecone, Weaviate, ChromaDB, pgvector, FAISS, Milvus |
| Databases | PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, SQLite, Redis |
| Queues | Celery, BullMQ, Kafka, RabbitMQ, RQ, AWS SQS |
| Async primitives | asyncio.Semaphore, run_in_executor, asyncio.gather, asyncio.Lock |
| Workers | --workers N (uvicorn/gunicorn), replicas: (docker-compose), PM2 instances |
| External sources | Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack, GitHub, Stripe, Salesforce, Twilio |
| Evaluation | TruLens, RAGAS, LangSmith |
pip install workflow-generator-mcp
workflow-generator . WORKFLOW.html # CLI: scan and write the report workflow-generator-mcp # stdio MCP server
With pip installed, any MCP host config reduces to:
{
"mcpServers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": "workflow-generator-mcp" } } }
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
git clone https://github.com/askuma/workflow-generator.git ~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator
Then in any Claude Code session:
/workflow-generator
/workflow-generator /path/to/project
1. Install the dependency:
pip install mcp
2. Add to your MCP host config (replace ~ with your actual home path):
Claude Desktop
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (Mac) %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows)
{
"mcpServers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } }
</details>
VS Code
.vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": { "workflow-generator": { "type": "stdio", "command": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } }
</details>
Cursor
~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } }
</details>
Zed
.zed/settings.json
{
"context_servers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": { "path": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } } }
</details>
Windsurf
~/.windsurf/mcp_config.json
{
"mcpServers": { "workflow-generator": { "command": "python3", "args": ["~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/mcp/server.py"] } } }
</details>
3. Restart your tool, then ask:
generate a workflow diagram for this project
how many concurrent requests can this handle? show me the system architecture
MCP tools exposed:
generate_workflow — scans project, writes WORKFLOW.html, optionally opens in browseranalyze_workflow — returns structured JSON summary (no file written)No install needed beyond Python 3.8+:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/workflow-generator/scripts/analyze.py . ~/WORKFLOW.html
Optional flags:
--access-log /path/to/access.log # overlay real request counts onto the dependency graph
--graph-detail auto|files|dirs # force file-level or directory-level graph nodes (default: auto)
Written: /your/project/WORKFLOW.html
Framework: FastAPI · Workers: 8 · Concurrent I/O: ~800 Practical throughput: ~50–200 req/min Bottleneck: OpenAI (LLM latency 3–30s per call) Gateway: nginx · 2 rate limit zone(s) LLM: OpenAI · eval: TruLens RAG Triad Storage: Qdrant, Redis External sources: Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack
workflow-generator/
├── SKILL.md ← Claude Code skill definition ├── INSTALL.md ← detailed per-platform install guide ├── workflow_generator_mcp/ │ ├── analyze.py ← core scanner + HTML renderer (stdlib only) │ └── server.py ← MCP stdio server (package form) ├── scripts/ │ └── analyze.py ← thin compatibility shim -> workflow_generator_mcp/analyze.py ├── tests/ ← pytest suite for the scanner ├── mcp/ │ ├── server.py ← MCP stdio server │ └── requirements.txt ← pip install mcp └── copilot/ ├── index.js ← GitHub Copilot Extension (Express) ├── package.json └── openai_function.json
MIT