Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Ask batchwatch whether to batch a job and get the real measured queue evidence, not a guess.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"batchwatch": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"batchwatch-mcp"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add batchwatch -- npx -y batchwatch-mcp粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"batchwatch": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"batchwatch-mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"batchwatch": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"batchwatch-mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 batchwatch 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.1)于2个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, debuff
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Let coding agents play, test and tune your 2D web game: live state, explained errors, replays, fuzz.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Let an AI agent ask batchwatch "should I batch this job?" instead of guessing.
When a developer asks Claude, Cursor, Cline or any MCP-speaking agent *"should I send this to the batch queue or run it synchronously?"*, this server lets the agent call batchwatch and get the real queue evidence — the measured wait distribution, the current conditions, a graded confidence, and how fresh the data is.
It wraps batchwatch's existing read routes as MCP tools. It is a thin, faithful proxy: it makes no decision and invents no numbers. Every answer is the provider's own JSON, passed through verbatim, carrying the n, confidence, why, basis and freshness the API already returns. If the API is down or slow, the tool returns an error — never a fabricated figure.
Because it is a faithful proxy, the server runs on the same tiers as the batchwatch API — there is no separate MCP plan and no MCP fast lane. Each tool carries your BATCHWATCH_TOKEN and earns exactly the tier that key earns anywhere else:
live behaviour. Live figures are what let an agent route real traffic on the answer, and they are bought here the same way they are bought at the API.One access model, gated in one place — the batchwatch tier system (see the Tiers, delay, quota and the free trial reference in the batchwatch API docs).
Each tool maps to a real route in src/index.js (there is deliberately no tradeoff tool — /v1/tradeoff is named in the KRAVSPEC but not built yet, and a tool for a route that does not answer would be exactly the fabricated capability this project refuses to ship).
| Tool | Route | What it answers |
|---|---|---|
should_i_batch | GET /v1/should-i-batch | Given a model and your own max_wait, does the batch queue currently honour it? The verdict. |
estimate_batchtime | GET /v1/estimate-batchtime | How long is *my* job likely to wait? A distribution, never a single ETA. |
conditions | GET /v1/conditions | Current conditions vs the recent norm — "is it me or them?" |
distribution | GET /v1/distribution | The full measured wait distribution (the raw evidence). |
coverage | GET /v1/coverage | Which provider+model combos have data, and how answerable each is. |
wait | GET /v1/wait | The public "is the queue moving now?" reading (delayed without a key). |
batchwatch reports distributions and current conditions, not point ETAs. A personal history of 3-minute medians once produced a 480-minute job; "your job finishes at 14:32" is a lie the one time it matters. The tools' descriptions say so, so the calling model uses the answer correctly.
cd mcp
npm install node index.js # speaks MCP over stdio
Requires Node ≥ 18 (uses the built-in fetch).
| Var | Default | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
BATCHWATCH_URL | https://batchwatch.dev | API base. |
BATCHWATCH_TOKEN | *(unset)* | Optional API key. Without it the data is delayed, not absent — you still get answers, just older ones. |
BATCHWATCH_TIMEOUT_MS | 8000 | Per-call timeout. On timeout the tool errors; it never guesses. |
Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline mcpServers entry:
{
"mcpServers": { "batchwatch": { "command": "node", "args": ["/absolute/path/to/batchwatch/mcp/index.js"], "env": { "BATCHWATCH_TOKEN": "tk_your_key_optional" } } } }
npm test # offline unit tests (mocked fetch) — deterministic
BATCHWATCH_LIVE=1 npm test # also runs the live smoke against BATCHWATCH_URL
The unit tests assert the load-bearing properties: omitted numeric fields are never sent as 0; the provider JSON is passed through unchanged; only the real routes are exposed (no tradeoff); and an API error yields an error, never a number.
The highest-leverage distribution channel for a 2026 dev tool is being the answer an agent reaches for by default. Once this is published so agents can install it, batchwatch wins the call instead of merely being mentioned. Targets: the Anthropic MCP registry, Smithery, and mcp.so. The package is publish-ready (bin: batchwatch-mcp, zero build step); registry submission is tracked on Vikunja task #57.
batchwatch measures how long jobs actually wait in LLM providers' async batch queues. Batch is half price, but "done within 24 hours" cannot be planned around, so most callers pay full price out of habit. This server puts the queue evidence one tool-call away from the agent that is about to make that choice.